Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Carbohydrate type, not amount, linked to obesity

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
calypso@voyager.com - 17 Feb 2005 13:48 GMT
http://www.reutershealth.com/archive/2005/02/16/eline/links/20050216eli
MMu - 17 Feb 2005 16:12 GMT
right link:

http://www.reutershealth.com/archive/2005/02/16/eline/links/20050216elin003.html
TC - 17 Feb 2005 16:36 GMT
> right link:
>
>http://www.reutershealth.com/archive/2005/02/16/eline/links/20050216elin003.html

The mainstream recommends that around 55% of ones caloric intake should
be catbs.

55% of 2400 kcal = 1320 kcal / 4 gram/kcal = 330 grams of carbs.

I challenge anyone to eat 330 grams of lower-carb wholefood
carbohydrates per day. It can be easily done with pasta, white bread
and sugars, but it becomes very difficult to do with whole foods.

And it is commonly recognized that 120 grams per day is plenty of carbs
for us, why would we want to almost triple that. More than that is an
excess of carbs.

TC
Tim Taylor - 17 Feb 2005 17:25 GMT
The 55% is a very crude way to define the CHO needs of an individual. It
depends on several other factors - activity level and EAR for energy.  An
inactive person should maintain the fruit, vegetable, proteins and essential
fats components of their diet but should probably reduce the CHO component.
In the western world we eat too many refined CHOs, the only nutritional
value of many of them is simple energy - this can be reduced. Complex,
wholefood CHO rich foods have more nutritional value.

BTW - very active people probably need the higher CHO weight in their diet
to replenish glycogen reserves.

Tim T.

> > right link:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> TC
TC - 17 Feb 2005 17:56 GMT
Various highly respected government agencies and supposedly independent
bodies recommend anywheres from 45% to 65% of calories from carbs. I
tend to use the middle ground for my discussions, hence the 55%.

TC

> The 55% is a very crude way to define the CHO needs of an individual. It
> depends on several other factors - activity level and EAR for energy.
An
> inactive person should maintain the fruit, vegetable, proteins and essential
> fats components of their diet but should probably reduce the CHO component.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> >
> > TC
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.