Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

whole grain wheat

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TC - 07 Jun 2005 20:19 GMT
http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/cgi-bin/list_nut_edit.pl

Wheat flour, whole-grain
New Search
NDB No:     20080 Nutrient  Units  Value per
100 grams of
edible portion  Number
of Data
Points Std.
Error
Proximates
Water  g 10.27 15 0.453
Energy  kcal 339 0 0
Energy  kj 1418 0 0
Protein  g 13.70 16 0.456
Total lipid (fat)  g 1.87 10 0.04
Ash  g 1.60 14 0.053
Carbohydrate, by difference  g 72.57 0 0
Fiber, total dietary  g 12.2 0 0
Sugars, total  g 0.41 3 0.03
Minerals
Calcium, Ca  mg 34 8 2.484
Iron, Fe  mg 3.88 8 0.059
Magnesium, Mg  mg 138 6 1.898
Phosphorus, P  mg 346 6 3.784
Potassium, K  mg 405 7 16.273
Sodium, Na  mg 5 7 1.583
Zinc, Zn  mg 2.93 11 0.185
Copper, Cu  mg 0.382 11 0.024
Manganese, Mn  mg 3.799 10 0.309
Selenium, Se  mcg 70.7 3 8.175
Vitamins
Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid  mg 0.0 0 0
Thiamin  mg 0.447 20 0.018
Riboflavin  mg 0.215 20 0.013
Niacin  mg 6.365 8 0.263
Pantothenic acid  mg 1.008 2 0
Vitamin B-6  mg 0.341 3 0.019
Folate, total  mcg 44 7 4.194
Folic acid  mcg 0 0 0
Folate, food  mcg 44 7 4.194
Folate, DFE  mcg_DFE 44 0 0
Vitamin B-12  mcg 0.00 0 0
Vitamin A, IU  IU 9 0 0
Vitamin A, RAE  mcg_RAE 0 0 0
Retinol  mcg 0 0 0
Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol)  mg 0.82 1 0
Vitamin K (phylloquinone)  mcg 1.9 2 0
Lipids
Fatty acids, total saturated  g 0.322 0 0
4:0  g 0.000 0 0
6:0  g 0.000 0 0
8:0  g 0.018 0 0
10:0  g 0.000 0 0
12:0  g 0.000 0 0
14:0  g 0.003 0 0
16:0  g 0.271 0 0
18:0  g 0.015 0 0
Fatty acids, total monounsaturated  g 0.232 0 0
16:1 undifferentiated  g 0.013 0 0
18:1 undifferentiated  g 0.219 0 0
20:1  g 0.000 0 0
22:1 undifferentiated  g 0.000 0 0
Fatty acids, total polyunsaturated  g 0.779 0 0
18:2 undifferentiated  g 0.738 0 0
18:3 undifferentiated  g 0.038 0 0
18:4  g 0.000 0 0
20:4 undifferentiated  g 0.002 0 0
20:5 n-3  g 0.000 0 0
22:5 n-3  g 0.000 0 0
22:6 n-3  g 0.000 0 0
Cholesterol  mg 0 0 0
Amino acids
Tryptophan  g 0.212 12 0
Threonine  g 0.395 25 0
Isoleucine  g 0.508 25 0
Leucine  g 0.926 25 0
Lysine  g 0.378 26 0
Methionine  g 0.212 26 0
Cystine  g 0.317 20 0
Phenylalanine  g 0.646 25 0
Tyrosine  g 0.400 24 0
Valine  g 0.618 25 0
Arginine  g 0.642 26 0
Histidine  g 0.317 26 0
Alanine  g 0.487 24 0
Aspartic acid  g 0.703 25 0
Glutamic acid  g 4.325 24 0
Glycine  g 0.552 23 0
Proline  g 1.422 23 0
Serine  g 0.646 23 0
Other
Alcohol, ethyl  g 0.0 0 0
Caffeine  mg 0 0 0
Theobromine  mg 0 0 0
Carotene, beta  mcg 5 1 0
Carotene, alpha  mcg 0 0 0
Cryptoxanthin, beta  mcg 0 0 0
Lycopene  mcg 0 0 0
Lutein + zeaxanthin  mcg 220 1 0

----

The above may be hard to read but whole grain wheat contains:

zero vitamin C
zero Vitamin A, RAE
zero Retinol
zero Vitamin B-12

a whopping 72.57 grams of carbohydrate per 100 grams

For the so-called "staff of life" it is missing some very important
nutrients. And this is whole grain wheat, refined white flour is
virtually bereft of any nutrienst useful to humans.

TC
TC - 07 Jun 2005 20:25 GMT
> http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/cgi-bin/list_nut_edit.pl
>
[quoted text clipped - 113 lines]
>
> TC

Here is the nutritional content (bwahh haaa haaaaaa) of mac and cheese:

HODGSON MILL, Whole Wheat Macaroni and Cheese Dinner, dry mix
New Search
NDB No:     22701 Nutrient  Units  Value per
100 grams of
edible portion  Number
of Data
Points Std.
Error  1.00 X 1 package
-------
206g
Proximates
Water  g 8.50 1 0 17.51
Energy  kcal 376 0 0 775
Energy  kj 1571 0 0 3236
Protein  g 14.10 1 0 29.05
Total lipid (fat)  g 4.70 1 0 9.68
Ash  g 3.50 1 0 7.21
Carbohydrate, by difference  g 69.20 0 0 142.55
Fiber, total dietary  g 7.6 1 0 15.7
Minerals
Calcium, Ca  mg 114 1 0 235
Iron, Fe  mg 2.62 1 0 5.40
Sodium, Na  mg 611 1 0 1259
Vitamins
Lipids
Fatty acids, total saturated  g 1.370 1 0 2.822
Cholesterol  mg 8 1 0 16

---

This is from

http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/

I know it is hard to read but basically there is no nutrition in mac
and cheese.

TC
Enrico C - 07 Jun 2005 21:04 GMT
On 7 Jun 2005 12:19:07 -0700, TC wrote in
<news:1118171947.060684.16350@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> on
sci.med.nutrition :

> The above may be hard to read but whole grain wheat contains:
>
> zero vitamin C
> zero Vitamin A, RAE
> zero Retinol
> zero Vitamin B-12

Who would look for those vitamins in any grains?

Signature

Enrico C

TC - 07 Jun 2005 21:26 GMT
> On 7 Jun 2005 12:19:07 -0700, TC wrote in
> <news:1118171947.060684.16350@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> on
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> --
> Enrico C

Exactly, you wouldn't. If you are looking for foods that are full of
nutrition, wheat ain't it, regardless of what the USDA's food pyramid
says about wheat and grains.

TC
Enrico C - 07 Jun 2005 23:52 GMT
On 7 Jun 2005 13:26:28 -0700, TC wrote in
<news:1118175988.621149.283700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on
sci.med.nutrition :

>> On 7 Jun 2005 12:19:07 -0700, TC wrote in
>> <news:1118171947.060684.16350@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> on
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> TC

Let's see...

http://www.mypyramid.gov/pyramid/grains_why.html

"Why is it important to eat grains, especially whole grains?"

Eating grains, especially whole grains, provides health benefits. People
who eat whole grains as part of a healthy diet have a reduced risk of some
chronic diseases. Grains provide many nutrients that are vital for the
health and maintenance of our bodies.

Health benefits

   * Consuming foods rich in fiber, such as whole grains, as part of a
healthy diet, reduces the risk of coronary heart disease.
   * Consuming foods rich in fiber, such as whole grains, as part of a
healthy diet, may reduce constipation.
   * Eating at least 3 ounce equivalents a day of whole grains may help
with weight management.
   * Eating grains fortified with folate before and during pregnancy helps
prevent neural tube defects during fetal development.
   * Click here for more information about preventing cardiovascular
disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, and cancer.

Nutrients

Food sources of the nutrients in bold can be found in the Dietary
Guidelines for Americans. Click on the nutrient name to link to the food
sources table.

   * Grains are important sources of many nutrients, including dietary
fiber, several B vitamins (thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and folate), and
minerals (iron, magnesium, and selenium).
   * Dietary fiber from whole grains, as part of an overall healthy diet,
helps reduce blood cholesterol levels and may lower risk of heart disease.
Fiber is important for proper bowel function. It helps reduce constipation
and diverticulosis. Fiber-containing foods such as whole grains help
provide a feeling of fullness with fewer calories. Whole grains are good
sources of dietary fiber; most refined (processed) grains contain little
fiber.
   * B vitamins (thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and folate)play a key role
in metabolism - they help the body release energy from protein, fat, and
carbohydrates. B vitamins are also essential for a healthy nervous system.
Many refined grains are enriched with these B vitamins.
   * Folate (folic acid), another B vitamin, helps the body form red blood
cells. Women of childbearing age who may become pregnant and those in the
first trimester of pregnancy should consume adequate folate, including
folic acid from fortified foods or supplements. This reduces the risk of
neural tube defects, spina bifida, and anencephaly during fetal
development.
   * Iron is used to carry oxygen in the blood. Many teenage girls and
women in their childbearing years have iron-deficiency anemia. They should
eat foods high in heme-iron (meats) or eat other iron containing foods
along with foods rich in vitamin C, which can improve absorption of
non-heme iron. Whole and enriched refined grain products are major sources
of non-heme iron in American diets.
   * Whole grains are sources of magnesium and selenium. Magnesium is a
mineral used in building bones and releasing energy from muscles. Selenium
protects cells from oxidation. It is also important for a healthy immune
system.

===
Pizza Girl - 08 Jun 2005 00:06 GMT
Oh that's why as our bread consumption goes up the chance of a heart attack
or a stroke does too.

