Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Inappropriate Longterm Use of Antibiotics in "Sham vs. Wham: The Health Insider"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
djensen36@cox.net - 28 May 2007 21:14 GMT
Pardon the brief intrusion . . . Today's post at
http://shamvswham.blogspot.com/2007/05/sham-inappropriate-use-of-antibiotics.html
is about the dangers of long-term use of antibiotics, which sometimes
occurs in treating conditions such as Lyme Disease. New guidelines
coming from a group of MD's hope to help cure those doctors who too
easily write prescriptions for lengthy regiments of antibiotics. Long-
term antibiotic use can be associated with such side effects as
diarrhea, blood stream infections, and blood clots. Please visit the
daily health and wellness compendium, at "Sham vs. Wham: The Health
Insider."

D.
Susan - 28 May 2007 23:38 GMT
> Pardon the brief intrusion . . . Today's post at
> http://shamvswham.blogspot.com/2007/05/sham-inappropriate-use-of-antibiotics.html
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> D.

It's not as if the long term effects of chronic infections are benign.

Susan
djensen36@cox.net - 29 May 2007 07:01 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Susan

That is certainly true, Susan, and my guess is that this is a major
decision of weighing risks that the patient has to make. The problem,
however, is that often antibiotics are used when there is no clear cut
reason to use them, but few other conventional options exist. My son,
for example, had a chronic infestation of a parasite, and his MD
wanted to treat him with a long-term dose of an antibiotic. Another,
more holistic doc, suggested a daily course of tea made from an herb,
Uva ursi, and it cleared it up in about 45 days. There ARE options to
antibiotics. This article reports specifically on Lyme disease, where
new guidelines are in place to caution docs about the risks of long-
term antibiotic usage.

Dave
D. - 30 May 2007 02:46 GMT
On May 28, 11:01 pm, djense...@cox.net wrote:

> > x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Dave

Susan, I had an interesting conversation with a few people on the
usenet group for Lyme disease, and I found that quite a number of them
are getting some results out of long-term antibiotics regimens, which
flies in the face of this research I reported on. When discussing it
with them, it appears that there are two groups of MD's battling it
out as to which protocol is the best for L.D. What a nasty and
mysterious disease that one is!

Dave
Susan - 30 May 2007 14:15 GMT
> Susan, I had an interesting conversation with a few people on the
> usenet group for Lyme disease, and I found that quite a number of them
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> out as to which protocol is the best for L.D. What a nasty and
> mysterious disease that one is!

I can't believe you managed to have a coherent conversation on that
particular usenet group.

The problem is that both sides take too many liberties with the truth,
and the academics routinely lie in public and say very different things
about chronicity in private, off the record.  I've been there to witness it.

Susan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.