Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / August 2005
The Basics of Natural Hygiene
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Visual Purple - 25 Aug 2005 22:09 GMT B"H
Decide for yourselves if this is right for you:
http://www.angelfire.com/ia/sniadach/true2.html
It is the wisest and most balanced approach to health that I have ever come accross.
outsor@citynet.net - 25 Aug 2005 22:12 GMT "Decide for yourselves if this is right for you:
http://www.angelfire.com/ia/sniadach/true2.html
It is the wisest and most balanced approach to health that I have ever come accross."
What approach to making a decision led you to accept this set of notions as being "right" for you? Having looked at the above there is almost no science in it and many unsupported assertions which provide no way to come to a logical conclusion about the claims. There is much that is not factual, such as:
"There is some evidence for the historic inclusion of a very small amount of animal products into our diet - maybe 1-2%. But the evidence for the use of any animal products is either speculative or inconclusive"
This is completely unsupported and he has no evidence. If you wish to know what is known about the history of human diets can be provided, but in short humans ate and eat anything they can get their hands on in their enviroment as the basis of their diet. There is a sub disipline which examines human fossilized feces to see what the diet was which confirms the above, in addition to the vast ethnographic diet information collected from all parts of the world.
Jeff - 25 Aug 2005 22:56 GMT > B"H > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > It is the wisest and most balanced approach to health that I have ever > come accross. What a joke. Thanks for the laugh.
Jeff
Jeff - 26 Aug 2005 02:09 GMT >> B"H >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > What a joke. Thanks for the laugh. I should add that from the subject, I thought it was about how to use leaves when you have to go in the woods and stuff. Actually, i wasn't that far off.
Jeff
> Jeff Cubit - 25 Aug 2005 22:59 GMT The webpage seems to be an example of paranoid delusion. The writer has a vision, and could have written the page with a buzz phrase generator. He uses generalities like a typical horoscope uses generalities.
> B"H > > Decide for yourselves if this is right for you: > > It is the wisest and most balanced approach to health that I have ever > come accross. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 25 Aug 2005 23:20 GMT > B"H > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > It is the wisest and most balanced approach to health that I have ever > come accross. COMMENT:
This guy needs to go to school.
>>Is all this sickness inevitable? Is this much suffering normal? I dare say not! Observing life within natural surroundings, we notice that all wild animals are born, live healthfully, and then die according to natural patterns and genetic capabilities. Throughout their lives they remain healthy and agile. If they survive into "old age", they will die a natural death wherein all body organ systems more or less cease functioning together.<< COMMENT:
Indeed. That's a pretty good description of what happens when a herbivore is eaten (which is what happens to middle-aged herbivores in nature). However, carnivores starve to death, and that takes a little longer.
Just a little study of the biology of populations of mammals in the wild would show this shaman that wild animals live on average about a third as long as the same animals in zoos. Unhealthy animals in the wild don't last long. They are possible to find (especially if young). But they are relatively rare, again because they don't last long-- they either get better or die.
Animals in zoos live far, far longer. It's rare to find a cougar in the wild older than 10, but in zoos they go out past 20. And when animals in zoos do die in old age, they get the same cancer, arthritis, pneumonia, etc, that humans and our protected pets do.
>>I believe humans should live out our whole lives being just as agile, healthy and happy. << He can believe anything *should* happen that he wants. I believe there should be a Santa Claus.
SBH
Visual Purple - 26 Aug 2005 00:30 GMT More and more it becomes apparent that there are people who sit on this group for the sole purpose of torpedoing that which they see as a threat to allopathic medicine and the pharmeceutical companies.
The more they naysay, the more you can be sure that Natural Hygiene is the best and most cost-effective way to get and stay healthy.
To your health.
Visual Purple - 26 Aug 2005 00:37 GMT Observe, if you will, their negative and irrational emotionality.
Would you want people like this assessing your state of health? Would you entrust yourself into their care?
With what will they heal you? With their sarcasm and sardonic humor? With their hubris? With their absolute certainty that all truth resides with them and all else is folly and nonsense?
They write like out of control fools because that is what they are. Their opinions are worthless, their "care" could only harm.
No wisdom resides with them. There is no love in their hearts. They really do not wish for you to be well. Their concern is keeping the illness industry going.
