the "financial times" was pretty good. it had a good amount of articles,
but not really much on the actual analysis. more of a newspaper than a
magazine though. personally, i like to do my own analysis instead of having
it written or typed out for me. the financial times did a free trial; they
might still offer it. check it out if you wish.
-js
"Tim"
wrote in message
news:GfudnVS4kNdTheDfRVn-oQ@giganews.com...
> My primary focus is technical analyses, derivatives & stocks, but I
> certainly don't want to be ignorant of the fundamentals. I'm also
> peripherally interested in general financial and real estate news. Which
> weekly magazine would you most highly recommend for me?
>
> Thanks
> Tim
Roger Rabbit - 20 May 2005 23:16 GMT
>the "financial times" was pretty good. it had a good amount of articles,
>but not really much on the actual analysis. more of a newspaper than a
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> Thanks
>> Tim
That's nice! And this has *what* to do with sci.med.nutrition?
rr