I bought a scale that can tell your weight to the nearest 0.2 pounds,
and just for interest's sake, decided to try weighing myself
throughout the day to see how much a person's weight fluctuates
naturally. (Among other things, this would mean that if I weighed
myself to see how much I'd lost on a diet, I'd have to include the
natural daily weight-fluctuation as a margin of error.)
But I keep seeing anomalies where I'll weigh myself two times about an
hour apart and see a difference of 0.6 or 0.8 pounds, even though I
haven't done anything (eating, drinking, sweating, or doing to the
bathroom) for the intervening hour that should change my weight.
At first I thought that was just the margin of error for the scale.
But if I weigh myself twice, one time immediately after the other, the
scale always gives the same reading.
So, either:
(a) the scale has a wide margin of error, but it somehow "remembers"
what you weighed 15 seconds ago (perhaps due to an anomaly in how it's
built, or perhaps deliberately in order to fool people who are doing
this in order to test the scale's accuracy :) ), so the fluctuations
don't show up in two successive weighings
or:
(b) I really can gain or lose up to 0.8 pounds in an hour of doing
nothing. If that's the case, then how? (My hair is dry at the
beginning and end of the interval so that's not it :) )
Del Cecchi - 28 Jan 2008 17:26 GMT
>I bought a scale that can tell your weight to the nearest 0.2 pounds,
> and just for interest's sake, decided to try weighing myself
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> nothing. If that's the case, then how? (My hair is dry at the
> beginning and end of the interval so that's not it :) )
If I was designing an electronic scale I would strongly consider having
it remember the last weight or the last several weights and redisplay
them if the current weight is close to one or more of the stored values.
They would be stored for a period of time. It would give an illusion of
great accuracy in the store to those testing the scale by stepping on and
off.
Try taking a known weight, like a quart of water. Weigh yourself. step
off scale, pick up water, step back on scale. You should weigh 2 pounds
more.
del
Mr. Natural-Health - 29 Jan 2008 18:31 GMT
> (b) I really can gain or lose up to 0.8 pounds in an hour of doing
> nothing. If that's the case, then how? (My hair is dry at the
> beginning and end of the interval so that's not it :) )
Metabolism
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Metabolism
Now, what prize did I win for answering your question?
Bennett Haselton - 30 Jan 2008 15:48 GMT
On Jan 29, 10:31 am, "Mr. Natural-Health"
<zx...@naturalhealthperspective.com> wrote:
> > (b) I really can gain or lose up to 0.8 pounds in an hour of doing
> > nothing. If that's the case, then how? (My hair is dry at the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Now, what prize did I win for answering your question?
Um, I'm pretty sure that due to the conservation of mass, metabolism
wouldn't actually cause you to lose weight while you were just sitting
still. (Even exercising, the weight you lose during exercise would
only be equal to the weight of the sweat that runs off of you.) I
assumed that "weight loss" was achieved as a result of energy-
containing compounds being broken down during exercise and converted
into other compounds that then get removed from your body when you go
to the bathroom, instead of those energy-containing compounds getting
converted to fat.
-Bennett
Mr. Natural-Health - 08 Feb 2008 17:37 GMT
> On Jan 29, 10:31 am, "Mr. Natural-Health"
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> to the bathroom, instead of those energy-containing compounds getting
> converted to fat.
Um, I 'm pretty sure that you don't know what you are talking
about. :)
The answer was and still is: Metabolism.
Bennett Haselton - 08 Feb 2008 18:36 GMT
On Feb 8, 9:37 am, "Mr. Natural-Health"
<zx...@naturalhealthperspective.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 29, 10:31 am, "Mr. Natural-Health"
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
OK, if the chemical reactions in your body follow the conservation of
mass even while you're sitting still in a chair, then where does the
mass "go"? If some substance has to leave your body in order for you
to lose weight, then what is it?
Marshall Price - 01 Mar 2008 20:10 GMT
> I bought a scale that can tell your weight to the nearest 0.2 pounds,
> and just for interest's sake, decided to try weighing myself
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> nothing. If that's the case, then how? (My hair is dry at the
> beginning and end of the interval so that's not it :) )
That weight change simply isn't credible. What sort of scale is it?
Most piezoelectric-crystal-based digital scales give very unreliable
results when used on surfaces that aren't hard, immobile, and
vibration-free. Not only that, but they're affected by vibrations
(jitteriness) coming from your own nervous system.
To prove it, try weighing something in a car with the motor running, and
then again with the motor off.

Signature
Marshall Price of Miami
Known to Yahoo as d021317c