Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The Basics of Natural Hygiene

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Visual Purple - 25 Aug 2005 22:09 GMT
B"H

Decide for yourselves if this is right for you:

http://www.angelfire.com/ia/sniadach/true2.html

It is the wisest and most balanced approach to health that I have ever
come accross.
outsor@citynet.net - 25 Aug 2005 22:12 GMT
"Decide for yourselves if this is right for you:

http://www.angelfire.com/ia/sniadach/true2.html

It is the wisest and most balanced approach to health that I have ever
come accross."

What approach to making a decision led you to accept this set of notions
as being "right" for you?  Having looked at the above there is almost no
science in it and many unsupported assertions which provide no way to come
to a logical conclusion about the claims.  There is much that is not
factual, such as:

"There is some evidence for the historic inclusion of a very small amount
of
animal products into our diet - maybe 1-2%. But the evidence for the use
of
any animal products is either speculative or inconclusive"

This is completely unsupported and he has no evidence.  If you wish to
know what is known about the history of human diets can be provided, but
in short humans ate and eat anything they can get their hands on in their
enviroment as the basis of their diet.  There is a sub disipline which
examines human fossilized feces to see what the diet was which confirms
the above, in addition to the vast ethnographic diet information collected
from all parts of the world.
Jeff - 25 Aug 2005 22:56 GMT
> B"H
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It is the wisest and most balanced approach to health that I have ever
> come accross.

What a joke. Thanks for the laugh.

Jeff
Jeff - 26 Aug 2005 02:09 GMT
>> B"H
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> What a joke. Thanks for the laugh.

I should add that from the subject, I thought it was about how to use leaves
when you have to go in the woods and stuff. Actually, i wasn't that far off.

Jeff

> Jeff
Cubit - 25 Aug 2005 22:59 GMT
The webpage seems to be an example of paranoid delusion.  The writer has a
vision, and could have written the page with a buzz phrase generator.  He
uses generalities like a typical horoscope uses generalities.

> B"H
>
> Decide for yourselves if this is right for you:
>
> It is the wisest and most balanced approach to health that I have ever
> come accross.
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 25 Aug 2005 23:20 GMT
> B"H
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It is the wisest and most balanced approach to health that I have ever
> come accross.

COMMENT:

This guy needs to go to school.

>>Is all this sickness inevitable? Is this much suffering normal? I dare say not! Observing life within natural surroundings, we notice that all wild animals are born, live healthfully, and then die according to natural patterns and genetic capabilities. Throughout their lives they remain healthy and agile. If they survive into "old age", they will die a natural death wherein all body organ systems more or less cease functioning together.<<

COMMENT:

Indeed. That's a pretty good description of what happens when a
herbivore is eaten (which is what happens to middle-aged herbivores in
nature).  However, carnivores starve to death, and that takes a little
longer.

Just a little study of the biology of populations of mammals in the
wild would show this shaman that wild animals live on average about a
third as long as the same animals in zoos. Unhealthy animals in the
wild don't last long. They are possible to find (especially if young).
But they are relatively rare, again because they don't last long-- they
either get better or die.

Animals in zoos live far, far longer. It's rare to find a cougar in the
wild older than 10, but in zoos they go out past 20. And when animals
in zoos do die in old age, they get the same cancer, arthritis,
pneumonia, etc, that humans and our protected pets do.

>>I believe humans should live out our whole lives being just as agile, healthy and happy. <<

He can believe anything *should* happen that he wants. I believe there
should be a Santa Claus.

SBH
Visual Purple - 26 Aug 2005 00:30 GMT
More and more it becomes apparent that there are people who sit on this
group for the sole purpose of torpedoing that which they see as a
threat to allopathic medicine and the pharmeceutical companies.

The more they naysay, the more you can be sure that Natural Hygiene is
the best and most cost-effective way to get and stay healthy.

To your health.
Visual Purple - 26 Aug 2005 00:37 GMT
Observe, if you will, their negative and irrational emotionality.

Would you want people like this assessing your state of health?  Would
you entrust yourself into their care?

With what will they heal you?  With their sarcasm and sardonic humor?
With their hubris?  With their absolute certainty that all truth
resides with them and all else is folly and nonsense?

They write like out of control fools because that is what they are.
Their opinions are worthless, their "care" could only harm.

No wisdom resides with them.  There is no love in their hearts. They
really do not wish for you to be well.  Their concern is keeping the
illness industry going.

