Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / March 2007
Vitamin D status predicts physical performance and its decline in older persons
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Matti Narkia - 12 Mar 2007 18:07 GMT The Dutch study
Wicherts IS, van Schoor NM, Boeke AJ, Visser M, Deeg DJ, Smit J, Knol DL, Lips P. Vitamin D status predicts physical performance and its decline in older persons. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Mar 6; [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 17341569 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] <http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/jc.2006-1525v1> <http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/rapidpdf/jc.2006-1525v1> (koko teksti PDF-tiedostona),
just published online, found that low vitamin D status is common in older persons and associated with poorer physical performance and a greater decline in physical performance. Below the abstract of this study:
"Context: Vitamin D deficiency is common among older people, and can cause mineralization defects, bone loss, and muscle weakness. Objective: To investigate the association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) concentration with current physical performance and its decline over 3 years among elderly. Design: Cross-sectional and longitudinal design (3 years follow-up) within the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Setting: An age- and sex-stratified random sample of the Dutch older population. Other participants: Subjects included 1234 men and women (aged 65yr and older) for cross- sectional analysis, and 979 (79%) persons for longitudinal analysis. Main Outcome Measure(s): physical performance (sum score of the walking test, chair stands, and tandem stand) and decline in physical performance. Results: serum 25-OHD was associated with physical performance after adjustment for age, gender, chronic diseases, degree of urbanization, BMI, and alcohol consumption. Compared with individuals with serum 25-OHD levels above 30ng/ml, physical performance was poorer in participants with serum 25-OHD<10ng/ml (B= -1.69; 95% confidence interval[CI]= -2.28; -1.10), and with serum 25-OHD 10-20ng/ml (B= -0.46; 95%CI=-0.90;-0.03). After adjustment for confounding variables, participants with 25-OHD<10ng/ml and 25-OHD 10-20ng/ml had significantly higher odds ratios (OR) for 3-year decline in physical performance ([OR=2.21; 95%CI=1.00- 4.87] and [OR=2.01; 95%CI=1.06-3.81]), compared with participants with 25-OHD>/=30ng/ml. The results were consistent for each individual performance test. Conclusions: Serum 25-OHD concentrations <20ng/ml are associated with poorer physical performance and a greater decline in physical performance in older men and women. Because almost 50% of the population had serum 25-OHD<20ng/ml, public health strategies should be aimed at this group."
 Signature Matti Narkia
CliffMacgillivray - 12 Mar 2007 20:42 GMT > just published online, found that low vitamin D status is common in > older persons and associated with poorer physical performance and a > greater decline in physical performance. Below the abstract of this > study: *gasp* So old people that are too frail to go outside into the sunlight have low vitamin D levels!?!? I think that being too frail to go outside leads to the vitamin D deficiency and not the other way around.
Jim Chinnis - 12 Mar 2007 20:58 GMT CliffMacgillivray <nospam@fake-email.net> wrote in part:
>> just published online, found that low vitamin D status is common in >> older persons and associated with poorer physical performance and a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >have low vitamin D levels!?!? I think that being too frail to go outside >leads to the vitamin D deficiency and not the other way around. Right. I also think the "discovery" of lower vit D in those with diabetes type 2 is similar: they got diabetes (many of them) because they didn't go out and bike/walk/run/swim enough and they got low vit D because they didn't go out and bike/walk/run/swim enough. -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
Susan - 12 Mar 2007 21:18 GMT > Right. I also think the "discovery" of lower vit D in those with diabetes > type 2 is similar: they got diabetes (many of them) because they didn't go > out and bike/walk/run/swim enough and they got low vit D because they didn't > go out and bike/walk/run/swim enough. Or they got it because they live in a climate where part of the year it's difficult and/or dangerous to be out, and little sun is out, too. Or they did all those things with their skin covered by clothing and SPF, and with sunglasses on.
Susan
Jim Chinnis - 12 Mar 2007 21:31 GMT Susan <nevermind@nomail.com> wrote in part:
>x-no-archive: yes > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Susan Why would that make diabetics lower in vitamin d than non-diabetics? -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
Susan - 12 Mar 2007 21:56 GMT > Why would that make diabetics lower in vitamin d than non-diabetics? > -- For one thing, vitamin D is miscategorized as a vitamin; it's a steroid, a secosteroid to be exact.
