Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Pharmacy / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New required frequency of visits for controlled substance Rx's

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Matt Beckwith - 24 Apr 2005 22:13 GMT
I heard recently from a pain mgmt doc in my area that there's a new
rule that says that, for certain controlled substances (perhaps
category II), the doctor has to evaluate the patient in person
periodically.  I think the time was something like every 21-32 days,
but I don't remember the exact time period he said.  Anybody heard
about this?

The reason I ask is that I've recently started seeing my patients every
month who are on chronic C-II drugs, and it would be easier if I could
tell them there was a rule to back me up in the practice.

Thanks.
Hawki63@sbcglobal.net - 24 Apr 2005 23:18 GMT
>I heard recently from a pain mgmt doc in my area that there's a new
> rule that says that, for certain controlled substances (perhaps
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Thanks.

it is scarey to think you need to ask on a ng questions like this??
P T - 25 Apr 2005 05:47 GMT
I'm starting to hear whispers that the DEA ruled that it is illegal for
a prescriber to issue a C-II rx dated for a future date or presumably
issued with a "do not fill before x/xx/xxxx" notation. Perhaps this is
the origin of the rumors you hear.
Hawki63@sbcglobal.net - 25 Apr 2005 08:50 GMT
> I'm starting to hear whispers that the DEA ruled that it is illegal for
> a prescriber to issue a C-II rx dated for a future date or presumably
> issued with a "do not fill before x/xx/xxxx" notation. Perhaps this is
> the origin of the rumors you hear.

but it is not a rumor

sched II meds have ALWAYS included "no refills" ie "do not fill before dates
or post dated scripts" are logically refills....

not a rumor

more to follow
Matt Beckwith - 16 Jul 2005 20:32 GMT
> I'm starting to hear whispers that the DEA ruled that it is illegal for
> a prescriber to issue a C-II rx dated for a future date or presumably
> issued with a "do not fill before x/xx/xxxx" notation. Perhaps this is
> the origin of the rumors you hear.

This is definitely true.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.