Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

diet idea

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
physiocrat - 04 Aug 2005 21:27 GMT
Another message gave me an idea for a diet program. Obtain an
instrument known as a pedometer. It registers foot steps. It will
function as a measure of calories burned. Wear it all the time. It must
be calibrated. Let's arbitrarily assign one step per calorie. If, at
the end of the day, the dieter has taken 1,000 steps, the dieter may
consume 1,000 calories of food energy. Consuming more would lead to
body fat build-up. That's not unreasonable, is it? Eat whatever you
like. Nutrition is another story. This is a strict calorie-counting
diet.
http://www.pedometersusa.com/
Laurie - 15 Aug 2005 04:14 GMT
> ... function as a measure of calories burned.
   Calories cannot be"burned"; what do yo get?  Calorie oxide?

> That's not unreasonable, is it?
   Yes, it is unreasonable to believe the current misinformation about
"calories" flailing about in contemporary nutribabble.
http://www.ecologos.org/ex.htm
http://www.ecologos.org/pcf.htm

   Laurie
TC - 15 Aug 2005 15:16 GMT
> > ... function as a measure of calories burned.
>     Calories cannot be"burned"; what do yo get?  Calorie oxide?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>     Laurie

I agree. The whole calorie thing is bogus. The numbers don't make sense
in the real world. 95% of low-calorie diets fail, which statistically
signifies that low-calorie dieting is a complete failure. People on
low-carb diets can eat up to around 300 calories more than people on
low-fat and still lose more weigth (which is supposed to be contrary to
the laws of energy, according to those who adhere to the calorie
concept). The manufacturers don't report and measure them accurately.
The calorie/food valuations themselves are highly suspect and a number
of fudge-factors had to be applied to calculate them and make them
sorta work. No follow up was done to the original calorie/food
valuation calculations to 1) confirm them or 2) to actually show that
they can be applied to weight management. There does not exist any
original, seminal and/or groundbreaking study or report that actually
made the scientific finding that calories can be applied directly to
predict weight gain or loss based strictly on calories in vs calories
out.

It is all a mirage. The big lie. Smoke and mirrors. Fool's gold.

TC
TC - 15 Aug 2005 17:12 GMT
> > > ... function as a measure of calories burned.
> >     Calories cannot be"burned"; what do yo get?  Calorie oxide?
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> TC

And in case Robert is out there, it is all the fault of the USDA for
foisting the calories valuations on us poor stupid foreigners.

TC
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.