Higher insulin levels inhibit steroidogenesis, which is what your body does to synthesize steroids. Type 2 starts out with hypersecretion of insulin, and later treatments either sensitize to insulin (more is bioavailable) or cause DMs to excrete more so they can eat all the starch and sugar the ADA advice tells them to.
Just one other possibility in what I think is a more complex equation.
Susan
Jim Chinnis - 12 Mar 2007 22:39 GMT Susan <nevermind@nomail.com> wrote in part:
>x-no-archive: yes > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >Susan Thank you! Good insights, I'd say. -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
Susan - 12 Mar 2007 22:44 GMT > Thank you! Good insights, I'd say. > -- You know me; full of insights.
Often wrong, never in doubt. ;-)
Susan
Juhana Harju - 12 Mar 2007 23:09 GMT : x-no-archive: yes : :: Why would that make diabetics lower in vitamin d than non-diabetics? : : For one thing, vitamin D is miscategorized as a vitamin; it's a : steroid, a secosteroid to be exact. I suggest that you read this article by Reinhold Vieth.
http://www.direct-ms.org/pdf/VitDVieth/Vit%20D%20not%20a%20Hormone%20Vieth.pdf
 Signature Juhana
Matti Narkia - 12 Mar 2007 23:42 GMT >CliffMacgillivray <nospam@fake-email.net> wrote in part: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >out and bike/walk/run/swim enough and they got low vit D because they didn't >go out and bike/walk/run/swim enough. That's logical, but I don't think that the observation of relatively high prevalence of low vitamin D status among type 2 diabetes patients was a main point of this study. IMHO it was the association of low vitamin D status within this population with increased atherosclerosis. An excerpt from the abstract:
"In multivariate regression analysis, low 25(OH)D concentrations independently predicted carotid IMT (P < 0.001) in people with type 2 diabetes after adjustment for classical risk factors, diabetes duration, HbA1c, calcium, renal function tests, inflammatory markers, use of medications, and presence of the metabolic syndrome" As for the relation between low vitamin D status and type 2 diabetes, I take a couple of IMHO interesting quotes from
Zittermann A. Vitamin D in preventive medicine: are we ignoring the evidence? Br J Nutr. 2003 May;89(5):552-72. Review. PMID: 12720576 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] <http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cabi/bjn/2003/00000089/00000005/art00002?t oken=00531a0783f6da2dd5264f65263a3d4f58762f467c405847447b23442f7b317b763b6b674c7 a2d1245d> (full text available from that page)
"Experimental studies have demonstrated that a reduction in vitamin D activity can result in both increased insulin resistance and reduced insulin secretion (Boucher, 1998). Epidemiological data have shown a four- to five-fold higher prevalence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes in dark-skinned Asian immigrants in comparison with British Caucasians indicating that low vitamin D status may contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetes (McKeigue et al. 1992). Moreover, in elderly subjects the subgroup with the lowest tertile of 25(OH)D levels had a significantly higher blood glucose increase and higher blood insulin increase after an oral glucose-tolerance test in comparison with the subgroup with the highest tertile of 25(OH)D levels (Baynes et al. 1997). Data indicate that vitamin D insufficiency may result in insulin resistance. Results are in line with the suggestion that enhanced levels of TNF-alpha, a cytokine with is inversely related to 25(OH)D and calcitriol (see p. 560), promote insulin resistance (Hotamisligil & Spiegelman, 1994).
[...]
It should be mentioned that hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes mellitus are often associated with obesity. Obese subjects have an increased risk for low circulating 25(OH)D levels (Bell et al. 1985; Wortsman et al. 2000) due to the storage of vitamin D and 25(OH)D in adipose tissue (Wortsman et al. 2000). The alterations in vitamin D metabolism of obese subjects in comparison with lean subjects are also associated with functional alterations such as elevated PTH levels (Bell et al. 1985; Wortsman et al. 2000). Obesity might thus contribute to insufficient circulating 25(OH)D levels."
