Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Size of Channel opened by PVP

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bruce Veeder - 21 Apr 2005 12:45 GMT
I have read a few posts where the prostate was too large to do a PVP.  If
the doctor is going in and opening a  channel for the urine to flow through
what does it matter?  Wouldn't everyone need approximately the same sized
channel?  Or, does the larger prostate press more on the urethera  and once
the channel is opened, it would then reclose and have to be enlarged again?

Also on an older post the one guy, havig a PVP, was told by his docotor that
he would need to sign a form allowing the docotor to use TURP, if needed.
On a recent visit to my urologist I was told that if there is tri-lobal
growth that goes into the bladder, the TURP is necessary because it's angle
of operation is much greater than the laser, thus allowing it to get into
place the laser cannot reach.
Ed - 21 Apr 2005 20:09 GMT
>I have read a few posts where the prostate was too large to do a PVP.  If
>the doctor is going in and opening a  channel for the urine to flow through
>what does it matter?  Wouldn't everyone need approximately the same sized
>channel?  Or, does the larger prostate press more on the urethera  and once
>the channel is opened, it would then reclose and have to be enlarged again?

The doc wants to remove as much of the prostate as reasonable because
there will probably be some regrowth, resulting in renewed flow
problems, requiring more surgery. You don't want to have a little PVP
followed by many little PVPs.

The large prostate presents bleeding risks and also I guess the
disposition of a large gland, after removal of part of it, isn't
always going to be predictable, so a second PVP may well be required.

>Also on an older post the one guy, havig a PVP, was told by his docotor that
>he would need to sign a form allowing the docotor to use TURP, if needed.
>On a recent visit to my urologist I was told that if there is tri-lobal
>growth that goes into the bladder, the TURP is necessary because it's angle
>of operation is much greater than the laser, thus allowing it to get into
>place the laser cannot reach.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.