Listen to them and you will hear their hatred in every word.
Robert - 26 Aug 2005 01:13 GMT > Observe, if you will, their negative and irrational emotionality. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > really do not wish for you to be well. Their concern is keeping the > illness industry going. Natural Hygiene is an industry that deals in illness, an "illness industry" that can only exist if it invalidates any other illness industry.
> Listen to them and you will hear their hatred in every word. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 26 Aug 2005 01:17 GMT > Observe, if you will, their negative and irrational emotionality. > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Listen to them and you will hear their hatred in every word. COMMENT:
Because we told you there was no Tooth Fairy? That's rather harsh, don't you think?
SBH
Susan - 26 Aug 2005 02:09 GMT > Observe, if you will, their negative and irrational emotionality. I think we have, that's why you're being blown off.
Susan
Mr-Natural-Health - 26 Aug 2005 08:17 GMT > More and more it becomes apparent that there are people who sit on this > group for the sole purpose of torpedoing that which they see as a > threat to allopathic medicine ... Frankly, I don't think that you have a clue as to what you are talking about.
Your reference refers to "Nerve energy." I bet you don't know that Nerve energy is nothing but historical allopathic medical theory? Much of Quacky Natural Hygiene can be traced back a couple of hundred years to allopathic medical theory, or precisely what you are feebly trying to knock.
"The system of medicine prevailing in the Colonies in the years immediately preceding the American Revolution, was that of the Dutch physician and teacher Hermann Boerhaave (1668-1738). The Boerhaavian theory of disease explained it in terms of chemical and physical qualities, such as acidity and alkalinity, or tension and relaxation. The Boerhaavian system was increasingly being challenged in the second half of the 18th century by the theories of William Cullen (1710-1790), a Scottish physician and teacher. Cullen held that an excess or an insufficiency of nervous tension was the cause of all disease. Too much tension was often characterized by a fever, to be treated by a depleting regiment including bleeding, a restricted diet, purging, and rest and sedation. A cold or chill, on the other hand, indicated too much relaxation and called for restorative measures." http://tutorials.naturalhealthperspective.com/allopathy.html
"What is generally not realized is that the American Health Reform Movement of hygienic systems obviously embraced many of the 18th and 19th century philosophical beliefs of allopathy (ex, health benefits of fresh air, miasmas, enervation as the cause of all disease, belief that a complete diagnosis is unnecessary before treatment begins because there basically is only one disease, and concern with the acidity and alkalinity of the body) while strongly rejecting most, but not all of the allopathy's treatment methods ( health benefits of drinking vinegar, importance of cleansing the digestive tract, and use of enemas were adopted by the Health Reform Movement, for example). It is, thus, historical fact that the American Health Reform Movement of hygienic systems embraced many of the 18th and 19th century philosophical beliefs of allopathy and, thus, these forms of alternative medicine started out by embracing the then science of allopathy." http://tutorials.naturalhealthperspective.com/allopathy.html
You also obviously aware of the fact that a very large number of the full text of Natural Hygiene and Nature Cure historical books are available online for FREE, are you not?
_Natural Hygiene Man's Pristine Way Of Life_ by HERBERT M. SHELTON http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020125shelton.pristine/020125toc.htm
_TOXEMIA EXPLAINED _ By J. H. TILDEN, M. D. http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020103toxemia/02010301.html
_Fasting, Hydropathy and Exercise_ by BERNARR MACFADDEN http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020137macfasting/macfasting-toc.htm
_Impaired Health: ITS CAUSE AND CURE_ By J. H. TILDEN, M. D. http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020116tildenpt1/020116toc.html
_APPENDICITIS: THE ETIOLOGY, HYGIENIC AND DIETETIC TREATMENT_ By J. H. TILDEN, M. D. http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020104/02010400frame.html
For dozens of more free online books, just follow the hyperlinks.
Mr-Natural-Health - 26 Aug 2005 22:04 GMT > Decide for yourselves if this is right for you: > http://www.angelfire.com/ia/sniadach/true2.html I decided a long time ago that Natural Hygiene and that representative web page is just total bullshit, just like that _Nature Cures_ book. I am not saying that I don't believe in natural cures. I am saying that web page, Natural Hygiene, and that _Nature Cures_ book says virtually nothing about anything.
