Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What's with corn (maize)?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Sankey - 10 May 2005 13:03 GMT
I hear lots of comments that corn isn't the best for us, but no
details. Why do you think whole-kernel corn should be reduced or
eliminated from a diet?
TC - 10 May 2005 14:43 GMT
> I hear lots of comments that corn isn't the best for us, but no
> details. Why do you think whole-kernel corn should be reduced or
> eliminated from a diet?

Freshly picked whole food corn is not that bad although it is low in a
couple of nutrients. It is OK but it isn't the *ideal* food. I would
not make it a major part of my diet.

The problem is when they over-process it into corn flakes and/or high
fructose corn syrup, then it becomes a negative nutrient, your body
ends up using up more nutrients to metabolize it than it gets from it.

TC
MMu - 10 May 2005 15:58 GMT
>> I hear lots of comments that corn isn't the best for us, but no
>> details. Why do you think whole-kernel corn should be reduced or
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> fructose corn syrup, then it becomes a negative nutrient, your body
> ends up using up more nutrients to metabolize it than it gets from it.

Please to elaborate on the term "negative nutrient" a little closer.

If every nutrient that uses some resource more than it gains that certain
resource (a vitamin, a mineral, a macronutrient, ATP,...) is a negative
nutrient then the majority of nutrients are. No single nutrient is supposed
to deliver all micro and macronutrients needed a day.. hence judging
individual food items isn't really very meaningful (except for toxicologic
concerns of course).

PS high fructose corn syrup isnt something one is living on as a main food
item I hope.

> TC
TC - 10 May 2005 16:42 GMT
> >> I hear lots of comments that corn isn't the best for us, but no
> >> details. Why do you think whole-kernel corn should be reduced or
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> > TC

Fresh nutritious whole-food supplies more nutrients than it requires
for its metabolization in the human body. That is positive nutrition.

Many processed and/or refined foods lack the nutrients that the body
needs to metabolize it. That is negative nutrition.

Good nutritional health requires that we consume as much
positive-nutrition as possible. The more negative-nutrition we consume
the more likely we are to suffer from chronic disease and chronic
conditions due to depletion of nutrients.

A bit of negative-nutrition in the midst of a diet full of positive
nutrition is a minor thing but a constant diet of negative-nutrition
will create all kinds of health problems.

No single food source will provide us with all the nutrition we need.
That is why we need a relatively diverse number of good nutritious
whole foods to maintain health.

Refined carbs are the major source of negative nutrition for humans.
Sugars and refined grains. Especially Ready-To-Eat cereals, white flour
pasta, white four bread, soda or pop, etc. Not only do they not contain
any nutrition, they are negative-nutrition. They deplete you of
essential vitamins and minerals.

TC
Mr-Natural-Health - 10 May 2005 18:38 GMT
> I hear lots of comments that corn isn't the best for us, but no
> details. Why do you think whole-kernel corn should be reduced or
> eliminated from a diet?

high fructose corn syrup

Need anybody say more?

Corn is a grain rather than a vegetable.  It is more desirable to
increase the consumption of vegetables in your diet, than the number of
grains eaten.
TC - 10 May 2005 18:48 GMT
> > I hear lots of comments that corn isn't the best for us, but no
> > details. Why do you think whole-kernel corn should be reduced or
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> increase the consumption of vegetables in your diet, than the number of
> grains eaten.

Did you even read the original post?

TC
Mr-Natural-Health - 10 May 2005 19:03 GMT
> Did you even read the original post?

Do Crappers even read?  Enquiring minds want to know?
sTeve - 10 May 2005 19:24 GMT
>I hear lots of comments that corn isn't the best for us, but no
>details. Why do you think whole-kernel corn should be reduced or
>eliminated from a diet?

"Us" is a very generic term.  Some of "Us" would be a more appropriate
label:

Corn contains a lectin (ZMEA) that has been shown to agglutinate blood
group B. It is also an insulin mimicker for blood groups O and B.

Hence, for most people with blood type A, corn is very healthy. For
the rest, it is unhealthy.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.