 Signature Matti Narkia
Matti Narkia - 13 Mar 2007 00:50 GMT >>CliffMacgillivray <nospam@fake-email.net> wrote in part: >> [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] > Obesity might thus contribute to insufficient circulating > 25(OH)D levels." Here a few more references about the relation between low vitamin D status and insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes
Pittas AG, Harris SS, Stark PC, Dawson-Hughes B. The Effects of Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation on Blood Glucose and Markers of Inflammation in Non-diabetic Adults. Diabetes Care. 2007 Feb 2; [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 17277040 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] <http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/dc06-1994v1>
"Conclusions. In healthy older adults with impaired fasting glucose, supplementation with calcium and vitamin D may attenuate increases in glycemia and insulin resistance that occur over time. However, our findings should be considered hypothesis generating and need to be confirmed in randomized trials specifically designed for the outcomes of interest."
Mathieu C, Gysemans C, Giulietti A, Bouillon R. Vitamin D and diabetes. Diabetologia. 2005 Jul;48(7):1247-57. Epub 2005 Jun 22. Review. PMID: 15971062 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] DOI: 10.1007/s00125-005-1802-7 <http://www.springerlink.com/content/q21433360tv03407/>
"Vitamin D deficiency predisposes individuals to type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and receptors for its activated form - 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 - have been identified in both beta cells and immune cells. Vitamin D deficiency has been shown to impair insulin synthesis and secretion in humans and in animal models of diabetes, suggesting a role in the development of type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, epidemiological studies suggest a link between vitamin D deficiency in early life and the later onset of type 1 diabetes. In some populations, type 1 diabetes is associated with certain polymorphisms within the vitamin D receptor gene. In studies in nonobese diabetic mice, pharmacological doses of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, or its structural analogues, have been shown to delay the onset of diabetes, mainly through immune modulation. Vitamin D deficiency may, therefore, be involved in the pathogenesis of both forms of diabetes, and a better understanding of the mechanisms involved could lead to the development of preventive strategies."
Chiu KC, Chu A, Go VL, Saad MF (2004) Hypovitaminosis D is associated with insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr 79:820-825 <http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/79/5/820>
"CONCLUSIONS: The data show a positive correlation of 25(OH)D concentration with insulin sensitivity and a negative effect of hypovitaminosis D on beta cell function. Subjects with hypovitaminosis D are at higher risk of insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome. Further studies are required to explore the underlying mechanisms.
[...]
Our data show that, in glucose-tolerant subjects, 25(OH)D concentration has a positive relation to insulin sensitivity and a negative effect on beta cell function. These relations are independent of confounding factors. Therefore, hypovitaminosis D is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Although there is to date no report on both of these associations in a single study such as the current study, separate reports have shown the association of hypovitaminosis D with insulin resistance (16) and beta cell dysfunction (8).
[...]
To our knowledge, the current study is the first to show the relation of 25(OH)D concentration to insulin sensitivity and secretion by using a hyperglycemic clamp technique in a group of healthy, glucose-tolerant subjects. We also observed that hypovitaminosis D is a risk factor for the metabolic syndrome. Extrapolation from the observations in the current study suggests that increasing 25(OH)D from 10 to 30 ng/mL can improve insulin sensitivity by 60%, from 3.8128 to 6.1176 (micromol/L) * m^(-2) * min^(-1) * (pmol/L)^(-1). This improvement in insulin resistance could potentially eliminate the burden on beta cells and reverse abnormal glucose tolerance. Furthermore, the 60% improvement in insulin sensitivity that results from vitamin D treatment indicates that that treatment is more potent than either troglitazone or metformin treatment (54% and 13% improvement in insulin sensitivity, respectively; 36). The modest effect of vitamin D on insulin sensitivity in individual persons may translate into a dramatic effect in the population as a whole because of the high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D, which, in a large population, carries an attributable risk for type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Although a review of the literature suggests non- calcium-mediated effects, the underlying molecular mechanism remains to be elucidated."