> On 7 Jun 2005 13:26:28 -0700, TC wrote in
> <news:1118175988.621149.283700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>
> ===
Enrico C - 08 Jun 2005 00:22 GMT
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:08:17 -0400, Pizza Girl wrote in
<news:1118185461.f68bfb465ef7d9e268929877b64967ef@teranews> on
sci.med.nutrition :

> Oh that's why as our bread consumption goes up the chance of a heart attack
> or a stroke does too.

1970-2000: total daily calories +24.5% (+530 calories)

Signature

Enrico C

TC - 08 Jun 2005 15:20 GMT
> On 7 Jun 2005 13:26:28 -0700, TC wrote in
> <news:1118175988.621149.283700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> chronic diseases. Grains provide many nutrients that are vital for the
> health and maintenance of our bodies.

Talk about twisting the truth. Eating whole grains only provides
"health benefits" when compared to people who eat refined grain and
refined sugar crap. Grains provide some small amounts of these vital
nutrients. And refined grains are virtually bereft of these nutrients
except for the few cheap ones the add for "enrichment".

> Health benefits
>
>     * Consuming foods rich in fiber, such as whole grains, as part of a
> healthy diet, reduces the risk of coronary heart disease.

What is wrong, then, with consuming a better quality fibre from a
better quality food, like fruits and vegetables. Grain fibre is harsh
and abrasive to the GI tract. There is plenty of available high fibre
food without needing grain fibre.

>     * Consuming foods rich in fiber, such as whole grains, as part of a
> healthy diet, may reduce constipation.

see above. And grains causes all kinds of problems with the GI tract
such as IBS, Crohn's, etc.

>     * Eating at least 3 ounce equivalents a day of whole grains may help
> with weight management.

And not eating any grains will not have any deleterious effect on
health or on weight.

>     * Eating grains fortified with folate before and during pregnancy helps
> prevent neural tube defects during fetal development.

And eating other foods with naturally occurring folate and/or folic
acid will be better. It is always better to get the real thing from
real food rather than the artificially added folate.

>     * Click here for more information about preventing cardiovascular
> disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, and cancer.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> fiber, several B vitamins (thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and folate), and
> minerals (iron, magnesium, and selenium).

They are relatively poor sources of these nutrients to begin with. Then
they lose the vitamins in storage and handling and the berries are not
soaked to enable us to absorb these vitamins properly. And grains
contain phyto-toxins that are not neutralized properly before we
consume them.

>     * Dietary fiber from whole grains, as part of an overall healthy diet,
> helps reduce blood cholesterol levels and may lower risk of heart disease.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> sources of dietary fiber; most refined (processed) grains contain little
> fiber.

Better fibre is available from veggies and fruit.

>     * B vitamins (thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and folate)play a key role
> in metabolism - they help the body release energy from protein, fat, and
> carbohydrates. B vitamins are also essential for a healthy nervous system.
> Many refined grains are enriched with these B vitamins.

>     * Folate (folic acid), another B vitamin, helps the body form red blood
> cells. Women of childbearing age who may become pregnant and those in the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> ===

Grains are a poor food for human consumption. They are fine to some
degree for cattle and birds. But, for human consumption, they are
ridiculously lacking in nutrition. The more grains in the diet the
worse our health will be.

TC
Pizza Girl - 08 Jun 2005 22:12 GMT
shhhhhhh. The minions still consume grains. They don't know better This
leaves the good sh.t for us.

General Mills and Admirable Veggie

> > On 7 Jun 2005 13:26:28 -0700, TC wrote in
> > <news:1118175988.621149.283700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on
[quoted text clipped - 127 lines]
>
> TC
TC - 08 Jun 2005 22:11 GMT
> shhhhhhh. The minions still consume grains. They don't know better This
> leaves the good sh.t for us.
>
> General Mills and Admirable Veggie

That is actually a very good point.

TC
Pizza Girl - 08 Jun 2005 22:36 GMT
It just goes against my grain!    hmmm...  wouldn't that be a good thing
then?

> > shhhhhhh. The minions still consume grains. They don't know better This
> > leaves the good sh.t for us.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> TC
Enrico C - 08 Jun 2005 23:13 GMT
On 8 Jun 2005 07:20:27 -0700, TC wrote in
<news:1118240427.571839.105160@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on
sci.med.nutrition :

>> On 7 Jun 2005 13:26:28 -0700, TC wrote in
>> <news:1118175988.621149.283700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> "health benefits" when compared to people who eat refined grain and
> refined sugar crap.

I don't know whether those benefits apply "only compared to...".

Anyway, most people in the world *do* eat grains and sugars, so whole
grains would provide benefits to all them, at least.

> Grains provide some small amounts of these vital
> nutrients. And refined grains are virtually bereft of these nutrients
> except for the few cheap ones the add for "enrichment".

That's a reason for eating *whole* grains.


>> Health benefits
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> abrasive to the GI tract. There is plenty of available high fibre
> food without needing grain fibre.

Nothing wrong with fruits and vegetables, at all!
I believe people should eat more fruits and vegetables (and less grains and
sugars) than they usually do.

>>     * Consuming foods rich in fiber, such as whole grains, as part of a
>> healthy diet, may reduce constipation.
>
> see above. And grains causes all kinds of problems with the GI tract
> such as IBS, Crohn's, etc.

Well, if grains cause you problems, just don't eat them.
The same could be said about milk or meat or beans... Some people have
problems with them, many others don't.

>>     * Eating at least 3 ounce equivalents a day of whole grains may help
>> with weight management.
>
> And not eating any grains will not have any deleterious effect on
> health or on weight.

Actually I don't think there is a single food a human being cannot live
without, as long as they balances their diet with other foods.

If I were forced to choose only a few foods and give up the rest, I think I
would keep fruits and vegetables, milk, fish and olive oil.
Fortunately, I am not forced to choose! :)

>>     * Eating grains fortified with folate before and during pregnancy helps
>> prevent neural tube defects during fetal development.
>
> And eating other foods with naturally occurring folate and/or folic
> acid will be better. It is always better to get the real thing from
> real food rather than the artificially added folate.

I don't know much about folate, but I strongly agree with you on the point,
generally speaking: better to get the real thing from real food, if you
can.

>>     * Click here for more information about preventing cardiovascular
>> disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, and cancer.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> They are relatively poor sources of these nutrients to begin with.

Hmmm...   it seems to me that bran is a good source of niacin and
magnesium, and germ of thiamin, for example; and grains of fiber in
general; and so on...

> Then
> they lose the vitamins in storage and handling and the berries are not
> soaked to enable us to absorb these vitamins properly.

Would you expand on that? :)

> And grains
> contain phyto-toxins that are not neutralized properly before we
> consume them.

Aren't they, through leavening and cooking?

>>     * Dietary fiber from whole grains, as part of an overall healthy diet,
>> helps reduce blood cholesterol levels and may lower risk of heart disease.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Better fibre is available from veggies and fruit.

Well, I don't know which fiber is better, but I don't think one has to
choose one or the other, if one can have both.
Generally speaking, the more foods to choose from, the better!

>>     * B vitamins (thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and folate)play a key role
>> in metabolism - they help the body release energy from protein, fat, and
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> ridiculously lacking in nutrition. The more grains in the diet the
> worse our health will be.

"The more grains" you mean overindulgence? In that case I would agree.
On the other hand, the same could be said for  meat or cheese or virtually
anything: too much is too much.
If you mean that any quantity of grains is harmful, instead, I strongly
doubt that. Eat everything, don't eat too much of anything! :)

Signature

Enrico C

455 - 16 Jun 2005 05:36 GMT
> Eating grains, especially whole grains, provides health benefits. People
> who eat whole grains as part of a healthy diet have a reduced risk of some
> chronic diseases. Grains provide many nutrients that are vital for the
> health and maintenance of our bodies.

They forgot to mention the benefits to the farmers and lobbyists.
TC - 16 Jun 2005 19:03 GMT
> > Eating grains, especially whole grains, provides health benefits. People
> > who eat whole grains as part of a healthy diet have a reduced risk of some
> > chronic diseases. Grains provide many nutrients that are vital for the
> > health and maintenance of our bodies.
>
> They forgot to mention the benefits to the farmers and lobbyists.

And benefits to Archer Daniels Midland, Monsanto, Kellogg, Kraft, etc.

TC
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 09 Jun 2005 04:29 GMT
>>For the so-called "staff of life" it is missing some very important
nutrients. And this is whole grain wheat, refined white flour is
virtually bereft of any nutrienst useful to humans. <<

COMMENT:

As is white rice and white rice flour.  This does not prevent the
Japanese from having the world's best life expectancies, as they mix
all that white rice with a bunch of other stuff, whenever they eat it.

Why this same principle should not work as well with white wheat flour
is not obvious. Probably it does, as you point out for the
Mediterraneans. I think the overall epidemiology suggests that it
hardly matters what carbohydrate you use, so long as you consume it
adequate with protein and fat. And that your overal diet has enough
vitamins (which can be from other sources entirely), minerals, and
adequate w-3 and w-6 EFAs.

SBH
TC - 09 Jun 2005 14:54 GMT
> >>For the so-called "staff of life" it is missing some very important
> nutrients. And this is whole grain wheat, refined white flour is
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> SBH

The difference is the sheer amount of refined carbs. It is also the
amount of fat in the diet.

The mediterraneans and the japanese do not eat huge amounts of sugars.
They eat moderate amounts of pasta and/or rice. They eat a lot of fresh
whole-food foods with minimal processing. They eat entirely adequate
amounts of healthy fats (fish fats, olive oil, etc). The live closer to
the soil with little extra food processing other than just cooking the
fresh foods. These foods are filling and full of real nutrition.

As opposed to the western diet with lots of sugar (super sized sodas,
high fructose corn syrup added to everything), plenty of pasta (mac and
cheese, huge plates of pasta) and/or rice and/or starchy tubers (french
fries with every second meal) and less healthy fats
(margarine,shortening). And a lot of what they eat is highly processed.
This food is appetite-stimulating and empty of real nutrition.

