Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / July 2005
whole grain wheat
|
|
Thread rating:  |
TC - 07 Jun 2005 20:19 GMT http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/cgi-bin/list_nut_edit.pl
Wheat flour, whole-grain New Search NDB No: 20080 Nutrient Units Value per 100 grams of edible portion Number of Data Points Std. Error Proximates Water g 10.27 15 0.453 Energy kcal 339 0 0 Energy kj 1418 0 0 Protein g 13.70 16 0.456 Total lipid (fat) g 1.87 10 0.04 Ash g 1.60 14 0.053 Carbohydrate, by difference g 72.57 0 0 Fiber, total dietary g 12.2 0 0 Sugars, total g 0.41 3 0.03 Minerals Calcium, Ca mg 34 8 2.484 Iron, Fe mg 3.88 8 0.059 Magnesium, Mg mg 138 6 1.898 Phosphorus, P mg 346 6 3.784 Potassium, K mg 405 7 16.273 Sodium, Na mg 5 7 1.583 Zinc, Zn mg 2.93 11 0.185 Copper, Cu mg 0.382 11 0.024 Manganese, Mn mg 3.799 10 0.309 Selenium, Se mcg 70.7 3 8.175 Vitamins Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid mg 0.0 0 0 Thiamin mg 0.447 20 0.018 Riboflavin mg 0.215 20 0.013 Niacin mg 6.365 8 0.263 Pantothenic acid mg 1.008 2 0 Vitamin B-6 mg 0.341 3 0.019 Folate, total mcg 44 7 4.194 Folic acid mcg 0 0 0 Folate, food mcg 44 7 4.194 Folate, DFE mcg_DFE 44 0 0 Vitamin B-12 mcg 0.00 0 0 Vitamin A, IU IU 9 0 0 Vitamin A, RAE mcg_RAE 0 0 0 Retinol mcg 0 0 0 Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) mg 0.82 1 0 Vitamin K (phylloquinone) mcg 1.9 2 0 Lipids Fatty acids, total saturated g 0.322 0 0 4:0 g 0.000 0 0 6:0 g 0.000 0 0 8:0 g 0.018 0 0 10:0 g 0.000 0 0 12:0 g 0.000 0 0 14:0 g 0.003 0 0 16:0 g 0.271 0 0 18:0 g 0.015 0 0 Fatty acids, total monounsaturated g 0.232 0 0 16:1 undifferentiated g 0.013 0 0 18:1 undifferentiated g 0.219 0 0 20:1 g 0.000 0 0 22:1 undifferentiated g 0.000 0 0 Fatty acids, total polyunsaturated g 0.779 0 0 18:2 undifferentiated g 0.738 0 0 18:3 undifferentiated g 0.038 0 0 18:4 g 0.000 0 0 20:4 undifferentiated g 0.002 0 0 20:5 n-3 g 0.000 0 0 22:5 n-3 g 0.000 0 0 22:6 n-3 g 0.000 0 0 Cholesterol mg 0 0 0 Amino acids Tryptophan g 0.212 12 0 Threonine g 0.395 25 0 Isoleucine g 0.508 25 0 Leucine g 0.926 25 0 Lysine g 0.378 26 0 Methionine g 0.212 26 0 Cystine g 0.317 20 0 Phenylalanine g 0.646 25 0 Tyrosine g 0.400 24 0 Valine g 0.618 25 0 Arginine g 0.642 26 0 Histidine g 0.317 26 0 Alanine g 0.487 24 0 Aspartic acid g 0.703 25 0 Glutamic acid g 4.325 24 0 Glycine g 0.552 23 0 Proline g 1.422 23 0 Serine g 0.646 23 0 Other Alcohol, ethyl g 0.0 0 0 Caffeine mg 0 0 0 Theobromine mg 0 0 0 Carotene, beta mcg 5 1 0 Carotene, alpha mcg 0 0 0 Cryptoxanthin, beta mcg 0 0 0 Lycopene mcg 0 0 0 Lutein + zeaxanthin mcg 220 1 0
----
The above may be hard to read but whole grain wheat contains:
zero vitamin C zero Vitamin A, RAE zero Retinol zero Vitamin B-12
a whopping 72.57 grams of carbohydrate per 100 grams
For the so-called "staff of life" it is missing some very important nutrients. And this is whole grain wheat, refined white flour is virtually bereft of any nutrienst useful to humans.
TC
TC - 07 Jun 2005 20:25 GMT > http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/cgi-bin/list_nut_edit.pl > [quoted text clipped - 113 lines] > > TC Here is the nutritional content (bwahh haaa haaaaaa) of mac and cheese:
HODGSON MILL, Whole Wheat Macaroni and Cheese Dinner, dry mix New Search NDB No: 22701 Nutrient Units Value per 100 grams of edible portion Number of Data Points Std. Error 1.00 X 1 package ------- 206g Proximates Water g 8.50 1 0 17.51 Energy kcal 376 0 0 775 Energy kj 1571 0 0 3236 Protein g 14.10 1 0 29.05 Total lipid (fat) g 4.70 1 0 9.68 Ash g 3.50 1 0 7.21 Carbohydrate, by difference g 69.20 0 0 142.55 Fiber, total dietary g 7.6 1 0 15.7 Minerals Calcium, Ca mg 114 1 0 235 Iron, Fe mg 2.62 1 0 5.40 Sodium, Na mg 611 1 0 1259 Vitamins Lipids Fatty acids, total saturated g 1.370 1 0 2.822 Cholesterol mg 8 1 0 16
---
This is from
http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/
I know it is hard to read but basically there is no nutrition in mac and cheese.
TC
Enrico C - 07 Jun 2005 21:04 GMT On 7 Jun 2005 12:19:07 -0700, TC wrote in <news:1118171947.060684.16350@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> on sci.med.nutrition :
> The above may be hard to read but whole grain wheat contains: > > zero vitamin C > zero Vitamin A, RAE > zero Retinol > zero Vitamin B-12 Who would look for those vitamins in any grains?
 Signature Enrico C
TC - 07 Jun 2005 21:26 GMT > On 7 Jun 2005 12:19:07 -0700, TC wrote in > <news:1118171947.060684.16350@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> on [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > -- > Enrico C Exactly, you wouldn't. If you are looking for foods that are full of nutrition, wheat ain't it, regardless of what the USDA's food pyramid says about wheat and grains.
TC
Enrico C - 07 Jun 2005 23:52 GMT On 7 Jun 2005 13:26:28 -0700, TC wrote in <news:1118175988.621149.283700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on sci.med.nutrition :
>> On 7 Jun 2005 12:19:07 -0700, TC wrote in >> <news:1118171947.060684.16350@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> on [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > TC Let's see...
http://www.mypyramid.gov/pyramid/grains_why.html
"Why is it important to eat grains, especially whole grains?"
Eating grains, especially whole grains, provides health benefits. People who eat whole grains as part of a healthy diet have a reduced risk of some chronic diseases. Grains provide many nutrients that are vital for the health and maintenance of our bodies.
Health benefits
* Consuming foods rich in fiber, such as whole grains, as part of a healthy diet, reduces the risk of coronary heart disease. * Consuming foods rich in fiber, such as whole grains, as part of a healthy diet, may reduce constipation. * Eating at least 3 ounce equivalents a day of whole grains may help with weight management. * Eating grains fortified with folate before and during pregnancy helps prevent neural tube defects during fetal development. * Click here for more information about preventing cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, and cancer.
Nutrients
Food sources of the nutrients in bold can be found in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Click on the nutrient name to link to the food sources table.
* Grains are important sources of many nutrients, including dietary fiber, several B vitamins (thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and folate), and minerals (iron, magnesium, and selenium). * Dietary fiber from whole grains, as part of an overall healthy diet, helps reduce blood cholesterol levels and may lower risk of heart disease. Fiber is important for proper bowel function. It helps reduce constipation and diverticulosis. Fiber-containing foods such as whole grains help provide a feeling of fullness with fewer calories. Whole grains are good sources of dietary fiber; most refined (processed) grains contain little fiber. * B vitamins (thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and folate)play a key role in metabolism - they help the body release energy from protein, fat, and carbohydrates. B vitamins are also essential for a healthy nervous system. Many refined grains are enriched with these B vitamins. * Folate (folic acid), another B vitamin, helps the body form red blood cells. Women of childbearing age who may become pregnant and those in the first trimester of pregnancy should consume adequate folate, including folic acid from fortified foods or supplements. This reduces the risk of neural tube defects, spina bifida, and anencephaly during fetal development. * Iron is used to carry oxygen in the blood. Many teenage girls and women in their childbearing years have iron-deficiency anemia. They should eat foods high in heme-iron (meats) or eat other iron containing foods along with foods rich in vitamin C, which can improve absorption of non-heme iron. Whole and enriched refined grain products are major sources of non-heme iron in American diets. * Whole grains are sources of magnesium and selenium. Magnesium is a mineral used in building bones and releasing energy from muscles. Selenium protects cells from oxidation. It is also important for a healthy immune system.
===
Pizza Girl - 08 Jun 2005 00:06 GMT Oh that's why as our bread consumption goes up the chance of a heart attack or a stroke does too.
