The 55% is a very crude way to define the CHO needs of an individual. It
depends on several other factors - activity level and EAR for energy. An
inactive person should maintain the fruit, vegetable, proteins and essential
fats components of their diet but should probably reduce the CHO component.
In the western world we eat too many refined CHOs, the only nutritional
value of many of them is simple energy - this can be reduced. Complex,
wholefood CHO rich foods have more nutritional value.
BTW - very active people probably need the higher CHO weight in their diet
to replenish glycogen reserves.
Tim T.
> > right link:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> TC
TC - 17 Feb 2005 17:56 GMT
Various highly respected government agencies and supposedly independent
bodies recommend anywheres from 45% to 65% of calories from carbs. I
tend to use the middle ground for my discussions, hence the 55%.
TC
> The 55% is a very crude way to define the CHO needs of an individual. It
> depends on several other factors - activity level and EAR for energy.
An
> inactive person should maintain the fruit, vegetable, proteins and essential
> fats components of their diet but should probably reduce the CHO component.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> >
> > TC