First, let me say I am not an anti-milk! Not at all. I just love milk, I
drink it every day and I think it's good food (unless there is something
that spoils it, of course).
But... I can't understand why MyPyramid.gov shows "Milk" as one of the
essential food groups:
Grains
Vegetables
Fruits
Milk
Meat & Beans
Oils
Discretionary Calories
Physical Activity
Well, I love milk, as I said, but I admit one can live without milk & dairy
if they want or need to.
Well, yes... the same could be said for other single foods, but... some
groups look more "essential" than others, don't they?
"Meat & Beans" (including fish), for instance, is the wide group of protein
sources, and some protein we need somehow, don't we?
I don't understand this new MyPyramid stuff. It's not clear about what is
good or bad for you. It doesn't show, in a picture, what you should eat
more ore less. Those colored stripes look like abstract art, as someone
said, and the names of the food groups are ill picked, imho. If "Milk" is
essential, why not "Fish"? Why are good olive oil and not-so-good
margarine together in the "Oils" group? Why do they say "Grains" rather
than "Whole Grains".
And where is the "No, thanks!" to pops, candies and added sugar? If it's
somewhere in MyPyramid, it's well hidden!
And, I wonder, why didn't USDA use the Harvard Healthy Eating Pyramid
instead?
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/pyramids.html
Apart from some difference in content, Harvard Pyramyd makes *clear* the
do's and dont's about food: YES to whole grains and olive oil, for
instance, Vegetable *in abundance*, YES to legumes and nuts, NO to lots of
sweets, use *sparingly* butter and fatty red meat.... and so on...
Most of those ideas can be found in the new American Guide Lines 2005,
can't they?, but they are not clearly expressed in MyPyramyd symbols.
Why?
TC - 27 May 2005 17:49 GMT
> First, let me say I am not an anti-milk! Not at all. I just love milk, I
> drink it every day and I think it's good food (unless there is something
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> can't they?, but they are not clearly expressed in MyPyramyd symbols.
> Why?
They have given up on dazzling us with their brilliance and are now
just trying to baffle us with their bullshit.
TC
Doug Freese - 27 May 2005 18:57 GMT
> They have given up on dazzling us with their brilliance and are now
> just trying to baffle us with their bullshit.
You are so predictable, the world is wrong and you are right. Notice
what is at the base - daily exercise and I don't think they mean
operating the remote control or your exaggerated fence building tale.
-DF
TC - 27 May 2005 19:55 GMT
> > They have given up on dazzling us with their brilliance and are now
> > just trying to baffle us with their bullshit.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> -DF
Well they got one thing right. Yippeeeee!
TC