> On 7 Jun 2005 13:26:28 -0700, TC wrote in > <news:1118175988.621149.283700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > > === Enrico C - 08 Jun 2005 00:22 GMT On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:08:17 -0400, Pizza Girl wrote in <news:1118185461.f68bfb465ef7d9e268929877b64967ef@teranews> on sci.med.nutrition :
> Oh that's why as our bread consumption goes up the chance of a heart attack > or a stroke does too. 1970-2000: total daily calories +24.5% (+530 calories)
 Signature Enrico C
TC - 08 Jun 2005 15:20 GMT > On 7 Jun 2005 13:26:28 -0700, TC wrote in > <news:1118175988.621149.283700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > chronic diseases. Grains provide many nutrients that are vital for the > health and maintenance of our bodies. Talk about twisting the truth. Eating whole grains only provides "health benefits" when compared to people who eat refined grain and refined sugar crap. Grains provide some small amounts of these vital nutrients. And refined grains are virtually bereft of these nutrients except for the few cheap ones the add for "enrichment".
> Health benefits > > * Consuming foods rich in fiber, such as whole grains, as part of a > healthy diet, reduces the risk of coronary heart disease. What is wrong, then, with consuming a better quality fibre from a better quality food, like fruits and vegetables. Grain fibre is harsh and abrasive to the GI tract. There is plenty of available high fibre food without needing grain fibre.
> * Consuming foods rich in fiber, such as whole grains, as part of a > healthy diet, may reduce constipation. see above. And grains causes all kinds of problems with the GI tract such as IBS, Crohn's, etc.
> * Eating at least 3 ounce equivalents a day of whole grains may help > with weight management. And not eating any grains will not have any deleterious effect on health or on weight.
> * Eating grains fortified with folate before and during pregnancy helps > prevent neural tube defects during fetal development. And eating other foods with naturally occurring folate and/or folic acid will be better. It is always better to get the real thing from real food rather than the artificially added folate.
> * Click here for more information about preventing cardiovascular > disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, and cancer. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > fiber, several B vitamins (thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and folate), and > minerals (iron, magnesium, and selenium). They are relatively poor sources of these nutrients to begin with. Then they lose the vitamins in storage and handling and the berries are not soaked to enable us to absorb these vitamins properly. And grains contain phyto-toxins that are not neutralized properly before we consume them.
> * Dietary fiber from whole grains, as part of an overall healthy diet, > helps reduce blood cholesterol levels and may lower risk of heart disease. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > sources of dietary fiber; most refined (processed) grains contain little > fiber. Better fibre is available from veggies and fruit.
> * B vitamins (thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and folate)play a key role > in metabolism - they help the body release energy from protein, fat, and > carbohydrates. B vitamins are also essential for a healthy nervous system. > Many refined grains are enriched with these B vitamins.
> * Folate (folic acid), another B vitamin, helps the body form red blood > cells. Women of childbearing age who may become pregnant and those in the [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > === Grains are a poor food for human consumption. They are fine to some degree for cattle and birds. But, for human consumption, they are ridiculously lacking in nutrition. The more grains in the diet the worse our health will be.
TC
Pizza Girl - 08 Jun 2005 22:12 GMT shhhhhhh. The minions still consume grains. They don't know better This leaves the good sh.t for us.
General Mills and Admirable Veggie
> > On 7 Jun 2005 13:26:28 -0700, TC wrote in > > <news:1118175988.621149.283700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on [quoted text clipped - 127 lines] > > TC TC - 08 Jun 2005 22:11 GMT > shhhhhhh. The minions still consume grains. They don't know better This > leaves the good sh.t for us. > > General Mills and Admirable Veggie That is actually a very good point.
TC
Pizza Girl - 08 Jun 2005 22:36 GMT It just goes against my grain! hmmm... wouldn't that be a good thing then?
> > shhhhhhh. The minions still consume grains. They don't know better This > > leaves the good sh.t for us. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > TC Enrico C - 08 Jun 2005 23:13 GMT On 8 Jun 2005 07:20:27 -0700, TC wrote in <news:1118240427.571839.105160@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on sci.med.nutrition :
>> On 7 Jun 2005 13:26:28 -0700, TC wrote in >> <news:1118175988.621149.283700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > "health benefits" when compared to people who eat refined grain and > refined sugar crap. I don't know whether those benefits apply "only compared to...".
Anyway, most people in the world *do* eat grains and sugars, so whole grains would provide benefits to all them, at least.
> Grains provide some small amounts of these vital > nutrients. And refined grains are virtually bereft of these nutrients > except for the few cheap ones the add for "enrichment". That's a reason for eating *whole* grains.
>> Health benefits >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > abrasive to the GI tract. There is plenty of available high fibre > food without needing grain fibre. Nothing wrong with fruits and vegetables, at all! I believe people should eat more fruits and vegetables (and less grains and sugars) than they usually do.
>> * Consuming foods rich in fiber, such as whole grains, as part of a >> healthy diet, may reduce constipation. > > see above. And grains causes all kinds of problems with the GI tract > such as IBS, Crohn's, etc. Well, if grains cause you problems, just don't eat them. The same could be said about milk or meat or beans... Some people have problems with them, many others don't.
>> * Eating at least 3 ounce equivalents a day of whole grains may help >> with weight management. > > And not eating any grains will not have any deleterious effect on > health or on weight. Actually I don't think there is a single food a human being cannot live without, as long as they balances their diet with other foods.
If I were forced to choose only a few foods and give up the rest, I think I would keep fruits and vegetables, milk, fish and olive oil. Fortunately, I am not forced to choose! :)
>> * Eating grains fortified with folate before and during pregnancy helps >> prevent neural tube defects during fetal development. > > And eating other foods with naturally occurring folate and/or folic > acid will be better. It is always better to get the real thing from > real food rather than the artificially added folate. I don't know much about folate, but I strongly agree with you on the point, generally speaking: better to get the real thing from real food, if you can.
>> * Click here for more information about preventing cardiovascular >> disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, and cancer. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > They are relatively poor sources of these nutrients to begin with. Hmmm... it seems to me that bran is a good source of niacin and magnesium, and germ of thiamin, for example; and grains of fiber in general; and so on...
> Then > they lose the vitamins in storage and handling and the berries are not > soaked to enable us to absorb these vitamins properly. Would you expand on that? :)
> And grains > contain phyto-toxins that are not neutralized properly before we > consume them. Aren't they, through leavening and cooking?
>> * Dietary fiber from whole grains, as part of an overall healthy diet, >> helps reduce blood cholesterol levels and may lower risk of heart disease. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Better fibre is available from veggies and fruit. Well, I don't know which fiber is better, but I don't think one has to choose one or the other, if one can have both. Generally speaking, the more foods to choose from, the better!
>> * B vitamins (thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and folate)play a key role >> in metabolism - they help the body release energy from protein, fat, and [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > ridiculously lacking in nutrition. The more grains in the diet the > worse our health will be. "The more grains" you mean overindulgence? In that case I would agree. On the other hand, the same could be said for meat or cheese or virtually anything: too much is too much. If you mean that any quantity of grains is harmful, instead, I strongly doubt that. Eat everything, don't eat too much of anything! :)
 Signature Enrico C
455 - 16 Jun 2005 05:36 GMT > Eating grains, especially whole grains, provides health benefits. People > who eat whole grains as part of a healthy diet have a reduced risk of some > chronic diseases. Grains provide many nutrients that are vital for the > health and maintenance of our bodies. They forgot to mention the benefits to the farmers and lobbyists.
TC - 16 Jun 2005 19:03 GMT > > Eating grains, especially whole grains, provides health benefits. People > > who eat whole grains as part of a healthy diet have a reduced risk of some > > chronic diseases. Grains provide many nutrients that are vital for the > > health and maintenance of our bodies. > > They forgot to mention the benefits to the farmers and lobbyists. And benefits to Archer Daniels Midland, Monsanto, Kellogg, Kraft, etc.
TC
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 09 Jun 2005 04:29 GMT >>For the so-called "staff of life" it is missing some very important nutrients. And this is whole grain wheat, refined white flour is virtually bereft of any nutrienst useful to humans. <<
COMMENT:
As is white rice and white rice flour. This does not prevent the Japanese from having the world's best life expectancies, as they mix all that white rice with a bunch of other stuff, whenever they eat it.
Why this same principle should not work as well with white wheat flour is not obvious. Probably it does, as you point out for the Mediterraneans. I think the overall epidemiology suggests that it hardly matters what carbohydrate you use, so long as you consume it adequate with protein and fat. And that your overal diet has enough vitamins (which can be from other sources entirely), minerals, and adequate w-3 and w-6 EFAs.
SBH
TC - 09 Jun 2005 14:54 GMT > >>For the so-called "staff of life" it is missing some very important > nutrients. And this is whole grain wheat, refined white flour is [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > SBH The difference is the sheer amount of refined carbs. It is also the amount of fat in the diet.
The mediterraneans and the japanese do not eat huge amounts of sugars. They eat moderate amounts of pasta and/or rice. They eat a lot of fresh whole-food foods with minimal processing. They eat entirely adequate amounts of healthy fats (fish fats, olive oil, etc). The live closer to the soil with little extra food processing other than just cooking the fresh foods. These foods are filling and full of real nutrition.
