Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

catheters

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
William Watson - 14 Sep 2005 11:16 GMT
Is anyone on ISC - intermittent self catheterisation? I have been put on
this by the Urology department. I use a catheter 4 or 5 times a day in order
to rehabilitate the bladder which at present is stretched after having an
enlarged prostate for more than 12 years. The idea is to see if an operation
on the prostate would be worthwhile. I am 75. A side effect of the procedure
is that I can now know that my bladder is empty and I won't have to pass
urine for at least 3 hours. This has improved my life style. Bill.

Signature

********************************************

Derek F - 14 Sep 2005 17:18 GMT
> Is anyone on ISC - intermittent self catheterisation? I have been put on
> this by the Urology department. I use a catheter 4 or 5 times a day in
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> is that I can now know that my bladder is empty and I won't have to pass
> urine for at least 3 hours. This has improved my life style. Bill.

Your ISP would indicate that you are in the UK. Don't let your Uro force you
into having a TURP. Ask to be referred to an NHS hospital doing PVP no
matter how far away it is.
Derek.
outlier48 - 15 Sep 2005 00:43 GMT
Bill,

Like you, I have had to self-catheterize 3 times a day for several
months for the same reasons.  The primary purpose was to see if my
bladder still had any function.  Fortunately, I still have bladder
function.  I am scheduled for a PVP in November to resolve my various
enlarged prostate related problems.  I think as you do your research
you will find that this procedure is generally favored in this group
whenever it is feasible.  Certainly, the anecdotal evidence is
overwhelmingly in support of this procedure compared to the
alternatives.  My advise is to take the time to do the research and
make your own decision(s).

My first uro told me I needed a TURP.  At that time my prostate was 108
grams (TRUS measured).  Other uros recommended an open prostatectomy.
It quickly became clear that the uros I saw generally had one solution
for my problem - the one they used to make their living.  I turned to a
uro at a well known and highly ranked urology research hospital who is
well versed in and teaches several procedures.  He took the time to
explain what was involved in each and why, at the time, he would
recommend an open prostatectomy (large gland size).  However, I began
taking Avodart and Uroxatrol.  While they have been hell on my sex
life, they did help quite a bit and now, several months later, my
prostate is now under 70 grams in size!  My uro is now comfortable with
the PVP procedure for my problem.  

Best of luck in your quest.
William Watson - 16 Sep 2005 12:33 GMT
Dear group members,
I am delighted with all the information which has flooded onto my computer.
I am already more knowledgeable about prostate treatment and I have been
told where to get lots more information.
Many thanks to all who took the trouble to write.
Yours sincerely,
Bill.
> Bill,
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Best of luck in your quest.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.