Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

red salmon

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
VT - 11 Feb 2005 12:51 GMT
Is it true that salmon is white and that they add some colour to it to
make it pink ?
And is that toxic ?

Virg
christopher.a.dowling@gmail.com - 11 Feb 2005 13:55 GMT
Wild salmon gets its color from the crustaceans they eat that contain
pigments such as astaxanthin.

Without astaxanthin in the diet, the salmon's flesh would be
"yellowgray"

To create the pink-red color in farmed salmon, synthetically produced
carotenoids, mainly astaxanthin, are added to their feed, but, AFA
anyone knows, it's good for ya, not toxic.
Phil Scott - 13 Feb 2005 20:16 GMT
> Wild salmon gets its color from the crustaceans they eat that contain
> pigments such as astaxanthin.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> carotenoids, mainly astaxanthin, are added to their feed, but, AFA
> anyone knows, it's good for ya, not toxic.

thanks for filling me on the accurate details...I assumed it
was dye, because the lables say 'artificially colored'. its
good to hear its not dye.

  Phil Scott
Bob - 14 Feb 2005 02:18 GMT
>> Wild salmon gets its color from the crustaceans they eat
>that contain
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>was dye, because the lables say 'artificially colored'. its
>good to hear its not dye.

Huh? He just explained to you that it is a dye, namely astaxanthin.

bob
Phil Scott - 16 Feb 2005 06:36 GMT
> ><christopher.a.dowling@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Huh? He just explained to you that it is a dye, namely astaxanthin.

 didnt sound like dye to me... but an organic compound apart
from what I consider to be a pure dye, inorganic in most
cases.

Phil Scott

> bob
Bob - 17 Feb 2005 03:44 GMT
>> ><christopher.a.dowling@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>from what I consider to be a pure dye, inorganic in most
>cases.

Dictionary (and general use): a dye is a coloring matter. period. It
may be organic or inorganic, soluble or insoluble, natural or
synthetic, toxic or not -- all of which are more or less independent
of each other. Not surprisingly, it is common to use adjectives with
"dye", to pin down what is meant.

Is there any information on the toxicity of astaxanthin, both natural
and synthetic forms??

It is interesting how much coloring is added to foods to make them
conform to our pre-conceptions!

bob
Ralf - 14 Feb 2005 07:15 GMT
>Wild salmon gets its color from the crustaceans they eat that contain
>pigments such as astaxanthin.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>carotenoids, mainly astaxanthin, are added to their feed, but, AFA
>anyone knows, it's good for ya, not toxic.

See also www.food-info.net in the Questions and Answer part. or search
Astaxanthin or Salmon.

Ralf
Juhana Harju - 14 Feb 2005 08:22 GMT
:: On 11 Feb 2005 05:55:38 -0800, "christopher.a.dowling@gmail.com"
:: <christopher.a.dowling@gmail.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
::
:: Ralf

There are also other reasons to avoid _farmed_ salmon. Farmed salmon is
_very high_ in inflammation provoking arachinonic acid (20:4) because of
the feed given to salmons. I prefer small mackerel to salmon.

Signature

Juhana

Juhana Harju - 14 Feb 2005 08:24 GMT
:: Ralf wrote:
:::: On 11 Feb 2005 05:55:38 -0800, "christopher.a.dowling@gmail.com"
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
:: because of the feed given to salmons. I prefer small mackerel to
:: salmon.

http://www.nutritiondata.com/foods-000064000000000000000-w.html

Signature

Juhana

Alf Christophersen - 14 Feb 2005 18:53 GMT
>There are also other reasons to avoid _farmed_ salmon. Farmed salmon is
>_very high_ in inflammation provoking arachinonic acid (20:4) because of
>the feed given to salmons. I prefer small mackerel to salmon.

Some farmers give the fish soy oil and other food high in omega-6
instead of giving them fish oil (which is more expensive).