As opposed to the western diet with lots of sugar (super sized sodas, high fructose corn syrup added to everything), plenty of pasta (mac and cheese, huge plates of pasta) and/or rice and/or starchy tubers (french fries with every second meal) and less healthy fats (margarine,shortening). And a lot of what they eat is highly processed. This food is appetite-stimulating and empty of real nutrition.
It is those darned food paradoxes at work again. Western people eat lots of carbs and less fat and end up gaining weight and getting sicker which is the exact opposite of what is supposed to happen, according to the experts. While the mediterraneans and japanese eat less overall carbs and better carbs and more healthy fat and they are less obese and much healthier.
TC
Enrico C - 09 Jun 2005 15:22 GMT On 9 Jun 2005 06:54:34 -0700, TC wrote in <news:1118325274.002815.202180@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on sci.med.nutrition :
> As opposed to the western diet with lots of sugar (super sized sodas, On a web site that you suggested, it reads, in fact...
"According to the National Soft Drink Association (NSDA), consumption of soft drinks is now over 600 12-ounce servings (12 oz.) per person per year. Since 1978, soda consumption in the US has tripled for boys and doubled for girls. Young males age 12-29 are the biggest consumers at over 160 gallons per year—that’s almost 2 quarts per day. At these levels, the calories from soft drinks contribute as much as 10 percent of the total daily caloric intake for a growing boy." http://www.westonaprice.org/modernfood/soft.html
But just give us Europeans some time, and we'll catch up! :-(
"Up to 25 percent of children in many European countries are considered obese, a percentage that is reaching toward the U.S. figure of 33 percent." http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04088/292685.stm
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 09 Jun 2005 18:54 GMT >>The mediterraneans and the japanese do not eat huge amounts of sugars. They eat moderate amounts of pasta and/or rice. They eat a lot of fresh
whole-food foods with minimal processing. They eat entirely adequate amounts of healthy fats (fish fats, olive oil, etc). The live closer to
the soil with little extra food processing other than just cooking the fresh foods. These foods are filling and full of real nutrition. <<
COMMENT
I don't know where the hell you get these ideas, but it's not from being in the Mediterranean.
The sweetest breakfast I ever had was as a houseguest on the island of Majorca IN the Mediterranean, where my hosts ate a collection of the lightest, thinnest pastries you ever saw, for breakfast. With juice. Nor were they the oily sweet pastries of the Greeks. There were just plain honey glaze and flour, so far as I could tell. This was not tourist stuff, but what they ate every day. Other meals did indeed include a lot of seafood (little fried octupi and lots of shrimp) but as for "processing," I have no idea what you mean. Food that is cut up and cooked and fried with spices and other stuff is "processed."
On the continent, the breakfasts tend to center about pastry (that's why this is called a "continental breakfast" don't you know). The idea that continental pastry is somehow a lot different than what you get in the US, is bullshit.
The lowest carb breakfasts I've ever had while traveling came in England and Scotland, where the standard fare at bed and breakfasts is bacon, eggs, butter, clotted cream, and maybe fruit or shortbread. Served by widows of men who'd probably been killed by similar breakfasts. This is heart disease country. There's no particular "food paradox" when it comes to the first meal of the day, unless you think high glucose load meals cause vascular disease. Then there is.
SBH
Enrico C - 09 Jun 2005 20:26 GMT On 9 Jun 2005 10:54:22 -0700, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com wrote in <news:1118339662.685574.55460@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on sci.med.nutrition :
> Nor were they the oily sweet pastries of the Greeks. There were just > plain honey glaze and flour, so far as I could tell. This was not <...>
I think the more you go South (in the Mediterrean region), the more people like sweet pastries (and spicy foods, btw)!
Sicilian pastries are sweet. And North African pastries (that I buy in cous-cous restaurants) are pretty sweet too.
http://cp.settlement.org/english/algeria/eating.html "Algerians enjoy a variety of pastries. They include kalb-el-louz (semolina with almond paste and rose water), makroud (made with figs or dates), chacab (crescent-shaped almond-filled pastries), samsa (pastry filled with sweets), griouche (honey-filled pastry) and tamina (roasted semolina with butter and honey)."
 Signature Enrico C
TC - 09 Jun 2005 20:36 GMT > >>The mediterraneans and the japanese do not eat huge amounts of sugars. > They eat moderate amounts of pasta and/or rice. They eat a lot of fresh [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > plain honey glaze and flour, so far as I could tell. This was not > tourist stuff, but what they ate every day. You mean they ate that when they had you for a guest. You have no idea if that was a typical breakfast.
Other meals did indeed
> include a lot of seafood (little fried octupi and lots of shrimp) but > as for "processing," I have no idea what you mean. Food that is cut up > and cooked and fried with spices and other stuff is "processed." By processed I mean in a can, in a box or in any way changed from its original whole-food form before you even buy it.
By fresh I mean a food that is recognizable in the form it was grown, whether produce or animal at the time it was bought.
> On the continent, the breakfasts tend to center about pastry (that's > why this is called a "continental breakfast" don't you know). The idea > that continental pastry is somehow a lot different than what you get in > the US, is bullshit. Again, cheap tourist crap "continental" breakfasts. There is a difference between foods aimed at tourist demand and food eaten by a typical european.
I've had pastries and goodies from the continent and they were not nearly as sweet as typical american stuff. That is not to say that sweet european pastries don't exist. What I am saying is that generally speaking european goodies are not nearly as sweet as american goodies.
> The lowest carb breakfasts I've ever had while traveling came in > England and Scotland, where the standard fare at bed and breakfasts is [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > SBH High glucose meals causes vascular disease. By direct damage from high blood glucose levels, and the chronic depletion of vitamins, specifically the B vitamins and vitamin c, which are essential to vascular health.
Fresh healthy fats from healthy animals are not the cause of heart disease. And elevated blood cholesterol levels or excess cholesterol in the diet are irrelevant to vascular disease.
Heart disease country is in India among the vegetarian Hindus who have triple the incidence of heart disease of their meat eating neighbors, the Indian Muslim. This is referred to as the Indian Paradox.
TC
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 10 Jun 2005 03:16 GMT >>High glucose meals causes vascular disease. By direct damage from high blood glucose levels, and the chronic depletion of vitamins, specifically the B vitamins and vitamin c, which are essential to vascular health. <<
COMMENT
I suppose that would explain the many animal models of atherosclerosis caused by giving the animals high blood sugars chronically (aka diabetic or streptozotocin treated rats). Not.
It DOESN'T work. You can give rats or rabbits or dogs or monkeys atherosclerosis by modifying their dietary fat and cholesterol. If there's any model where this has been done to these animals by screwing around with their dietary glucose loads and dietary carbs, please enlighten us. Yes, elevated blood sugars surely contribute to the human problem in frank diabetics. But most human vascular disease doesn't occur in frank diabetics. It does however, occur to humans with LDL > 100, and heart disease is rare in cultures where LDL is low.
>>Heart disease country is in India among the vegetarian Hindus who have triple the incidence of heart disease of their meat eating neighbors, the Indian Muslim. This is referred to as the Indian Paradox. << COMMENT:
There's no paradox about it. You know about that favorite Hindu food clarified butter, called ghee? Full of saturated fat, transfat, oxidized cholesterol. I can't think of a food better designed to give you atherosclerosis, and it has NOTHING to do with carbohydrates. Nada.
If these Hindus were vegan, now THAT would be a paradox. Ghee is no paradox. Ghee will kill you.
SBH
TC - 10 Jun 2005 04:36 GMT > >>High glucose meals causes vascular disease. By direct damage from high > blood glucose levels, and the chronic depletion of vitamins, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > caused by giving the animals high blood sugars chronically (aka > diabetic or streptozotocin treated rats). Not. You mean the studies that fed animal source fats to normally vegetarian animals? Pretty sad science, if you ask me.
> It DOESN'T work. You can give rats or rabbits or dogs or monkeys > atherosclerosis by modifying their dietary fat and cholesterol. If [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > doesn't occur in frank diabetics. It does however, occur to humans with > LDL > 100, and heart disease is rare in cultures where LDL is low. We are not talking about rats ir rabbits or dogs or monkeys, we are talking about humans.
> >>Heart disease country is in India among the vegetarian Hindus who have triple the incidence of heart disease of their meat eating neighbors, the Indian Muslim. This is referred to as the Indian Paradox. << > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > oxidized cholesterol. I can't think of a food better designed to give > you atherosclerosis, and it has NOTHING to do with carbohydrates. Nada. That's is just plain ridiculous.
> If these Hindus were vegan, now THAT would be a paradox. Ghee is no > paradox. Ghee will kill you. > > SBH Garbage.
TC
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 11 Jun 2005 00:08 GMT > I suppose that would explain the many animal models of atherosclerosis > caused by giving the animals high blood sugars chronically (aka > diabetic or streptozotocin treated rats). Not.
>>You mean the studies that fed animal source fats to normally vegetarian animals? Pretty sad science, if you ask me. <<
Rats are not "normally vegetarian". They are omnivores. And atherosclerosis has been induced in dogs, which are carnivores and normally very resistant to it,by feeding them hydrgenated coconut oil and cholesterol. Feeding a little safflower oil along with this, prevents the problem.