It is those darned food paradoxes at work again. Western people eat
lots of carbs and less fat and end up gaining weight and getting sicker
which is the exact opposite of what is supposed to happen, according to
the experts. While the mediterraneans and japanese eat less overall
carbs and better carbs and more healthy fat and they are less obese and
much healthier.

TC
Enrico C - 09 Jun 2005 15:22 GMT
On 9 Jun 2005 06:54:34 -0700, TC wrote in
<news:1118325274.002815.202180@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on
sci.med.nutrition :

> As opposed to the western diet with lots of sugar (super sized sodas,

On a web site that you suggested, it reads, in fact...

"According to the National Soft Drink Association (NSDA), consumption of
soft drinks is now over 600 12-ounce servings (12 oz.) per person per year.
Since 1978, soda consumption in the US has tripled for boys and doubled for
girls. Young males age 12-29 are the biggest consumers at over 160 gallons
per year—that’s almost 2 quarts per day. At these levels, the calories from
soft drinks contribute as much as 10 percent of the total daily caloric
intake for a growing boy."
http://www.westonaprice.org/modernfood/soft.html

But just give us Europeans some time, and we'll catch up! :-(

"Up to 25 percent of children in many European countries are considered
obese, a percentage that is reaching toward the U.S. figure of 33 percent."
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04088/292685.stm
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 09 Jun 2005 18:54 GMT
>>The mediterraneans and the japanese do not eat huge amounts of sugars.
They eat moderate amounts of pasta and/or rice. They eat a lot of fresh

whole-food foods with minimal processing. They eat entirely adequate
amounts of healthy fats (fish fats, olive oil, etc). The live closer to

the soil with little extra food processing other than just cooking the
fresh foods. These foods are filling and full of real nutrition. <<

COMMENT

I don't know where the hell you get these ideas, but it's not from
being in the Mediterranean.

The sweetest breakfast I ever had was as a houseguest on the island of
Majorca IN the Mediterranean, where my hosts ate a collection of the
lightest, thinnest pastries you ever saw, for breakfast. With juice.
Nor were they the oily sweet pastries of the Greeks. There were just
plain honey glaze and flour, so far as I could tell. This was not
tourist stuff, but what they ate every day.  Other meals did indeed
include a lot of seafood (little fried octupi and lots of shrimp) but
as for "processing," I have no idea what you mean. Food that is cut up
and cooked and fried with spices and other stuff is "processed."

On the continent, the breakfasts tend to center about pastry (that's
why this is called a "continental breakfast" don't you know). The idea
that continental pastry is somehow a lot different than what you get in
the US, is bullshit.

The lowest carb breakfasts I've ever had while traveling came in
England and Scotland, where the standard fare at bed and breakfasts is
bacon, eggs, butter, clotted cream, and maybe fruit or shortbread.
Served by widows of men who'd probably been killed by similar
breakfasts. This is heart disease country. There's no particular "food
paradox" when it comes to the first meal of the day, unless you think
high glucose load meals cause vascular disease.  Then there is.

SBH
Enrico C - 09 Jun 2005 20:26 GMT
On 9 Jun 2005 10:54:22 -0700, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com wrote in
<news:1118339662.685574.55460@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on
sci.med.nutrition :

> Nor were they the oily sweet pastries of the Greeks. There were just
> plain honey glaze and flour, so far as I could tell. This was not
<...>

I think the more you go South (in the Mediterrean region), the more people
like sweet pastries (and spicy foods, btw)!

Sicilian pastries are sweet. And North African pastries (that I buy in
cous-cous restaurants) are pretty sweet too.

http://cp.settlement.org/english/algeria/eating.html
"Algerians enjoy a variety of pastries. They include kalb-el-louz (semolina
with almond paste and rose water), makroud (made with figs or dates),
chacab (crescent-shaped almond-filled pastries), samsa (pastry filled with
sweets), griouche (honey-filled pastry) and tamina (roasted semolina with
butter and honey)."

Signature

Enrico C

TC - 09 Jun 2005 20:36 GMT
> >>The mediterraneans and the japanese do not eat huge amounts of sugars.
> They eat moderate amounts of pasta and/or rice. They eat a lot of fresh
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> plain honey glaze and flour, so far as I could tell. This was not
> tourist stuff, but what they ate every day.

You mean they ate that when they had you for a guest. You have no idea
if that was a typical breakfast.

Other meals did indeed
> include a lot of seafood (little fried octupi and lots of shrimp) but
> as for "processing," I have no idea what you mean. Food that is cut up
> and cooked and fried with spices and other stuff is "processed."

By processed I mean in a can, in a box or in any way changed from its
original whole-food form before you even buy it.

By fresh I mean a food that is recognizable in the form it was grown,
whether produce or animal at the time it was bought.

> On the continent, the breakfasts tend to center about pastry (that's
> why this is called a "continental breakfast" don't you know). The idea
> that continental pastry is somehow a lot different than what you get in
> the US, is bullshit.

Again, cheap tourist crap "continental" breakfasts. There is a
difference between foods aimed at tourist demand and food eaten by a
typical european.

I've had pastries and goodies from the continent and they were not
nearly as sweet as typical american stuff. That is not to say that
sweet european pastries don't exist. What I am saying is that generally
speaking european goodies are not nearly as sweet as american goodies.

> The lowest carb breakfasts I've ever had while traveling came in
> England and Scotland, where the standard fare at bed and breakfasts is
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> SBH

High glucose meals causes vascular disease. By direct damage from high
blood glucose levels, and the chronic depletion of vitamins,
specifically the B vitamins and vitamin c, which are essential to
vascular health.

Fresh healthy fats from healthy animals are not the cause of heart
disease. And elevated blood cholesterol levels or excess cholesterol in
the diet are irrelevant to vascular disease.

Heart disease country is in India among the vegetarian Hindus who have
triple the incidence of heart disease of their meat eating neighbors,
the Indian Muslim. This is referred to as the Indian Paradox.

TC
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 10 Jun 2005 03:16 GMT
>>High glucose meals causes vascular disease. By direct damage from high
blood glucose levels, and the chronic depletion of vitamins,
specifically the B vitamins and vitamin c, which are essential to
vascular health. <<

COMMENT

I suppose that would explain the many animal models of atherosclerosis
caused by giving the animals high blood sugars chronically (aka
diabetic or streptozotocin treated rats).  Not.

It DOESN'T work. You can give rats or rabbits or dogs or monkeys
atherosclerosis by modifying their dietary fat and cholesterol.  If
there's any model where this has been done to these animals by screwing
around with their dietary glucose loads and dietary carbs, please
enlighten us.  Yes, elevated blood sugars surely contribute to the
human problem in frank diabetics.  But most human vascular disease
doesn't occur in frank diabetics. It does however, occur to humans with
LDL > 100, and heart disease is rare in cultures where LDL is low.

>>Heart disease country is in India among the vegetarian Hindus who have triple the incidence of heart disease of their meat eating neighbors, the Indian Muslim. This is referred to as the Indian Paradox. <<

COMMENT:

There's no paradox about it. You know about that favorite Hindu food
clarified butter, called ghee? Full of saturated fat, transfat,
oxidized cholesterol.  I can't think of a food better designed to give
you atherosclerosis, and it has NOTHING to do with carbohydrates. Nada.

If these Hindus were vegan, now THAT would be a paradox. Ghee is no
paradox. Ghee will kill you.

SBH
TC - 10 Jun 2005 04:36 GMT
> >>High glucose meals causes vascular disease. By direct damage from high
> blood glucose levels, and the chronic depletion of vitamins,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> caused by giving the animals high blood sugars chronically (aka
> diabetic or streptozotocin treated rats).  Not.

You mean the studies that fed animal source fats to normally vegetarian
animals? Pretty sad science, if you ask me.

> It DOESN'T work. You can give rats or rabbits or dogs or monkeys
> atherosclerosis by modifying their dietary fat and cholesterol.  If
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> doesn't occur in frank diabetics. It does however, occur to humans with
> LDL > 100, and heart disease is rare in cultures where LDL is low.

We are not talking about rats ir rabbits or dogs or monkeys, we are
talking about humans.

> >>Heart disease country is in India among the vegetarian Hindus who have triple the incidence of heart disease of their meat eating neighbors, the Indian Muslim. This is referred to as the Indian Paradox. <<
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> oxidized cholesterol.  I can't think of a food better designed to give
> you atherosclerosis, and it has NOTHING to do with carbohydrates. Nada.

That's is just plain ridiculous.

> If these Hindus were vegan, now THAT would be a paradox. Ghee is no
> paradox. Ghee will kill you.
>
> SBH

Garbage.

TC
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 11 Jun 2005 00:08 GMT
> I suppose that would explain the many animal models of atherosclerosis
> caused by giving the animals high blood sugars chronically (aka
> diabetic or streptozotocin treated rats).  Not.

>>You mean the studies that fed animal source fats to normally vegetarian
animals? Pretty sad science, if you ask me. <<

Rats are not "normally vegetarian". They are omnivores.  And
atherosclerosis has been induced in dogs, which are carnivores and
normally very resistant to it,by feeding them hydrgenated coconut oil
and cholesterol.  Feeding a little safflower oil along with this,
prevents the problem.

>>We are not talking about rats ir rabbits or dogs or monkeys, we are
talking about humans. <<

In whom the mechanisms for production of atherosclerosis are hardly
likely to be much different. Yes, meat eating animals are more
resistant to production of atherosclerosis. But humans are (apparently)
not good carnivores. At least, we don't do well on a high aggricultural
meat or dairy fat diet.