Listen to them and you will hear their hatred in every word.
Robert - 26 Aug 2005 01:13 GMT
> Observe, if you will, their negative and irrational emotionality.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> really do not wish for you to be well.  Their concern is keeping the
> illness industry going.

Natural Hygiene is an industry that deals in illness, an "illness industry"
that can only exist if it invalidates any other illness industry.

> Listen to them and you will hear their hatred in every word.
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 26 Aug 2005 01:17 GMT
> Observe, if you will, their negative and irrational emotionality.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Listen to them and you will hear their hatred in every word.

COMMENT:

Because we told you there was no Tooth Fairy?  That's rather harsh,
don't you think?

SBH
Susan - 26 Aug 2005 02:09 GMT
> Observe, if you will, their negative and irrational emotionality.

I think we have, that's why you're being blown off.

Susan
Mr-Natural-Health - 26 Aug 2005 08:17 GMT
> More and more it becomes apparent that there are people who sit on this
> group for the sole purpose of torpedoing that which they see as a
> threat to allopathic medicine ...

Frankly, I don't think that you have a clue as to what you are talking
about.

Your reference refers to "Nerve energy."  I bet you don't know that
Nerve energy is nothing but historical allopathic medical theory?  Much
of Quacky Natural Hygiene can be traced back a couple of hundred years
to allopathic medical theory, or precisely what you are feebly trying
to knock.

"The system of medicine prevailing in the Colonies in the years
immediately preceding the American Revolution, was that of the Dutch
physician and teacher Hermann Boerhaave (1668-1738). The Boerhaavian
theory of disease explained it in terms of chemical and physical
qualities, such as acidity and alkalinity, or tension and relaxation.
The Boerhaavian system was increasingly being challenged in the second
half of the 18th century by the theories of William Cullen (1710-1790),
a Scottish physician and teacher. Cullen held that an excess or an
insufficiency of nervous tension was the cause of all disease. Too much
tension was often characterized by a fever, to be treated by a
depleting regiment including bleeding, a restricted diet, purging, and
rest and sedation. A cold or chill, on the other hand, indicated too
much relaxation and called for restorative measures."
http://tutorials.naturalhealthperspective.com/allopathy.html

"What is generally not realized is that the American Health Reform
Movement of hygienic systems obviously embraced many of the 18th and
19th century philosophical beliefs of allopathy (ex, health benefits of
fresh air, miasmas, enervation as the cause of all disease, belief that
a complete diagnosis is unnecessary before treatment begins because
there basically is only one disease, and concern with the acidity and
alkalinity of the body) while strongly rejecting most, but not all of
the allopathy's treatment methods ( health benefits of drinking
vinegar, importance of cleansing the digestive tract, and use of enemas
were adopted by the Health Reform Movement, for example). It is, thus,
historical fact that the American Health Reform Movement of hygienic
systems embraced many of the 18th and 19th century philosophical
beliefs of allopathy and, thus, these forms of alternative medicine
started out by embracing the then science of allopathy."
http://tutorials.naturalhealthperspective.com/allopathy.html

You also obviously aware of the fact that a very large number of the
full text of  Natural Hygiene and Nature Cure historical books are
available online for FREE, are you  not?

_Natural Hygiene Man's Pristine Way Of Life_ by HERBERT M. SHELTON
http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020125shelton.pristine/020125toc.htm

_TOXEMIA EXPLAINED _ By J. H. TILDEN, M. D.
http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020103toxemia/02010301.html

_Fasting, Hydropathy and Exercise_ by BERNARR MACFADDEN
http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020137macfasting/macfasting-toc.htm

_Impaired Health: ITS CAUSE AND CURE_ By J. H. TILDEN, M. D.
http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020116tildenpt1/020116toc.html

_APPENDICITIS: THE ETIOLOGY, HYGIENIC AND DIETETIC TREATMENT_ By J. H.
TILDEN, M. D.
http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020104/02010400frame.html

For dozens of more free online books, just follow the hyperlinks.
Mr-Natural-Health - 26 Aug 2005 22:04 GMT
> Decide for yourselves if this is right for you:
> http://www.angelfire.com/ia/sniadach/true2.html

I decided a long time ago that Natural Hygiene and that representative
web page is just total bullshit, just like that _Nature Cures_ book.  I
am not saying that I don't believe in natural cures.  I am saying that
web page, Natural Hygiene, and that _Nature Cures_ book says virtually
nothing about anything.

