Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mad Cows and Madder Humans

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
banmilk@hotmail.com - 06 Jul 2005 22:01 GMT
From: "Robert Cohen" <notmilk@...>
Date: Thu Jun 30, 2005  10:56 am
Subject: Latest Mad Cow & Mad Human News  notmilk2002
Offline
Send Email

Latest Mad Cow & Mad Human Disease News

In November of 2004, I wrote a series of columns
regarding USDA's Second Mad Cow Disease coverup.
USDA denied, as I provided evidence that they lied.
This last week of June, 2005, USDA has admitted
that they lied. So what else is new? As a result of
USDA's clever brainwashing, Americans no longer
give a damn. At the conclusion of this column,
I'll include my astounding November, 2004 column.
Meanwhile...back at the farm...

When the subject is Mad Cow Disease,
consumers no longer give a damn.

The day after America's second Mad Cow was confirmed,
cattle futures soared 70 cents per pound on strong
trading. Cattlemen now know that meat-eaters don't
really care about Mad Cow Disease.

What's next?

A new test for Mad Cow Disese has been developed by
Vacci-Test Corporation. The new test requires just one
drop of blood from a suspected cow. That assay will
determine whether the suspect animal has a neurological
disorder. The test will cost about $20 per cow, which
should add about two cents to a meat-eater's next burger.

Coming Soon: A test for Mad Human Disease?
____________________________________
My Mad Cow Column of November 20, 2004
____________________________________

USDA Mad Cow Coverup Unravels

I now realize that there may never again be a
confirmed case of Mad Cow Disease during the
George Bush Administration. Oh, the diseased
animals are out there, but in the name of
homeland security, we are being "protected"
in this Orwell-like twenty first century by
rulers who think we need sheltering. We may
never know the true reason that Ann Veneman
resigned her post as USDA's boss the day
after the latest Mad Cow incident began.
Shortly before her (forced?) resignation,
she remarked that her intention was to
serve through a second term. Did she leave
because she was ordered to fudge the Mad Cow
results? I've discovered new evidence that
is quite suggestive of a continuing coverup.
You be the judge, as I reveal disturbing
new information in this column.

The problem with lying, is that many lies
have to be told to cover up the original lie,
so that the liar often forgets to protect
the original lie.

Records show that after USDA concluded that the
pre-Thanksgiving cow was not a Mad Cow, they then
began to test an unprecedented number of other
cows. Had the test come back negative, USDA would
logically have gone back to previous test levels.
Instead, significantly more animals were tested.

During that ten week period prior to the discovery
of America's latest case of Mad Cow Disease, the
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
examined the brains of 60,655 slaughtered creatures.
That's an average of 6,066 per week.

During that one week period of discovery (11/15-11/21),
USDA tested 7,900 cows, an increase of 1,835 over
the previous ten week average. Such a dramatic increase
makes sense, of course, but what followed after
USDA's "safe" conclusion contradicts USDA's lie.

Once USDA fudged the results, I anxiously awaited
the following week's data. Was USDA telling the
truth? If so, it would have been logical to return
to the previous test level of 6,066 tested animals
per week. If USDA officials were more concerned
than they let on, the test numbers would be close
or would exceed the key week's 7,900 level.

Here are the results.

During the Thanksgiving week of November 22-November 28,
how many cows were tested for Mad Cow Disease? Most of
America enjoyed two weekdays days off of work, plus a
weekend. A shortened four day work week had to have
resulted in fewer animals being tested, particularly
after USDA's big lie. So, from 11/22-11/28, just 5,878
animals were tested. If USDA had been telling the truth,
the following week's testing would have reverted to
the running 6,000 average or lower. If USDA had fudged
the test data, the following week's data would
have jumped through the roof. So I waited. And watched.

