Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / February 2006
Whole-Grains provide a lot more fiber, than fruits & vegetables
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Mr-Natural-Health - 18 Feb 2006 15:57 GMT From: "John Gohde" Date: Wed May 29, 2002 3:17 pm Subject: Eating Whole Grains Lowers Hypertension Risk
http://my.webmd.com/content/article/1817.50963?z=1728_00000_1000_ln_04 "Eating a high-fiber diet may not only keep you regular, but it may also keep your blood pressure in check. A new study shows that encouraging Americans to eat more foods high in dietary fiber may be a cost-effective way to prevent and lower the prevalence of high blood pressure on a national scale. " ... Grains provide about 36% of normal dietary fiber. Therefore, choosing these grains might be a better solution for people trying to meet the guidelines for fiber [intake], says study author Priscilla Samuel, PhD, of the John Stuart Research Laboratories at Quaker Foods and Beverages. ... 'On a density basis, grains do provide much more of an amount of fiber compared to fruits and vegetables," says Samuel. "That is one of the reasons why we really do believe that they need to be emphasized more than they are right now to [help people] meet the fiber guidelines and in order to have an effect on high blood pressure.'" -- John Gohde, Achieving good Nutrition is an Art, NOT a Science!
The nutrition of eating a healthy diet is a biological factor of the mind-body connection. Weighing in at 17 web pages, The Nutrition of a Healthy Diet ( http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/ ) is now with more documentation and sharper terminology than ever before.
TC - 19 Feb 2006 02:50 GMT Fibre is undigestible crap that does nothing for you nutritionally.
just thought you would know that.
TC
> From: "John Gohde" > Date: Wed May 29, 2002 3:17 pm [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Healthy Diet ( http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/ ) is now with > more documentation and sharper terminology than ever before. jt - 19 Feb 2006 04:22 GMT >Fibre is undigestible crap that does nothing for you nutritionally. > >just thought you would know that. > >TC Thanks for your typical unbiased scientific view.
Mr-Natural-Health - 19 Feb 2006 14:15 GMT > Fibre is undigestible [sic] crap that does nothing for you nutritionally. TC 'The Complainer' complains, yet again. :(
Maybe be you need some BRAN in your diet in order to flush out that bug that has been living up your Arse for the last few years?
Only a nutrition fool would write something so foolish as: "Fibre is indigestible crap that does nothing for you nutritionally." BRAN certainly does a lot for you nutritionally..
BRAN provides a big health benefit. If something that provides a major health benefit is not called a nutrient, or is not considered to have improved your nutrition, then science needs to revise their definitions. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/whole-grains.html -- John Gohde, Achieving good Nutrition is an Art, NOT a Science!
The nutrition of eating a healthy diet is a biological factor of the mind-body connection. Now, weighing in at 18 web pages, the Nutrition of a Healthy Diet is with more documentation and sharper terminology than ever before. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/
TC - 19 Feb 2006 20:01 GMT I eat NO bran and very little grain at all and I am as regular as clockwork, healthy as a horse and at my ideal weight without having to work hard at keeping my weight there.
How 'bout you tubby. What is your height and weight? My cholesterol is bang on normal, is yours? My blood presssure is typically a wee bit on the low side, how 'bout you? My fasting BGL is bang on normal, is yours?
I'll compare my health and my diet to yours anyday. I haven't needed a prescription in four or five years..... and you?
TC
> > Fibre is undigestible [sic] crap that does nothing for you nutritionally. > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > sharper terminology than ever before. > http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/ Mr-Natural-Health - 20 Feb 2006 03:41 GMT > I eat NO bran and very little grain at all You have my condolences. :(
http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/whole-grains.html -- John Gohde, Achieving good Nutrition is an Art, NOT a Science!
The nutrition of eating a healthy diet is a biological factor of the mind-body connection. Now, weighing in at 18 web pages, the Nutrition of a Healthy Diet is with more documentation and sharper terminology than ever before. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/
TC - 20 Feb 2006 03:47 GMT Just as I thought you bunged up fat piece of sh.t.
TC
> > I eat NO bran and very little grain at all > > You have my condolences. :( Alf Christophersen - 24 Feb 2006 19:36 GMT >Fibre is undigestible crap that does nothing for you nutritionally. > >just thought you would know that. They bind many nutrients, like betaine and minerals and trace elements.
TC - 24 Feb 2006 19:47 GMT > >Fibre is undigestible crap that does nothing for you nutritionally. > > > >just thought you would know that. > > They bind many nutrients, like betaine and minerals and trace > elements. They displace real nutrient dense foods.
And the more abrasive grains, and some are very abrasive, will cause all kinds of problems with your sensitive GI tract. Some wood turners use grain bran to finish sand the wood on the lathe. They grab a handful and rub it on the spinning wood. That cannot be good to put thru your GI tract.
Is it possible that the scratching and GI tract abuse can cause GI tract sores, infections, cancers?
