Frankly, I have not heard of the measuring method used in this study
but it seems to be more accurate than BMI and more defined than WHR
(waist hip ratio) wrt abdominal fat.
Arbor
Big Belly Boosts Risk of Later Dementia
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080326/D8VLD3RO0.html
Mar 26, 6:42 PM (ET)
By MALCOLM RITTER
NEW YORK (AP) - Having a big belly in your 40s can boost your risk of
getting Alzheimer's disease or other dementia decades later, a new
study suggests.
It's not just about your weight. While previous research has found
evidence that obesity in middle age raises the chances of developing
dementia later, the new work found a separate risk from storing a lot
of fat in the abdomen. Even people who weren't overweight were
susceptible.
That abdominal fat, sometimes described as making people apple-shaped
rather than pear-shaped, has already been linked to higher risk of
developing diabetes, stroke and heart disease.
"Now we can add dementia to that," said study author Rachel Whitmer of
the Kaiser Permanente Division of Research in Oakland, Calif.
She and others report the findings in Wednesday's online issue of the
journal Neurology.
The study involved 6,583 men and women who were ages 40 to 45 when
they had checkups between 1964 and 1973. As part of the exam, their
belly size was measured by using a caliper to find the distance
between their backs and the surface of their upper abdomens. For the
study, a distance of about 10 inches or more was considered high.
The researchers checked medical records to see who had developed
Alzheimer's or another form of dementia by an average of 36 years
later. At that point the participants were ages 73 to 87. There were
1,049 cases.
Analysis found that compared to people in the study with normal body
weight and a low belly measurement:
- Participants with normal body weight and high belly measurements
were 89 percent more likely to have dementia.
- Overweight people were 82 percent more likely if they had a low
belly measurement, but more than twice as likely if they had a high
belly measurement.
- Obese people were 81 percent more likely if they had a low belly
measurement, but more than three times as likely if they had a high
measurement.
Whitmer said there's no precise way to translate belly measurements
into waist circumference. But most people have a sense of whether they
have a big belly, she said. And if they do, the new study suggests
they should get rid of it, she said.
It's not clear why abdominal fat would promote dementia, but it may
pump out substances that harm the brain, she said.
Dr. Jose Luchsinger of the Columbia University Medical Center in New
York, who studies the connection between obesity and Alzheimer's
disease but didn't participate in the new work, cautioned that such a
study cannot prove abdominal fat promotes dementia.
But the study results are "highly plausible" and "I'm not surprised at
all," he said. High insulin levels might help explain them, he said.
Dr. Samuel Gandy, who chairs the medical and scientific advisory
council of the Alzheimer's Association, said the results fit in with
previous work that indicates a person's characteristics in middle age
can affect the risk of dementia in later life.
And it's another example of how traits associated with the risk of
developing heart disease are also linked to later dementia, he said.
Paul Antonik Wakfer - 28 Mar 2008 05:54 GMT
On Mar 26, 6:41 pm, soowhatdouth...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Frankly, I have not heard of the measuring method used in this study
> but it seems to be more accurate than BMI and more defined than WHR
> (waist hip ratio) wrt abdominal fat.
I think that the different types of measurements are valuable in
accuracy for different purposes. This back to belly distance appears
"to be more accurate for the purposes of this study, but perhaps not
for assessing the risks of many other pathologies relative to being
overweight and obese.
> Arbor
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> between their backs and the surface of their upper abdomens. For the
> study, a distance of about 10 inches or more was considered high.
I am amazed that only greater than 10 inches was considered high, but
perhaps this is because there were far fewer overweight people around
when these measurements were taken 35-44 years ago.
FWIW, my corresponding measurement made right after eating my one meal
a day, was 8.25".
--Paul Wakfer
MoreLife for the rational - http://morelife.org
Reality based tools for more life in quantity and quality
The Self-Sovereign Individual Project - http://selfsip.org
Self-sovereignty, rational pursuit of optimal lifetime happiness,
individual responsibility, social preferencing & social contracting