
Signature
Gregory M. K. Poon, Ph.D., R.Ph., B.Sc.Phm.
Departments of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Chemical Engineering
University of Toronto
Toronto, ON M5S 2S2
*It isn't immediately clear to me how the renal transport of uric acid is
*coupled to Ca; they are oppositely charged and so any coupled transport
*would involve symport, presumably reabsorption out of the lumen into the
*tubular cells.
Well, it isn't immediately clear to me either, but I'm reasonably sure
that it exists. By which I mean I'm sure that decreased tubular transport
of uric acid results in increased renal reabsorption of calcium and
decreased calcium excretion. I couldn't tell you WHY it does, but it does.
At least, that's what I was told! :)
-h.

Signature
hillary israeli vmd http://www.hillary.net info@hillary.net
"uber vaccae in quattuor partes divisum est."
not-so-newly minted veterinarian-at-large :)
Gregory Poon - 16 Apr 2004 04:13 GMT
> Well, it isn't immediately clear to me either, but I'm reasonably sure
> that it exists. By which I mean I'm sure that decreased tubular transport
> of uric acid results in increased renal reabsorption of calcium and
> decreased calcium excretion. I couldn't tell you WHY it does, but it does.
> At least, that's what I was told! :)
Do you mean uric acid tubular *reabsorption* out of the lumen or *secretion*
into the lumen? The fact that transporter blockers like probenecid increase
renal clearance of uric acid means that uric acid is net reabsorbed renally.
However to maintain electroneutrality, these oppositely charged ions have to
move in the same direction. So now we've run into a contradiction.
Hmmm.....

Signature
Gregory M. K. Poon, Ph.D., R.Ph., B.Sc.Phm.
Departments of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Chemical Engineering
University of Toronto
Toronto, ON M5S 2S2