> Pardon the brief intrusion . . . Today's post at
> http://shamvswham.blogspot.com/2007/05/sham-inappropriate-use-of-antibiotics.html
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> D.
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Susan
That is certainly true, Susan, and my guess is that this is a major
decision of weighing risks that the patient has to make. The problem,
however, is that often antibiotics are used when there is no clear cut
reason to use them, but few other conventional options exist. My son,
for example, had a chronic infestation of a parasite, and his MD
wanted to treat him with a long-term dose of an antibiotic. Another,
more holistic doc, suggested a daily course of tea made from an herb,
Uva ursi, and it cleared it up in about 45 days. There ARE options to
antibiotics. This article reports specifically on Lyme disease, where
new guidelines are in place to caution docs about the risks of long-
term antibiotic usage.
Dave
D. - 30 May 2007 02:46 GMT
On May 28, 11:01 pm, djense...@cox.net wrote:
> > x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Dave
Susan, I had an interesting conversation with a few people on the
usenet group for Lyme disease, and I found that quite a number of them
are getting some results out of long-term antibiotics regimens, which
flies in the face of this research I reported on. When discussing it
with them, it appears that there are two groups of MD's battling it
out as to which protocol is the best for L.D. What a nasty and
mysterious disease that one is!
Dave
Susan - 30 May 2007 14:15 GMT
> Susan, I had an interesting conversation with a few people on the
> usenet group for Lyme disease, and I found that quite a number of them
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> out as to which protocol is the best for L.D. What a nasty and
> mysterious disease that one is!
I can't believe you managed to have a coherent conversation on that
particular usenet group.
The problem is that both sides take too many liberties with the truth,
and the academics routinely lie in public and say very different things
about chronicity in private, off the record. I've been there to witness it.
Susan