Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

the Inuit paradox

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TC - 26 Apr 2005 17:30 GMT
http://www.sciencentral.com/articles/view.php3?article_id=218392410&cat=1_3

Native Diet
Search

As you dig into your Thanksgiving leftovers, take a lesson from our
neighbors to the far north?not all fat is created equal. This
ScienCentral News video has more.

Good Fat

Thanksgiving marks the beginning of the Season of Eating, a time when
many of us go off our diets. But the Inuit people of the Far North did
not have a choice of diets. They led a subsistence way of life.

Patricia Cochran, an Inupiat who grew up in Nome, Alaska and is now the
executive director of the Alaska Native Science Commission, grew up
living off the land. "As I say in our areas in Alaska, our Safeway
store is when you open up your door," she says. "That's where we go
shopping, that's where we find our food. We really did grow up in a
very traditional way, living off the land, learning how to hunt, how to
fish?we had everything from marine mammals to small birds to roots and
berries, and herbs, a lot of fish, and in my particular area, reindeer
was an important part of our subsistence foods as well."

"The Inuit people are numerous groups of hunter-gatherers," says Loren
Cordain, a professor in the Department of Health and Exercise Science
at Colorado State University and author of the book The Paleo Diet.
"It's not a single group. There are many, many cultures and they lived
in many many parts of the Arctic. There was no single Inuit diet, other
than the fact that none of them had a whole lot of carbohydrate or
fresh fruits and vegetables."

image: ABC News
Scientists studying the Inuit in the 1970s found that as a group, they
suffered much less than their European counterparts from certain
diseases, such as coronary heart disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and
diabetes mellitus. Yet their diet was very high in fat from eating
foods like whale, seal, and salmon. Discover Magazine called this the
"Inuit Paradox."

The solution to the paradox may lie in the fact that not all fat is
created equal. "[The Inuit] ate a lot of marine animals, like walruses
and seals, whales and so forth, and the blubber of these animals is a
very high source of monounsaturated fat,"says Cordain. "So if you
contrast the Inuit diet to the Western diet, it actually turns out to
be lower in saturated fat?very high in fat, but high in healthful fat,
monounsaturates and polyunsaturates, high in a specific type of
polyunsaturates called omega-3 fatty acids that come from the marine
food chain."

Cordain says that while the Inuit diet is not optimal, there are a few
things we can learn from it. "Let's take the good of the Inuit, the
lean protein, the good fats?minimize refined cereal, the refined
sugars, and increase the fruit and vegetables in our diet," he says,
adding that the single most important thing we can do in our diets is
increase the omega-3 fatty acids, which are found in many oily fish.

For Cochran, food is as much cultural as it is nutritional. "The food
is an important part of who we are, and our relationship to the land
and the Creator is an important part of who we are," says Cochran. "Our
foods, our traditional foods, the wild foods that come from Mother
Earth, are the things that nourish us, not only our minds but also our
bodies and our souls. They are really all connected. I think a lot of
people could learn from the fact that our communities have been around
for centuries and there's a reason that our communities have been
around for centuries. We are a very healthy, resilient, adaptable
community and we have been able to live in the harshest environments
anywhere on the planet and to not only survive, but really to thrive in
those conditions. There's no question to me that that is an important
lesson for the rest of the world to experience."

---

Yet another "paradox". How can so many peoples around the world eat so
poorly, according to the USDA pyramid, and still be healthy and the US
people who follow the USDA be so obese?

TC
montygram - 26 Apr 2005 18:38 GMT
This "report" is the usual incredible garbage.  I investigated these
Eskimo claims a few years back, and what I found is that on the
"traditional diet," high in omega 6 PUFAs, these people rarely lived
beyond the age of 40.  On such a diet, the risk of bleeding to death
from minor blunt force trauma is incredible.  Bleeding time is
increased dramatically, even compared to European peoples who eat quite
a bit of fish themselves (the Danish).  Yet our great "experts" fail to
mention that those who eat lots of coconut or palm product not only
live long, despite rudimentary "health care systems," but have very low
rates of "chronic disease."  Go to the World Health Organization and
see the statistics for yourself.  You also hear about the great
"Mediterranean Diet," yet when you look at the statistics at the WHO
site, you don't really see anything to get all that excited about.  For
example, compare the cancer rates of Italians to Americans.  The key
mechanism is stress to cells, and while UV radiation and other things
are problems, dietary polyunsaturated (in conjunction with too much
iron and not enough antioxidants) are the underly reason for the high
"chronic disease" rates in nations like the USA.  Lipid peroxidation
even causes cholesterol to be changed into the only real "bad" form,
known as oxysterols, which do indeed "clog arteries."  LDL is not "bad"
as long as it is not oxidized, and HDL is not "good" if it gets
oxidized.
TC - 26 Apr 2005 19:17 GMT
> This "report" is the usual incredible garbage.  I investigated these
> Eskimo claims a few years back, and what I found is that on the
> "traditional diet," high in omega 6 PUFAs, these people rarely lived
> beyond the age of 40.

Where did you get this number from?

On such a diet, the risk of bleeding to death
> from minor blunt force trauma is incredible.  Bleeding time is
> increased dramatically, even compared to European peoples who eat quite
> a bit of fish themselves (the Danish).

Why?

Yet our great "experts" fail to
> mention that those who eat lots of coconut or palm product not only
> live long, despite rudimentary "health care systems," but have very low
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> as long as it is not oxidized, and HDL is not "good" if it gets
> oxidized.
Alf Christophersen - 26 Apr 2005 22:26 GMT
>This "report" is the usual incredible garbage.  I investigated these
>Eskimo claims a few years back, and what I found is that on the
>"traditional diet," high in omega 6 PUFAs, these people rarely lived

Inuit diet is almost devoid of omega-6 acids, but contain lot of
omega-3 acids, and EPA that cannot be transformed to an active
blood-clotting agent, thromboxane-3 (TXA3) is not giving rise to clot
forming, even though TXA3 might be formed. The formation of TXA3 is
very slow, and the substrate, which has a binding constant almost
10-fold compared to the omega-6 analogye, displace the substrates,
PGH2, from the enzyme forming TXA2, thus hampering with TXA2
formation.
Only arachidonic acid can form the bioactive blood clotting agent,
TXA2.

DHGLA don't form TX's at all.
On the other hand, both PGI2 and PGI3 made in blood endothelial cells
can supress the effects of TXA2. Effect? Even a tiny rupture in a
blood vessel in nose may turn lethal.
The first slide I saw of inuits was a child sitting in the snow,
almost loosing all blood. The snow was colored red in a diameter
around the poor child almost 1 m wide.

(WHen I was ill two years ago, I was eating a omega-3 rich, omega-6
poor diet, and fell down from around 13 in blood to 9.5 in just two
nights of almost endless bleeding. Second day I coughed up a huge
coagulate of blood around 5 cm in diameter. Terrible feeling when I
tried to cough it up. Fortunately I succeeded (otherwise I probably
had not been writing here now). The doctor was really shocked and was
quite furious at the nurses who hadn't told him during night about
what was happening. Fortunately it stopped again..
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.