Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / June 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

GDA - am I missing something?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Goran Tomas - 15 Jun 2008 18:45 GMT
So I was reading the nutritional info on a sandwich I bought at M&S
and on the package there is a GDA (as in Guideline Daily Amount)
breakdown that goes like this:

Energy (kcal): 2000
Protein: 45g
Carbohydrate: 230g
of which sugars: 90g
Fat: 70g
of which saturates: 20g
Fibre: 24g
Sodium: 2.4g
Equivalent as salt: 6g

This also appears on their web site:
http://www.marksandspencer.com/gp/node/n/51422031?ie=UTF8&mnSBrand=core

Am I missing something here, because when you add up those calories
(45*4+230*4+70*9) it comes up to 1730 kcal?? Not 2000 kcal.

Or they are (un)intentionally misleading the public?

Regards,
Goran Tomas
Ron Peterson - 15 Jun 2008 22:06 GMT
On Jun 15, 12:45 pm, Goran Tomas <goran.tomasN...@Memail.htnet.hr>
wrote:
> So I was reading the nutritional info on a sandwich I bought at M&S
> and on the package there is a GDA (as in Guideline Daily Amount)
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Sodium: 2.4g
> Equivalent as salt: 6g

> This also appears on their web site:http://www.marksandspencer.com/gp/node/n/51422031?ie=UTF8&mnSBrand=core

> Am I missing something here, because when you add up those calories
> (45*4+230*4+70*9) it comes up to 1730 kcal?? Not 2000 kcal.

> Or they are (un)intentionally misleading the public?

No, they are just leaving slack for calories which can be made up from
extra protein, fat, and carbohydrates.

The guidelines don't seem to be accurate being high in both fat and
carbohydrates and low in protein.

--
   Ron
Goran Tomas - 15 Jun 2008 23:28 GMT
>On Jun 15, 12:45 pm, Goran Tomas <goran.tomasN...@Memail.htnet.hr>
>wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>No, they are just leaving slack for calories which can be made up from
>extra protein, fat, and carbohydrates.

Are you saying they can put extra 270 kcal in (let say 30g of fat) and
not display it?

>The guidelines don't seem to be accurate being high in both fat and
>carbohydrates and low in protein.

Definitely low in protein and high in fat...

Regards,
Goran Tomas
Ron Peterson - 16 Jun 2008 00:55 GMT
On Jun 15, 5:28 pm, Goran Tomas <goran.tomasN...@Memail.htnet.hr>
wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:06:18 -0700 (PDT), Ron Peterson

> >No, they are just leaving slack for calories which can be made up from
> >extra protein, fat, and carbohydrates.

> Are you saying they can put extra 270 kcal in (let say 30g of fat) and
> not display it?

No, the guideline daily amount (GDA) is independent of any product.
You could also get the calories from alcohol.

> >The guidelines don't seem to be accurate being high in both fat and
> >carbohydrates and low in protein.

> Definitely low in protein and high in fat...

Since PUFA is the only fat required by the body and probably 10 g
would be sufficient, they seem to be adding saturated and
monounsaturated fat to the diet.

--
  Ron
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.