Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

VOLUNTARY OBESITY

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
withliquer - 24 Nov 2006 23:58 GMT
is an arbritrary perversion and limitation stemming from the fear of
being wrongly ferreted out as gay.

The science of how the religions actually CAUSED the propagation of
gays, and in particular in a ratio of 3 lesbians to one male gay
person, follows, with reference to Leslie Stahl's documentary on the
subject on "60 Minutes."

Stahl reported, without more, on "60 Minutes" recently, that later-born
sons are likelier to be gay.

The study cited was a remake of one done by Breedlove at UCLA wherein
Breedlove.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0330094644.htm

Cautioned Breedlove, biology does not determine sexual
orientation. The findings are STATISTICAL RELATIONSHIPS, which means
that many men and women do not fit the pattern.

"It is just mindboggling to think that some men are gay because of the
number of boys their mothers had before their own birth. THESE EVENTS
MUST REGISTER IN THE WOMAN'S BODY BEFORE AN INDIVIDUAL IS EVEN
CONCEIVED. "

Thereafter arose the variable that Breedlove said would
explain the statistical result.
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996519

"We have finally solved (gay pop. sustaqinability) this paradox, says
Andrea Camperio-Ciani of the University of Padua. The same factor that
influences sexual orientation in males promotes higher fecundity in
females. "

Hamer then discovered at the N.I.H. the gay gene ONLY PASSES
MATERNALLY.
(Natl. Instit. of Health: Science, 7/16/93 and N.Y. Times, 7/16/93, on
page 1)

NO WONDER psychiatrists considered man-hating mother the prime cause of

male
homosexuality until discovered/apx. 75% of gay men carry Xq28. Women
can get 1 copy of 2, alternately; men, only 1 copy. Hamer's discovery
first covered in "Science," 7/16/93, and "N.Y. Times",7/16/93, on page
1, by Natalie Angier, incl.:"THE LATEST RESULTS INDICATE THAT THE NEWLY

REPORTED GENETIC FACTOR IS PASSED THROUGH THE MATERNAL LINE, A CURIOUS
TWIST GIVEN THAT IN THE PAST PSYCHIATRY HAS HELD WOMEN AT LEAST PARTLY
RESPONSIBLE FOR FOSTERING THEIR SONS' HOMOSEXUALITY."
THE GENE RESPONSIBLE FOR 95% OF GAYS ONLY PASSES MATERNALLY,
AND THE OTHER, RESPONSIBLE FOR ABOUT 5%, ALSO ONLY PASSES
MATERNALLY.

http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6519

The genetic doubt caused by the double X's crossing out generality
(the gay gene is on the "X," or female, chromosome) is largely erased
by the finding some X genes do NOT cancel out (for example, the
BRCA's.)

So, if a son is gay, it's still the case the mother is most probably
gay.

http://rense.com/general9/worse.htmRostler/Mundell "Homosexual Sex

Exploding With US Women-5 Fold
Increase in 10 Years," Journal of Sex Research," 2001 37: 333-343
VERIFIES MENDELIAN 3:1 LESBIAN TO GAY MALE RATIO.

THIS OUTCOME SURVEY SHOWING 3 LESBIANS PER MALE GAY VERIFIES
THE GENETIC PREDICTION:

The religions have naively induced THE PROPAGATION OF GAYS,
PARTICULARLY
LESBIANS, all the while making straight men afraid of being wrongly
ferreted out as gay to increase population.

This is the chief basis of hypocrisy and denial that defines U.S. life
particularly.

It is also the basis for judgementalism and scapegoating. The license
to limit men with fear not only induces paranoia and inadequacy, but
imbues females with god-like privilege, and man-haters with invisible
yet open liberties; for instance: analysis by Jeffrey Zaslow, "Wall
Street Journal," "Girl Power as Boy Bashing: Evaluating the Latest
Twist in the War of the Sexes," 4/21/2005, as to Todd Harris Goldman's
"Boys are Stupid, Throw Rocks at Them."

Captioned picture in the WSJ article shows a mother wearing a t-shirt
reading: "boys are smelly."

In "A Painful Discovery," Carren Strock ("Newsweek" columnist) said
there are very many very late self-aware, or simply self-denying,
lesbians

"20-20," 2000, ABC-News, "marriage counselors have seen a sudden influx

of middle aged married women with children complaining of "lacking
something," "not knowing what it is," and ultimately accepting that
they don't want to go further without accepting that they in fact are
lesbians.

Dear Ms. Stahl: What could possibly be more obvious but that Bar
Mitzvahs (fertility rites--virtually every early culture on Earth had
them) and making straights afraid of being wrongly ferreted out as gay
served to encourage population growth?

Oh, why guys in red cities look constipated:

Paranoid from the fear of being wrongly ferreted out as gay and more
fundamentally paranoia's Greek for all-knowing, the foundation of
Western religion. In psychiatry, one is paranoid where he assumes he is
always right and thus when something goes wrong it's someone else's
fault.

Though we've known since '93 the gay gene only passes maternally, the
W. religions have made straight guys afraid of being wrongly ferreted
out as gay (the inquisition afoul of science is the main purpose of
stigmatizing gays, though that in itself has been a facilitator of most
other major scapegoating events) to increase population. The
concomitant masculine insecurity renders their men clownish
inadequates, crushingly limited.

This enabled ancient despots to rumble. modern ones too apparently
In fact, the gay gene only passes maternally and the concomitant result

of inducing lesbians to marry heterosexually has resulted in the
Mendelian
expectation of producing 3 lesbians per male gay.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Personal%2C_Social_and_Health_Educa...

http://historyoffear.tripod.com#science
Davide - 06 Dec 2006 21:30 GMT
What a bunch of bullshit
Read this if you really want to stop being so superstitious about
pseudoscientific psycho-bubble and understand that sexual identities
are not for real and are not scientifically proven but just cultural
labelling of very relative continuum of complex human personalities and
individual interactions with other beings
Any attempt to classify "sexual identities" in narrow patters and
standards and to find genes for them is just moronic pseudoscientific
religion by people too stupid to deal with real sciences

http://www.amazon.com/VICE-VERSA-Bisexuality-Eroticism-Everyday/dp/0684824124

"The truer oppositions are between bisexuality and monosexuality,
between an eroticism that permits attraction to INDIVIDUALS and one
that permits attraction only to a specific gender"

Please stop spreading psycho-nonsense pseudoscience in a newsgroup that
tries to deal with real science not with ridicolous bible-like book
like the DSM

"there is ample reason to conclude that the latest versions of  DSM  as
a clinical tool are unreliable and therefore of questionable validity
as a classification system" - Dr. Herb Kutchins -
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.