Complain to the main office if it is a drugstore chain. If the
pharmacist is relatively young & inexperienced it would be a good lesson
in how to handle potential situations professionally & with respect if
he was "dressed down" by his bosses for how he treated a legitimate
patient(ie, "paying customer" to the district manager). I tend to think
it was a less experienced pharmacist as I would never mumble something
about calling the authorities within earshot of a patient. If that
patient were illegitimate it would only provoke a confrontation and if
the patient were legitimate it would be humiliating & disrespectful.
Anyone can be having a bad day but professionalism should never suffer.
At the least, you should take your business elsewhere.
Rich
Hank wrote
>I recently presented a legitimate
>prescription...
How do you know the prescription was legitimate? There are a lot of
technical requirements for a Percocet prescription. Many such
prescriptions are deficient.
(Don't forget Elvis: His pharmacist went to jail. He physician got a
slap on the wrist.)
.. to a pharmacist who reacted with unambiguous suspicion and
undisguised rudeness...
Maybe he was trying to discourage your business. I once heard a story of
someone who did some sort of home remodeling. When he had more business
than he wanted, he discouraged more business by raising his prices.
Pharmacists can't do that. Some (all?) just treat patients less politely
when they have too much work.
>He questioned both me personally
>at some length and the validity
>of the prescription itself...
A pharmacist has a legal duty to attempt to determine whether a
prescription is legitimate. He may have to ask more questions than a
patient wants to answer...
>This time the prescription was for
>48 Percocet tablets. (I also had a
>prescription for acyclovir--I have
>shingles.)
Well, that's a tough one. I think an experienced pharmacist would infer
a degree of legitimacy to Percocet prescription when there was also one
for acyclovir at the same time.
>After suggesting that he call
>my doctor (which he did)...
This is a tantalizing clue. I can't imagine that the pharmacist would go
to the trouble of contacting the doctor unless there was a significant
concern that the prescription was legitimate, or a significant
deficiency in the prescription.
>the prescriptions were dutifully filled
Well, there you go...
>amidst much grumbling.
Okay, that's a funny one. Sounds like he was having a bad day.
>...And I can guarantee that my doc's >prescribing practices are above
reproach
Therapeautically, your MD may indeed be excellent. However, unless you
are a pharmacist, you have no basis to evaluate his prescription
_writing_ ability.
>...I was so taken aback by this
>whole affair that at the time I
>was shocked speechless. Was this
>pharmacist just having a bad day?
I hate to say it, but based only on what you say, it does sound that
way. Yes, it would have been interesting to ask him what his problem
was. On the other hand, it probably wouldn't have gotten you an answer.
I find when I encounter a difficult person, it's best to just move on,
and no longer give them your business.
>What is the appropriate response from
>a patient in a situation like this?
Be polite. Sometimes a direct question can get you an honest answer.
Something like, "Is there anything wrong with the prescription?" or "Is
there some reason why you are reluctant to fill my prescription?" or
"Can you give me a good idea of how long this will take?"
Maybe he was having a bad day. Maybe he has poor customer skills.
Nicole H - 13 May 2005 08:58 GMT
that's stupid. the pharmacist is only fulfilling the order given by the
doctor. the pharm can't prescribe meds himself.
good grief
> Hank wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 77 lines]
>
> Maybe he was having a bad day. Maybe he has poor customer skills.
P T - 13 May 2005 16:25 GMT
Nicole H wrote
>that's stupid. the pharmacist is only
>fulfilling the order given by the doctor.
>the pharm can't prescribe meds himself.
>good grief
Nicole, I understand your point of view. It does seem that all a
pharmacist needs to do is count out some pills: Easy, right?
Actually, a pharmacist (or nurse, etc.) who only is "fulfilling the
order given by the doctor" will certainly end up
1 hurting or killing a patient
and/or
2 in jail
and/or
3 without a license
Nicole H - 13 May 2005 23:52 GMT
I think you misunderstood my point. I have a chronic illness and take a lot
of meds. My pharmacist plays a very critical role in my health care.
I just don't understand why the pharmacist would be arrested for filling the
rx's that a doctor wrote but the doctor doesn't get chastised.
I just don't believe it's the pharmacist fault when a doctor is over
prescribing. I take a lot of meds (12 prescriptions). I frequently review
them with my dr and my pharmacist. I just can't imagine my pharmacist
getting in trouble for filling the rx's my drs have written (I have 2 drs
and both are aware of each other and what each is rx'ing)
Nicole H wrote
>that's stupid. the pharmacist is only
>fulfilling the order given by the doctor.
>the pharm can't prescribe meds himself.
>good grief
Nicole, I understand your point of view. It does seem that all a
pharmacist needs to do is count out some pills: Easy, right?
Actually, a pharmacist (or nurse, etc.) who only is "fulfilling the
order given by the doctor" will certainly end up
1 hurting or killing a patient
and/or
2 in jail
and/or
3 without a license