 Signature Matti Narkia
Matti Narkia - 12 Mar 2007 23:18 GMT >> just published online, found that low vitamin D status is common in >> older persons and associated with poorer physical performance and a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >have low vitamin D levels!?!? I think that being too frail to go outside >leads to the vitamin D deficiency and not the other way around. A good point, and because this was an epidemiological study, no causal conclusions can be drawn. Certainly not going out will lead to a low vitamin D status, if supplements are not used. Still, the study claims that the association of low vitamin D status with poorer physical performance and its greater decline remained significant after adjustment for number of chronic diseases and physical activity. From the discussion chapter of the study:
"This study clearly shows that physical performance is not only associated with vitamin D status cross-sectionally, but that vitamin D status is also associated with decline over time in physical performance. Compared with the reference group (25-OHD >= 30 ng/ml), participants with levels up to 20 ng/ml had significantly lower scores for physical performance, and had higher odds for decline in physical performance. This was significant after adjustment for age, gender, number of chronic diseases, degree of urbanization, BMI, alcohol consumption, and physical activity."
 Signature Matti Narkia
Matti Narkia - 13 Mar 2007 11:34 GMT >>> just published online, found that low vitamin D status is common in >>> older persons and associated with poorer physical performance and a [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > gender, number of chronic diseases, degree of urbanization, > BMI, alcohol consumption, and physical activity." References about the relation between vitamin D status and muscle function and physical performance:
Gloth FM III, Smith CE, Hollis BW, Tobin JD. Functional improvement with vitamin D replenishment in a cohort of frail, vitamin D-deficient older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43:1269-71. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=7 594162&dopt=Abstract>
"CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of homebound older people, improvement in vitamin D status was associated with functional improvement as measured by the FEFA questionnaire."
Verhaar HJ, Samson MM, Jansen PA, de Vreede PL, Manten JW, Duursma SA. Muscle strength, functional mobility and vitamin D in older women. Aging (Milano). 2000 Dec;12(6):455-60. PMID: 11211956 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstra ctPlus&list_uids=11211956>
"Six months of treatment with alphacalcidol led to significant improvements (compared to the controls) in values of isometric knee extensor strength (left leg: 14.6% +/- 5.7%. p=0.03; right leg: 11.5% +/- 5.0%, p=0.02) (mean +/- SEM). The achievements in the timed "Up & Go" test and 2- minute walking test did not improve in the alphacalcidol group compared to the controls after 6 months. However, within the vitamin D-deficient group, 6 months of alphacalcidol treatment led to a significant increase in the walking distance over 2 minutes (increase from 137.6 +/- 12.6 to 151.3 +/- 11.2 meters, p=0.03). The controls, with normal vitamin D levels, did not exhibit improvements in performance of any of the tests over a period of 6 months. Summarized, alphacalcidol seems to improve muscle strength and walking distance over 2 minutes in vitamin D-deficient older women."
Ziambaras K, Dagogo-Jack S. Reversible muscle weakness in patients with vitamin D deficiency. West J Med 1997;167:435?9. <http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=9426489> <http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1304730&blobtype=pdf>
"We report on two patients who presented with significant proximal muscle weakness, one with vitamin D malabsorption and one with dietary vitamin D deficiency. A search for inflammation or other causes of myopathy was negative. Muscle biopsy in one patient revealed type IIB fiber atrophy. Once normal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels were restored, both patients experienced gradual muscle strength improvement and reversal of proximal myopathy within 6 months.
[...] The ultimate proof of the diagnosis of vitamin D-deficient muscle weakness rests on the response to therapy. Improvement in muscle strength has been observed as early as after a week,5 but usually within one to two months,14,15 of treatment with pharmacologic doses of vitamin D. Treatment is required for several months, however, for complete recovery of muscle strength.13,15"
Glerup H, Mikkelsen K, Poulsen L, et al. Hypovitaminosis D myopathy without biochemical signs of osteomalacic bone involvement. Calcif Tissue Int 2000;66:419?24. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=1 0821877&dopt=Abstract>
"Hypovitaminosis D myopathy is a prominent symptom of vitamin D deficiency, and severely impaired muscle function may be present even before biochemical signs of bone disease develop. Full normalization of hypovitaminosis D myopathy demands high-dose vitamin D treatment for 6 months or more. Our findings indicate that serum levels of ALP cannot be used in the screening for hypovitaminosis D myopathy. Assessment of s-25OHD is the only reliable test."
