I have read a few posts where the prostate was too large to do a PVP. If
the doctor is going in and opening a channel for the urine to flow through
what does it matter? Wouldn't everyone need approximately the same sized
channel? Or, does the larger prostate press more on the urethera and once
the channel is opened, it would then reclose and have to be enlarged again?
Also on an older post the one guy, havig a PVP, was told by his docotor that
he would need to sign a form allowing the docotor to use TURP, if needed.
On a recent visit to my urologist I was told that if there is tri-lobal
growth that goes into the bladder, the TURP is necessary because it's angle
of operation is much greater than the laser, thus allowing it to get into
place the laser cannot reach.
>I have read a few posts where the prostate was too large to do a PVP. If
>the doctor is going in and opening a channel for the urine to flow through
>what does it matter? Wouldn't everyone need approximately the same sized
>channel? Or, does the larger prostate press more on the urethera and once
>the channel is opened, it would then reclose and have to be enlarged again?
The doc wants to remove as much of the prostate as reasonable because
there will probably be some regrowth, resulting in renewed flow
problems, requiring more surgery. You don't want to have a little PVP
followed by many little PVPs.
The large prostate presents bleeding risks and also I guess the
disposition of a large gland, after removal of part of it, isn't
always going to be predictable, so a second PVP may well be required.
>Also on an older post the one guy, havig a PVP, was told by his docotor that
>he would need to sign a form allowing the docotor to use TURP, if needed.
>On a recent visit to my urologist I was told that if there is tri-lobal
>growth that goes into the bladder, the TURP is necessary because it's angle
>of operation is much greater than the laser, thus allowing it to get into
>place the laser cannot reach.