Remember, bran are tough bits and pieces of the outer protective shell of the grain. They are hard and sharp. Birds have a pouch of sand called the gizzard to grind down seeds and seed bran and cattle have four stomaches to digest the fibre that we can't digest.
Why on earth would we want to eat undigestible and abrasive seed shells which contain no nutrition? To sell grains for the food, grain and farming industries. No other possible reason. Wreck your health to support the farmer. I suggest that the farmer just get used to selling grain as bird and cattle feed.
TC
Alf Christophersen - 25 Feb 2006 01:51 GMT >They displace real nutrient dense foods. yes, and thus shortens the time food stays in intestines and in turn decrease the chances that PUFA do form dangerous oxygenated compounds speeding up cell division, crosslinking DNA and proteins thus inducing mutations that do not get repaired in due time because the same incidences also signals start of cell division, thereamongst DNA duplication, long before the repair enzymes has removed the AA based clastogens formed by oxygen attack of the ring, making isoketals that are extremely reactive towards amino sidechains in proteins, and some other macromolecules beside DNA. .
Enrico C - 25 Feb 2006 19:16 GMT On 24 Feb 2006 11:47:27 -0800, TC wrote in <news:1140810447.526054.41970@t39g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> on sci.med.nutrition :
> use grain bran to finish sand the wood on the lathe. They grab a Do they use cooked/soaked grains?
 Signature Enrico C
* cut the ending "cut-togli.invalid" string when replying by email *
Mr-Natural-Health - 24 Feb 2006 21:58 GMT > >Fibre is undigestible crap that does nothing for you nutritionally. > > > >just thought you would know that. > > They bind many nutrients, like betaine and minerals and trace > elements. Well, good!
There are 24 hours in a day. And, seven days in a week.
There is plenty of time to eat more food. And, the research studies indicate health benefits from eating whole grains. Every test subject was in the same boat regarding the so-called anti-nutrient content of whole-grains. Mother nature obviously knows better than testtube scientists when it comes to the health benefits of food. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/whole-grains.html -- John Gohde, Achieving good Nutrition is an Art, NOT a Science!
The nutrition of eating a healthy diet is a biological factor of the mind-body connection. Now, weighing in at 18 web pages, the Nutrition of a Healthy Diet is with more documentation and sharper terminology than ever before. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/
Ron Peterson - 19 Feb 2006 05:36 GMT > 'On a density basis, grains do provide much more of an amount of fiber > compared to fruits and vegetables," says Samuel. "That is one of the > reasons why we really do believe that they need to be emphasized more > than they are right now to [help people] meet the fiber guidelines and > in order to have an effect on high blood pressure.'" Whole wheat bread supplies 5 g of fiber for a 100 calories serving.
Broccoli supplies 20 g of fiber for a 100 calorie serving.
Some fruits and vegetables supply more fiber per 100 calories than most of the grain products, except for bran cereal.
See: http://www.wehealnewyork.org/healthinfo/dietaryfiber/fibercontentchart.html
 Signature Ron
Mr-Natural-Health - 19 Feb 2006 14:11 GMT > Whole wheat bread supplies 5 g of fiber for a 100 calories serving. > > Broccoli supplies 20 g of fiber for a 100 calorie serving. Perhaps, if you were to focus?
Depends upon whether or not the Broccoli is cooked. Every try eating grains raw? Bet raw ground up wheat has more fiber than raw broccoli.
You can cook Broccoli until it melts into your mouth.
BRAN provides a big health benefit. If something that provides a major health benefit is not called a nutrient, then science needs to revise their definition. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/whole-grains.html -- John Gohde, Achieving good Nutrition is an Art, NOT a Science!
The nutrition of eating a healthy diet is a biological factor of the mind-body connection. Now, weighing in at 18 web pages, the Nutrition of a Healthy Diet is with more documentation and sharper terminology than ever before. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/
st7 - 20 Feb 2006 06:45 GMT > Whole wheat bread supplies 5 g of fiber for a 100 calories serving. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > See: > http://www.wehealnewyork.org/healthinfo/dietaryfiber/fibercontentchart.html Thank you Ron Peterson.
Also see the dramatic near-instant improvement in plasma lipids and colon function from a very high fruit/veg "starch-free" regime compared to a whole-grain starchy regime:
Metabolism. 2001 Apr;50(4):494-503.
Effect of a very-high-fiber vegetable, fruit, and nut diet on serum lipids and colonic function.
Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Popovich DG, Vidgen E, Mehling CC, Vuksan V, Ransom TP, Rao AV, Rosenberg-Zand R, Tariq N, Corey P, Jones PJ, Raeini M, Story JA, Furumoto EJ, Illingworth DR, Pappu AS, Connelly PW.
Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Quebec, Canada.
