"Head and Shoulders" and "Body Zone" both sell anti-dandruff shampoo
with the active ingredient 1% zinc pyrithione. Body Zone is
significantly cheaper which is why I bought it--assuming everything else
was equal. Yet the Body Zone doesn't work as well. I expected it to work
just as well as Head and Shoulders.
My hypothesis is that there some deterioration in the effectiveness of
the chemical over some period of time--that Body Zone gets its zinc
pyrithione at a much cheaper price because it is an older batch than the
zinc pyrithione that Head and Shoulders uses, and is therefore cheaper,
but less effective.
My questions to this group are these: a) is there merit to the idea? b)
are there other factors that might mitigate the issue?
Pumbaa - 09 Aug 2006 01:13 GMT
> "Head and Shoulders" and "Body Zone" both sell anti-dandruff shampoo
> with the active ingredient 1% zinc pyrithione. Body Zone is
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> My questions to this group are these: a) is there merit to the idea? b)
> are there other factors that might mitigate the issue?
Things like particle size and inert ingredients of the zinc pyrithione
shampoos could be different between the two products. How about the
expirations dates on the products? Were they both in date or was one
getting old? I really don't think the FDA requires Body Zone to be
clinically tested against Head and Shoulders for effectiveness but I could
be wrong. Try seeing if using more of the Body Zone makes it work as well
as Head and Shoulders.