Prabhala A, Garg R, Dandona P. Severe myopathy associated with vitamin D deficiency in western New York. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:1199-203 <http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/160/8/1199>
"Five cases of severe myopathy associated with vitamin D deficiency are described. Each patient was confined to a wheelchair because of weakness and immobility. Two were elderly, 1 was a 37-year-old African American with type 1 diabetes mellitus, 1 was being treated for carcinoid syndrome, and 1 was severely malnourished due to poor oral intake. In each, weakness had previously been attributed to other causes, including old age, concomitant diabetic neuropathy, or general debility. Correct diagnosis was made initially by a high index of suspicion, following the demonstration of clinical proximal myopathy; confirmation was made by the demonstration of low 25-hydroxyvitamin D and elevated parathyroid hormone concentrations. Treatment with vitamin D caused a resolution of body aches and pains and a restoration of normal muscle strength in 4 to 6 weeks. Four patients became fully mobile and had normal 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, and the fifth also became mobile. In the 4 fully recovered cases, parathyroid hormone levels on follow- up were lower but still elevated. This finding suggests a degree of autonomy of parathyroid secretion known to occur in cases of long-standing vitamin D deficiency. Myopathy, due to chronic vitamin D deficiency, probably contributes to immobility and ill health in a significant number of patients in the northern United States. An awareness of this condition may significantly improve mobility and quality of life in patient populations vulnerable to vitamin D deficiency."
Endo I, Inoue D, Mitsui T, Umaki Y, Akaike M, Yoshizawa T, Kato S, Matsumoto T. Deletion of vitamin D receptor gene in mice results in abnormal skeletal muscle development with deregulated expression of myoregulatory transcription factors. Endocrinology. 2003 Dec;144(12):5138-44. Epub 2003 Aug 13. PMID: 12959989 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] <http://endo.endojournals.org/cgi/content/full/144/12/5138>
"These results suggest that VDR plays a physiological role in skeletal muscle development, participating in temporally strict down-regulation of myoregulatory transcription factors. The present study can form a molecular basis of VDR actions on muscle and should help further establish the physiological roles of VDR in muscle development as well as pharmacological effects of vitamin D on muscle functions."
Pfeifer M, Begerow B, Minne HW. Vitamin D and muscle function. Osteoporos Int. 2002 Mar;13(3):187-94. Review. PMID: 11991436 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] DOI: 10.1007/s001980200012 <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstra ctPlus&list_uids=11991436>
Staud R. Vitamin D: more than just affecting calcium and bone. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2005 Oct;7(5):356-64. Review. PMID: 16174483 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstra ctPlus&list_uids=16174483>
"Clinical consequences related to low vitamin D levels include not only osteomalacia, osteoporosis, and rickets, but also neuro-muscular dysfunction and fractures. Falls related to neuromuscular dysfunction lead to 40% of all nursing home admissions and are the largest single cause of injury-related deaths in elderly people. [...] It is well established that vitamin D deficiency not only has serious consequences for bone health, but also for other organ systems. Previous studies have shown that vitamin D supplementation reduces the number of fractures and directly improves neuromuscular function, thus helping to prevent falls and subsequent fractures."
Boonen S, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Cooper C, Lips P, Ljunggren O, Meunier PJ, Reginster JY. Addressing the musculoskeletal components of fracture risk with calcium and vitamin D: a review of the evidence. Calcif Tissue Int. 2006 May;78(5):257-70. Epub 2006 Apr 21. Review. PMID: 16622587 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?itool=abstractplus&db=pubmed&cmd=R etrieve&dopt=abstractplus&list_uids=16622587> <http://www.springerlink.com/content/w786x2mjm3276ggk/>
"Additionally, calcium and vitamin D supplementation significantly improves body sway and lower extremity strength, reducing the risk of falls."
