Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Why do they keep adding trans fats?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Graeme - 16 Jun 2005 18:07 GMT
Why do companies continue to put hydrogenated (trans) fats into foods?
They must know of the health concerns about trans fats.  If they are
concerned about a fat going rancid, can't they just substitute a
monounsaturated fat like canola oil, or add a little antioxidant?

Since I'm intolerant of milk, what really bugs me is the coffee
creamers like Cremora.  They ALL add hydrogenated fats.  Even the
"lite" ones that say they have no fat--if you read the label have
hydrogenated fat as the second ingredient (not sure how they can get
away with that).
TC - 16 Jun 2005 19:00 GMT
> Why do companies continue to put hydrogenated (trans) fats into foods?
> They must know of the health concerns about trans fats.

Silly question, easy answer:

The money. Profits. Cash flow. Muchas denero. The bottom line.

TC
Jim Chinnis - 16 Jun 2005 19:11 GMT
"John Graeme" <jdgraeme@my-deja.com> wrote in part:

>Why do companies continue to put hydrogenated (trans) fats into foods?
>They must know of the health concerns about trans fats.

Silly question, easy answer:

Because people buy them.
--
Jim Chinnis  Warrenton, Virginia, USA  jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
John Graeme - 16 Jun 2005 20:39 GMT
> "John Graeme" <jdgraeme@my-deja.com> wrote in part:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Silly question, easy answer:
> Because people buy them.

That doesn't really answer the question:
Why do companies continue to put hydrogenated (trans) fats into foods?
They must know of the health concerns about trans fats.  If they are
concerned about a fat going rancid, can't they just substitute a
monounsaturated fat like canola oil, or add a little antioxidant?

It seems it would be just as cheap to use something acceptable and
thereby gain additional customers who do pay attention to such health
concerns.
TC - 16 Jun 2005 21:05 GMT
> > "John Graeme" <jdgraeme@my-deja.com> wrote in part:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> thereby gain additional customers who do pay attention to such health
> concerns.

It is easier and cheaper to use what they have. It is expensive and
difficult to engineer a solution that tastes the same as what they have
now.

And most importantly of all we, the consumer, are not demanding that
they change their product.

And secondly of importance, no one in govt is insisting that they
change.

TC
Jim Chinnis - 16 Jun 2005 21:30 GMT
"TC" <tunderbar@hotmail.com> wrote in part:

>And secondly of importance, no one in govt is insisting that they
>change.

Many governments have banned transfats (partially hydrogenated
oils).
--
Jim Chinnis  Warrenton, Virginia, USA  jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
Jim Chinnis - 16 Jun 2005 21:29 GMT
"John Graeme" <jdgraeme@my-deja.com> wrote in part:

>> "John Graeme" <jdgraeme@my-deja.com> wrote in part:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>thereby gain additional customers who do pay attention to such health
>concerns.

My response was a bit flippant. But it's true that if many people
would not buy products containing trans fats, they would be
reformulated. Canola oil will turn rancid fairly quickly, compared
with the partially hydrogenated oils now used. I believe that many
products already contain various preservatives, but that doesn't
do the job entirely when long shelf life and poor handling and
storage conditions must be catered to.

In the case of coffee creamer, most people who want to reduce
trans fat probably just use a little milk or half-and-half. I
realize you can't do that, but it means that there may not be much
of an increase in sales if manufacturers switch to a non-transfat
simulated cream product: there is already one available.
--
Jim Chinnis  Warrenton, Virginia, USA  jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
Rita - 16 Jun 2005 21:31 GMT
>> "John Graeme" <jdgraeme@my-deja.com> wrote in part:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>thereby gain additional customers who do pay attention to such health
>concerns.

Because they are packaged foods, put together to taste good and
have long shelf life.  If you want foods made without them, shop
at a good health food store and buy products that don't contain
them.  There are plenty of them out there.  Read labels and you
will see for yourself.  Or better yet, prepare your own food.
Jeff - 16 Jun 2005 23:28 GMT
> Why do companies continue to put hydrogenated (trans) fats into foods?

Because they improve the consistancy and taste of foods.

> They must know of the health concerns about trans fats.

Consumers have the ability to read the ingredients on the package and read
about transfats. With this information, they can make an informed decision
about whether or not to buy products with transfats.

>  If they are
> concerned about a fat going rancid, can't they just substitute a
> monounsaturated fat like canola oil, or add a little antioxidant?

Money.

> Since I'm intolerant of milk, what really bugs me is the coffee
> creamers like Cremora.  They ALL add hydrogenated fats.  Even the
> "lite" ones that say they have no fat--if you read the label have
> hydrogenated fat as the second ingredient (not sure how they can get
> away with that).

Because  people buy their product.

Jeff
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.