> There's no paradox about it. You know about that favorite Hindu food
> clarified butter, called ghee? Full of saturated fat, transfat,
> oxidized cholesterol.  I can't think of a food better designed to give
> you atherosclerosis, and it has NOTHING to do with carbohydrates. Nada.

>>That's is just plain ridiculous.

Why?  Because you don't want to believe it?

Int J Cardiol. 1996 Oct 25;56(3):289-98; discussion 299-300.

Association of trans fatty acids (vegetable ghee) and clarified butter
(Indian
ghee) intake with higher risk of coronary artery disease in rural and
urban
populations with low fat consumption.

Singh RB, Niaz MA, Ghosh S, Beegom R, Rastogi V, Sharma JP, Dube GK.

Heart Research Laboratory, Medical Hospital and Research Centre,
Moradabad,
India.

These cross-sectional surveys included 1769 rural (894 men and 875
women) and
1806 urban (904 men and 902 women) randomly selected subjects between
25-64
years of age from Moradabad in North India. The total prevalence of
coronary
artery disease based on clinical history and electrocardiogram was
significantly
higher in urban compared to rural men (11.0 vs. 3.9%) and women (6.9
vs. 2.6%),
respectively. Food consumption patterns showed that important
differences in
relation to coronary artery disease were higher intake of total visible
fat,
milk and milk products, meat, eggs, sugar and jaggery in urban compared
to rural
subjects. Prevalence of coronary artery disease in relation to visible
fat
intake showed a higher prevalence rate with higher visible fat intake
in both
sexes and the trend was significant for total prevalence rates both for
rural
and urban men and women. Subgroup analysis among urban (694 men and 694
women)
and rural (442 men and 435 women) subjects consuming moderate to high
fat diets
showed that subjects eating trans fatty acids plus clarified butter or
those
consuming clarified butter as total visible fat had a significantly
higher
prevalence of coronary artery disease compared to those consuming
clarified
butter plus vegetable oils in both rural (9.8, 7.1 vs. 3.0%) and urban
(16.2,
13.5 vs. 11.0%) men as well as in rural (9.2, 4.5 vs. 1.5%) and urban
(10.7, 8.8
vs. 6.4%) women. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis with
adjustment
for age showed that sedentariness in women, body mass index in urban
men and
women, milk and clarified butter plus trans fatty acids in both rural
and urban
in both sexes were significantly associated with coronary artery
disease. It is
possible that lower intake of total visible fat (20 g/day), decreased
intake of
milk, increased physical activity and cessation of smoking may benefit
some
populations in the prevention of coronary artery disease.

PMID: 8910075 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
George Cherry - 11 Jun 2005 02:19 GMT
>> I suppose that would explain the many animal models of atherosclerosis
>> caused by giving the animals high blood sugars chronically (aka
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> not good carnivores. At least, we don't do well on a high aggricultural
> meat or dairy fat diet.

Yes, our progenitors likely gathered more than they hunted.
Plant food doesn't run away, and paleolithic man didn't
have very long-range hunting weapons. Evolutionary histories
do count.

>> There's no paradox about it. You know about that favorite Hindu food
>> clarified butter, called ghee? Full of saturated fat, transfat,
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
>
> PMID: 8910075 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Emma Chase VanCott - 12 Jun 2005 23:05 GMT
: > I suppose that would explain the many animal models of atherosclerosis
: > caused by giving the animals high blood sugars chronically (aka
: > diabetic or streptozotocin treated rats).  Not.

: >>You mean the studies that fed animal source fats to normally vegetarian
: animals? Pretty sad science, if you ask me. <<

: Rats are not "normally vegetarian". They are omnivores.  And

They shun white flour.

Interesting.
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 13 Jun 2005 17:22 GMT
>>I suppose that would explain the many animal models of atherosclerosis
: > caused by giving the animals high blood sugars chronically (aka
: > diabetic or streptozotocin treated rats).  Not.
: >>You mean the studies that fed animal source fats to normally vegetarian
: animals? Pretty sad science, if you ask me. <<
: Rats are not "normally vegetarian". They are omnivores.  And

>>They shun white flour.<<

That is an urban legend created by people who've never had mice in
their flour.

SBH
calypso47@voyager.net - 12 Jun 2005 00:13 GMT
"Heart disease country is in India among the vegetarian Hindus who have
triple the incidence of heart disease of their meat eating neighbors,
the Indian Muslim. This is referred to as the Indian Paradox."

Web source please.
TC - 14 Jun 2005 14:54 GMT
> "Heart disease country is in India among the vegetarian Hindus who have
> triple the incidence of heart disease of their meat eating neighbors,
> the Indian Muslim. This is referred to as the Indian Paradox."
>
> Web source please.

http://www.indianewengland.com/media/paper549/news/2004/05/01/Medicine/Study.Sou
th.Asians.At.Higher.Risk.Of.Heart.Disease-673859.shtml


---

"Asian Indians have the highest rates of heart attacks, with those
settled in the United States having a 400 percent higher incidence than
white Americans, and a 600 percent higher hospitalization than
Chinese-Americans, despite the fact that almost half of them are
lifelong vegetarians.

---

Unique Indian paradox

The higher rates of heart attacks in Indians worldwide are accompanied
by paradoxically low rates of conventional risk factors: hypertension,
obesity, cigarette smoking and cholesterol levels.

The common tool employed to assess heart attack risk is the lipid
profile. Indians usually have acceptable lipid profiles as recommended
by the American Heart Association.

----

Indians differ from other ethnic groups in the following ways:

* Higher prevalence of abdominal obesity, glucose intolerance, insulin
resistance and diabetes.

* Higher prevalence of emerging clot-promoting risk factors.

* Higher prevalence of cardiodysmetabolic syndrome (consisting of
abdominal obesity, high tryiglycerides, low HDL, glucose intolerance,
hyperinsulinemia and hypertension).

********************

http://www.time.com/time/asia/covers/501040510/story2.html

"So vulnerable is the subcontinent to cardiovascular ailments that the
World Health Organization (who) estimates that 60% of the world's
cardiac patients will be Indian by 2010. "Of all Asians, South Asians
have by far the worst problems" when it comes to heart disease, says
Dr. Timothy Gill, an Asia-Pacific specialist with the International
Obesity Task Force, a medical NGO that coordinates with the who on
obesity issues."

---

"Equally troubling, it is not just the elderly who are being hit by
cardiovascular disease. In India, nearly 50% of CVD-related deaths
occur below the age of 70, compared with just 22% in the West."

----

One of the world's foremost epidemiologists of cardiovascular disease,
Yusuf once championed the idea that ethnicity was a significant
determinant of heart disease, but his recent research has convinced him
otherwise. "By and large, the differences in heart-disease rates are
because of different lifestyles," he says. "About 80% of the risk can
be accounted for by known risk factors like smoking or obesity or blood
pressure and the way we live and eat, which leaves very little room for
genetic risk factors." Even the common idea that family history is a
decisive risk factor, Yusuf says, overlooks the fact that families tend
to have similar lifestyles and are exposed to the same environment.

*******

http://www.tlca.com/adults/heart.html

Asian Indians at highest risk of heart disease in world

BY JULIE SEVRENS LYONS AND ANU MANCHIKANTI

(KRT) - Mr. Rao always chalked up his high cholesterol and blood
pressure to bad luck, figuring a family history of heart troubles set
him up for coronary artery disease. The 48-year-old never suspected his
ethnicity could be to blame.

But now researchers have determined that those of Indian and Pakistani
descent have the highest rates of heart disease in the world, despite
coming from a culture that shuns smoking, encourages a vegetarian diet
and lacks many of the other classic risk factors for the disease.

About 25 percent of all heart attacks among men of Indian descent occur
while they are younger than 40, unheard of in any other population,
according to researchers. Death rates from the disease are up to three
times higher among Indians than those of European or East-Asian origin.

Such findings, borne out most recently by a new report, surprise many
Indo-Americans - and just as many doctors. Research carried out in the
United Kingdom years ago began to suggest a genetic link, but there has
not been a push for early screening in the Indo-American community
here, and relatively few education campaigns.

"Most physicians trained in the U.S. are not aware their Asian-Indian
patients are at risk," said Dr. Susan Ivey, an assistant researcher at
the University of California-Berkeley Center for Family and Community
Health, which spearheaded the new study.

And this lack of awareness, researchers worry, may be deadly.

"Just being of Asian-Indian descent places you at higher risk for heart
disease than having high cholesterol and being a smoker," said Dr. H.
Robert Superko, director of research at the Berkeley HeartLab.

Superko launched a separate study, the National Asian Indian Heart
Disease Program, several years ago and discovered one gene is
responsible for part of the increased risk in heart disease rates. A
metabolic disorder common in Indians likely also plays a role, as does
having high levels of a dangerous type of cholesterol. Lifestyle, such
as diet and lack of exercise, is also to blame.

The problem is coming into sharpest focus in places such as
California's Bay Area, where Indians are the fastest growing of all
Asian groups. But there are 1.6 million Indians sprinkled all over the
United States who are also at risk. Because the population is
scattered, researchers say it is difficult to study the problem fully
or raise awareness among doctors and within communities.

The elevated risk of heart disease often catches many Indians off
guard. Generally, their overall cholesterol levels have been normal.
High blood pressure isn't prevalent in the community. Smoking rates
are low. And about half are vegetarians.

Knowing that doing many of the right things to prevent the disease
still might not be enough, "It does make you afraid," said Mr. Rao, a
Yuba City sandwich shop owner who immigrated from India nearly three
decades ago. His father has been battling heart problems for years.

"A lot of people, they just feel they look healthy, they feel healthy,"
and so they don't get tested for heart disease, Mr. Rao said. "By the
time some of them find out they have it, they're either in an
ambulance or a hospital bed."