Zittermann A. Vitamin D in preventive medicine: are we ignoring the evidence? Br J Nutr. 2003 May;89(5):552-72. Review. PMID: 12720576 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] <http://tinyurl.com/249efc> (full text available from that page)
"It has been assumed already at the beginning of the 20th century that severe vitamin D deficiency results in a disturbed muscle metabolism (Ritz et al. 1980). Animal studies have demonstrated that the aktinomyosin content of myofibrills is reduced during experimental rickets (Stroder & Arensmeyer, 1965). Moreover, vitamin D deficiency can impair intracellular Ca metabolism in muscle cells. The Ca content of mitochondria isolated from vitamin D-depleted chicks is low (Pleasure et al. 1979) and Ca uptake into the sarcoplasmic reticulum is reduced during vitamin D deficiency (Curry et al. 1983). Patients with osteomalacia suffer from muscle weakness and have low serum levels of muscle enzymes (Ritz et al. 1980; Rimaniol et al. 1994). Supplementation with 357 or 1250 mcg vitamin D/d or 50 mcg 25(OH)D/d for 1 to 2 months was able to normalize muscle strength in patients with myopathy (Rimaniol et al. 1994; Ziambaras & Dagogo-Jack, 1997). Sub-clinical myopathy may even occur at serum 25(OH)D levels of 10-50 nmol/l (Peacock, 1995). In line with this assumption, leg extension power was positively correlated with serum 25(OH)D levels in elderly males and with serum calcitriol levels in the whole group of males and females. The males had mean 25(OH)D levels of 90 (sd 87.5) nmol/l and the females had mean 25(OH)D levels of 68 (sd 53) nmol/l (Bischoff et al. 1999b) indicating that a large number of subjects had an insufficient vitamin D status. A recent study has brought forward evidence that a low vitamin D status also contributes to the pathogenesis of congestive heart failure, a disease resulting in cardiac muscle weakness due to impaired myocardial contractility. Circulating levels of NT- proANP, a biochemical indicator of congestive heart failure severity, were inversely correlated with serum 25(OH)D levels (r2 0.16, P>0.001; Zittermann et al. 2003).
Supplemental studies have demonstrated that doses of 0.5 mcg calitriol/d or 10 mcg vitamin D/d had no effects on parameters of muscle function (Table 4). A daily supplement of very high doses of vitamin D and also doses of 20 mcg vitamin D/d could, however, significantly improve muscle function in subjects with low initial 25(OH)D levels (Table 4). It should also be mentioned that in both intervention trials the 20 mcg vitamin D/d was combined with a daily supplement of 1 200 mg Ca. Probably, the combined effect of 20 mcg vitamin D with high doses of oral Ca was responsible for the beneficial effects in these studies." Mowe M, Haug E, Bohmer T. Low serum calcidiol concentration in older adults with reduced muscular function. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999;47:220-6. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9 988294&dopt=Abstract>
"CONCLUSIONS: Older people with reduced muscle function often had reduced levels of calcidiol serum concentration. Low levels of calcidiol were not associated with signs of general undernutrition, such as low body mass, or with reduced arm- muscle circumference or triceps skinfold thickness. This finding may suggest a physiological role for calcidiol in muscle function. Reduced muscle strength increased disability in our older subjects, which may be improved by vitamin D supplementation in vitamin D-deficient subjects.
