Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / April 2006
Gastric bypass resolves/improves diabetes
|
|
Thread rating:  |
ada - 03 Oct 2003 07:23 GMT Public release date: 2-Oct-2003
Contact: Frank Raczkiewicz RaczkiewiczFA@upmc.edu 412-647-3555 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Gastric bypass surgery resolves or improves diabetes in most patients, reports Pittsburgh study PITTSBURGH, Oct. 2 A study of obese people with type 2 diabetes who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery (LGBP) found that 83 percent of them experienced a resolution of their disease. The study, from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, is in the October issue of the journal Annals of Surgery.
The study also found that clinical resolution or improvement in diabetes occurred in all patients, but patients with the shortest duration and mildest form of type 2 diabetes had a higher rate of resolution after the surgery. During the study there were no new occurrences or recurrences of type 2 diabetes in 310 patient years of follow-up. Nearly one third of patients permanently discontinued anti-diabetic medications after discharge from the hospital even before significant weight loss could occur.
According to Philip Schauer, M.D., director of bariatric surgery at the University of Pittsburgh, principal investigator in the study and co-director of the Minimally Invasive Surgery Center at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, the study suggests that early surgical intervention is warranted to increase the likelihood of rendering these patients euglycemic.
"Most patients in the study with type 2 diabetes who underwent bypass surgery achieved excellent biochemical glycemic control and were able to reap the clinical benefits of withdrawing from most, if not all, anti-diabetes medications, including insulin," Dr. Schauer said. "Younger diabetes patients with less severe disease stand to gain more from the surgery by circumventing years of progressive, debilitating disease."
The study included 1,160 patients who underwent Roux-en Y gastric bypass surgery (LGBP) between 1997 and 2002 at the University of Pittsburgh Medial Center. Of those patients, 240 had impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes. Follow-up was possible in 190. The mean age at surgery was 48 years and 75 percent of the patients were female. Mean body mass index was 50.
"Prior to surgery, the disease severity for these patients was quite significant overall," said Dr. Schauer, "with 65 percent of them requiring oral agents and 27 percent of them requiring insulin as well."
Post surgery, patients had a mean excess weight loss of 60 percent and a body mass index of 34 after 20 months. Fasting plasma glucose and glycoslated hemoglobin concentrations returned to normal levels in 83 percent of patients, while 17 percent of patients markedly improved. Following surgery, 80 percent of patients had a significant reduction in the use of oral anti-diabetic agents and 79 percent had a reduction in their use of insulin.
"The impressive effect of bypass surgery on morbidly obese patients with type 2 diabetes raises an argument for lowering the threshold for surgical intervention to moderate or mild obesity," Dr. Schauer said. "Further investigation demonstrating risk versus benefit for patients with moderate obesity is warranted."
The LGBP procedure involves constructing a small stomach pouch of approximately 15 millimeters (about the size of a plastic medicine cup), and bypassing a small segment of intestines by constructing a Y-shaped limb of small bowel. Patients lose weight because there is a decrease in caloric intake resulting from the reduced reservoir capacity of the small stomach pouch.
Type 2 diabetes is the most common form of diabetes, in which the body is unable to properly use the insulin that it produces. About 80 percent of people with type 2 diabetes are overweight.
Exactly a year ago there was another study from UCLA.
Arch Surg. 2002 Oct;137(10):1109-17. Related Articles, Links
Effects of obesity surgery on non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Greenway SE, Greenway FL 3rd, Klein S.
Department of Surgery, Harbor-University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90509, USA.
