Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Pharmacy / October 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Electronic prescribing: Panacea or problems?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
P T - 26 Oct 2003 05:29 GMT
I have seen some pharmacists here proclaim that electronic transmittal
of Rx  will solve all our problems. I disagree.

I work in a hospital and we fill about 400-500 outpatient Rx a day. Some
are discharge orders, some are refills, and many are from out op
clinics.

We call our system Epic web, so I presume that is the name of the design
company. The Rxs print out on computer printers in our pharmacies.
Although I've never seen it, I presume the physicians have a
standardized set of input options, as opposed to total liberty to enter
whatever they want.

I've worked here ~9 months, and system has been in place a bit longer.
I'm not impressed. I think we make as many phone calls as before. Issues
involving insurance formularies are just the same as before. While
handwriting is no longer an issue, show me a computer & printer system
that never break down. Also, I've seen some pretty weird Rx. For
example:

Rx Zithromax 250mg
Quant 6
Sig: Take 2 tablets

Rx Atenolol 25mg
Quant 90
Sig: /2 tab qd

The correct Rx were the standard ZPak in the former, and 1/2 tab qd in
the latter. Of course, most Rx come down fine, but can't the same be
said for handwritten Rx?

Since this is an in-house system, none of the Rx are signed. If the
patient decides not to use our pharmacy, they have to make a trip back
to the MD. C-2 Rx cannot be filled this way. It's not uncommon for the
patients to show up before the Rx.

Maybe it's a improvement. It doesn't seem to be a great improvement.
Paul Trusten - 26 Oct 2003 22:10 GMT
Doesn't sound like a good system. Don't know if MDs can electronically
cancel an RX and send it to another pharmacy. In my experience with an POE
system, the CPRS system at the US Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA),I
loved it. Prescriptions were signed electronically (this is an in-house
security issue, so in retail, I guess they need to build a larger "house",
security-wise), and I didn't see any incomplete RXs such as the one you
describe. This thing is not even in its infancy----it's still embryonic. I
would think that, over the next ten years, it will be debugged. Keep the
faith.

The C-II problem is not yet solveable, I agree.

Signature

Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
3609 Caldera Boulevard Apartment 122
Midland TX 79707-2872 USA
432-694-6208
ptrusten@cox.net

"There are two cardinal sins, from which
all the others spring: impatience and laziness."

                                         ---Franz Kafka

> I have seen some pharmacists here proclaim that electronic transmittal
> of Rx  will solve all our problems. I disagree.
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Maybe it's a improvement. It doesn't seem to be a great improvement.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.