You can only go so far by attacking allopathy.  At some point, you have
to take a stand on something.  You have to put your name on the line.
And, everything written by Herbert Shelton is so chicken sh.t that he
never made a definitive statement about anything.  The only thing not
worthy about natural hygiene is that they are against drugs.  And,
having ruled out any use of herbal medicines that does not leave
natural hygiene leaving to offer anyone other than a bunch of total hot
air.

Allopathy did not put natural hygiene out of business.  In my opinion,
it was the Civil War which resulted in about 85 different health spas
across the country going out of business.

Just my opinion, but I am right as usual.
Mr-Natural-Health - 26 Aug 2005 22:10 GMT
> Decide for yourselves if this is right for you:
> http://www.angelfire.com/ia/sniadach/true2.html

I decided a long time ago that Natural Hygiene and that representative
web page is just total bullshit, just like that _Nature Cures_ book.  I
am not saying that I don't believe in natural cures.  I am saying that
web page, Natural Hygiene, and that _Nature Cures_ book says virtually
nothing about anything.

You can only go so far by attacking allopathy.  At some point, you have
to take a stand on something.  You have to put your name on the line.
And, everything written by Herbert Shelton is so chicken sh.t that he
never made a definitive statement about anything.  The only thing note
worthy about natural hygiene is that they are against drugs.  And,
having ruled out any use of herbal medicines and vitamins, that does
not leave natural hygiene having much to offer anyone other than a
bunch of total hot air and allopathic quackery.

Allopathy did not put natural hygiene out of business.  In my opinion,
it was the Civil War which resulted in about 85 different health spas
across the country going out of business.

Just my opinion, but I am right as usual.
Mr-Natural-Health - 27 Aug 2005 18:39 GMT
> Decide for yourselves if this is right for you:
> http://www.angelfire.com/ia/sniadach/true2.html

Hello!  Anybody home!

Just like Montygram, Visual Purple does not respond to criticizism.
She has left the building, hopefully for good. :)

It is documented historical fact that the key beliefs of natural
hygiene:
-nerve engery (ie, enervation is the cause of all disease),
-the belief that a complete diagnosis is unnecessary before treatment
begins because there basically is only one disease, and
- concern with the acidity and alkalinity of the body
are nothing but 18th century allopathic medical theory.

And, that natural hygiene's belief in the importance of cleansing the
digestive tract with the use of enemas is in fact heroic medicine.
http://tutorials.naturalhealthperspective.com/allopathy.html

No wonder Visual Purple remainds silent.

Natural health does not suffer from the defects of natural hygiene.
http://naturalhealthperspective.com/tutorials/definition.html
Mr-Natural-Health - 27 Aug 2005 19:14 GMT
> Natural health does not suffer from the defects of natural hygiene.
> http://naturalhealthperspective.com/tutorials/definition.html

By the way: the call for a return to nature belongs to the nature cure
movement, or naturopathy.  The call for a 'return to nature' is in fact
referring to the use of herbal medicine which is in direct opposition
to the use of synthetic medicines by conventional medicine.

Since natural hygiene is fundamentally against the use of herbal
medicines, it does NOT advocate a 'return to nature.'

This is precisely what 'return to nature' means.  Any other sloppy use
of the phrase is precisely that: Sloppy. :)

Neither, does natural health.  As defined by moi, and strongly
suggested by Andrew Weil, MD in his books natural health only advocates
the use of simple natural therapies. There is no requirement for a
return to nature.  Jack LaLanne, for example, advocates that no one
should eat what man makes yet drinks high soybean protein shakes all
the time. There is no real contradiction here because there is no
requirement to do only what is natural. In natural health, one would
use herbal medicines or a return to nature only when one is sick, but
never on a long term basis unless one is treating a chronic health
condition.

Just my opinion, but I am always right.
Mr-Natural-Health - 30 Aug 2005 04:28 GMT
> > Decide for yourselves if this is right for you:
> > http://www.angelfire.com/ia/sniadach/true2.html
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Just like Montygram, Visual Purple does not respond to criticism.
> She has left the building, hopefully for good. :)

Yep, the proof is in.  I whooped Visual Purple's a.s on this THREAD.
She is back posting on other threads, babbling incoherently foaming at
the mouth.

Don't go away mad, Purple. Just go away.

Just my opinion, but I have NEVER been wrong before. :)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.