Today's post from "Sham vs. Wham: The Health Insider":
The American Media's Anti-Supplement Slant
As my readers know, I am over in Europe right now and what a
difference we have in the reporting of facts about herbs, or about
dietary supplements on this side of the water compared to the States.
I truly believe that we are seeing an agenda playing out here, driven
by pharmaceutical companies and the huge money that they throw into
the media with their advertising campaigns for drugs.
Here's an example . . . Both today's BBC news, and the local news in
Lisbon, Portugal, carried the story of new, large Echinacea clinical
trials which show strong results from the herb for keeping colds at
bay, and also for knocking out colds early. Here are some of the facts
of this story about the research done by researchers from the USA and
reported in The Lancet (one of the most important medical publications
in the world):
"Taking the herbal remedy echinacea can more than halve the risk of
catching a common cold, US researchers say. They found it decreased
the odds of developing a cold by 58% and the duration of colds by a
day-and-a-half. The results in The Lancet Infectious Diseases conflict
with other studies that show no beneficial effect.
Experts believe echinacea, a collection of nine related plant species
indigenous to North America, may work by boosting the body's immune
system. Researchers, led by Dr Craig Coleman from the University of
Connecticut School of Pharmacy, combined the results of 14 different
studies on Echinacea's anti-cold properties.
In one of the 14 studies the researchers reviewed, echinacea was taken
alongside vitamin C. This combination reduced cold incidence by 86%.
When echinacea was used alone it reduced cold incidence by 65%."
As you might imagine, seeing this as front page headlines locally and
on the BBC, and seeing that it was an American research team, I
thought for sure that it would be repeated either on CNN or on the
various USA networks or print media. Apparently, I was mistaken. It
seems that the same news media outlets which prominently featured the
NEGATIVE trials on this herb simply took this positive news and swept
it under the rug.
I am beginning to sense a serious MD/Pharma Company coalition working
against the dietary supplement industry. Does anyone else have another
explanation for this? See the news story from BBC linked to this
headline.
D.
Jim Chinnis - 25 Jun 2007 15:21 GMT
"D." <djensen36@cox.net> wrote in part:
>Today's post from "Sham vs. Wham: The Health Insider":
>
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
>D.
Statistically, one would expect a positive result (0.05) about 1 in 20 times
when there is no true effect. That's about what we see for Echinacea.
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
Susan - 25 Jun 2007 16:20 GMT
> Statistically, one would expect a positive result (0.05) about 1 in 20 times
> when there is no true effect. That's about what we see for Echinacea.
> --
I don't know what you've been reading, but when I researched it years
ago, I found evidence for macrophage mobilization and other immune
stimulatory effects of echinacea.
Anecdotally; it made me extremely faint and weak when I tried it for
sinus infection many years ago; this is a very common occurrence in CFS
and FMS patients who try it at anything above tiny doses.
I think some of the research I read supporting it for infections was
from the German E commission.
Susan
Jim Chinnis - 25 Jun 2007 17:51 GMT
Susan <nevermind@nomail.com> wrote in part:
>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>Susan
There is almost always laboratory support for mechanisms with any
drug/"supplement." There have been some randomized studies of echinacea to
see if it prevents colds. Those are what I recall seeing.
I know I used to take echinacea and stopped after seeing too much negative
data from controlled studies.
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
Susan - 25 Jun 2007 18:09 GMT
> There is almost always laboratory support for mechanisms with any
> drug/"supplement." There have been some randomized studies of echinacea to
> see if it prevents colds. Those are what I recall seeing.
>
> I know I used to take echinacea and stopped after seeing too much negative
> data from controlled studies.
\
There are data both for and against, very likely due to the variability
in the preparations and their constituents.
At least, that's what a review of the literature pointed to when I did a
quick search earlier today.
Susan
D. - 25 Jun 2007 19:38 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Susan
The meta analysis of all trials has now been done, and is reported on
in today's USA Today, finally . . .
D.
John H. - 26 Jun 2007 00:41 GMT
E has been found to increase the risks of asthma and allergy problems. I'm
not a fan of immunostimulants. Most people seem to think that anything which
increases immuno activity is a good thing. Not true, it can be quite
dangerous, particularly for your nervous system. In any event, getting the
occasional mild infection may be good for us.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=
464156&in_page_id=1770&ct=5
> > x-no-archive: yes
> >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> D.
D. - 27 Jun 2007 19:50 GMT
> E has been found to increase the risks of asthma and allergy problems. I'm
> not a fan of immunostimulants. Most people seem to think that anything which
> increases immuno activity is a good thing. Not true, it can be quite
> dangerous, particularly for your nervous system. In any event, getting the
> occasional mild infection may be good for us.
I don't know John, I love not getting colds, flu, etc, and haven't
been sick at all since taking Arctic Root, a brand of Rhodiola
(adaptogen) made in Sweden. Not one day of work missed since then --
why exactly would I want to be infected again?
Dave