[...] Our findings may be clinically relevant to the musculoskeletal health in the aged, because vitamin D insufficiency has been shown to be associated with lower muscle strength and increased falling tendency in adults. Conversely, supplement of native vitamin D or treatment with active vitamin D has been reported to improve muscle functions and protect from falling events and falling- associated fractures (29, 30, 31, 32, 33). Whether the beneficial effects of vitamin D treatment occur via direct VDR actions on skeletal muscle cells or indirect mechanisms remains unclear. Interestingly, however, abnormal expression of MyoD family members and MHC isoforms has been reported in various models of immobilization and denervation (34, 35, 36, 37, 38). Considering the plasticity and highly adaptive nature of muscle fibers, it is conceivable that reprogramming and adaptations of muscle fibers may occur under various pathological conditions, particularly in elderly patients, and that these processes may be modulated by VDR-dependent vitamin D actions. In summary, we have shown that VDR gene deleted mice exhibit abnormal skeletal muscle development. These abnormalities occur independently of secondary metabolic changes such as hypocalcemia and hypophosphatemia and are accompanied by deregulated expression of myogenic transcription factors and MHC isoforms. These effects appear to involve direct vitamin D actions on muscle through VDR, because similar effects were reproduced by treatment of VDR-positive myoblastic cells with 1,25(OH)2D in vitro. The present study can form a molecular basis of VDR actions on muscle and should help further establish the physiological roles of VDR in muscle development as well as pharmacological effects of vitamin D on muscle functions." Solomon AM, Bouloux PM. Modifying muscle mass - the endocrine perspective. J Endocrinol. 2006 Nov;191(2):349-60. Review. PMID: 17088404 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] <http://joe.endocrinology-journals.org/cgi/content/full/191/2/349>
"Calcium, vitamin D and phosphate levels all impact on muscle function most notably in deficiency states such as the myopathy seen in osteomalacia. This has been confirmed as a histological atrophy of muscle, predominantly type II fibres and is exacerbated by ageing (Janssen et al. 2002). Polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor and vitamin D knockout models have a significant muscle phenotype (Demay 2003). Vitamin D null mice have smaller muscle fibres and raised levels of MRFs. These changes are reversed by treatment with vitamin D (Endo et al. 2003). Vitamin D- receptor polymorphisms associated with body composition and muscle strength have been reported in men and women. One study assessing older men showed variation in the vitamin D- receptor FokI polymorphism (Roth et al. 2004), with a different polymorphism linked with muscle strength in a further study of older women (Geusens et al. 1997). In a longitudinal study looking at sarcopenia in older men and women, low vitamin D was linked with increased risk (by approximately x2) of reduced muscle mass and strength. a similar relationship was found with raised parathyroid hormone levels (Visser et al. 2003). In functional terms, several trials have examined the relationship between vitamin D status and falls; these have been recently reviewed (Mosekilde 2005)."
Janssen HCJP, Samson MM, Verhaar HJJ. Vitamin D deficiency, muscle function, and falls in elderly people. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;75:611-5. <http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/80/2/496>
"In conclusion, vitamin D deficiency is a condition that may cause muscle weakness in elderly persons. Although only a few intervention studies with vitamin D have been conducted in elderly people, the available evidence indicates that vitamin D supplementation preserves muscle strength and functional ability in high-risk groups, eg, frail, mostly homebound elderly people. Additional research, preferably by means of controlled randomized trials, is needed to confirm these findings."
Visser M, Deeg DJ, Lips P. Low vitamin D and high parathyroid hormone levels as determinants of loss of muscle strength and muscle mass (sarcopenia): the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:5766?72. <http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/88/12/5766>
"After adjustment for physical activity level, season of data collection, serum creatinine concentration, chronic disease, smoking, and body mass index, persons with low (<25 nmol/liter) baseline 25-OHD levels were 2.57 (95% confidence interval 1.40-4.70, based on grip strength) and 2.14 (0.73-6.33, based on muscle mass) times more likely to experience sarcopenia, compared with those with high (>50 nmol/liter) levels. High PTH levels (>=4.0 pmol/liter) were associated with an increased risk of sarcopenia, compared with low PTH (<3.0 pmol/liter): odds ratio = 1.71 (1.07-2.73) based on grip strength, odds ratio = 2.35 (1.05-5.28) based on muscle mass. The associations were similar in men and women. The results of this prospective, population-based study show that lower 25-OHD and higher PTH levels increase the risk of sarcopenia in older men and women."
Bishoff HA, Stahelin HB, Urscheler N, et al. Muscle strength in the elderly: its relation to vitamin D metabolites. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:54?8. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9 915372&dopt=Abstract>
"CONCLUSION: Muscle strength declined with age in ambulatory elderly people and showed modest, but significant, positive correlation with 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D in both sexes and with 25(OH)D in male subjects. Therefore vitamin D deficiency appears to contribute to the age-related loss of muscle strength, which might be more pronounced in institutionalized elderly people with a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency."
Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dietrich T, Orav EJ, Hu FB, Zhang Y, Karlson EW, Dawson-Hughes B. Higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are associated with better lower-extremity function in both active and inactive persons aged > or =60 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Sep;80(3):752-8. PMID: 15321818 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] <http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/80/3/752>
"BACKGROUND: Vitamin D may improve muscle strength through a highly specific nuclear receptor in muscle tissue. [...] CONCLUSION: In both active and inactive ambulatory persons aged > or =60 y, 25(OH)D concentrations between 40 and 94 nmol/L are associated with better musculoskeletal function in the lower extremities than are concentrations < 40 nmol/L."
Szulc P, Duboeuf F, Marchand F, Delmas PD. Hormonal and lifestyle determinants of appendicular skeletal muscle mass in men: the MINOS study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Aug;80(2):496-503. PMID: 15277176 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] <http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/80/2/496>
"CONCLUSION: In elderly men, low physical activity, tobacco smoking, thinness, low testosterone (AFTC and FTI), and decreased 25(OH)D concentrations are risk factors for sarcopenia."
Zamboni M, Zoico E, Tosoni P, et al. Relation between vitamin D, physical performance, and disability in elderly persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002;57:M7?11 <http://biomed.gerontologyjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/57/1/M7>
"Conclusions. In community-dwelling elderly women, 25(OH)D is related to muscular function and reported disability. Because of the high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in the elderly population, this association seems to be clinically relevant."
J. R Sharkey, C. Giuliani, P. S Haines, L. G Branch, J. Busby-Whitehead, and N. Zohoori Summary measure of dietary musculoskeletal nutrient (calcium, vitamin D, magnesium, and phosphorus) intakes is associated with lower-extremity physical performance in homebound elderly men and women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2003; 77(4): 847 - 856. <http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/77/4/847>
See also the link
<http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/search?q=vitamin+d>
provided by RArmant for the references aboty the relation between vitamin D status and physical performance.
 Signature Matti Narkia
Matti Narkia - 13 Mar 2007 16:12 GMT >>>> just published online, found that low vitamin D status is common in >>>> older persons and associated with poorer physical performance and a [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] >References about the relation between vitamin D status and muscle >function and physical performance: See also
Vitamin D Micronutrient Information Center - Linus Pauling Institute <http://lpi.oregonstate.edu/infocenter/vitamins/vitaminD/>
"Vitamin D deficiency causes muscle weakness and pain in children and adults. Muscle pain and weakness was a prominent symptom of vitamin D deficiency in a study of Arab and Danish Moslem women living in Denmark (20). In a cross-sectional study of 150 consecutive patients referred to a clinic in Minnesota for the evaluation of persistent, nonspecific musculoskeletal pain, 93% had serum 25(OH)D levels indicative of vitamin D deficiency (21). A randomized controlled trial found that supplementation of elderly women with 800 IU/day of vitamin D and 1,200 mg/day of calcium for three months increased muscle strength and decreased the risk of falling by almost 50% compared to supplementation with calcium alone (22)."
References mentioned in above excerpt:
20. Bringhurst FR, Demay MB, Kronenberg HM. Mineral Metabolism. In: Larson PR, Kronenberg HM, Melmed S, Polonsky KS, eds. Larsen: Williams Textbook of Endocrinology: Elsevier; 2003:1317-1320.
21. Plotnikoff GA, Quigley JM. Prevalence of severe hypovitaminosis D in patients with persistent, nonspecific musculoskeletal pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(12):1463-1470. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1 4661675&dopt=Abstract>
22. Bischoff HA, Stahelin HB, Dick W, et al. Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on falls: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(2):343-351. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1 2568412&dopt=Abstract>
"Musculoskeletal function improved significantly in the Cal+D-group (p = 0.0094). A single intervention with vitamin D plus calcium over a 3-month period reduced the risk of falling by 49% compared with calcium alone. Over this short- term intervention, recurrent fallers seem to benefit most by the treatment. The impact of vitamin D on falls might be explained by the observed improvement in musculoskeletal function."
 Signature Matti Narkia
RArmant - 12 Mar 2007 21:13 GMT Vitamin D appears to help reverse atherosclerosis. See -- http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/search?q=vitamin+d
|
|
|