> Hi!
> you can have a more information from this linkhttp://homeopathynotaplacebothepathy.blogspot.com/
> Dr.M.Devendra Kumar
> MD ( Homeo)
I notice that you claim "Scientific Research in Homeopathy" as
an interest but you apparently have found none to reference on
your blog. (I don't know anyone who has found anything of
consequence.) Why not rename your blog in line with the
evidence: "Homeopathy IS a placebo therapy"
Jeff - 16 Mar 2007 14:54 GMT
>> Hi!
>> you can have a more information from this
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> consequence.) Why not rename your blog in line with the
> evidence: "Homeopathy IS a placebo therapy"
A better blog in line would be "Homeopathy is *not* therapy" or "Homeopathy
is do-do."
Jeff
Enrico C - 16 Mar 2007 15:25 GMT
>> evidence: "Homeopathy IS a placebo therapy"
>
> A better blog in line would be "Homeopathy is *not* therapy"
Placebo *is* a therapy (for some pathologies, at least).
> Homeopathy is not a placebo theraphy
I guess you mean "...is not *only" a placebo...".
Anyway, define what you exactly mean by "homeopathy" in the first place, as
there are differente schools and different dilutions.
Very high dilutions just mean... plain water, you should know that.
> http://homeopathynotaplacebothepathy.blogspot.com/
You are spamming *and* OT, right?
Two birds with a stone.
> Dr.M.Devendra Kumar
> MD ( Homeo)
That only makes things worst.