Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What is the starch conmption in the US?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tipster - 26 May 2005 01:24 GMT
Can anyone give me the yearly starch consumption in the US please ?
Wheat, rice etc. I want to know how much starch is consumed per year,
per person.
TC - 26 May 2005 15:14 GMT
> Can anyone give me the yearly starch consumption in the US please ?
> Wheat, rice etc. I want to know how much starch is consumed per year,
> per person.

You would probably have to find the figures for each individual
comodity and average them together to get a combined starch consuption
per year number.

Start with googling "wheat consumption per capita" then "rice
consumption per capita", etc. Then you will have to narrow the search
to US-only stats.

Good luck and have fun.

TC
Tipster - 26 May 2005 18:43 GMT
Thanks TC,

So far I found these figures 348 pounds of rice/wheat/flour/cereal
products per capita.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0104742.html

> > Can anyone give me the yearly starch consumption in the US please ?
> > Wheat, rice etc. I want to know how much starch is consumed per year,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> TC
calypso47@voyager.net - 26 May 2005 20:15 GMT
About 50 percent of calories eaten on average, strictly speaking starch is
a subcategory of carbohydrates which is the number here and my guess as
to your intent.  It is much higher in other parts of the world, s. asia
and e. asia finds around 70 percent for example.
Enrico C - 27 May 2005 00:32 GMT
> About 50 percent of calories eaten on average,
<snip>

Now that we are at it... What is the rest of it? :)

Signature

Enrico C

calypso47@voyager.net - 27 May 2005 00:50 GMT
To extend and refine my previous answer we find:

"Agriculture Factbook 2001-2002/chapter 2"

http://www.usda.gov/factbook/chapter2.htm

"putting dietary intake of
  calories in 2000 at just under 2,700 calories per person per day."

If no math mistakes were made and assuming the 50 percent of the diet in
carbohydrates posted before at 4 calories per gram of carbohydrate with a
yearly total of 123187.5 grams and doing the conversion, 271.58 pounds of
carbohydrates are consumed each year per person on average.  

Mentioning again, starch is a specific technical term for a type of
carbohydrate and would be a sub fraction of the 271.58 lbs.  Also, some
fraction of carbohydrates are not digestable, mostly fibers but also some
starch.  What is yyour intrest in the question?
Tipster - 28 May 2005 19:10 GMT
I wanted to know the relationship (if there exists one) between
carbohydrate on calorie consumption.

starch consumption in the far east seems significant in the far east,
and yet the obesity problem doesnt seem as worse as in the US (at least
not yet!).

With all the speculation with obesity and carbohydrate I wondered if
there's any relationship between carbohydrate consumption and calorie
consumption. But so far...

> Mentioning again, starch is a specific technical term for a type of
> carbohydrate and would be a sub fraction of the 271.58 lbs.  Also, some
> fraction of carbohydrates are not digestable, mostly fibers but also some
> starch.  What is yyour intrest in the question?
Enrico C - 28 May 2005 19:43 GMT
On 28 May 2005 11:10:55 -0700, Tipster wrote in
<news:1117303855.256994.249660@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> on
sci.med.nutrition :

> I wanted to know the relationship (if there exists one) between
> carbohydrate on calorie consumption.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> there's any relationship between carbohydrate consumption and calorie
> consumption. But so far...

Carbohydrate also include sugars and other compounds, not just starch.

Anyway, here is a possible explanation for the obesity "epidemic" in the
US:
more refined grains,
more added fats,
more added sugars,
more calories (+24.5% 1970-2000),
less physical activities.
Isn't that enough?

http://www.usda.gov/factbook/chapter2.htm

=======================================
USDA's Economic Research Service (ERS) estimates [...] dietary intake of
calories in 2000 at just under 2,700 calories per person per day. ERS data
suggest that average daily calorie intake increased by 24.5 percent, or
about 530 calories, between 1970 and 2000. Of that 24.5-percent increase,
grains (mainly refined grain products) contributed 9.5 percentage points;
added fats and oils, 9.0 percentage points; added sugars, 4.7 percentage
points; fruits and vegetables together, 1.5 percentage points; meats and
nuts together, 1 percentage point; and dairy products and eggs together,
-1.5 percentage point.

Some of the observed increase in caloric intake may be associated with the
increase in eating out. Data from USDA's food intake surveys show that the
food-away-from-home sector provided 32 percent of total food energy
consumption in 1994-96, up from 18 percent in 1977-78. The data also
suggest that, when eating out, people either eat more or eat higher calorie
foods-or both-and that this tendency appears to be increasing.

According to the National Center for Health Statistics, an astounding 62
percent of adult Americans were overweight in 2000, up from 46 percent in
1980. Twenty-seven percent of adults were so far overweight that they were
classified as obese (at least 30 pounds above their healthy weight)-twice
the percentage classified as such in 1960. Alarmingly, an upward trend in
obesity is also occurring for U.S. children.

Although multiple factors can account for weight gain, the basic cause is
an excess of energy intake over energy expenditure. In general, Americans'
activity levels have not kept pace with their increase in calorie
consumption. Many people apparently are oblivious to the number of calories
they consume.

=======================================
calypso47@voyager.net - 29 May 2005 19:18 GMT
"starch consumption in the far east seems significant in the far east,
and yet the obesity problem doesnt seem as worse as in the US (at least
not yet!)."

It is changing there too, my previous remarks referred to traditional
eating patterns.  As physical activity has decreased, more animal protein
and fat increased, and increased use of vegetable oils increase, and
ability to purchase food, obesity and health disorders related to it have
increased.  Overall carbohydrate intake by percent is about the same,ie.
70, but people are just eating more of it along with the above.  Calorie
level determines weight status.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.