>>Ordinary milk often lacks the BGH too, but you can't be sure.
BGH doesn't get into milk. What does, is the secondary hormone which
BGF induces, called IGF-1. However, all milk contains IGF-1 (including
normal cow and human milk), and r-BGH treatment of cows increases
normal levels of IGF-1 so little that it's hard to tell the difference,
except statistically (ie, the mean difference is far less than the
normal statistical spread in IGF-1 levels).
Incidentally, the issue is sensitive because although BGH is different
from human GH, the IGF-1's of humans and cows are identical.
SBH
banmilk@hotmail.com - 10 Jul 2005 03:43 GMT
> >>Ordinary milk often lacks the BGH too, but you can't be sure.
> BGH doesn't get into milk. What does, is the secondary hormone which
> BGF induces, called IGF-1. However, all milk contains IGF-1 (including
> normal cow and human milk), and r-BGH treatment of cows increases
> normal levels of IGF-1 so little that it's hard to tell the difference,
Harris, Monsanto's $500,000,000 worth of research put the IGF-1
increase as high as 80%.
NIH accepted this without question.
The Ag-Canada rBST TAsk Force accepted these figures.
Now along comes Harris, to spin the opposite.
> except statistically (ie, the mean difference is far less than the
> normal statistical spread in IGF-1 levels).
> Incidentally, the issue is sensitive because although BGH is different
> from human GH, the IGF-1's of humans and cows are identical.
> SBH