As lifestyles change in India, heart disease is hitting epidemic
proportions there - and also among Indo-Americans - with more than 10
percent of urban Indians now suffering from the disease. Over the past
three decades, coronary artery disease rates have declined by half in
many developed countries, but have more than doubled in India,
according to the Coronary Artery Disease among Asian Indians Research
Foundation. Rates are significantly higher in urban regions of India
than in rural ones.

This helps dispel the theory that a Western lifestyle is entirely to
blame for the problem among immigrants, some scientists believe. Dining
on greasy fast food and adopting a couch-potato lifestyle can certainly
make the situation worse, they said. But other factors clearly are at
play.

"Genetics load the gun. Environment pulls the trigger," said Dr. Enas
A. Enas, director of the research foundation.

That is all the more reason why Indo-Americans need to be aggressive
about preventing heart disease. Parents should be sure to start their
children on health diets and exercise programs when they're as young
as age 2, Enas said.

"If you have a loaded gun and you don't pull the trigger, no harm is
done."

Viren Venkat, 66, knows first-hand the importance of a healthy
lifestyle. The Sunnyvale resident experienced his first heart attack
when he was only 44. His oldest brother, Surendra, had one at 48.
Another brother, Narendra, had one at 47.

They were all busy business executives, and none of them got much
exercise, he conceded, but they were still surprised to suffer heart
problems at such an early age.

At the time of Venkat's first attack, he lived in Bombay and worked
as a record executive in India. His staff included a gardener, a
chauffeur and a cook. Venkat didn't even have to carry his briefcase
to his car in the morning.

Like many Indians and Indo-Americans, he ate heavier food cooked in
ghee, or clarified butter. Doctors recommend that foods be cooked in
olive oil instead.

Enas is convinced that high heart disease rates are partially
attributable to what he calls an "influence of affluence," which could
help explain the higher rates in urban India versus rural regions.
Research into this theory is still ongoing, but Enas points to the
highly automated lifestyle that is enjoyed in urban areas.

"Indians are Silicon Valley high-tech execs. What do they do? They do
not exercise. How do they go to work? By car," Enas said.

The Berkeley researchers believe that the children and grandchildren of
Indian immigrants could be at the highest risk for heart problems,
given their lifestyle as children is much more inactive than their
parents' tended be. The scientists, who looked at more than 300
Indo-Americans living in Yuba City and Alameda and Contra Costa
counties, anticipate the phenomena won't be visible, however, for a
few more years.

"We haven't hit the big wave of second- and third-generation"
Indo-Americans, Ivey said. "Indians are more at risk when they're put
in a Western environment."

*************

The Indian Paradox: a supposed heart-healthy vegetarian diet and they
have the highest heart diseases rate in the world.

The mainstream medical response: blame it on every thing else except
the diet, call it a paradox, and start prescribing pills and surgery
and start making some serious money.

TC
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 14 Jun 2005 18:05 GMT
TC, do you even read the stuff you post?

>>The higher rates of heart attacks in Indians worldwide are accompanied
by paradoxically low rates of conventional risk factors: hypertension,
obesity, cigarette smoking and cholesterol levels. <<

>>Indians differ from other ethnic groups in the following ways:
* Higher prevalence of abdominal obesity, glucose intolerance, insulin
resistance and diabetes.
* Higher prevalence of emerging clot-promoting risk factors.
* Higher prevalence of cardiodysmetabolic syndrome (consisting of
abdominal obesity, high tryiglycerides, low HDL, glucose intolerance,
hyperinsulinemia and hypertension). <<

COMMENT:
Please note that these quotes largely contradict each other.  Diabetes
is a well-known cardiovascular risk factor, and so is abdominal
obesity, high triglycerides, low HDL and hypertension.

Further on:

>>One of the world's foremost epidemiologists of cardiovascular disease,
Yusuf once championed the idea that ethnicity was a significant
determinant of heart disease, but his recent research has convinced him

otherwise. "By and large, the differences in heart-disease rates are
because of different lifestyles," he says. "About 80% of the risk can
be accounted for by known risk factors like smoking or obesity or blood

pressure and the way we live and eat, which leaves very little room for

genetic risk factors." <<

COMMENT:

Well, if "About 80% of the risk can be accounted for by known risk
factors like smoking or obesity or blood
pressure and the way we live and eat," then that leaves just 20% for
the big "paradox."  Not very impressive. So which is it?

Even the quoted storylet has problems:

>>At the time of Venkat's first attack, he lived in Bombay and worked
as a record executive in India. His staff included a gardener, a
chauffeur and a cook. Venkat didn't even have to carry his briefcase
to his car in the morning.
Like many Indians and Indo-Americans, he ate heavier food cooked in
ghee, or clarified butter. Doctors recommend that foods be cooked in
olive oil instead.<<

COMMENT:

The guy never exercised and lived on clarified butter. Then had a heart
attack. Amazing!  SUCH a paradox.

>>The Indian Paradox: a supposed heart-healthy vegetarian diet and they
have the highest heart diseases rate in the world. <<

COMMENT:

It's NOT a supposed heart-healthy vegetarian diet if it's full of
clarified butter.

Back in the bad old days of the Joslin high fat treatment for diabetes,
they used to treat diabetics with an Atkins-like diet which had things
like a breakfast of 10 pats of butter, and a little bit of toast.
"Carbohydrates made for sugar and sugar was bad," was the mantra. The
Joslin diet controlled diabetes, all right. But it wasn't long before
somebody found that these diabetics weren't dying of diabetes any more
on this diet. They were dying of heart attacks. This was half a century
ago. It's not news.

SBH
TC - 14 Jun 2005 19:11 GMT
> TC, do you even read the stuff you post?
>
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
>
> SBH

If you had read what I posted you would have noted the incredible
variety of views on what is supposed to cause heart disease and what
doesn't and the wide variety of "paradoxes" seen in the real world.
With everyone speculating about the possible causes of the increased
incidences of heart disease, it seem no-one is even questioning the
diet, ie. vegetarianism.

They ascribe the problem to genetics, and if that doesn't explain it
they ascribe it to sedentariness, and if that doesn't fit they ascribe
it to the ghee, and if that doesn't fit then they ascribe it to
cholesterol etc etc and if it still doesn't fit they call it a paradox
and prescribe the cholesterol reducing drugs and the blood thinning
drugs and more and more drugs, nd if that doesn't work the operate and
bypass their arteries. No one gets healthy except for the doctors
wallets.

You keep talking about the evils of ghee, but the Masai that ate a
primarily dairy based diet had no such high incidence of heart disease.
There is no credible science to link heart disease to butter oe any
animal fat, I challenge you to show some credible science to back that
up.

The point I am making is that a primarily vegetarian group has very
high incidences of heart disease and when they become "westernized" and
they continue eating vegetarian they get even worse. Is it the fat
causing the jump or is it the greater access to more refined carbs in
their vegetarian diet?

Heart disease is more of a nutrient deficiency condition then it is a
condition caused by too much of a certain nutrient. The B vitamins and
vitamin C and collagen in the diet has more impact on the health of the
cardio-pulmonary system than any suggested excess of any fat.

The fact is that a vegetarian whole-food diet(as in India) will not
provide good enough nutrition for proper cardio health. Switch some of
the carbs to refined westernized carbs and their cardio health will get
even worse. That is the pattern.

Vegetarians have weak and damaged arteries due to their poor diets and
the lack of the right nutrients that are primarily gotten from animal
sources, and the first arteries to go will be the ones that move the
most and get the most physical stress, and those are the heart
arteries.

When the artery walls become compromised the improperly fed body tries
to repair the damage with fatty deposits which become plaque. It is
caused by a nutritional deficiency not by some as-yet-unproven and
unknown effect of fat in the system.

TC
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 15 Jun 2005 02:18 GMT
>>You keep talking about the evils of ghee, but the Masai that ate a
primarily dairy based diet had no such high incidence of heart disease.

There is no credible science to link heart disease to butter oe any
animal fat, I challenge you to show some credible science to back that
up. <<

COMMENT:
See below on the backup. There's a huge literature linking animal fat
(non fish) intake to heart disease. What, you couldn't find anything of
heart disease and animal fat intake on medline?  Go on.  But the
problem is less the animal fat than what it replaces. Vegetarians,
particularly males, really do have less coronary disease.

As for the Masai, it's a complex issue, but the bottom line is that
it's not the total fat in the diet that makes the big difference, but
rather the ratio of n-3 fat to total fat. High saturated fat diets are
only harmful when that fat replaces plant and seafood sources of n-3,
as apparently happens in urban India (where n-3 levels are low because
the people subsist on calories other than fresh produce, eat little
seafood, and get their calories as carbs and butter). The Masai diet
has a lot of milk products, but in a rural pastoral people on the
grasslands of Africa, it may well have enough n-3 from plants to make
up for it. Not so in urban Indian smokers, and that's the difference.

1: Circulation. 2005 Jan 18;111(2):157-64. Epub 2005 Jan 3.

Interplay between different polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of
coronary
heart disease in men.

Mozaffarian D, Ascherio A, Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Siscovick
DS, Rimm
EB.

Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's
Hospital and
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, USA. dmozaffa@hsph.harvard.edu

BACKGROUND: Consumption of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may
reduce
coronary heart disease (CHD) risk, but n-6 PUFAs may compete with n-3
PUFA
metabolism and attenuate benefits. Additionally, seafood-based,
long-chain n-3
PUFAs may modify the effects of plant-based, intermediate-chain n-3
PUFAs.
However, the interactions of these PUFAs in relation to CHD risk are
not well
established. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 45,722 men free of known
cardiovascular
disease in 1986, usual dietary intake was assessed at baseline and
every 4 years
by using validated food-frequency questionnaires. CHD incidence was
prospectively ascertained. Over 14 years of follow-up, participants
experienced
218 sudden deaths, 1521 nonfatal myocardial infarctions (MIs), and 2306
total
CHD events (combined sudden death, other CHD deaths, and nonfatal MI).
In
multivariate-adjusted analyses, both long-chain and intermediate-chain
n-3 PUFA
intakes were associated with lower CHD risk, without modification by
n-6 PUFA
intake. For example, men with > or = median long-chain n-3 PUFA intake
(> or
=250 mg/d) had a reduced risk of sudden death whether n-6 PUFA intake
was below
(<11.2 g/d; hazard ratio [HR]=0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.34
to 0.79)
or above (> or =11.2 g/d; HR=0.60; 95% CI=0.39 to 0.93) the median
compared with
men with a < median intake of both. In similar analyses, > or = median
intake of
intermediate-chain n-3 PUFAs (> or =1080 mg/d) was associated with a
reduced
total CHD risk whether n-6 PUFA intake was lower (HR=0.88; 95% CI=0.78
to 0.99)
or higher (HR=0.89; 95% CI=0.79 to 0.99) compared with a < median
intake of
both. Intermediate-chain n-3 PUFAs were particularly associated with
CHD risk
when long-chain n-3 PUFA intake was very low (<100 mg/d); among these
men, each
1 g/d of intermediate-chain n-3 PUFA intake was associated with an
approximately
50% lower risk of nonfatal MI (HR=0.42; 95% CI=0.23 to 0.75) and total
CHD
(HR=0.53; 95% CI=0.34 to 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: n-3 PUFAs from both
seafood and
plant sources may reduce CHD risk, with little apparent influence from
background n-6 PUFA intake. Plant-based n-3 PUFAs may particularly
reduce CHD
risk when seafood-based n-3 PUFA intake is low, which has implications
for
populations with low consumption or availability of fatty fish.

PMID: 15630029 [PubMed - in process]

2: Nutrition. 2004 Nov-Dec;20(11-12):967-73.

Omega-3 fatty acids and selenium as coronary heart disease risk
modifying
factors in Asian Indian and Chinese males.

Manav M, Su J, Hughes K, Lee HP, Ong CN.

Department of Community, Occupational, and Family Medicine, National
University
of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

OBJECTIVE: Asian Indian men are reported to have a higher incidence of
coronary
heart disease than men of other ethnic groups worldwide. Among the many
hypotheses, one possible risk factor may be related to their dietary
habits.
This study estimated the plasma concentrations of fatty acids,
antioxidant
vitamins, and selenium in Indians and Chinese of Singapore. METHODS:
The study
population consisted of 145 Indian men and 147 Chinese men ages 26 to
79 y from
a cross-sectional survey, the National University of Singapore Heart
Study.
RESULTS: Our findings indicated that Indians had lower plasma
concentrations of
docosahexanoic acid (3.07% versus 3.54%, P < 0.001), alpha-linolenic
acid (0.48%
versus 0.57%, P < 0.001), and total omega-3 fatty acids (4.71% versus
5.27%, P <
0.001) than did the Chinese. Arachidonic acid was higher in Indians
(4.83%) than
in the Chinese (4.51%, P = 0.007). The ratio of omega-3 acid to omega-6
fatty
acid was also lower in Indians (0.15) than in the Chinese (0.16, P =
0.007).
There were no significant differences in the concentrations of
monounsaturated
fatty acids, but saturated fatty acids were higher in Indians (39.17%)
than in
the Chinese (38.28%, P < 0.001). Analysis of vitamins A, C, and E
showed no
significant differences between Indians (0.67, 5.72, and 13.04 mg/L,
respectively) and Chinese (0.68, 6.48, and 12.71 mg/L, respectively);
however,
serum concentration of selenium in Indians (117.49 microg/L) was
significantly
lower than in the Chinese (126.72 microg/L, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The
results
suggest that lower plasma concentrations of omega-3 fatty acids and
selenium and
higher concentrations of arachidonic acid and saturated fatty acids in
Indians
may reflect lower intakes of marine foods and, as a consequence, higher
susceptibility to coronary heart disease.

PMID: 15561485 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

3: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2004 Jun;14(3):162-9.

Alpha-linolenic acid and coronary heart disease.

de Lorgeril M, Salen P.

Laboratoire Nutrition, Vieillissement et Maladies Cardiovasculaires
(NVMCV), UFR
de Medecine et Pharmacie, Universite Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France.
michel.delorgeril@ujf-grenoble.fr

AIM: To summarize our present knowledge about vegetable omega-3 fatty
acids.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) is one of the two essential
fatty
acids in humans. Epidemiological studies and dietary trials strongly
suggest
that this fatty acid is important in relation with the pathogenesis
(and
prevention) of coronary heart disease. Like other n-3 fatty acids from
marine
origin, it may prevent cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.
The optimal
dietary intake of alpha-linolenic acid seems to be about 2 g per day or
0.6 to
1% of total energy intake. Obtaining an optimal ratio of the two
essential fatty
acids, linoleic and alpha-linolenic acids--ie a ratio of less than 4 to
1 in the
diet--is a major issue. The main sources of alpha-linolenic acid for
the
European population should be canola oil (and canola-oil based
margarine if
available), nuts (English walnut), ground linseeds and green leafy
vegetables
such as purslane. CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiological studies and dietary
trials in
humans suggest that alpha-linolenic acid is a major cardio-protective
nutrient.

Publication Types:
   Review
   Review, Tutorial

PMID: 15330276 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

4: Annu Rev Nutr. 2004;24:597-615.

Dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acid balance and cardiovascular health.

Wijendran V, Hayes KC.

Foster Biomedical Research Lab, Brandeis University, Waltham,
Massachusetts
02254, USA. vwijen@brandeis.edu

Epidemiological and clinical studies have established that the n-6
fatty acid,
linoleic acid (LA), and the n-3 fatty acids, linolenic acid (LNA),
eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)
collectively protect
against coronary heart disease (CHD). LA is the major dietary fatty
acid
regulating low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-C metabolism by downregulating
LDL-C
production and enhancing its clearance. Further, the available mass of
LA is a
critical factor determining the hyperlipemic effects of other dietary
fat
components, such as saturated and trans fatty acids, as well as
cholesterol. By
contrast, n-3 fatty acids, especially EPA and DHA, are potent
antiarryhthmic
agents. EPA and DHA also improve vascular endothelial function and help
lower
blood pressure, platelet sensitivity, and the serum triglyceride level.
The
distinct functions of these two families make the balance between
dietary n-6
and n-3 fatty acids an important consideration influencing
cardiovascular
health. Based on published literature describing practical dietary
intakes, we
suggest that consumption of ~6% en LA, 0.75% en LNA, and 0.25% en EPA +
DHA
represents adequate and achievable intakes for most healthy adults.
This
corresponds to an n-6/n-3 ratio of ~6:1. However, the absolute mass of
essential
fatty acids consumed, rather than their n-6/n-3 ratio, should be the
first
consideration when contemplating lifelong dietary habits affecting
cardiovascular benefit from their intake.

Publication Types:
   Review

PMID: 15189133 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

5: Int J Cardiol. 2004 May;95(1):35-8.

To what extent are the effects of diet on coronary heart disease
lipid-mediated?

Serrano-Martinez M, Martinez-Losa E, Prado-Santamaria M,
Brugarolas-Brufau C,
Fernandez-Jarne E, Martinez-Gonzalez MA.

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Irunlarrea s/n, Facultad
de
Medicina, University of Navarre, 31080 Pamplona, Spain.
mserranm@nacom.es

BACKGROUND: Cohort and case-control studies support the effect of diet
on
coronary heart disease. The objective of this study was to analyze the
strength
of the influence of dietary fat subtypes and other nutrients on serum
lipids
levels in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction. METHODS:
We studied
139 patients with a first myocardial infarction and no previous history
of
vascular disease. Serum lipids were determined, and nutrient intake was
analyzed
using a validated 118-food item questionnaire. RESULTS: Multiple
regression
models found weak but significant associations between the intake of
different
fatty acids and total to HDL cholesterol ratio (atherogenic index) when
we
adjusted for age, gender and body mass index (BMI). Positive
associations with
serum HDL cholesterol concentration were observed for energy-adjusted
intake of
red wine, alcohol intake, and omega-3 fatty acids intake. However,
these
nutrients explained less than 12% of the variability in the atherogenic
index,
and less than 17% in the variability of HDL. CONCLUSIONS: Our results
suggest
only a modest contribution of the investigated nutrients on serum
lipids
(atherogenic index and HDL cholesterol) in coronary patients.
Alternative
mechanisms of dietary factors not directly related with serum lipids
or, more
likely, a global effect of diet on inflammatory and antioxidant
parameters
should be studied in order to better understand the nature of dietary
habits'
influence on cardiovascular disease.

PMID: 15159035 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

>>Heart disease is more of a nutrient deficiency condition then it is a
condition caused by too much of a certain nutrient. The B vitamins and
vitamin C and collagen in the diet has more impact on the health of the

cardio-pulmonary system than any suggested excess of any fat. <<

Citations, please?

>>The fact is that a vegetarian whole-food diet(as in India) will not
provide good enough nutrition for proper cardio health. Switch some of
the carbs to refined westernized carbs and their cardio health will get

even worse. That is the pattern. <<

Agreed. But only because you're not giving them what they need, which
is n-3 PUFAs.  For this you need fish or fresh produce, the very things
that all heart protective diets have in abundance.

>>Vegetarians have weak and damaged arteries due to their poor diets and
the lack of the right nutrients that are primarily gotten from animal
sources, and the first arteries to go will be the ones that move the
most and get the most physical stress, and those are the heart
arteries. <<

COMMENT:

The last part of your comment is no doubt correct. Atherosclerosis hits
flexed arteries first, and that is why, after the heart, it hits the
carotids where the head turns, and the leg arteries near the joints.

