> Here is an important note from the research about source of the benefits
> of carbs:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> screaming from the room rather then consider consuming more carbs from
> grains or fruits, but allow themselves only veggies.
Not necessarily. Depends on the fruit, veggie or grain and the degree
of processing and refining.
Mention should be
> made of the benefits being with low gi/gl sources of carbs.
Always. Limiting carb intake to low gi/gl sources of carbs is the key
to healthy low-carb living.
For a normal
> person having carbs as a substantual part of the diet should be no
> problem, this is not a low carb diet.
Compared to a typical north american diet high in refined grains like
pasta and white flour, sugars and potatoes, it is much lower in carbs.
If carbs are consumed in their
> whole form and concentrated highly refined carb sources are minimal and
> with all sources of carbs from low gi/gl sources. People with metabolic
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> results were more favorable when the source had more veggie sources then
> animal.
TC
markd@toad-net.com - 26 Feb 2004 16:21 GMT
"Always. Limiting carb intake to low gi/gl sources of carbs is the key
to healthy low-carb living."
Ah, but tis "the definition of low carb" that is at issue. This is where
we must look to large population studies to see what level of low gi/gl
carbs has minimal risk levels. In the east asian example I posted
yesterday, a very substantual part of their diet was from low gi/gl foods,
including a kind of yam, with far lesser amount of fish and cooking oils
of the mono fat type. The health outcome in these folk is excellent.
They are a living example of my thesis that it is a far more complex
picture then total amount of carbs alone, it is low sat fat, low gi/gl
carbs, normal weight, exercise, etc. that makes up the total picture.