Here's the surprise. Last week, from 11/29 through
12/3, USDA tested 9,110 animals. See their test history:

<http://www.aphis.usda.gov/lpa/issues/bse_testing/test_results.html >

Tiny URL: <http://tinyurl.com/5f2qu >

The numbers do not lie. They expose USDA's lie.
Over 9,000 cows were tested last week by concerned
USDA regulators. An increase of fifty-five percent!
Had there been no mad cow, the numbers would have
been much lower, not 55% higher. More cows were
tested because the cow was positive for Mad Cow.
USDA lied to America to protect cattlemen.

Only USDA's Department of Enlightenment (Propaganda)
lies. Mad Cow is here, and in order to do damage control,
insiders are in a panic, testing more animals to prevent
the coming plague. Why test more animals? Because USDA
confirmed that the original animal tested positive. Had
it not, USDA most certainly would have returned to routine
testing. They are now in an accelerated testing mode
for good reason. It's here...

Mad Cow Testing Timeline

During that ten week period prior to November 18th, 2004,
USDA tested 60,660 cows for Mad Cow Disease, or an average
of 6,066 per week, or an average of 867 cows per day.
_________________________________________________
November 15, 2004-Oklahoma Cow suspected of Mad Cow Disease
November 16, 2004-USDA Secretary Ann Veneman Resigns
November 17, 2004
November 18, 2004-USDA First announces positive Mad Cow Test
November 19, 2004
November 20, 2004**(X=1129 cows tested each day this week)
November 21, 2004
_________________________________________________
November 22, 2004
November 23, 2004-USDA Announces 7900 Cows Tested 11/15-11/21
November 24, 2004-USDA Announces no Mad Cow Disease
November 25, 2004-Traditional Day Off Before Thanksgiving
November 26, 2004-Thanksgiving Day
November 27, 2004
November 28, 2004**(X=839 cows tested each day this week)
_________________________________________________
November 29, 2004
November 30, 2004-USDA Announces 5878 Cows Tested 11/22-11/28
December 01, 2004
December 02, 2004
December 03, 2004**(X=1301 cows tested each day this week)
December 04, 2004
December 05, 2004
_________________________________________________
December 06, 2004
December 07, 2004-USDA Announces 9110 Cows Tested 11/29-12/5

Had the original cow tested negative, USDA would have
shifted their testing procedures into neutral, or
into a lower gear. Instead, they now have their
accelerator to the floor in the highest gear in
their history. That's because they know the truth,
and it's panic time at USDA. Now that the truth be
known, do not expect future numbers to be true.
They will fudge their future results. This time
atound they were caught with their pants down.
How can you be sure? Do not drink the milk. Do
not eat the meat.

Bottom line: After lying to America, USDA increased
their testing from 839 cows per day to 1301 cows per
day, an increase of 55%! Such an increase reflects
extremely concerned bureaucrats. The numbers do not lie.
The lies come from the dishonest bureaucrats in America's
new elite who think that we need protection from ourselves.

Robert Cohen
http://www.notmilk.com
Phil Scott - 09 Jul 2005 10:04 GMT
> From: "Robert Cohen" <notmilk@...>
> Date: Thu Jun 30, 2005  10:56 am
[quoted text clipped - 105 lines]
> Here's the surprise. Last week, from 11/29 through
> 12/3, USDA tested 9,110 animals. See their test history:

<http://www.aphis.usda.gov/lpa/issues/bse_testing/test_results
.html >

> Tiny URL: <http://tinyurl.com/5f2qu >
>
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
> The lies come from the dishonest bureaucrats in America's
> new elite who think that we need protection from ourselves.

Thank you Robert...  I weaned myself off of milk two years
ago, then yogurt last year, now it looks like beef this year.

Fortunately I am coming to like salads, fruit and fish a lot.

and you are right also about the 'new elite'...here in calif
we retire our police, prison guards, Sherifs and highway
patrol at 90% of last years income...but then many fudge that
by means of there associates taking paid sick time off so they
can earn 130k or so in their last year and retire at age 51
and 10k a month..   the citizens that pay the tax supporting
that average a tenth of that.

Such a mess is not sustainable.

Phil Scott

> Robert Cohen
> http://www.notmilk.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.