We tested the effects of feeding a diet very high in fiber from fruit and vegetables. The levels fed were those, which had originally inspired the dietary fiber hypothesis related to colon cancer and heart disease prevention and also may have been eaten early in human evolution. Ten healthy volunteers each took 3 metabolic diets of 2 weeks duration. The diets were: high-vegetable, fruit, and nut (very-high-fiber, 55 g/1,000 kcal); starch-based containing cereals and legumes (early agricultural diet); or low-fat (contemporary therapeutic diet). All diets were intended to be weight-maintaining (mean intake, 2,577 kcal/d). Compared with the starch-based and low-fat diets, the high-fiber vegetable diet resulted in the largest reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (33% +/- 4%, P <.001) and the greatest fecal bile acid output (1.13 +/- 0.30 g/d, P =.002), fecal bulk (906 +/- 130 g/d, P <.001), and fecal short-chain fatty acid outputs (78 +/- 13 mmol/d, P <.001). Nevertheless, due to the increase in fecal bulk, the actual concentrations of fecal bile acids were lowest on the vegetable diet (1.2 mg/g wet weight, P =.002). Maximum lipid reductions occurred within 1 week. Urinary mevalonic acid excretion increased (P =.036) on the high-vegetable diet reflecting large fecal steroid losses. We conclude that very high-vegetable fiber intakes reduce risk factors for cardiovascular disease and possibly colon cancer. Vegetable and fruit fibers therefore warrant further detailed investigation. Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company
Publication Types:
* Clinical Trial * Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 11288049 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
---
Whole grains are fantastic compared to refined grains. But, vegetables and fruits provide more powerful protection on a unit energy basis.
Since most people don't make fruits and nonstarchy vegetables a considerable fraction of their kcals, they miss out on some of the greatest potential benefits.
I have nothing against whole grains, but I feel strongly that fruits and vegetables should be increased significantly in the diet, with a corresponding de-emphasis on whole grains, not only for CHD health and cancer risk reduction, but also for a reason as simple as nutrient density.
Mr-Natural-Health - 20 Feb 2006 11:35 GMT > > Whole wheat bread supplies 5 g of fiber for a 100 calories serving. > > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > colon function from a very high fruit/veg "starch-free" regime compared > to a whole-grain starchy regime: You know, you people are really really really stupid.
Whole-grain products are NOT starchy by definition.
I have at least a half dozen research studies that directly refutes your above hot air bullshit.
All you people do is whine and continue with your sloppy use use of language and lazy ignorant ways.
I have wasted enough of my personal time on you dumb a.s morons.
The FDA has my condolences for having the unenviable job of having to communicate with a bunch of bloody morons. I myself don't have to put up with your crap. :)
Just thought that you might want to know. :)
TC - 20 Feb 2006 14:48 GMT > > > Whole wheat bread supplies 5 g of fiber for a 100 calories serving. > > > [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > Just thought that you might want to know. :) When shown to be an idiot, cut and run. The King of the Trolls is leaving the groups. Yee haaaw.
TC
Mr-Natural-Health - 21 Feb 2006 01:51 GMT > > > > Whole wheat bread supplies 5 g of fiber for a 100 calories serving. > > > > [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > When shown to be an idiot, cut and run. The King of the Trolls is > leaving the groups. Yee haaaw. TC 'The Complainer' while complaining yet again argues over language like the fool that he truly is.
You have my condolences.
You probably wouldn't know what a whole-grain is if one grain managed to bounce off your skull like a falling coconut. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/whole-grains.html -- John Gohde, Achieving good Nutrition is an Art, NOT a Science!
The nutrition of eating a healthy diet is a biological factor of the mind-body connection. Now, weighing in at 18 web pages, the Nutrition of a Healthy Diet is with more documentation and sharper terminology than ever before. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/
Mr-Natural-Health - 25 Feb 2006 11:35 GMT Introducing an encore performance for the benefit of those unable to look up to the top of the thread.
http://my.webmd.com/content/article/1817.50963?z=1728_00000_1000_ln_04 "Eating a high-fiber diet may not only keep you regular, but it may also keep your blood pressure in check. A new study shows that encouraging Americans to eat more foods high in dietary fiber may be a cost-effective way to prevent and lower the prevalence of high blood pressure on a national scale. " ... Grains provide about 36% of normal dietary fiber. Therefore, choosing these grains might be a better solution for people trying to meet the guidelines for fiber [intake], says study author Priscilla Samuel, PhD, of the John Stuart Research Laboratories at Quaker Foods and Beverages. ... 'On a density basis, grains do provide much more of an amount of fiber compared to fruits and vegetables," says Samuel. "That is one of the reasons why we really do believe that they need to be emphasized more than they are right now to [help people] meet the fiber guidelines and in order to have an effect on high blood pressure.'" -- John Gohde, Achieving good Nutrition is an Art, NOT a Science!
The nutrition of eating a healthy diet is a biological factor of the mind-body connection. Weighing in at 17 web pages, The Nutrition of a Healthy Diet ( http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/ ) is now with more documentation and sharper terminology than ever before.
|
|
|