>>We are not talking about rats ir rabbits or dogs or monkeys, we are talking about humans. <<
In whom the mechanisms for production of atherosclerosis are hardly likely to be much different. Yes, meat eating animals are more resistant to production of atherosclerosis. But humans are (apparently) not good carnivores. At least, we don't do well on a high aggricultural meat or dairy fat diet.
> There's no paradox about it. You know about that favorite Hindu food > clarified butter, called ghee? Full of saturated fat, transfat, > oxidized cholesterol. I can't think of a food better designed to give > you atherosclerosis, and it has NOTHING to do with carbohydrates. Nada.
>>That's is just plain ridiculous. Why? Because you don't want to believe it?
Int J Cardiol. 1996 Oct 25;56(3):289-98; discussion 299-300.
Association of trans fatty acids (vegetable ghee) and clarified butter (Indian ghee) intake with higher risk of coronary artery disease in rural and urban populations with low fat consumption.
Singh RB, Niaz MA, Ghosh S, Beegom R, Rastogi V, Sharma JP, Dube GK.
Heart Research Laboratory, Medical Hospital and Research Centre, Moradabad, India.
These cross-sectional surveys included 1769 rural (894 men and 875 women) and 1806 urban (904 men and 902 women) randomly selected subjects between 25-64 years of age from Moradabad in North India. The total prevalence of coronary artery disease based on clinical history and electrocardiogram was significantly higher in urban compared to rural men (11.0 vs. 3.9%) and women (6.9 vs. 2.6%), respectively. Food consumption patterns showed that important differences in relation to coronary artery disease were higher intake of total visible fat, milk and milk products, meat, eggs, sugar and jaggery in urban compared to rural subjects. Prevalence of coronary artery disease in relation to visible fat intake showed a higher prevalence rate with higher visible fat intake in both sexes and the trend was significant for total prevalence rates both for rural and urban men and women. Subgroup analysis among urban (694 men and 694 women) and rural (442 men and 435 women) subjects consuming moderate to high fat diets showed that subjects eating trans fatty acids plus clarified butter or those consuming clarified butter as total visible fat had a significantly higher prevalence of coronary artery disease compared to those consuming clarified butter plus vegetable oils in both rural (9.8, 7.1 vs. 3.0%) and urban (16.2, 13.5 vs. 11.0%) men as well as in rural (9.2, 4.5 vs. 1.5%) and urban (10.7, 8.8 vs. 6.4%) women. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis with adjustment for age showed that sedentariness in women, body mass index in urban men and women, milk and clarified butter plus trans fatty acids in both rural and urban in both sexes were significantly associated with coronary artery disease. It is possible that lower intake of total visible fat (20 g/day), decreased intake of milk, increased physical activity and cessation of smoking may benefit some populations in the prevention of coronary artery disease.
PMID: 8910075 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
George Cherry - 11 Jun 2005 02:19 GMT >> I suppose that would explain the many animal models of atherosclerosis >> caused by giving the animals high blood sugars chronically (aka [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > not good carnivores. At least, we don't do well on a high aggricultural > meat or dairy fat diet. Yes, our progenitors likely gathered more than they hunted. Plant food doesn't run away, and paleolithic man didn't have very long-range hunting weapons. Evolutionary histories do count.
>> There's no paradox about it. You know about that favorite Hindu food >> clarified butter, called ghee? Full of saturated fat, transfat, [quoted text clipped - 70 lines] > > PMID: 8910075 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Emma Chase VanCott - 12 Jun 2005 23:05 GMT : > I suppose that would explain the many animal models of atherosclerosis : > caused by giving the animals high blood sugars chronically (aka : > diabetic or streptozotocin treated rats). Not.
: >>You mean the studies that fed animal source fats to normally vegetarian : animals? Pretty sad science, if you ask me. <<
: Rats are not "normally vegetarian". They are omnivores. And They shun white flour.
Interesting.
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 13 Jun 2005 17:22 GMT >>I suppose that would explain the many animal models of atherosclerosis : > caused by giving the animals high blood sugars chronically (aka : > diabetic or streptozotocin treated rats). Not. : >>You mean the studies that fed animal source fats to normally vegetarian : animals? Pretty sad science, if you ask me. << : Rats are not "normally vegetarian". They are omnivores. And
>>They shun white flour.<< That is an urban legend created by people who've never had mice in their flour.
SBH
calypso47@voyager.net - 12 Jun 2005 00:13 GMT "Heart disease country is in India among the vegetarian Hindus who have triple the incidence of heart disease of their meat eating neighbors, the Indian Muslim. This is referred to as the Indian Paradox."
Web source please.
TC - 14 Jun 2005 14:54 GMT > "Heart disease country is in India among the vegetarian Hindus who have > triple the incidence of heart disease of their meat eating neighbors, > the Indian Muslim. This is referred to as the Indian Paradox." > > Web source please. http://www.indianewengland.com/media/paper549/news/2004/05/01/Medicine/Study.Sou th.Asians.At.Higher.Risk.Of.Heart.Disease-673859.shtml
---
"Asian Indians have the highest rates of heart attacks, with those settled in the United States having a 400 percent higher incidence than white Americans, and a 600 percent higher hospitalization than Chinese-Americans, despite the fact that almost half of them are lifelong vegetarians.
---
Unique Indian paradox
The higher rates of heart attacks in Indians worldwide are accompanied by paradoxically low rates of conventional risk factors: hypertension, obesity, cigarette smoking and cholesterol levels.
The common tool employed to assess heart attack risk is the lipid profile. Indians usually have acceptable lipid profiles as recommended by the American Heart Association.
----
Indians differ from other ethnic groups in the following ways:
* Higher prevalence of abdominal obesity, glucose intolerance, insulin resistance and diabetes.
* Higher prevalence of emerging clot-promoting risk factors.
* Higher prevalence of cardiodysmetabolic syndrome (consisting of abdominal obesity, high tryiglycerides, low HDL, glucose intolerance, hyperinsulinemia and hypertension).
********************
http://www.time.com/time/asia/covers/501040510/story2.html
"So vulnerable is the subcontinent to cardiovascular ailments that the World Health Organization (who) estimates that 60% of the world's cardiac patients will be Indian by 2010. "Of all Asians, South Asians have by far the worst problems" when it comes to heart disease, says Dr. Timothy Gill, an Asia-Pacific specialist with the International Obesity Task Force, a medical NGO that coordinates with the who on obesity issues."
---
"Equally troubling, it is not just the elderly who are being hit by cardiovascular disease. In India, nearly 50% of CVD-related deaths occur below the age of 70, compared with just 22% in the West."
----
One of the world's foremost epidemiologists of cardiovascular disease, Yusuf once championed the idea that ethnicity was a significant determinant of heart disease, but his recent research has convinced him otherwise. "By and large, the differences in heart-disease rates are because of different lifestyles," he says. "About 80% of the risk can be accounted for by known risk factors like smoking or obesity or blood pressure and the way we live and eat, which leaves very little room for genetic risk factors." Even the common idea that family history is a decisive risk factor, Yusuf says, overlooks the fact that families tend to have similar lifestyles and are exposed to the same environment.
*******
http://www.tlca.com/adults/heart.html
Asian Indians at highest risk of heart disease in world
BY JULIE SEVRENS LYONS AND ANU MANCHIKANTI
(KRT) - Mr. Rao always chalked up his high cholesterol and blood pressure to bad luck, figuring a family history of heart troubles set him up for coronary artery disease. The 48-year-old never suspected his ethnicity could be to blame.
But now researchers have determined that those of Indian and Pakistani descent have the highest rates of heart disease in the world, despite coming from a culture that shuns smoking, encourages a vegetarian diet and lacks many of the other classic risk factors for the disease.
About 25 percent of all heart attacks among men of Indian descent occur while they are younger than 40, unheard of in any other population, according to researchers. Death rates from the disease are up to three times higher among Indians than those of European or East-Asian origin.
Such findings, borne out most recently by a new report, surprise many Indo-Americans - and just as many doctors. Research carried out in the United Kingdom years ago began to suggest a genetic link, but there has not been a push for early screening in the Indo-American community here, and relatively few education campaigns.
"Most physicians trained in the U.S. are not aware their Asian-Indian patients are at risk," said Dr. Susan Ivey, an assistant researcher at the University of California-Berkeley Center for Family and Community Health, which spearheaded the new study.
And this lack of awareness, researchers worry, may be deadly.
"Just being of Asian-Indian descent places you at higher risk for heart disease than having high cholesterol and being a smoker," said Dr. H. Robert Superko, director of research at the Berkeley HeartLab.
Superko launched a separate study, the National Asian Indian Heart Disease Program, several years ago and discovered one gene is responsible for part of the increased risk in heart disease rates. A metabolic disorder common in Indians likely also plays a role, as does having high levels of a dangerous type of cholesterol. Lifestyle, such as diet and lack of exercise, is also to blame.
The problem is coming into sharpest focus in places such as California's Bay Area, where Indians are the fastest growing of all Asian groups. But there are 1.6 million Indians sprinkled all over the United States who are also at risk. Because the population is scattered, researchers say it is difficult to study the problem fully or raise awareness among doctors and within communities.
The elevated risk of heart disease often catches many Indians off guard. Generally, their overall cholesterol levels have been normal. High blood pressure isn't prevalent in the community. Smoking rates are low. And about half are vegetarians.
