
Signature
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
> Squggles,
> I am not a chemist. It's my guess that the two different companies that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> science classses.
> Jason
Thank you for your reply Jason. Unlike other chemical preparations,
lithium is a crystalline powder on its own, with a high melting point,
and very poor solubility. I checked the solubility and found that
the generic (which is much easier on me for many "near toxic" symptoms)
is actually milkier and dissolves more slowly. That would be a
paradox if the generic preparation actually has LESS lithium and more
filler, given the side effect profile. On the other hand, it could
just be the filler, or it could be that more lithium prevents
withdrawals which mimic toxic signs. But I don't think so -- I think
the brand-name one really did give me toxic signs - the classic ones,
which I will not bother you with.
I appreciate your reply. Any hints on the chemistry of the crystalline
powder would be enlightening.
Squiggles
Jason - 09 Jun 2005 04:25 GMT
> > Squggles,
> > I am not a chemist. It's my guess that the two different companies that
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Squiggles
Squiggles,
I suppose that it is possible that someone at one of the drug factories
may have mis-labelled the dose information. For example, if the generic
has a lower dose than the other one--that could be the reason. As you may
know, with many medications--a low dose of a medication may not produce
any bad side effects but a higher dose of that same medication could
produce some bad side effects. Do you think that this good have happened
related to your medication? I believe that you should discuss this with
your doctor and get a blood test to determine if you are not having any
medical problems.
Jason

Signature
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
Squiggles - 09 Jun 2005 13:15 GMT
A blood test would be more objective. All
subjective indications point to less amount of lithium
after at least 6 years of toxicity complaints to my dr.
(e.g. daily pilgrimages for Montezuma).
Maybe I'm just lucky. :-)
tx
Squiggles
Squiggles - 09 Jun 2005 15:38 GMT
> A blood test would be more objective. All
> subjective indications point to less amount of lithium
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Squiggles
p.s. No, that is not *entirely* true - Montezuma
still rules as witnessed this a.m. -- seems coincidental
with headaches; still this preparation feels better
in other respects. It could be that not all symptoms
are related to the drug.
Squiggles
Jason - 09 Jun 2005 16:44 GMT
> A blood test would be more objective. All
> subjective indications point to less amount of lithium
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Squiggles
Squiggles,
I agree. When I referred you to your doctor--I'm sure
that your doctor would have arranged the blood test.
In addition, you could ask him or her any questions
you have about medications. If a medication is causing
you to have bad side effects--you should see your doctor.
Ask the doctor if a lower dose of the medication or another
medication will solve the problem. Don't start cutting
pills in half unless the doctor tells you to do it.
Jason

Signature
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
Squiggles - 10 Jun 2005 17:05 GMT
...
> Squiggles,
> I agree. When I referred you to your doctor--I'm sure
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> pills in half unless the doctor tells you to do it.
> Jason
It would appear that the problem is with the company's
preparation; the one that has toxic indications for so
many years may be the one that should be examined. And
I have sent notice to Health Canada about it. This company
has had problems before with lithium preparation. Perhaps
their lab is not up to scratch.
It has been many years since I have felt so much better,
and that has been since taking the generic version from
a different company. I am sure my doctor will be pleased to
hear that as switching to another med after 20 years plus
on a tried, , retried, and finally successfully attained drug balance
(Synthroid and Rivotril as well) would be hard to overturn
with new tests and their accompanied risks.
Some drugs have a narrow therapeutic index - lithium is one
of them, possibly requiring meticulous laboratory attention.
Squiggles
Jason - 10 Jun 2005 20:35 GMT
> ...
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Squiggles
Squiggles,
I am glad that your problem is solved. It appears that my first guess
was the correct one. I had a feeling that it was either preparation
method problems or dosage level problems. Regardless, I'm glad that
you are feeling better.
Jason

Signature
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
Squiggles - 10 Jun 2005 20:50 GMT
> Squiggles,
> I am glad that your problem is solved. It appears that my first guess
> was the correct one. I had a feeling that it was either preparation
> method problems or dosage level problems. Regardless, I'm glad that
> you are feeling better.
> Jason
Thanks Jason
I will end the thread here for fear of being diagnosed,
and even treated for narcissism. :-)
Seriously, it's very hard for people to be under the
influence of misprescribed, or misdosed, or misdiagnosed
conditions. Never trust authority. If you have an education
and can read, do so.
Squiggles