CONTEXT: Most individuals who have non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus are obese. The obese population has proved a frustrating entity regarding weight loss and diabetes control. Results of medical weight loss programs, medications, and behavior therapy have proved disappointing. HYPOTHESIS: Bariatric surgery is the most effective method of diabetes management and cure in the morbidly obese population. Surgical procedures to cause malabsorption provide a more dramatic effect on diabetes owing to the imparted bypass of the hormonally active foregut. DATA SOURCES: Pertinent journal articles spanning the last 40 years, as well as textbooks. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgical procedures have proven a much more successful method of weight loss and diabetes control in the obese population than conservative methods. These surgical procedures have proven safe with reported mortality rates of 0% to 1.5%. Bariatric operations may be divided based on the method of weight loss and effect on diabetes. The first category is restrictive and includes vertical banded gastroplasty and adjustable silicone gastric banding. These operations improve diabetes by decreasing food intake and body weight with a slowing of gastric emptying. The second category not only contains restrictive components but also elements of malabsorption. This category includes the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliary-pancreatic diversion, which bypass the foregut. Although all of the surgical procedures for obesity offer improved weight loss and diabetes control compared with conservative methods, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliary-pancreatic diversion offer superior weight loss and resolution of diabetes. The more dramatic effect seen in the surgical procedures to cause malabsorption is likely secondary to the bypass of the foregut resulting in increased weight loss and elevation of the enteroglucagon level.
Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial
PMID: 12361414 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Annette - 03 Oct 2003 08:26 GMT SHUDDER.
Annette
> Public release date: 2-Oct-2003 > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > reports Pittsburgh study > PITTSBURGH, Oct. 2 - A study of obese people with type 2 diabetes who
> underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery (LGBP) found that 83 > percent of them experienced a resolution of their disease. [quoted text clipped - 108 lines] > > PMID: 12361414 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] John 'the Man' - 03 Oct 2003 12:49 GMT Once upon a time, our fellow ada rambled on about "Gastric bypass resolves/improves diabetes." Our champion De-Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ...
>"The impressive effect of bypass surgery on morbidly obese patients >with type 2 diabetes raises an argument for lowering the threshold for >surgical intervention to moderate or mild obesity," Dr. Schauer said. Ha, ... Hah, Ha!
Jenny - 03 Oct 2003 14:25 GMT In 2 out of 100 sugeries, gastric bypass surgery also resolves life, since it kills that many people.
Shame on these surgeons for pushing a surgery that has such a high rate of killing people.
But the underlying idea is that it's better to be dead than fat. This, oddly enough, is the thinking that motivates anorexics but in their case it is considered a mental illnes..
-- Jenny
168.5/137
Low Carb 9/1998 - 8/2001 and 11/10/02 - Now
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean How to calculate your need for protein * How much people really lose each month * Water Weight Gain & Loss * The "Two Gram Cure" for Hunger Cravings * Characteristics of Successful Dieters * Indispensible Low Carb Treats * Should You Count that Low Impact Carb? * Curing Ketobreath * Exercise Starting from Zero * NEW! Do Starch Blockers Work?
> Public release date: 2-Oct-2003 > [quoted text clipped - 118 lines] > > PMID: 12361414 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] John 'the Man' - 03 Oct 2003 15:58 GMT Once upon a time, our fellow Jenny rambled on about "Re: Gastric bypass resolves/improves diabetes." Our champion De-Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ...
>But the underlying idea is that it's better to be dead than fat. This, >oddly enough, is the thinking that motivates anorexics but in their case it >is considered a mental illnes.. Actually, it is better to leave smn if you are fat then to pollute this ng with your filth!
Fat is not an issue for most normal people. :)
Just thought that you might want to know. :)
Jenny - 03 Oct 2003 22:01 GMT Well, for what it's worth, I am not fat. My BMI is well within normal for my height.
I'm also not rude, unlike you.
-- Jenny
168.5/137
Low Carb 9/1998 - 8/2001 and 11/10/02 - Now
http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean How to calculate your need for protein * How much people really lose each month * Water Weight Gain & Loss * The "Two Gram Cure" for Hunger Cravings * Characteristics of Successful Dieters * Indispensible Low Carb Treats * Should You Count that Low Impact Carb? * Curing Ketobreath * Exercise Starting from Zero * NEW! Do Starch Blockers Work?
> Once upon a time, our fellow Jenny > rambled on about "Re: Gastric bypass resolves/improves diabetes." [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Just thought that you might want to know. :) Philippic - 03 Oct 2003 22:35 GMT > "John 'the Self-Induced Anaemic'" <DeMan[104]@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:grkqnvklcefn1a8r9418ocad22qc7kepj2@ > > > > Fat is not an issue for most normal people. :) Nor is *self-induced anaemia*, Gohde-boy: why don't you clear off to some place reserved for character-disordered half-wits who've thrown away their iron stores as well as their teeth?