You can only go so far by attacking allopathy. At some point, you have to take a stand on something. You have to put your name on the line. And, everything written by Herbert Shelton is so chicken sh.t that he never made a definitive statement about anything. The only thing not worthy about natural hygiene is that they are against drugs. And, having ruled out any use of herbal medicines that does not leave natural hygiene leaving to offer anyone other than a bunch of total hot air.
Allopathy did not put natural hygiene out of business. In my opinion, it was the Civil War which resulted in about 85 different health spas across the country going out of business.
Just my opinion, but I am right as usual.
Mr-Natural-Health - 26 Aug 2005 22:10 GMT > Decide for yourselves if this is right for you: > http://www.angelfire.com/ia/sniadach/true2.html I decided a long time ago that Natural Hygiene and that representative web page is just total bullshit, just like that _Nature Cures_ book. I am not saying that I don't believe in natural cures. I am saying that web page, Natural Hygiene, and that _Nature Cures_ book says virtually nothing about anything.
You can only go so far by attacking allopathy. At some point, you have to take a stand on something. You have to put your name on the line. And, everything written by Herbert Shelton is so chicken sh.t that he never made a definitive statement about anything. The only thing note worthy about natural hygiene is that they are against drugs. And, having ruled out any use of herbal medicines and vitamins, that does not leave natural hygiene having much to offer anyone other than a bunch of total hot air and allopathic quackery.
Allopathy did not put natural hygiene out of business. In my opinion, it was the Civil War which resulted in about 85 different health spas across the country going out of business.
Just my opinion, but I am right as usual.
Mr-Natural-Health - 27 Aug 2005 18:39 GMT > Decide for yourselves if this is right for you: > http://www.angelfire.com/ia/sniadach/true2.html Hello! Anybody home!
Just like Montygram, Visual Purple does not respond to criticizism. She has left the building, hopefully for good. :)
It is documented historical fact that the key beliefs of natural hygiene: -nerve engery (ie, enervation is the cause of all disease), -the belief that a complete diagnosis is unnecessary before treatment begins because there basically is only one disease, and - concern with the acidity and alkalinity of the body are nothing but 18th century allopathic medical theory.
And, that natural hygiene's belief in the importance of cleansing the digestive tract with the use of enemas is in fact heroic medicine. http://tutorials.naturalhealthperspective.com/allopathy.html
No wonder Visual Purple remainds silent.
Natural health does not suffer from the defects of natural hygiene. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/tutorials/definition.html
Mr-Natural-Health - 27 Aug 2005 19:14 GMT > Natural health does not suffer from the defects of natural hygiene. > http://naturalhealthperspective.com/tutorials/definition.html By the way: the call for a return to nature belongs to the nature cure movement, or naturopathy. The call for a 'return to nature' is in fact referring to the use of herbal medicine which is in direct opposition to the use of synthetic medicines by conventional medicine.
Since natural hygiene is fundamentally against the use of herbal medicines, it does NOT advocate a 'return to nature.'
This is precisely what 'return to nature' means. Any other sloppy use of the phrase is precisely that: Sloppy. :)
Neither, does natural health. As defined by moi, and strongly suggested by Andrew Weil, MD in his books natural health only advocates the use of simple natural therapies. There is no requirement for a return to nature. Jack LaLanne, for example, advocates that no one should eat what man makes yet drinks high soybean protein shakes all the time. There is no real contradiction here because there is no requirement to do only what is natural. In natural health, one would use herbal medicines or a return to nature only when one is sick, but never on a long term basis unless one is treating a chronic health condition.
Just my opinion, but I am always right.
Mr-Natural-Health - 30 Aug 2005 04:28 GMT > > Decide for yourselves if this is right for you: > > http://www.angelfire.com/ia/sniadach/true2.html [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Just like Montygram, Visual Purple does not respond to criticism. > She has left the building, hopefully for good. :) Yep, the proof is in. I whooped Visual Purple's a.s on this THREAD. She is back posting on other threads, babbling incoherently foaming at the mouth.
Don't go away mad, Purple. Just go away.
Just my opinion, but I have NEVER been wrong before. :)
|
|
|