Knowing that doing many of the right things to prevent the disease still might not be enough, "It does make you afraid," said Mr. Rao, a Yuba City sandwich shop owner who immigrated from India nearly three decades ago. His father has been battling heart problems for years.
"A lot of people, they just feel they look healthy, they feel healthy," and so they don't get tested for heart disease, Mr. Rao said. "By the time some of them find out they have it, they're either in an ambulance or a hospital bed."
As lifestyles change in India, heart disease is hitting epidemic proportions there - and also among Indo-Americans - with more than 10 percent of urban Indians now suffering from the disease. Over the past three decades, coronary artery disease rates have declined by half in many developed countries, but have more than doubled in India, according to the Coronary Artery Disease among Asian Indians Research Foundation. Rates are significantly higher in urban regions of India than in rural ones.
This helps dispel the theory that a Western lifestyle is entirely to blame for the problem among immigrants, some scientists believe. Dining on greasy fast food and adopting a couch-potato lifestyle can certainly make the situation worse, they said. But other factors clearly are at play.
"Genetics load the gun. Environment pulls the trigger," said Dr. Enas A. Enas, director of the research foundation.
That is all the more reason why Indo-Americans need to be aggressive about preventing heart disease. Parents should be sure to start their children on health diets and exercise programs when they're as young as age 2, Enas said.
"If you have a loaded gun and you don't pull the trigger, no harm is done."
Viren Venkat, 66, knows first-hand the importance of a healthy lifestyle. The Sunnyvale resident experienced his first heart attack when he was only 44. His oldest brother, Surendra, had one at 48. Another brother, Narendra, had one at 47.
They were all busy business executives, and none of them got much exercise, he conceded, but they were still surprised to suffer heart problems at such an early age.
At the time of Venkat's first attack, he lived in Bombay and worked as a record executive in India. His staff included a gardener, a chauffeur and a cook. Venkat didn't even have to carry his briefcase to his car in the morning.
Like many Indians and Indo-Americans, he ate heavier food cooked in ghee, or clarified butter. Doctors recommend that foods be cooked in olive oil instead.
Enas is convinced that high heart disease rates are partially attributable to what he calls an "influence of affluence," which could help explain the higher rates in urban India versus rural regions. Research into this theory is still ongoing, but Enas points to the highly automated lifestyle that is enjoyed in urban areas.
"Indians are Silicon Valley high-tech execs. What do they do? They do not exercise. How do they go to work? By car," Enas said.
The Berkeley researchers believe that the children and grandchildren of Indian immigrants could be at the highest risk for heart problems, given their lifestyle as children is much more inactive than their parents' tended be. The scientists, who looked at more than 300 Indo-Americans living in Yuba City and Alameda and Contra Costa counties, anticipate the phenomena won't be visible, however, for a few more years.
"We haven't hit the big wave of second- and third-generation" Indo-Americans, Ivey said. "Indians are more at risk when they're put in a Western environment."
*************
The Indian Paradox: a supposed heart-healthy vegetarian diet and they have the highest heart diseases rate in the world.
The mainstream medical response: blame it on every thing else except the diet, call it a paradox, and start prescribing pills and surgery and start making some serious money.
TC
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 14 Jun 2005 18:05 GMT TC, do you even read the stuff you post?
>>The higher rates of heart attacks in Indians worldwide are accompanied by paradoxically low rates of conventional risk factors: hypertension, obesity, cigarette smoking and cholesterol levels. <<
>>Indians differ from other ethnic groups in the following ways: * Higher prevalence of abdominal obesity, glucose intolerance, insulin resistance and diabetes. * Higher prevalence of emerging clot-promoting risk factors. * Higher prevalence of cardiodysmetabolic syndrome (consisting of abdominal obesity, high tryiglycerides, low HDL, glucose intolerance, hyperinsulinemia and hypertension). <<
COMMENT: Please note that these quotes largely contradict each other. Diabetes is a well-known cardiovascular risk factor, and so is abdominal obesity, high triglycerides, low HDL and hypertension.
Further on:
>>One of the world's foremost epidemiologists of cardiovascular disease, Yusuf once championed the idea that ethnicity was a significant determinant of heart disease, but his recent research has convinced him
otherwise. "By and large, the differences in heart-disease rates are because of different lifestyles," he says. "About 80% of the risk can be accounted for by known risk factors like smoking or obesity or blood
pressure and the way we live and eat, which leaves very little room for
genetic risk factors." <<
COMMENT:
Well, if "About 80% of the risk can be accounted for by known risk factors like smoking or obesity or blood pressure and the way we live and eat," then that leaves just 20% for the big "paradox." Not very impressive. So which is it?
Even the quoted storylet has problems:
>>At the time of Venkat's first attack, he lived in Bombay and worked as a record executive in India. His staff included a gardener, a chauffeur and a cook. Venkat didn't even have to carry his briefcase to his car in the morning. Like many Indians and Indo-Americans, he ate heavier food cooked in ghee, or clarified butter. Doctors recommend that foods be cooked in olive oil instead.<<
COMMENT:
The guy never exercised and lived on clarified butter. Then had a heart attack. Amazing! SUCH a paradox.
>>The Indian Paradox: a supposed heart-healthy vegetarian diet and they have the highest heart diseases rate in the world. <<
COMMENT:
It's NOT a supposed heart-healthy vegetarian diet if it's full of clarified butter.
Back in the bad old days of the Joslin high fat treatment for diabetes, they used to treat diabetics with an Atkins-like diet which had things like a breakfast of 10 pats of butter, and a little bit of toast. "Carbohydrates made for sugar and sugar was bad," was the mantra. The Joslin diet controlled diabetes, all right. But it wasn't long before somebody found that these diabetics weren't dying of diabetes any more on this diet. They were dying of heart attacks. This was half a century ago. It's not news.
SBH
TC - 14 Jun 2005 19:11 GMT > TC, do you even read the stuff you post? > [quoted text clipped - 69 lines] > > SBH If you had read what I posted you would have noted the incredible variety of views on what is supposed to cause heart disease and what doesn't and the wide variety of "paradoxes" seen in the real world. With everyone speculating about the possible causes of the increased incidences of heart disease, it seem no-one is even questioning the diet, ie. vegetarianism.
They ascribe the problem to genetics, and if that doesn't explain it they ascribe it to sedentariness, and if that doesn't fit they ascribe it to the ghee, and if that doesn't fit then they ascribe it to cholesterol etc etc and if it still doesn't fit they call it a paradox and prescribe the cholesterol reducing drugs and the blood thinning drugs and more and more drugs, nd if that doesn't work the operate and bypass their arteries. No one gets healthy except for the doctors wallets.
You keep talking about the evils of ghee, but the Masai that ate a primarily dairy based diet had no such high incidence of heart disease. There is no credible science to link heart disease to butter oe any animal fat, I challenge you to show some credible science to back that up.
The point I am making is that a primarily vegetarian group has very high incidences of heart disease and when they become "westernized" and they continue eating vegetarian they get even worse. Is it the fat causing the jump or is it the greater access to more refined carbs in their vegetarian diet?
Heart disease is more of a nutrient deficiency condition then it is a condition caused by too much of a certain nutrient. The B vitamins and vitamin C and collagen in the diet has more impact on the health of the cardio-pulmonary system than any suggested excess of any fat.
The fact is that a vegetarian whole-food diet(as in India) will not provide good enough nutrition for proper cardio health. Switch some of the carbs to refined westernized carbs and their cardio health will get even worse. That is the pattern.
Vegetarians have weak and damaged arteries due to their poor diets and the lack of the right nutrients that are primarily gotten from animal sources, and the first arteries to go will be the ones that move the most and get the most physical stress, and those are the heart arteries.
When the artery walls become compromised the improperly fed body tries to repair the damage with fatty deposits which become plaque. It is caused by a nutritional deficiency not by some as-yet-unproven and unknown effect of fat in the system.
TC
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 15 Jun 2005 02:18 GMT >>You keep talking about the evils of ghee, but the Masai that ate a primarily dairy based diet had no such high incidence of heart disease.
There is no credible science to link heart disease to butter oe any animal fat, I challenge you to show some credible science to back that up. <<
COMMENT: See below on the backup. There's a huge literature linking animal fat (non fish) intake to heart disease. What, you couldn't find anything of heart disease and animal fat intake on medline? Go on. But the problem is less the animal fat than what it replaces. Vegetarians, particularly males, really do have less coronary disease.
As for the Masai, it's a complex issue, but the bottom line is that it's not the total fat in the diet that makes the big difference, but rather the ratio of n-3 fat to total fat. High saturated fat diets are only harmful when that fat replaces plant and seafood sources of n-3, as apparently happens in urban India (where n-3 levels are low because the people subsist on calories other than fresh produce, eat little seafood, and get their calories as carbs and butter). The Masai diet has a lot of milk products, but in a rural pastoral people on the grasslands of Africa, it may well have enough n-3 from plants to make up for it. Not so in urban Indian smokers, and that's the difference.
1: Circulation. 2005 Jan 18;111(2):157-64. Epub 2005 Jan 3.
Interplay between different polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of coronary heart disease in men.
Mozaffarian D, Ascherio A, Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Siscovick DS, Rimm EB.
Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, USA. dmozaffa@hsph.harvard.edu
BACKGROUND: Consumption of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may reduce coronary heart disease (CHD) risk, but n-6 PUFAs may compete with n-3 PUFA metabolism and attenuate benefits. Additionally, seafood-based, long-chain n-3 PUFAs may modify the effects of plant-based, intermediate-chain n-3 PUFAs. However, the interactions of these PUFAs in relation to CHD risk are not well established. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 45,722 men free of known cardiovascular disease in 1986, usual dietary intake was assessed at baseline and every 4 years by using validated food-frequency questionnaires. CHD incidence was prospectively ascertained. Over 14 years of follow-up, participants experienced 218 sudden deaths, 1521 nonfatal myocardial infarctions (MIs), and 2306 total CHD events (combined sudden death, other CHD deaths, and nonfatal MI). In multivariate-adjusted analyses, both long-chain and intermediate-chain n-3 PUFA intakes were associated with lower CHD risk, without modification by n-6 PUFA intake. For example, men with > or = median long-chain n-3 PUFA intake (> or =250 mg/d) had a reduced risk of sudden death whether n-6 PUFA intake was below (<11.2 g/d; hazard ratio [HR]=0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.34 to 0.79) or above (> or =11.2 g/d; HR=0.60; 95% CI=0.39 to 0.93) the median compared with men with a < median intake of both. In similar analyses, > or = median intake of intermediate-chain n-3 PUFAs (> or =1080 mg/d) was associated with a reduced total CHD risk whether n-6 PUFA intake was lower (HR=0.88; 95% CI=0.78 to 0.99) or higher (HR=0.89; 95% CI=0.79 to 0.99) compared with a < median intake of both. Intermediate-chain n-3 PUFAs were particularly associated with CHD risk when long-chain n-3 PUFA intake was very low (<100 mg/d); among these men, each 1 g/d of intermediate-chain n-3 PUFA intake was associated with an approximately 50% lower risk of nonfatal MI (HR=0.42; 95% CI=0.23 to 0.75) and total CHD (HR=0.53; 95% CI=0.34 to 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: n-3 PUFAs from both seafood and plant sources may reduce CHD risk, with little apparent influence from background n-6 PUFA intake. Plant-based n-3 PUFAs may particularly reduce CHD risk when seafood-based n-3 PUFA intake is low, which has implications for populations with low consumption or availability of fatty fish.
PMID: 15630029 [PubMed - in process]
2: Nutrition. 2004 Nov-Dec;20(11-12):967-73.
Omega-3 fatty acids and selenium as coronary heart disease risk modifying factors in Asian Indian and Chinese males.
Manav M, Su J, Hughes K, Lee HP, Ong CN.
Department of Community, Occupational, and Family Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
OBJECTIVE: Asian Indian men are reported to have a higher incidence of coronary heart disease than men of other ethnic groups worldwide. Among the many hypotheses, one possible risk factor may be related to their dietary habits. This study estimated the plasma concentrations of fatty acids, antioxidant vitamins, and selenium in Indians and Chinese of Singapore. METHODS: The study population consisted of 145 Indian men and 147 Chinese men ages 26 to 79 y from a cross-sectional survey, the National University of Singapore Heart Study. RESULTS: Our findings indicated that Indians had lower plasma concentrations of docosahexanoic acid (3.07% versus 3.54%, P < 0.001), alpha-linolenic acid (0.48% versus 0.57%, P < 0.001), and total omega-3 fatty acids (4.71% versus 5.27%, P < 0.001) than did the Chinese. Arachidonic acid was higher in Indians (4.83%) than in the Chinese (4.51%, P = 0.007). The ratio of omega-3 acid to omega-6 fatty acid was also lower in Indians (0.15) than in the Chinese (0.16, P = 0.007). There were no significant differences in the concentrations of monounsaturated fatty acids, but saturated fatty acids were higher in Indians (39.17%) than in the Chinese (38.28%, P < 0.001). Analysis of vitamins A, C, and E showed no significant differences between Indians (0.67, 5.72, and 13.04 mg/L, respectively) and Chinese (0.68, 6.48, and 12.71 mg/L, respectively); however, serum concentration of selenium in Indians (117.49 microg/L) was significantly lower than in the Chinese (126.72 microg/L, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that lower plasma concentrations of omega-3 fatty acids and selenium and higher concentrations of arachidonic acid and saturated fatty acids in Indians may reflect lower intakes of marine foods and, as a consequence, higher susceptibility to coronary heart disease.
PMID: 15561485 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2004 Jun;14(3):162-9.
Alpha-linolenic acid and coronary heart disease.
de Lorgeril M, Salen P.
Laboratoire Nutrition, Vieillissement et Maladies Cardiovasculaires (NVMCV), UFR de Medecine et Pharmacie, Universite Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France. michel.delorgeril@ujf-grenoble.fr
AIM: To summarize our present knowledge about vegetable omega-3 fatty acids. DATA SYNTHESIS: Alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) is one of the two essential fatty acids in humans. Epidemiological studies and dietary trials strongly suggest that this fatty acid is important in relation with the pathogenesis (and prevention) of coronary heart disease. Like other n-3 fatty acids from marine origin, it may prevent cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The optimal dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid seems to be about 2 g per day or 0.6 to 1% of total energy intake. Obtaining an optimal ratio of the two essential fatty acids, linoleic and alpha-linolenic acids--ie a ratio of less than 4 to 1 in the diet--is a major issue. The main sources of alpha-linolenic acid for the European population should be canola oil (and canola-oil based margarine if available), nuts (English walnut), ground linseeds and green leafy vegetables such as purslane. CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiological studies and dietary trials in humans suggest that alpha-linolenic acid is a major cardio-protective nutrient.
Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial
PMID: 15330276 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4: Annu Rev Nutr. 2004;24:597-615.
Dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acid balance and cardiovascular health.
Wijendran V, Hayes KC.
Foster Biomedical Research Lab, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254, USA. vwijen@brandeis.edu
Epidemiological and clinical studies have established that the n-6 fatty acid, linoleic acid (LA), and the n-3 fatty acids, linolenic acid (LNA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) collectively protect against coronary heart disease (CHD). LA is the major dietary fatty acid regulating low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-C metabolism by downregulating LDL-C production and enhancing its clearance. Further, the available mass of LA is a critical factor determining the hyperlipemic effects of other dietary fat components, such as saturated and trans fatty acids, as well as cholesterol. By contrast, n-3 fatty acids, especially EPA and DHA, are potent antiarryhthmic agents. EPA and DHA also improve vascular endothelial function and help lower blood pressure, platelet sensitivity, and the serum triglyceride level. The distinct functions of these two families make the balance between dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acids an important consideration influencing cardiovascular health. Based on published literature describing practical dietary intakes, we suggest that consumption of ~6% en LA, 0.75% en LNA, and 0.25% en EPA + DHA represents adequate and achievable intakes for most healthy adults. This corresponds to an n-6/n-3 ratio of ~6:1. However, the absolute mass of essential fatty acids consumed, rather than their n-6/n-3 ratio, should be the first consideration when contemplating lifelong dietary habits affecting cardiovascular benefit from their intake.
Publication Types: Review
PMID: 15189133 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5: Int J Cardiol. 2004 May;95(1):35-8.
To what extent are the effects of diet on coronary heart disease lipid-mediated?
Serrano-Martinez M, Martinez-Losa E, Prado-Santamaria M, Brugarolas-Brufau C, Fernandez-Jarne E, Martinez-Gonzalez MA.
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Irunlarrea s/n, Facultad de Medicina, University of Navarre, 31080 Pamplona, Spain. mserranm@nacom.es
BACKGROUND: Cohort and case-control studies support the effect of diet on coronary heart disease. The objective of this study was to analyze the strength of the influence of dietary fat subtypes and other nutrients on serum lipids levels in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: We studied 139 patients with a first myocardial infarction and no previous history of vascular disease. Serum lipids were determined, and nutrient intake was analyzed using a validated 118-food item questionnaire. RESULTS: Multiple regression models found weak but significant associations between the intake of different fatty acids and total to HDL cholesterol ratio (atherogenic index) when we adjusted for age, gender and body mass index (BMI). Positive associations with serum HDL cholesterol concentration were observed for energy-adjusted intake of red wine, alcohol intake, and omega-3 fatty acids intake. However, these nutrients explained less than 12% of the variability in the atherogenic index, and less than 17% in the variability of HDL. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest only a modest contribution of the investigated nutrients on serum lipids (atherogenic index and HDL cholesterol) in coronary patients. Alternative mechanisms of dietary factors not directly related with serum lipids or, more likely, a global effect of diet on inflammatory and antioxidant parameters should be studied in order to better understand the nature of dietary habits' influence on cardiovascular disease.
PMID: 15159035 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
>>Heart disease is more of a nutrient deficiency condition then it is a condition caused by too much of a certain nutrient. The B vitamins and vitamin C and collagen in the diet has more impact on the health of the
cardio-pulmonary system than any suggested excess of any fat. <<
Citations, please?
>>The fact is that a vegetarian whole-food diet(as in India) will not provide good enough nutrition for proper cardio health. Switch some of the carbs to refined westernized carbs and their cardio health will get
even worse. That is the pattern. <<
Agreed. But only because you're not giving them what they need, which is n-3 PUFAs. For this you need fish or fresh produce, the very things that all heart protective diets have in abundance.