The rest of what you say is nonsense. There is NO evidence that
vegetarians have weak arteries, or more coronary disease. The opposite
is generally true. Probably this is because most vegetarians get some
fresh produce, at least. In the few places where they don't, they are
in the same fix as the dogs who were fed hydrogenated coconut oil.
Without at least some n-3, even a carnivore's arteries go bad. Game
meat is ordinarily a good n-3 source. Dairy cows aren't. There you are.

1: J Am Coll Nutr. 2001 Feb;20(1):5-19.

Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a critical
review.

Hu FB, Manson JE, Willett WC.

Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston,
Massachusetts
02115, USA. Frank.hu@channing.harvard.edu

During the past several decades, reduction in fat intake has been the
main focus
of national dietary recommendations to decrease risk of coronary heart
disease
(CHD). Several lines of evidence. however, have indicated that types of
fat have
a more important role in determining risk of CHD than total amount of
fat in the
diet. Metabolic studies have long established that the type of fat, but
not
total amount of fat, predicts serum cholesterol levels. In addition,
results
from epidemiologic studies and controlled clinical trials have
indicated that
replacing saturated fat with unsaturated fat is more effective in
lowering risk
of CHD than simply reducing total fat consumption. Moreover,
prospective cohort
studies and secondary prevention trials have provided strong evidence
that an
increasing intake of n-3 fatty acids from fish or plant sources
substantially
lowers risk of cardiovascular mortality. In this article, we review
evidence
from epidemiologic studies and dietary intervention trials addressing
the
relationship between dietary fat intake and risk of CHD, with a
particular
emphasis on different major types of fat, n-3 fatty acids and the
optimal
balance between n-3 and n-6 fatty acids. We also discuss the
implications of the
available evidence in the context of current dietary recommendations.

Publication Types:
   Review
   Review, Tutorial

PMID: 11293467 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

2: Public Health Nutr. 2001 Apr;4(2B):441-57.

Epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases in Europe.

Kromhout D.

Division of Public Health Research, National Institute of Public Health
and the
Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. daan.kromhout@rivm.nl

Within Europe large differences exist in mortality from coronary heart
disease
and stroke. These diseases show a clear West-East gradient with high
rates in
Eastern Europe. In spite the decreasing trend in age-adjusted
cardiovascular
disease mortality in Western European countries an increase in the
number of
cardiovascular patients is expected because of the ageing of the
population.
Consequently the health care cost for these diseases will increase.
Total and
HDL cholesterol are major determinants of coronary heart disease.
Saturated and
trans fatty acids have a total and LDL cholesterol elevating effect and
unsaturated fatty acids a lowering effect. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty
acids seem
to have a protective effect on coronary heart disease occurrence
independent of
their effect on cholesterol. Dietary antioxidants could be of
importance because
they may prevent oxidation of the atherogenic cholesterol rich LDL
lipoproteins.
There is however no convincing evidence that either vitamin E,
carotenoids or
vitamin C protect against coronary heart disease. Observational
research has
shown that flavonols, polyphenols with strong antioxidant properties
present in
plant foods, may protect against coronary heart disease. Blood pressure
is a
major determinant of coronary heart disease and stroke. Historically
salt is
viewed as the most important dietary determinant of blood pressure.
Recent
research shows that also a low-fat diet rich in potassium, calcium and
magnesium
lowers blood pressure substantially. This suggests a multifactorial
influence of
different nutrients on blood pressure. It can be concluded that a diet
low in
saturated and trans fatty acids and rich in plant foods in combination
with
regular fish consumption is associated with a low risk of
cardiovascular
mortality.

Publication Types:
   Review
   Review, Tutorial

PMID: 11683540 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

3: J Nutr Health Aging. 2001;5(3):144-9.

Diet and cardiovascular diseases.

Kromhout D.

Division of Public Health Research, National Institute of Public Health
and
Environment, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
daan.kromhout@rivm.nl

In spite of the decreasing trend in age-adjusted cardiovascular disease
mortality in Western European countries, an increase in the
cardiovascular
morbidity is expected because of the ageing of the population.
Consequently the
health care cost for these diseases will increase. This article focuses
on the
role of diet in the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases.Total and HDL
cholesterol are major determinants of coronary heart disease. Saturated
and
trans fatty acids have a total and LDL cholesterol elevating effect and
unsaturated fatty acids a lowering effect. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty
acids seem
to have a protective effect on coronary heart disease occurrence
independent of
cholesterol. Dietary antioxidants could be of importance because they
may
prevent oxidation of the atherogenic cholesterol rich LDL lipoproteins.
There is
however no convincing evidence that either vitamin E, carotenoids or
vitamin C
protect against coronary heart disease. Observational research has
shown that
flavonols, polyphenols with strong antioxidant properties present in
plant
foods, may protect against coronary heart disease. Blood pressure is a
major
determinant of coronary heart disease and stroke. Historically salt is
viewed as
the most important dietary determinant of blood pressure. Recent
research shows
that also a low-fat diet rich in potassium, calcium and magnesium
lowers blood
pressure substantially. This suggests a multifactorial influence of
different
nutrients on blood pressure. It can be concluded that a diet low in
saturated
and trans fatty acids and rich in plant foods in combination with
regular fish
consumption is associated with a low risk of cardiovascular mortality.

Publication Types:
   Review
   Review, Tutorial

PMID: 11458283 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

4: Prev Med. 1999 Dec;29(6 Pt 2):S18-23.

Diet as primordial prevention in Seventh-Day Adventists.

Fraser GE.

Loma Linda University, California 92350, USA. gfraser@sph.llu.edu

Epidemiologic studies of Seventh-Day Adventists have clearly shown that
dietary
habits are associated with risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and
other
chronic diseases. However, a few surprising results emerge. Meat
consumption is
clearly hazardous for Adventist men by raising CHD mortality. However,
no such
effect was seen in women. Possible reasons are discussed. Our data, and
that of
others, strongly support the role of a fatty food, specifically nuts,
as
protective for CHD. The possible implications of this result for fat
intake as a
risk factor for CHD are discussed. In particular, it may be that
consumption of
modest quantities of certain fats is beneficial, rather than hazardous.
The
lower risk of CHD in Adventists probably has a complicated explanation
and
certainly cannot be entirely explained by their nonsmoking status or a
superior
serum lipid profile. Adventists are unique in that the majority of this
group
have adopted a dietary habit that is either vegetarian or tending in
this
direction. The power of incorporating health into a system of religious
belief
is discussed. Possibly others can also implement such a model to their
advantage.

Publication Types:
   Review
   Review, Tutorial

PMID: 10641813 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

5: QJM. 1999 Sep;92(9):531-44.

Comment in:
   QJM. 2000 Jun;93(6):387.

Vegetarian diet: panacea for modern lifestyle diseases?

Segasothy M, Phillips PA.

Department of Medicine, Northern Territory Clinical School of Medicine
of
Flinders University, Alice Springs, Australia. m.segasothy@nt.gov.au

We review the beneficial and adverse effects of vegetarian diets in
various
medical conditions. Soybean-protein diet, legumes, nuts and soluble
fibre
significantly decrease total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein
cholesterol
and triglycerides. Diets rich in fibre and complex carbohydrate, and
restricted
in fat, improve control of blood glucose concentration, lower insulin
requirement and aid in weight control in diabetic patients. An inverse
association has been reported between nut, fruit, vegetable and fibre
consumption, and the risk of coronary heart disease. Patients eating a
vegetarian diet, with comprehensive lifestyle changes, have had reduced
frequency, duration and severity of angina as well as regression of
coronary
atherosclerosis and improved coronary perfusion. An inverse association
between
fruit and vegetable consumption and stroke has been suggested.
Consumption of
fruits and vegetables, especially spinach and collard green, was
associated with
a lower risk of age-related ocular macular degeneration. There is an
inverse
association between dietary fibre intake and incidence of colon and
breast
cancer as well as prevalence of colonic diverticula and gallstones. A
decreased
breast cancer risk has been associated with high intake of soy bean
products.
The beneficial effects could be due to the diet (monounsaturated and
polyunsaturated fatty acids, minerals, fibre, complex carbohydrate,
antioxidant
vitamins, flavanoids, folic acid and phytoestrogens) as well as the
associated
healthy lifestyle in vegetarians. There are few adverse effects, mainly
increased intestinal gas production and a small risk of vitamin B12
deficiency.

Publication Types:
   Review

PMID: 10627874 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

6: Curr Opin Lipidol. 1994 Feb;5(1):17-21.

Vegetarianism, coronary disease risk factors and coronary heart
disease.

Thorogood M.

Health Promotion Sciences Unit, Department of Public Health and Policy,
London
School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Recent studies of vegetarians confirm a lower risk of fatal heart
disease
amongst such subjects. Lipid levels are lower in vegetarians, even when
the diet
of comparable meat-eaters is low in fat. This may partly explain the
lower
mortality, but it is not clear whether the absence of meat or some
other aspect
of the vegetarian diet is causal in this relationship.

Publication Types:
   Review
   Review, Tutorial

PMID: 15559026 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

7: Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Sep;48(3 Suppl):830-2.

Heart disease in British vegetarians.

Burr ML, Butland BK.

MRC Epidemiology Unit, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

A prospective study was conducted among customers of health food shops
and
members of societies interested in health foods. A total of 10,896
persons were
followed for 10-12 y, including 4671 vegetarians and 6225
nonvegetarians.
Mortality from ischemic heart disease (IHD) was significantly lower in
the
vegetarians than in the nonvegetarians; the difference was especially
marked
among the men. In a subset of 300 subjects, serum cholesterol and body
mass
index were lower in the vegetarians than in the nonvegetarians but
there were no
consistent differences in blood pressure between the two groups.
Vegetarianism
seems to confer some protection against IHD but it is not clear whether
this is
due to abstinence from meat or to a high consumption of vegetables.

