Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Calcium Not a Real Heart Risk to Older Women

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
carolinamaine@gmail.com - 19 Jan 2008 17:14 GMT
My blog, Maine Source, covers why I thought the New Zealand study was
flawed.
Older women should contine to take the Appropriate (for age/
cardiovascular health/dietary needs) amount of calcium.

http://carolinamaine.blogspot.com/2008/01/calcium-supplements-could-elevate-hear
t.html


or

http://carolinamaine.blogspot.com
sphynx.red@gmail.com - 24 Jan 2008 15:34 GMT
On Jan 19, 11:14 am, "carolinama...@gmail.com"
<carolinama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My blog, Maine Source, covers why I thought the New Zealand study was
> flawed.

Sandy Swarc did a great fisking of the calcium study, too, over at
JunkFoodScience
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/01/calcium-marvel-or-menace-evidence-ma
y.html


Adam Becker Sr
carolinamaine@gmail.com - 27 Jan 2008 01:32 GMT
Thanks, Adam, I will check it out.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.