>>Vegetarians have weak and damaged arteries due to their poor diets and the lack of the right nutrients that are primarily gotten from animal sources, and the first arteries to go will be the ones that move the most and get the most physical stress, and those are the heart arteries. <<
COMMENT:
The last part of your comment is no doubt correct. Atherosclerosis hits flexed arteries first, and that is why, after the heart, it hits the carotids where the head turns, and the leg arteries near the joints.
The rest of what you say is nonsense. There is NO evidence that vegetarians have weak arteries, or more coronary disease. The opposite is generally true. Probably this is because most vegetarians get some fresh produce, at least. In the few places where they don't, they are in the same fix as the dogs who were fed hydrogenated coconut oil. Without at least some n-3, even a carnivore's arteries go bad. Game meat is ordinarily a good n-3 source. Dairy cows aren't. There you are.
1: J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.
Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a critical review.
Hu FB, Manson JE, Willett WC.
Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Frank.hu@channing.harvard.edu
During the past several decades, reduction in fat intake has been the main focus of national dietary recommendations to decrease risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Several lines of evidence. however, have indicated that types of fat have a more important role in determining risk of CHD than total amount of fat in the diet. Metabolic studies have long established that the type of fat, but not total amount of fat, predicts serum cholesterol levels. In addition, results from epidemiologic studies and controlled clinical trials have indicated that replacing saturated fat with unsaturated fat is more effective in lowering risk of CHD than simply reducing total fat consumption. Moreover, prospective cohort studies and secondary prevention trials have provided strong evidence that an increasing intake of n-3 fatty acids from fish or plant sources substantially lowers risk of cardiovascular mortality. In this article, we review evidence from epidemiologic studies and dietary intervention trials addressing the relationship between dietary fat intake and risk of CHD, with a particular emphasis on different major types of fat, n-3 fatty acids and the optimal balance between n-3 and n-6 fatty acids. We also discuss the implications of the available evidence in the context of current dietary recommendations.
Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial
PMID: 11293467 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2: Public Health Nutr. 2001 Apr;4(2B):441-57.
Epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases in Europe.
Kromhout D.
Division of Public Health Research, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. daan.kromhout@rivm.nl
Within Europe large differences exist in mortality from coronary heart disease and stroke. These diseases show a clear West-East gradient with high rates in Eastern Europe. In spite the decreasing trend in age-adjusted cardiovascular disease mortality in Western European countries an increase in the number of cardiovascular patients is expected because of the ageing of the population. Consequently the health care cost for these diseases will increase. Total and HDL cholesterol are major determinants of coronary heart disease. Saturated and trans fatty acids have a total and LDL cholesterol elevating effect and unsaturated fatty acids a lowering effect. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids seem to have a protective effect on coronary heart disease occurrence independent of their effect on cholesterol. Dietary antioxidants could be of importance because they may prevent oxidation of the atherogenic cholesterol rich LDL lipoproteins. There is however no convincing evidence that either vitamin E, carotenoids or vitamin C protect against coronary heart disease. Observational research has shown that flavonols, polyphenols with strong antioxidant properties present in plant foods, may protect against coronary heart disease. Blood pressure is a major determinant of coronary heart disease and stroke. Historically salt is viewed as the most important dietary determinant of blood pressure. Recent research shows that also a low-fat diet rich in potassium, calcium and magnesium lowers blood pressure substantially. This suggests a multifactorial influence of different nutrients on blood pressure. It can be concluded that a diet low in saturated and trans fatty acids and rich in plant foods in combination with regular fish consumption is associated with a low risk of cardiovascular mortality.
Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial
PMID: 11683540 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3: J Nutr Health Aging. 2001;5(3):144-9.
Diet and cardiovascular diseases.
Kromhout D.
Division of Public Health Research, National Institute of Public Health and Environment, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. daan.kromhout@rivm.nl
In spite of the decreasing trend in age-adjusted cardiovascular disease mortality in Western European countries, an increase in the cardiovascular morbidity is expected because of the ageing of the population. Consequently the health care cost for these diseases will increase. This article focuses on the role of diet in the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases.Total and HDL cholesterol are major determinants of coronary heart disease. Saturated and trans fatty acids have a total and LDL cholesterol elevating effect and unsaturated fatty acids a lowering effect. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids seem to have a protective effect on coronary heart disease occurrence independent of cholesterol. Dietary antioxidants could be of importance because they may prevent oxidation of the atherogenic cholesterol rich LDL lipoproteins. There is however no convincing evidence that either vitamin E, carotenoids or vitamin C protect against coronary heart disease. Observational research has shown that flavonols, polyphenols with strong antioxidant properties present in plant foods, may protect against coronary heart disease. Blood pressure is a major determinant of coronary heart disease and stroke. Historically salt is viewed as the most important dietary determinant of blood pressure. Recent research shows that also a low-fat diet rich in potassium, calcium and magnesium lowers blood pressure substantially. This suggests a multifactorial influence of different nutrients on blood pressure. It can be concluded that a diet low in saturated and trans fatty acids and rich in plant foods in combination with regular fish consumption is associated with a low risk of cardiovascular mortality.
Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial
PMID: 11458283 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4: Prev Med. 1999 Dec;29(6 Pt 2):S18-23.
Diet as primordial prevention in Seventh-Day Adventists.
Fraser GE.
Loma Linda University, California 92350, USA. gfraser@sph.llu.edu
Epidemiologic studies of Seventh-Day Adventists have clearly shown that dietary habits are associated with risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and other chronic diseases. However, a few surprising results emerge. Meat consumption is clearly hazardous for Adventist men by raising CHD mortality. However, no such effect was seen in women. Possible reasons are discussed. Our data, and that of others, strongly support the role of a fatty food, specifically nuts, as protective for CHD. The possible implications of this result for fat intake as a risk factor for CHD are discussed. In particular, it may be that consumption of modest quantities of certain fats is beneficial, rather than hazardous. The lower risk of CHD in Adventists probably has a complicated explanation and certainly cannot be entirely explained by their nonsmoking status or a superior serum lipid profile. Adventists are unique in that the majority of this group have adopted a dietary habit that is either vegetarian or tending in this direction. The power of incorporating health into a system of religious belief is discussed. Possibly others can also implement such a model to their advantage.
Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial
PMID: 10641813 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5: QJM. 1999 Sep;92(9):531-44.
Comment in: QJM. 2000 Jun;93(6):387.
Vegetarian diet: panacea for modern lifestyle diseases?
Segasothy M, Phillips PA.
Department of Medicine, Northern Territory Clinical School of Medicine of Flinders University, Alice Springs, Australia. m.segasothy@nt.gov.au
We review the beneficial and adverse effects of vegetarian diets in various medical conditions. Soybean-protein diet, legumes, nuts and soluble fibre significantly decrease total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides. Diets rich in fibre and complex carbohydrate, and restricted in fat, improve control of blood glucose concentration, lower insulin requirement and aid in weight control in diabetic patients. An inverse association has been reported between nut, fruit, vegetable and fibre consumption, and the risk of coronary heart disease. Patients eating a vegetarian diet, with comprehensive lifestyle changes, have had reduced frequency, duration and severity of angina as well as regression of coronary atherosclerosis and improved coronary perfusion. An inverse association between fruit and vegetable consumption and stroke has been suggested. Consumption of fruits and vegetables, especially spinach and collard green, was associated with a lower risk of age-related ocular macular degeneration. There is an inverse association between dietary fibre intake and incidence of colon and breast cancer as well as prevalence of colonic diverticula and gallstones. A decreased breast cancer risk has been associated with high intake of soy bean products. The beneficial effects could be due to the diet (monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids, minerals, fibre, complex carbohydrate, antioxidant vitamins, flavanoids, folic acid and phytoestrogens) as well as the associated healthy lifestyle in vegetarians. There are few adverse effects, mainly increased intestinal gas production and a small risk of vitamin B12 deficiency.
Publication Types: Review
PMID: 10627874 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6: Curr Opin Lipidol. 1994 Feb;5(1):17-21.
Vegetarianism, coronary disease risk factors and coronary heart disease.
Thorogood M.
Health Promotion Sciences Unit, Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Recent studies of vegetarians confirm a lower risk of fatal heart disease amongst such subjects. Lipid levels are lower in vegetarians, even when the diet of comparable meat-eaters is low in fat. This may partly explain the lower mortality, but it is not clear whether the absence of meat or some other aspect of the vegetarian diet is causal in this relationship.
Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial
PMID: 15559026 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7: Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Sep;48(3 Suppl):830-2.
Heart disease in British vegetarians.
Burr ML, Butland BK.
MRC Epidemiology Unit, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
A prospective study was conducted among customers of health food shops and members of societies interested in health foods. A total of 10,896 persons were followed for 10-12 y, including 4671 vegetarians and 6225 nonvegetarians. Mortality from ischemic heart disease (IHD) was significantly lower in the vegetarians than in the nonvegetarians; the difference was especially marked among the men. In a subset of 300 subjects, serum cholesterol and body mass index were lower in the vegetarians than in the nonvegetarians but there were no consistent differences in blood pressure between the two groups. Vegetarianism seems to confer some protection against IHD but it is not clear whether this is due to abstinence from meat or to a high consumption of vegetables.
