Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / April 2005
the Inuit paradox
|
|
Thread rating:  |
TC - 26 Apr 2005 17:30 GMT http://www.sciencentral.com/articles/view.php3?article_id=218392410&cat=1_3
Native Diet Search
As you dig into your Thanksgiving leftovers, take a lesson from our neighbors to the far north?not all fat is created equal. This ScienCentral News video has more.
Good Fat
Thanksgiving marks the beginning of the Season of Eating, a time when many of us go off our diets. But the Inuit people of the Far North did not have a choice of diets. They led a subsistence way of life.
Patricia Cochran, an Inupiat who grew up in Nome, Alaska and is now the executive director of the Alaska Native Science Commission, grew up living off the land. "As I say in our areas in Alaska, our Safeway store is when you open up your door," she says. "That's where we go shopping, that's where we find our food. We really did grow up in a very traditional way, living off the land, learning how to hunt, how to fish?we had everything from marine mammals to small birds to roots and berries, and herbs, a lot of fish, and in my particular area, reindeer was an important part of our subsistence foods as well."
"The Inuit people are numerous groups of hunter-gatherers," says Loren Cordain, a professor in the Department of Health and Exercise Science at Colorado State University and author of the book The Paleo Diet. "It's not a single group. There are many, many cultures and they lived in many many parts of the Arctic. There was no single Inuit diet, other than the fact that none of them had a whole lot of carbohydrate or fresh fruits and vegetables."
image: ABC News Scientists studying the Inuit in the 1970s found that as a group, they suffered much less than their European counterparts from certain diseases, such as coronary heart disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and diabetes mellitus. Yet their diet was very high in fat from eating foods like whale, seal, and salmon. Discover Magazine called this the "Inuit Paradox."
The solution to the paradox may lie in the fact that not all fat is created equal. "[The Inuit] ate a lot of marine animals, like walruses and seals, whales and so forth, and the blubber of these animals is a very high source of monounsaturated fat,"says Cordain. "So if you contrast the Inuit diet to the Western diet, it actually turns out to be lower in saturated fat?very high in fat, but high in healthful fat, monounsaturates and polyunsaturates, high in a specific type of polyunsaturates called omega-3 fatty acids that come from the marine food chain."
Cordain says that while the Inuit diet is not optimal, there are a few things we can learn from it. "Let's take the good of the Inuit, the lean protein, the good fats?minimize refined cereal, the refined sugars, and increase the fruit and vegetables in our diet," he says, adding that the single most important thing we can do in our diets is increase the omega-3 fatty acids, which are found in many oily fish.
For Cochran, food is as much cultural as it is nutritional. "The food is an important part of who we are, and our relationship to the land and the Creator is an important part of who we are," says Cochran. "Our foods, our traditional foods, the wild foods that come from Mother Earth, are the things that nourish us, not only our minds but also our bodies and our souls. They are really all connected. I think a lot of people could learn from the fact that our communities have been around for centuries and there's a reason that our communities have been around for centuries. We are a very healthy, resilient, adaptable community and we have been able to live in the harshest environments anywhere on the planet and to not only survive, but really to thrive in those conditions. There's no question to me that that is an important lesson for the rest of the world to experience."
---
Yet another "paradox". How can so many peoples around the world eat so poorly, according to the USDA pyramid, and still be healthy and the US people who follow the USDA be so obese?
TC
montygram - 26 Apr 2005 18:38 GMT This "report" is the usual incredible garbage. I investigated these Eskimo claims a few years back, and what I found is that on the "traditional diet," high in omega 6 PUFAs, these people rarely lived beyond the age of 40. On such a diet, the risk of bleeding to death from minor blunt force trauma is incredible. Bleeding time is increased dramatically, even compared to European peoples who eat quite a bit of fish themselves (the Danish). Yet our great "experts" fail to mention that those who eat lots of coconut or palm product not only live long, despite rudimentary "health care systems," but have very low rates of "chronic disease." Go to the World Health Organization and see the statistics for yourself. You also hear about the great "Mediterranean Diet," yet when you look at the statistics at the WHO site, you don't really see anything to get all that excited about. For example, compare the cancer rates of Italians to Americans. The key mechanism is stress to cells, and while UV radiation and other things are problems, dietary polyunsaturated (in conjunction with too much iron and not enough antioxidants) are the underly reason for the high "chronic disease" rates in nations like the USA. Lipid peroxidation even causes cholesterol to be changed into the only real "bad" form, known as oxysterols, which do indeed "clog arteries." LDL is not "bad" as long as it is not oxidized, and HDL is not "good" if it gets oxidized.
TC - 26 Apr 2005 19:17 GMT > This "report" is the usual incredible garbage. I investigated these > Eskimo claims a few years back, and what I found is that on the > "traditional diet," high in omega 6 PUFAs, these people rarely lived > beyond the age of 40. Where did you get this number from?
On such a diet, the risk of bleeding to death
> from minor blunt force trauma is incredible. Bleeding time is > increased dramatically, even compared to European peoples who eat quite > a bit of fish themselves (the Danish). Why?
Yet our great "experts" fail to
> mention that those who eat lots of coconut or palm product not only > live long, despite rudimentary "health care systems," but have very low [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > as long as it is not oxidized, and HDL is not "good" if it gets > oxidized. Alf Christophersen - 26 Apr 2005 22:26 GMT >This "report" is the usual incredible garbage. I investigated these >Eskimo claims a few years back, and what I found is that on the >"traditional diet," high in omega 6 PUFAs, these people rarely lived Inuit diet is almost devoid of omega-6 acids, but contain lot of omega-3 acids, and EPA that cannot be transformed to an active blood-clotting agent, thromboxane-3 (TXA3) is not giving rise to clot forming, even though TXA3 might be formed. The formation of TXA3 is very slow, and the substrate, which has a binding constant almost 10-fold compared to the omega-6 analogye, displace the substrates, PGH2, from the enzyme forming TXA2, thus hampering with TXA2 formation. Only arachidonic acid can form the bioactive blood clotting agent, TXA2.
DHGLA don't form TX's at all. On the other hand, both PGI2 and PGI3 made in blood endothelial cells can supress the effects of TXA2. Effect? Even a tiny rupture in a blood vessel in nose may turn lethal. The first slide I saw of inuits was a child sitting in the snow, almost loosing all blood. The snow was colored red in a diameter around the poor child almost 1 m wide.
(WHen I was ill two years ago, I was eating a omega-3 rich, omega-6 poor diet, and fell down from around 13 in blood to 9.5 in just two nights of almost endless bleeding. Second day I coughed up a huge coagulate of blood around 5 cm in diameter. Terrible feeling when I tried to cough it up. Fortunately I succeeded (otherwise I probably had not been writing here now). The doctor was really shocked and was quite furious at the nurses who hadn't told him during night about what was happening. Fortunately it stopped again..
|
|
|