PMID: 3414590 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

8: Prev Med. 1984 Sep;13(5):490-500.

Meat consumption and fatal ischemic heart disease.

Snowdon DA, Phillips RL, Fraser GE.

In 1960 the meat-consumption habits of 25,153 California Seventh-Day
Adventists
were assessed by questionnaire. Between 1960 and 1980 ischemic heart
disease
deaths were identified. Meat consumption was positively associated with
fatal
ischemic heart disease in both men and women. This association was
apparently
not due to confounding by eggs, dairy products, obesity, marital
status, or
cigarette smoking. The positive association between meat consumption
and fatal
ischemic heart disease was stronger in men than in women and, overall,
strongest
in young men. For 45- to 64-year-old men, there was approximately a
threefold
difference in risk between men who ate meat daily and those who did not
eat
meat. This is the first study to clearly show a dose-response
relationship
between meat consumption and ischemic heart disease risk.

PMID: 6527990 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

9: Am J Clin Nutr. 1978 Oct;31(10 Suppl):S191-S198.

Coronary heart disease mortality among Seventh-Day Adventists with
differing
dietary habits: a preliminary report.

Phillips RL, Lemon FR, Beeson WL, Kuzma JW.

Seventh-Day Adventists (SDAs) are a conservative religious denomination
who
abstain from tobacco and alcohol; approximately one-half follow a
lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet. In this 6-year prospective study of 24,044
California
SDAs age 35 and over, coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality rates for
ages 35
to 64 and 65+ are 28% and 50% respectively, of the rates for the same
age groups
of the total California population. This reduced risk of CHD mortality
among
SDAs is partially due to abstinence from smoking; however, at least
half the low
risk among SDAs is likely attributable to other characteristics of the
SDA
lifestyle. The risk of fatal CHD among nonvegetarian SDA males, ages 35
to 64,
is three times greater than vegetarian SDA males of comparable age (P
less than
0.01), suggesting that the SDA diet may account for a large share of
their low
risk. This differential was much smaller for older SDA males and SDA
females.
Although the differential in risk of fatal CHD for male nonvegetarians
versus
vegetarians may be partially accounted for by other CHD risk factors,
which are
more frequent among nonvegetarians, a significant differential persists
after
adjustment for each of six other CHD risk factors.

PMID: 707372 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
calypso47@voyager.net - 16 Jun 2005 23:26 GMT
What I would like to know is what causes so much gas, so to speak?  The
traditional indian diet had one of the lowest rates of cvd and diabetes in
the world until a couple of decades ago.  That rat didn't go from bad to
worst by changing the amount of carbs eaten, it went from good to worst by
eating more fats, more calories, and by lowering physical activity.  The
low risk rates still exist in mostly rural areas where the shift has not
been made.  Most of be below is a pointless exercise in begging the
question and could be countered with research support, but with same
seldom forthcoming why bother.  Who could possibly counter what is created
so easily and cheaply?

>If you had read what I posted you would have noted the incredible
>variety of views on what is supposed to cause heart disease and what
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
>TC
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 17 Jun 2005 02:38 GMT
>>The traditional indian diet had one of the lowest rates of cvd and diabetes in
the world until a couple of decades ago.  That rat didn't go from bad
to
worst by changing the amount of carbs eaten, it went from good to worst
by
eating more fats, more calories, and by lowering physical activity. <<

COMMENT:

I think your reasoning is sound. "Westernization" of diets always adds
more fat than carbohydrates, and the fat that it does add, is low in
omega-3 (n-3) simply due to cost considerations. It's realtively hard
to get n-3 PUFAs relative to other fats and oils, and once you have
them, it's hard to keep them from spoiling. Industrial society runs on
hydrogenated veg oil and it *systematically* remove w-3s from the diet
at every opportunity.  To hear TC talk, you'd think the same thing
happens with vitamin C and other micronutrients. Sorry, but in our
vitamin charged fortified world, that just ain't true.  Read the
MacDonald's Menu, or the the one at In an Out or Burger King or
whatever.  Vitamins added everyplace.  Omega-3's--- nowhere.
TC - 17 Jun 2005 03:46 GMT
> >>The traditional indian diet had one of the lowest rates of cvd and diabetes in
> the world until a couple of decades ago.  That rat didn't go from bad
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> MacDonald's Menu, or the the one at In an Out or Burger King or
> whatever.  Vitamins added everyplace.  Omega-3's--- nowhere.

Reasoning based on what? Hearsay? Do you guys have anything to back
these assertions? Data? Studies? Statistical trends? Anything at all?

TC
nospam@aol.com - 17 Jun 2005 03:53 GMT
>>>The traditional indian diet had one of the lowest rates of cvd and diabetes in
>the world until a couple of decades ago.  That rat didn't go from bad
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>MacDonald's Menu, or the the one at In an Out or Burger King or
>whatever.  Vitamins added everyplace.  Omega-3's--- nowhere.

McDonald's uses soybean and canola oils, both of which contain adequate amounts
of Omega-3.  But too much Omega-6.
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 17 Jun 2005 20:44 GMT
>>McDonald's uses soybean and canola oils, both of which contain adequate amounts
of Omega-3.  But too much Omega-6. <<

COMMENT:

Ahem. What a misleading comment, and if you know enough to know what
you said above, you know enough to know how misleading it is. This is a
recent change (circa 2003 for McDonalds), and certainly would not show
up on anything epidemological.  McDonald's went public in 1965. For two
generations and more they've cooked everything in the same stuff
everybody else in the fast food business has--- partically hydrogenated
soybean and cottonseed oil. That doesn't make them evil, but let's
state the plain facts.

SBH
Pizza Girl - 18 Jun 2005 04:47 GMT
The sign in Canada's McDonalds says "Beef Tallow"

> >>McDonald's uses soybean and canola oils, both of which contain adequate amounts
> of Omega-3.  But too much Omega-6. <<
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> SBH
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 21 Jun 2005 03:49 GMT
>>The sign in Canada's McDonalds says "Beef Tallow" <<

Yes. But prior to 2003 when the anti-trans fat people finally got to
McDonalds, the sign wouldn't have said anything. Because McDonalds was
using whatever they thought was cheapest and tasted okay.
Pizza Girl - 21 Jun 2005 04:22 GMT
It wasn't a publicly available sign and it was before 2003 for sure.

It was posted in one of the back rooms as information for their staff. It
was preceded by "In case a customer asks" and written on cardboard with
marker.

> >>The sign in Canada's McDonalds says "Beef Tallow" <<
>
> Yes. But prior to 2003 when the anti-trans fat people finally got to
> McDonalds, the sign wouldn't have said anything. Because McDonalds was
> using whatever they thought was cheapest and tasted okay.
nospam@aol.com - 21 Jun 2005 07:23 GMT
>>>McDonald's uses soybean and canola oils, both of which contain adequate amounts
>of Omega-3.  But too much Omega-6. <<
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>SBH

What is the misleading part?  My comment was in reply to yours:

> Read the
>MacDonald's Menu, or the the one at In an Out or Burger King or
>whatever.  Vitamins added everyplace.  Omega-3's--- nowhere.

Their ingredients list is at
http://www.mcdonalds.com/app_controller.nutrition.categories.ingredients.index.html
I grant you that they do state that canola oil and soybean oil are used but they
do qualify it with "and/or" so there must be some Omega 3 somewhere in their
establishments.

Canola Oil 9.3 gm. per 100 gm. Omega 3
Soybean Oil  7 gm. per 100 gm. Omega 3

http://www.althealth.co.uk/products/details.php?id=ve027
           Recognizing the unique benefits of EPA and DHA and the serious
           consequences of a deficiency the US National Institutes of Health
           recently published Recommended Daily Intakes of fatty acids.

           They  recommend a total daily intake of 650 mg of EPA and DHA,
    2.22g/day of alpha-linolenic acid and 4.44 g/day of linoleic acid.

So where's the beef.  I do not understand your reference "certainly would not
show up on anything epidemological".

Ora
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 21 Jun 2005 22:03 GMT
The "beef" is trans-fats from hydrogenated cooking oils, which have
only recently been gotten rid of by McDonalds, but are still used in
many other fast foods. If you've eaten a french fry in the 20th century
in the US, it was probably cooked in trans-fat containing oil.
nospam@aol.com - 21 Jun 2005 23:22 GMT
>The "beef" is trans-fats from hydrogenated cooking oils, which have
>only recently been gotten rid of by McDonalds, but are still used in
>many other fast foods. If you've eaten a french fry in the 20th century
>in the US, it was probably cooked in trans-fat containing oil.

I believe for a while McDonald's was making french fries from formed mashed
potatoes.  Maybe they still are.  Those were strange to say the least.  Similar
to Pringles which (I believe) use the same process.  If I have an occasion to
eat french fries I only eat one.  That usually cures me of the urge to try them
again.  But once in a while I get some that are really good.

Ora
Pizza Girl - 22 Jun 2005 03:08 GMT
Try a cooking course. "Beef Tallow"

> The "beef" is trans-fats from hydrogenated cooking oils, which have
> only recently been gotten rid of by McDonalds, but are still used in
> many other fast foods. If you've eaten a french fry in the 20th century
> in the US, it was probably cooked in trans-fat containing oil.
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 22 Jun 2005 20:14 GMT
Try a cooking course. "Beef Tallow"

COMMENT:

Try some reading comprehension skills. McDonalds did not always cook
everything in beef tallow. No matter whether you think they did or not.
No matter how many times you insist on it.

SBH
Pizza Girl. - 23 Jun 2005 03:29 GMT
Sure sounds like a contradiction to me

" "Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" <sbharris@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> news:1119387826.154985.48880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> > The "beef" is trans-fats from hydrogenated cooking oils"

> Try a co