Amyloids, not

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

harikumar@indero.com - 25 Jul 2005 16:20 GMT

The "Amyloids series" is from one who has invented an unsupported scheme
not based in science, self diagnosed based on it and self medicates with
3 commercial products applied to the skin. There is almost no support
for the series but anecdotal subjective self delusion. The diabetes
involved accounts for most of the self reported symptoms and better
control of it for improvements reported.

Reply to this Message

Phil Scott - 25 Jul 2005 20:09 GMT

> The "Amyloids series" is from one who has invented an
> unsupported scheme
> not based in science, self diagnosed based on it and self
> medicates with

Read the links...here is just one. the other posts in the
my amyloid series list many others and the original search
results.
57,000 links to university level research.

.

Amyloidoisis listed as cause of diabetes 2 here, a major
research university...yet other universities and most other
studies are entirely unaware of this very well documented work
and say that 'maybe' getting rid of amyloids could help
diabetes but we have no evidence yet.

as Harvard as reversed diabetes 2 in rats by those means for a
few years now.

Ignorance runs rampant it appears everywhere or maybe with
diabetes and alzheimers, and many other disease reversible by
simple means, it could defund pharma by approx a trillion
dollars a year.

http://www.mad-cow.org/Congo.html#15

> 3 commercial products applied to the skin. There is almost
> no support
> for the series but anecdotal subjective self delusion.

MY results ARE anectdotal...and I DO NOT RECOMMEND anyone
try them because I think it can easily be fatal. Yes all are
commercial , one is by prescription.

The diabetes

> involved accounts for most of the self reported symptoms and
> better
> control of it for improvements reported.

rongggggg.. see the links. And the Harvard research rats.
but yes my personal improvement IS annectodal...

jerk
Reading the posts in this series would have solved yer
problem.

Phil Scott

Reply to this Message

harikumar@indero.com - 25 Jul 2005 23:31 GMT

"> The "Amyloids series" is from one who has invented an

> unsupported scheme
> not based in science, self diagnosed based on it and self
> medicates with

Read the links...here is just one. the other posts in the
my amyloid series list many others and the original search
results.
57,000 links to university level research."

I have been following your "series" for some years now, and it still has
no basis in science. You point to valid research and then self
diagnos in yourself, in a manner not related to the research, all the
while inventing a scheme about how it works in your body that is pure
imagination. All the criteria you have for diagnosis you ihnvented and
all the measures you also invented to show change of something that only
exists in your mind. Real measures of the substance requires tests and
biological examination at the tissue level, not the subjective
gobblygook you list. We AND YOU have no real way to know if you have or
evr had one gram of the substance in your body. Your 'TREATMENT"
CONSISTS OF APPLYING LOTIAN TYPE COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS TO YOUR SKIN,
NOTHING THAT THE REAL RESEARCH SUPPORTS EVEN IN THE LEAST.

Reply to this Message