> >On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:24:58 +0000, nospam wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Ora
Are you supposed to take it twice a day? If so #60 would be a month's
supply. Doctors are used to writing for a month's supply as that is what
insurance companies and most people seem to want. Doctors can't be expected
to remember how many tablets come in a bottle or even if it requires a Rx
as they do not see the bottles daily like Pharmacists do. If you decide to
deduct it from your Form 1040, if you have enough medical bills, then a
prescription is proof that it was ordered for you by a doctor.
P T - 27 Aug 2005 19:05 GMT
ORA wrote:
>My doctor gave me a prescription
>...I am really puzzled because
>this stuff is available OTC ...
>Why would I need to use a prescription?
A prescription is a simple, fast, effective way for a doctor to convey
orders to a patients. If a doctor said to patients, take 1500mg daily of
CaCO3, over 90% of the patients would be confused and require a LOT MORE
counselling by the the doctor AND the pharmacist about what they are
supposed to do. Many would still get it wrong.
For many patients, a pharmacist is wasting his time to tell them an OTC
equivalent is available. Some patients receive their medicine at little
or no cost, and would rather wait 30 minutes for a bottle of Tylenol as
a prescription for $0 or $1, instead of paying $3 and receiving it in 2
minutes. (Sometimes the cost differential is much greater.)
Also there is a magical element. Some people think a prescription in
inherently better than an OTC product: A doctor writes a magical
incantation on a small paper, strange people waving their fingers over
mysterious keyboards tell you the cost has been reduced, a woman in a
white jacket hiding in a room consecrates a vial of secret tablets: How
can that NOT be better than some old OTC product?