You'll see, BTW, that you have been *completely unsuccessful* in your pathetic attempts to convince my ISP that I shouldn't be allowed to remind people about what a pathetic creature you are: *get used to seeing me here*, Mr Gums.
Ph.
John 'the Man' - 03 Oct 2003 23:28 GMT Once upon a time, our fellow Jenny rambled on about "Re: Gastric bypass resolves/improves diabetes." Our champion De-Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ...
>Well, for what it's worth, I am not fat. My BMI is well within normal for >my height. Well, let me be perfectly clear.
Actually, it is better to leave smn ... then to pollute this ng with your filth!
Just thought that you might want to know. :)
Philippic - 03 Oct 2003 22:26 GMT > In 2 out of 100 sugeries, gastric bypass surgery also resolves life, since > it kills that many people. > > Shame on these surgeons for pushing a surgery that has such a high rate of > killing people. Indeed. And shame on them *also* for trying to build their professional careers by pushing such 'innovative' surgery when there are *far more urgently needed* procedures going unperformed every day of the year.
> But the underlying idea is that it's better to be dead than fat. I have a different suggestion: the 'underlying idea' here is really that it's better (read: *easier*) to 'resolve' your diabetic condition through a hi-tech, 'quick fix' surgical intervention than through sensible, healthy and *safe* long-term diet-and-behaviour 'lifestyle'-modification.
Ph.
tcomeau - 03 Oct 2003 16:47 GMT > Gastric bypass surgery resolves or improves diabetes in most patients, > reports Pittsburgh study <snip>
> "The impressive effect of bypass surgery on morbidly obese patients > with type 2 diabetes raises an argument for lowering the threshold for > surgical intervention to moderate or mild obesity," Dr. Schauer said. > "Further investigation demonstrating risk versus benefit for patients > with moderate obesity is warranted." So they want to lower the threshold for surgical intervention. Big surprise. They want more opportunity to get richer.
> The LGBP procedure involves constructing a small stomach pouch of > approximately 15 millimeters (about the size of a plastic medicine > cup), and bypassing a small segment of intestines by constructing a > Y-shaped limb of small bowel. Patients lose weight because there is a > decrease in caloric intake resulting from the reduced reservoir > capacity of the small stomach pouch. Wonder what would happen to a person if you were to restrict their food intake (and refined carb intake especially) to 15 mm at every meal. No major blood sugar spikes, no repeated over production of insulin. The insulin receptors would recover and become sensitive again.
This goal could be achieved without massive, dangerous and extreme stomach surgery. Just get rid of refined and high-GI-load carbs in the diet.
But then the surgeons would be scrambling for work. Oh darn...
TC
ada - 15 Oct 2003 02:05 GMT Here is another new way to reduce food intake. Hopefully this one is less invasive
ada
Shocking Appetite to Cut Calories Wed Aug 7, 2002 People willing to take drastic measures to shed weight may soon have an alternative to stomach stapling--electric shock treatments. A US medical company has scooped up the patents on an electric shock weight-reducing device developed by an Italian doctor. New Jersey-based Transneuronix has tested the device on 300 patients around the world. The device is implanted near nerves in the stomach wall and sends out a tiny current 12 times a minute. "This slows down peristalsis, the sequence of muscle contractions that force food along the digestive tract, so you won't feel hungry again quickly," New Scientist magazine said on Wednesday. The device also contracts muscles and restricts the amount of food that can pass through the stomach. It can be left on constantly or just used when an urge to binge strikes.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=594&ncid=594&e=3&u=/nm/20020807 /hl_nm/obesity_shock_dc_1
Mack - 15 Oct 2003 02:21 GMT can you show some respect and not cross post from sci.med.nutrition to the diabetic groups?
our goals are not the same.
tcomeau - 16 Oct 2003 16:40 GMT > Public release date: 2-Oct-2003 > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Gastric bypass surgery resolves or improves diabetes in most patients, > reports Pittsburgh study You know what else resolves diabetes.... death, but I wouldn't recomend that either.
