Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Pharmacy / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Biaxin XL?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MS - 21 Dec 2004 08:39 GMT
What is the difference between Biaxin and Biaxin XL? Just a different name
for the same med, clarithromycin? Or something different about it?
Gregory Poon - 21 Dec 2004 16:50 GMT
They are the same drug, clarithromycin, but formulated differently so that
instead of having to take one 500 mg tablet twice daily with "regular"
Biaxin (which they call BiaxinBID), you take both the tablets together once
daily (i.e., 1 g once daily) with Biaxin XL (a sustained release version).

> What is the difference between Biaxin and Biaxin XL? Just a different name
> for the same med, clarithromycin? Or something different about it?
MS - 21 Dec 2004 19:08 GMT
Interesting. The doc prescribed it to me the same dosing as regular Biaxin,
one 500 mg tablet twice per day. He said it was "stronger" than regular
Biaxin. If he really believes that, I'm surprised.

I really see no advantage in once-per-day than twice-per-day. It's easy
enough to remember to take a med twice per day. (Those that require five
times per day or so, that can be more complicated.) And I have my doubts
about "extended-release" meds, whether they really last as long as they
claim.

Is this a patent issue? Will regular Biaxin soon be available generically
(in the US), so they made the XL version to keep a patented version? Does
the XL version cost more (per 500 mg tablet) than the regular version? (It
doesn't to me, with my prescription insurance I have a low co-pay for
either. But the regular price?)

> They are the same drug, clarithromycin, but formulated differently so that
> instead of having to take one 500 mg tablet twice daily with "regular"
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > What is the difference between Biaxin and Biaxin XL? Just a different name
> > for the same med, clarithromycin? Or something different about it?
computernewby - 21 Dec 2004 19:21 GMT
You sure ask a lot of questions.

The extended release meds are required to last as long as they state.  Blood
tests will confirm this.

If a patient is in a nursing home or has a caretaker and extended release
medication might be better because that person will only need one dose
instead of two.  The less a person has to have medication administered the
less cost involved for that patient's care.

> Interesting. The doc prescribed it to me the same dosing as regular
> Biaxin,
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> name
>> > for the same med, clarithromycin? Or something different about it?
MS - 22 Dec 2004 19:55 GMT
> You sure ask a lot of questions.

Anything wrong with that? That's how one learns, by asking questions.

> The extended release meds are required to last as long as they state.  Blood
> tests will confirm this.

Perhaps they work well with some people, and not with others. I have often
found ER meds not to last as long as they are supposed to.

> If a patient is in a nursing home or has a caretaker and extended release
> medication might be better because that person will only need one dose
> instead of two.  The less a person has to have medication administered the
> less cost involved for that patient's care.

Perhaps they are better for some people, and not for others.

> > Interesting. The doc prescribed it to me the same dosing as regular
> > Biaxin,
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> > name
> >> > for the same med, clarithromycin? Or something different about it?
Bob G. - 21 Dec 2004 21:31 GMT
>I really see no advantage in once-per-day than twice-per-day. It's easy
>enough to remember to take a med twice per day. (Those that require five
>times per day or so, that can be more complicated.) And I have my doubts
>about "extended-release" meds, whether they really last as long as they
>claim.

Even though I am  a Retired Pharmacist  I can honestly say that once a
day dosing is a HELL of a lot easier..

For the Patient....   ME  ..... TO REMEMBER....

Bad enough to sit down at the computer desk at 10 AM and remember IF I
took all that crap (lol) 3 hours earlier when I first pulled my e-mail
at 7 AM...

I try to be complient with my meds...BUT I can now understand whyt so
many people are not...

Bob Griffiths
MS - 22 Dec 2004 19:56 GMT
Well, not the case for me.

As I said, a med that has to be taken five times per day gets complicated.

Twice a day is easy for me, no significant convenience factor between once
or twice per day in my case!

> >I really see no advantage in once-per-day than twice-per-day. It's easy
> >enough to remember to take a med twice per day. (Those that require five
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Bob Griffiths
Gregory Poon - 22 Dec 2004 00:11 GMT
Going from twice to once daily is a clinically significant improvement.  For
Effexor, for example, the XR capsules (which is once daily) is widely
preferred by both prescribers and patients over the regular tablets, which
is only twice daily.  So it can make a big difference.

BiaxinBID and XL are priced more-or-less the same.  A number of patients
have told me that they have GI distress with the XL and not with the
regular, but I've not seen anything official on this, or other differences.

> Interesting. The doc prescribed it to me the same dosing as regular Biaxin,
> one 500 mg tablet twice per day. He said it was "stronger" than regular
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> name
> > > for the same med, clarithromycin? Or something different about it?
Repeating Rifle - 21 Dec 2004 17:23 GMT
> What is the difference between Biaxin and Biaxin XL? Just a different name
> for the same med, clarithromycin? Or something different about it?

I am not truly knowledgeable on this subject but...here is my biased
opinion.

The primary purpose for the XL version is for the manufacturer to extend
patent protection. Usually a suffix like XL is used to indicate a sustained
release version of the original drug. This enables the developer to extend
patent protection for a few years on the original drug while the XL version
is being developed. It is one of those quirks of our wonderful patent
system.

If the original version works well enough for you, the XL version might
allow you to take fewer doses during the day. It is not, as they say, rocket
science. However, I personally do not think that good rocket science is more
complicated than good pharmacology.

Bill
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.