Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Fruit and vegetables cut stroke risk

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TC - 27 Jan 2006 15:45 GMT
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2006-01
-27T000319Z_01_L26704682_RTRIDST_0_HEALTH-STROKE-DC.XML


Fruit and vegetables cut stroke risk: study
Fri Jan 27, 2006 12:04 AM GMT

By Patricia Reaney

LONDON (Reuters) - Eating more than the recommended five portions of
fruit and vegetables a day can further reduce the odds of suffering a
stroke, researchers said on Friday.

An analysis of eight studies that looked into the impact of fruit and
vegetables on stroke showed that the more healthy foods people
consumed, the less likely they were to have a stroke, which is a
leading cause of disability and death.

"For the first time we have shown a quantitative relationship between
fruit and vegetable consumption and stroke," said Professor Graham
MacGregor of St George's medical school at the University of London.

"It has been known that fruit and vegetables seem to reduce stroke but
it wasn't known how much they did it by," he added in an interview.

In the analysis of research involving more than 257,500 people from
Japan, Europe and the United States, the scientists found that people
who ate more than five servings of fruit and vegetables a day had a 26
percent reduction in stroke compared to individuals who consumed less
than three servings daily.

"It is a very important finding because it really shows that the
quantity of fruit and vegetables you should be eating is more than five
a day," MacGregor said.

The average fruit and vegetable consumption a day in most developed
countries is 3-5 servings. A serving of vegetables is 77 grams (2.7
ounces) and 80 grams (2.8 ounces) for fruit, according to MacGregor and
his team.

INCREASED POTASSIUM

Strokes are caused by a blockage in an artery leading to the brain or
bleeding in or around the brain. About 17 million people die each year
of cardiovascular diseases, particularly heart attacks and strokes.
High blood pressure, diabetes, smoking, raised cholesterol, obesity and
lack of exercise are risk factors.

Fruit and vegetables are full of nutrients such as vitamin C, beta
carotene and potassium as well as plant proteins and dietary fiber.

The researchers suspect that potassium is an important factor in
preventing stroke.

"We've know that if you give people addition potassium it lowers blood
pressure," said MacGregor, who reported the research in The Lancet
medical journal.

"By increasing to five servings a day from three you would increase
your potassium intake by about 50 percent," he added.

MacGregor said fruit and vegetables also are less calorie-dense, have
very little fat and contain antioxidants which may also be beneficial.

*********

Now imagine if all of this produce were organic, and grown from the
best and richest soils, with no un-necessary pesticides, fertilizers
and fungicides. The nutritional punch that they carried would be
immensely improved and so damned healthy.

TC
George Cherry - 27 Jan 2006 17:23 GMT
> http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2006-01
-27T000319Z_01_L26704682_RTRIDST_0_HEALTH-STROKE-DC.XML

>
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> MacGregor said fruit and vegetables also are less calorie-dense, have
> very little fat and contain antioxidants which may also be beneficial.

I never see an article about similar benefits from
meat and animal fat consumption. Must be because
fruit and vegetable farmers have deeper pockets
than the meat industry, huh?

GWC
TC - 27 Jan 2006 17:34 GMT
> > http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2006-01
-27T000319Z_01_L26704682_RTRIDST_0_HEALTH-STROKE-DC.XML

> >
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>
> GWC

Hell, I am amazed that this study was done. I don't expect much from
todays nutritional sciences. And note the idiocy of the last statement:

"MacGregor said fruit and vegetables also are less calorie-dense, have
very little fat and contain antioxidants which may also be beneficial."

He completely ignores the fact that produce contains great nutrition
and tries to suggest that it is the absence of fat and calories that is
somehow responsible. What utter nonsense. This hints at the pro-veggie
and anti-meat bias of the researchers and the direction that they want
these findings to go in. Unnecessary and unscientific spin is not
science, it is editorializing.

TC
George Cherry - 27 Jan 2006 17:42 GMT
>> > http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2006-01
-27T000319Z_01_L26704682_RTRIDST_0_HEALTH-STROKE-DC.XML

>> >
[quoted text clipped - 77 lines]
> these findings to go in. Unnecessary and unscientific spin is not
> science, it is editorializing.

Who bribed 'em?
TC - 27 Jan 2006 19:12 GMT
> >> > http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2006-01
-27T000319Z_01_L26704682_RTRIDST_0_HEALTH-STROKE-DC.XML

> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 79 lines]
>
> Who bribed 'em?

Bias and the pursuit of agendas does not always imply bribery, but you
never know, do ya.

TC
Joe the Aroma - 27 Jan 2006 20:04 GMT
>> http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=healthNews&storyID=2006-01
-27T000319Z_01_L26704682_RTRIDST_0_HEALTH-STROKE-DC.XML

>>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>
> GWC

Eh? What about fish oil? What about animal protein (in general)?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.