PMID: 3414590 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8: Prev Med. 1984 Sep;13(5):490-500.
Meat consumption and fatal ischemic heart disease.
Snowdon DA, Phillips RL, Fraser GE.
In 1960 the meat-consumption habits of 25,153 California Seventh-Day Adventists were assessed by questionnaire. Between 1960 and 1980 ischemic heart disease deaths were identified. Meat consumption was positively associated with fatal ischemic heart disease in both men and women. This association was apparently not due to confounding by eggs, dairy products, obesity, marital status, or cigarette smoking. The positive association between meat consumption and fatal ischemic heart disease was stronger in men than in women and, overall, strongest in young men. For 45- to 64-year-old men, there was approximately a threefold difference in risk between men who ate meat daily and those who did not eat meat. This is the first study to clearly show a dose-response relationship between meat consumption and ischemic heart disease risk.
PMID: 6527990 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9: Am J Clin Nutr. 1978 Oct;31(10 Suppl):S191-S198.
Coronary heart disease mortality among Seventh-Day Adventists with differing dietary habits: a preliminary report.
Phillips RL, Lemon FR, Beeson WL, Kuzma JW.
Seventh-Day Adventists (SDAs) are a conservative religious denomination who abstain from tobacco and alcohol; approximately one-half follow a lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet. In this 6-year prospective study of 24,044 California SDAs age 35 and over, coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality rates for ages 35 to 64 and 65+ are 28% and 50% respectively, of the rates for the same age groups of the total California population. This reduced risk of CHD mortality among SDAs is partially due to abstinence from smoking; however, at least half the low risk among SDAs is likely attributable to other characteristics of the SDA lifestyle. The risk of fatal CHD among nonvegetarian SDA males, ages 35 to 64, is three times greater than vegetarian SDA males of comparable age (P less than 0.01), suggesting that the SDA diet may account for a large share of their low risk. This differential was much smaller for older SDA males and SDA females. Although the differential in risk of fatal CHD for male nonvegetarians versus vegetarians may be partially accounted for by other CHD risk factors, which are more frequent among nonvegetarians, a significant differential persists after adjustment for each of six other CHD risk factors.
PMID: 707372 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
calypso47@voyager.net - 16 Jun 2005 23:26 GMT What I would like to know is what causes so much gas, so to speak? The traditional indian diet had one of the lowest rates of cvd and diabetes in the world until a couple of decades ago. That rat didn't go from bad to worst by changing the amount of carbs eaten, it went from good to worst by eating more fats, more calories, and by lowering physical activity. The low risk rates still exist in mostly rural areas where the shift has not been made. Most of be below is a pointless exercise in begging the question and could be countered with research support, but with same seldom forthcoming why bother. Who could possibly counter what is created so easily and cheaply?
>If you had read what I posted you would have noted the incredible >variety of views on what is supposed to cause heart disease and what [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > >TC Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 17 Jun 2005 02:38 GMT >>The traditional indian diet had one of the lowest rates of cvd and diabetes in the world until a couple of decades ago. That rat didn't go from bad to worst by changing the amount of carbs eaten, it went from good to worst by eating more fats, more calories, and by lowering physical activity. <<
COMMENT:
I think your reasoning is sound. "Westernization" of diets always adds more fat than carbohydrates, and the fat that it does add, is low in omega-3 (n-3) simply due to cost considerations. It's realtively hard to get n-3 PUFAs relative to other fats and oils, and once you have them, it's hard to keep them from spoiling. Industrial society runs on hydrogenated veg oil and it *systematically* remove w-3s from the diet at every opportunity. To hear TC talk, you'd think the same thing happens with vitamin C and other micronutrients. Sorry, but in our vitamin charged fortified world, that just ain't true. Read the MacDonald's Menu, or the the one at In an Out or Burger King or whatever. Vitamins added everyplace. Omega-3's--- nowhere.
TC - 17 Jun 2005 03:46 GMT > >>The traditional indian diet had one of the lowest rates of cvd and diabetes in > the world until a couple of decades ago. That rat didn't go from bad [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > MacDonald's Menu, or the the one at In an Out or Burger King or > whatever. Vitamins added everyplace. Omega-3's--- nowhere. Reasoning based on what? Hearsay? Do you guys have anything to back these assertions? Data? Studies? Statistical trends? Anything at all?
TC
nospam@aol.com - 17 Jun 2005 03:53 GMT >>>The traditional indian diet had one of the lowest rates of cvd and diabetes in >the world until a couple of decades ago. That rat didn't go from bad [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >MacDonald's Menu, or the the one at In an Out or Burger King or >whatever. Vitamins added everyplace. Omega-3's--- nowhere. McDonald's uses soybean and canola oils, both of which contain adequate amounts of Omega-3. But too much Omega-6.
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 17 Jun 2005 20:44 GMT >>McDonald's uses soybean and canola oils, both of which contain adequate amounts of Omega-3. But too much Omega-6. <<
COMMENT:
Ahem. What a misleading comment, and if you know enough to know what you said above, you know enough to know how misleading it is. This is a recent change (circa 2003 for McDonalds), and certainly would not show up on anything epidemological. McDonald's went public in 1965. For two generations and more they've cooked everything in the same stuff everybody else in the fast food business has--- partically hydrogenated soybean and cottonseed oil. That doesn't make them evil, but let's state the plain facts.
SBH
Pizza Girl - 18 Jun 2005 04:47 GMT The sign in Canada's McDonalds says "Beef Tallow"
> >>McDonald's uses soybean and canola oils, both of which contain adequate amounts > of Omega-3. But too much Omega-6. << [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > SBH Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 21 Jun 2005 03:49 GMT >>The sign in Canada's McDonalds says "Beef Tallow" << Yes. But prior to 2003 when the anti-trans fat people finally got to McDonalds, the sign wouldn't have said anything. Because McDonalds was using whatever they thought was cheapest and tasted okay.
Pizza Girl - 21 Jun 2005 04:22 GMT It wasn't a publicly available sign and it was before 2003 for sure.
It was posted in one of the back rooms as information for their staff. It was preceded by "In case a customer asks" and written on cardboard with marker.
> >>The sign in Canada's McDonalds says "Beef Tallow" << > > Yes. But prior to 2003 when the anti-trans fat people finally got to > McDonalds, the sign wouldn't have said anything. Because McDonalds was > using whatever they thought was cheapest and tasted okay. nospam@aol.com - 21 Jun 2005 07:23 GMT >>>McDonald's uses soybean and canola oils, both of which contain adequate amounts >of Omega-3. But too much Omega-6. << [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >SBH What is the misleading part? My comment was in reply to yours:
> Read the >MacDonald's Menu, or the the one at In an Out or Burger King or >whatever. Vitamins added everyplace. Omega-3's--- nowhere. Their ingredients list is at http://www.mcdonalds.com/app_controller.nutrition.categories.ingredients.index.html I grant you that they do state that canola oil and soybean oil are used but they do qualify it with "and/or" so there must be some Omega 3 somewhere in their establishments.
Canola Oil 9.3 gm. per 100 gm. Omega 3 Soybean Oil 7 gm. per 100 gm. Omega 3
http://www.althealth.co.uk/products/details.php?id=ve027 Recognizing the unique benefits of EPA and DHA and the serious consequences of a deficiency the US National Institutes of Health recently published Recommended Daily Intakes of fatty acids.
They recommend a total daily intake of 650 mg of EPA and DHA, 2.22g/day of alpha-linolenic acid and 4.44 g/day of linoleic acid.
So where's the beef. I do not understand your reference "certainly would not show up on anything epidemological".
Ora
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 21 Jun 2005 22:03 GMT The "beef" is trans-fats from hydrogenated cooking oils, which have only recently been gotten rid of by McDonalds, but are still used in many other fast foods. If you've eaten a french fry in the 20th century in the US, it was probably cooked in trans-fat containing oil.
nospam@aol.com - 21 Jun 2005 23:22 GMT >The "beef" is trans-fats from hydrogenated cooking oils, which have >only recently been gotten rid of by McDonalds, but are still used in >many other fast foods. If you've eaten a french fry in the 20th century >in the US, it was probably cooked in trans-fat containing oil. I believe for a while McDonald's was making french fries from formed mashed potatoes. Maybe they still are. Those were strange to say the least. Similar to Pringles which (I believe) use the same process. If I have an occasion to eat french fries I only eat one. That usually cures me of the urge to try them again. But once in a while I get some that are really good.
Ora
Pizza Girl - 22 Jun 2005 03:08 GMT Try a cooking course. "Beef Tallow"
> The "beef" is trans-fats from hydrogenated cooking oils, which have > only recently been gotten rid of by McDonalds, but are still used in > many other fast foods. If you've eaten a french fry in the 20th century > in the US, it was probably cooked in trans-fat containing oil. Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 22 Jun 2005 20:14 GMT Try a cooking course. "Beef Tallow"
COMMENT:
Try some reading comprehension skills. McDonalds did not always cook everything in beef tallow. No matter whether you think they did or not. No matter how many times you insist on it.
SBH
Pizza Girl. - 23 Jun 2005 03:29 GMT Sure sounds like a contradiction to me
" "Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" <sbharris@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> news:1119387826.154985.48880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... > > The "beef" is trans-fats from hydrogenated cooking oils"
> Try a co |
|