TC
John 'the Man' - 16 Oct 2003 21:29 GMT Once upon a time, our fellow tcomeau rambled on about "Re: Gastric bypass resolves/improves diabetes." Our champion De-Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ...
>You know what else resolves diabetes.... death, but I wouldn't recomend that either. >TC Actually, TC, death doesn't change the fact that a person has diabetes.
Science geeks are supposed to be precise, TC.
Just thought that you might want to know. :)
loralspam@ozconnect.net - 16 Oct 2003 23:04 GMT >Once upon a time, our fellow tcomeau > rambled on about "Re: Gastric bypass resolves/improves diabetes." [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Just thought that you might want to know. :) I think death resolves, i.e. brings to resolution, most diseases. It's certainly precise enough for me. I suspect that the implication was that Gastric bypass is a fairly drastic "when all else fails" solution. Speaking only for myself, I think I'd look at every possible alternative first.
Cheers Alan, T2, Oz -- Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
B-Ob1 - 20 Oct 2003 01:29 GMT > > Public release date: 2-Oct-2003 > > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > TC If ya'll 'd QUIT eating sh.t,,,diabetes would NOT exist!! B-0b1
Mack - 20 Oct 2003 19:15 GMT >> > Public release date: 2-Oct-2003 >> > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > If ya'll 'd QUIT eating sh.t,,,diabetes would NOT exist!! B-0b1 spoken like the fool who knows nothing about diabetes.
Emma Chase VanCott - 21 Oct 2003 02:15 GMT :> > Public release date: 2-Oct-2003 :> > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] :> > Gastric bypass surgery resolves or improves diabetes in most patients, :> > reports Pittsburgh study Thru my nursing, i've met a # of people with diabetes.
I know a man who lost all his obesity, he is still diabetic. He lost a limb. He will still likely lose another.
I doubt it cures ("resolves") diabetes.
Emma
Tony Lance - 12 Apr 2006 13:25 GMT Big Bertha Thing gamma Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/gamma.html Access page JPG 81K Image Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews inluding alt.sci.planetary
Round photographic plates.
Caption;- A photograph of the tracks of electrons, ejected by the gamma rays from radium, after these had been filtered, through 2.5 cm. of steel. Some of the electrons have energies of 1 MeV. The photograph was taken, with a magnetic field of 12,000 oersteds.
From a book by J.D.Stranathan Ph.D., Professor of Physics and Chairman of Department, University of Kansas. The "Particles" of Modern Physics. (C) Copyright The Blakston Co. 1942
Big Bertha Thing effort
If you see someone slogging away, but doing it all wrong. Please remember, a great effort, with no results, is worth more than a great result with no effort. The first is purchased at great cost and the latter, in terms of cost, is worthless.
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997. To comply with my copyright, please distribute complete and free of charge.
Tony Lance tonylance@webandmail.co.uk
Big Bertha Thing debit
UK big banks have now made debit cards mandatory. 1. Every cheque book has a debit card. 2. You do not sign agreement for debit card. 3. Lost or stolen cards must be cancelled. 4. Insure debit cards for 1000 pounds sterling. 5. For every 8 pounds loss charged to the customer, the bank can lend 92 pounds. (Multiplier) 6. Cheque guarantee card included. 7. Cash Card included. 8. Phantom withdrawals included. 9. 50 pounds cashback at supermarkets. 10. 250 pounds 'Hole-in-the-wall' withdrawals. 11. 100 pounds Post Office and bank withdrawals. 12. How do you prove that you have cut the card up and disposed of it? 13. How do you prove that you did not use it before destruction? 14. Cut the card up and give to your solicitor or third party for safe-keeping. (Escrow) 15. The survival of the banks depends on putting customers to the sword. (Barbaric) Obviously not all customers, just enough. 16. Unauthorized access to debit card accounts, includes both criminals and bank insiders, which seem to be synonymous. 17. Authorized access to debit card accounts, includes bank insiders, grazing on the customers like milk cows, in their official capacity, as per job description. 18. You no longer need to prove this in a court of law, since it is endemic and ubiquitous. (Common knowledge) Case law sufficient for class action.
|
|
|