It is against Federal Law to take back medication and reuse it. The
Pharmacist can't be sure that it hasn't been tampered with and if you think
about it, you wouldn't want to buy medicine that the pharmacist had sold and
then took back. Some Wal-Marts will take back medicines if you insist, but
they won't reuse them. They will be thrown away or returned for credit to
the wholesaler/manufactorer and the store will lose money. They don't like
to do it, but the sign over the door says satisfaction guaranteed. If you
call 1-800-wal-mart and complain, the home office will make the pharmacist
do about anything legal you want. The pharmacy can't take back a controlled
substace legally, no matter what. Even then, sometimes you can still get
your money back. bpf
I am in the UK and we do take back medicines, but never re-use them. You
don't know how they have been stored, or even possibly tampered with (say
opening a capsule if in a bottle, loose, and putting rat poison in it's
place).
We have the national health service, and the prescription pays us for the
drugs we have dispensed. Once the drug leaves the store it can never be
returned and used, it's against the law, and I wouldn't want to risk getting
myself struck off to save a company a few pounds!
We also have to get the drugs disposed of properly, and that actually costs
us money. We can take back controlled drugs here, and a qualified
pharmacist can destroy them, but not a technician. We cannot destroy out of
date controlled drugs, that has to be done by a pharmacy inspector (if he'll
agree to do it, and some won't!) an area manager, who is also a pharmacist,
and a member of the police force drug squad who's job it is to inspect
pharmacies on a fairly regular basis - every couple of years or so. I never
really understood why we can destroy returned CD's but not out of date ones.
Why Wal-mart take back drugs and give you your money back is a complete
mystery to me. It doesn't make economic sense. Do your doctors or dentists
etc also refund you if they prescribe you a drug and you turn out to be
allergic to it ?
Elaine
www.pharmacy-forum.co.uk
The UK Forum for all things Pharmacy
Pumbaa - 04 Mar 2006 00:24 GMT
> I am in the UK and we do take back medicines, but never re-use them. You
> don't know how they have been stored, or even possibly tampered with (say
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> www.pharmacy-forum.co.uk
> The UK Forum for all things Pharmacy
Maybe they figure a UK pharmacist would not get high from a returned CD but
would get high from an out of date CD? Do you have to have a witness to
destroy a returned CD if you are a pharmacist? Laws generally do not make
sense as they are made by people who are lawyers and not knowledgeable about
things like pharmacy, medicine, firearms, so forth.
Elaine, when you become a corporation as large as Wal*Mart then you can do
pretty much what you like in America. Wally World, if a country, would have
a GNP greater than many other countries in the world. They get special
prices from producers by insisting that the producer sells to WM for a
special low discounted price. If they loose money on a particular pharmacy
return they will probably just make it up by selling the customer some
gasoline, electronic, clothing, or grocery item.
Down where I live they used to even refund cash for items returned to them
WITHOUT a receipt. They finally figured out that people were stealing from
them and returning the merchandise for cash. Now if you return something
without a receipt, they give you a debit card and you have to spend the
money at Wal*Mart. As you may have noticed, I don't particularly like Wally
World. But they stock food items previously unavailable in my area (like
organic milk, kosher hotdogs, Sam Adams beer, many organic fruits and veg,
etc.) and they really have a great return policy. So I do buy somethings
from them but I try to buy most groceries from a grocery store that has
served my area for most of my life.
jazon48@yahoo.com - 05 Mar 2006 12:22 GMT
> I am in the UK and . . .(snip). . .
>
> Why Wal-mart take back drugs and give you your money back is a complete
> mystery to me. It doesn't make economic sense. . . . .
>
> Elaine
A Wal-Mart pharmacy is embedded in a larger store which sells
general merchandise and often groceries. They use their pharmacies
as marketing tools to attract customers to the store. Very often,
the patient submits his/her prescription, shops in the store, then
returns to pick up the medicine. Since pharmaceutical returns are so
infrequent, they can afford to take the loss in order to attract
business to the store as a whole.
Jason
Bob G. - 05 Mar 2006 15:06 GMT
> A Wal-Mart pharmacy is embedded in a larger store which sells
>general merchandise and often groceries. They use their pharmacies
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Jason
=========================================
IF you think of it from the stores point of view why should they even
risk losing a customer...I'm retired but worked many years for a
Grocery Chain which had mostly food/drug combo stores...
Mrs Smith buys 200 bucks worth of groceries every week...$10,000
worth of groceries...every year ! You think they would risk losing
a $10,000 dollar a year customer if she wanted to return a 30 buck
RX...
NO WAY..
My first post in this thread indicated that I sure would not want to
work for a store that did take back Rx drugs .. I still would not !
.
But I can understand why Wal Mart would do so... .
Bob G.
Pumbaa - 05 Mar 2006 16:41 GMT
> IF you think of it from the stores point of view why should they even
> risk losing a customer...I'm retired but worked many years for a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Bob G.
I used to hear people say that Wal*Mart would tell you there was a 45 minute
wait for a prescription even if there was only a few minutes wait. It was
so the customer could walk around the whole store looking at and hopefully
buying other merchandise. I wonder if there is any truth to it? My local
WM now includes a Quick-Lub. They can change your oil and check your tires
while you walk around and hopefully buy lot of other merchandise.
Squish The Cat - 07 Mar 2006 12:35 GMT
>> IF you think of it from the stores point of view why should they even
>> risk losing a customer...I'm retired but worked many years for a
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> change your oil and check your tires while you walk around and
> hopefully buy lot of other merchandise.
While I'm sure there are some stores within the WM chain that would use this
deception to increase sales, the majority of WM pharmacies are ethical and
professional. The pharmacist is the highest paid person in any Wal-Mart and
receives bonuses based on PHARMACY sales, not store sales. It behooves him
to satisfy his customers. If someone is already feeling crappy enough that
they require medication, the last thing that person wants to do is spend 45
minutes listening to screaming, bratty kids, loud annoying overhead pages,
and domestic squabbles.
me@privacy.net - 05 Mar 2006 17:09 GMT
>why did you fill a prescription if it was never used or opened?
I dropped off the prescription and told them to fill
them and put charges on my VISA card
I didn't realize that Viagra is NOT covered by my
insurance! When I picked them up (via drive thru) they
had already paid for them via my VISA card and I didn't
open bag to see amt till I got home
Cost was abt $130 for ten 100mg pills! Ouch!
I tried taking them back but was refused.
I f.cked up guys I admit
But I will be stopping the antidepressants soon.....
and would rather just do "without" and not use Viagra
till then.
I'm a starving adult college student.... working full
time and going to college full time at nights. And
paying for school myself. I could have use that $130
for tuition or books, etc
Tony - 07 Mar 2006 19:59 GMT
I heard it was recommended to take Viagara and Prozac together.... At least
if you don't get laid you don't care too much!

Signature
Tony
> >why did you fill a prescription if it was never used or opened?
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> paying for school myself. I could have use that $130
> for tuition or books, etc