It is a tragedy that declaration of PUFA composition of farmed fish is
not obligatory. In case of using omega-3 fat, salmon cannot make so
much arachidonate. if any at all because omega-3 will dominate the
active site of delta-5 desaturase.
Juhana Harju - 14 Feb 2005 19:06 GMT
:: On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:22:39 +0200, "Juhana Harju"
:: <shantigiri@despammed.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
:: so much arachidonate. if any at all because omega-3 will dominate the
:: active site of delta-5 desaturase.

I recall that the feed given to salmons contains grains which are
changed into arachidonic acid by the metabolism of salmon. However, I am
not sure about this.

Signature

Juhana

Alf Christophersen - 20 Feb 2005 20:17 GMT
>I recall that the feed given to salmons contains grains which are
>changed into arachidonic acid by the metabolism of salmon. However, I am
>not sure about this.

grains and corn is not a natural food at all for salmons or any other
fishes :-)
But it is cheap for the fish farmer. So they give a damn and sell the
fish as a prime source of omega-3 acids.

And people believe that and omega-6 dependent diseases flourish and
fish intake is blamed.
John Que - 22 Feb 2005 10:36 GMT
> >I recall that the feed given to salmons contains grains which are
> >changed into arachidonic acid by the metabolism of salmon. However, I am
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> And people believe that and omega-6 dependent diseases flourish and
> fish intake is blamed.

Farmed salmon is seen as an inferior product.
Higher toxin loads and less omega 3 fatty acids.

The oil tankers are doing their part to destroy
the salmon fishery. The area around the Valdez
tanker leak is still damaged contrary to what the AM
radio prostitutes say.
Phil Scott - 13 Feb 2005 20:15 GMT
> Is it true that salmon is white and that they add some colour to it to
> make it pink ?
> And is that toxic ?
>
> Virg

Natural salmon is pink...from eating shrimp etc at sea...
shimp is too costly to feed farm raised salmon, so synthic
foods are fed to those, and grain etc...the pink color goes
out of the flesh..so dye is added to make the farm raized
salmon pink again.

The dye is no doubt toxic to a faint extent..more toxic are
other things found in the farm raised fish...you can research
that on google.    www.google.com     'web' tab on top left of
the empty box... then fill in the new empty box with the
relevant key words you wish to search...such as 'farm raised
salmon. toxic'

There is much bogus data in these areas...say 'it doubles risk
of some cancers'... when you look at the details you find the
risk was one in a million in the first place...now its 2 in a
million...

thats mostly disinformation, and smoke put out by drug
companies to distract from the fact that much of *their crap
KILLS hundreds of thousands of people a year outright... and
maims millions more...and bankrupts entire society's.

but the SALMON... DOUBLED the risk of corneal transplant
rejection... one guy in 30 million suffered.   See?   thats
the game.

Other issues can be legitimate..you need to become a wary
student of all this while looking for spin...and motives...
and please do understand the trillion dollar drug industry has
a long record of putting shills into these NG's..to trash
alternative methods and those who expose thier
frauds...fortunately with the vioxx and other scandals lately
they lost a lot of credibity.

next however via CODEX (a UN initiative) vitamins in any
worthwhile dose are being outlawed... in germany for instance
now 20 dollars worth of vitamin E, costs 200 dollars and you
need a prescription.

Things will get nasty if that gets to the US....its on the
table in Canada right now.

Phil Scott
Jeff - 13 Feb 2005 21:32 GMT
>> next however via CODEX (a UN initiative) vitamins in any
> worthwhile dose are being outlawed... in germany for instance
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Things will get nasty if that gets to the US....its on the
> table in Canada right now.

Nasty for the people who are selling products that don't meet quality
standards or make claims that aren't supported by the facts.

Good for consumers, though.

http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/index_en.jsp

Jeff
Ruby - 14 Feb 2005 06:10 GMT
>>> next however via CODEX (a UN initiative) vitamins in any
>> worthwhile dose are being outlawed... in germany for instance
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/index_en.jsp
> Jeff

whats good about needing a prescription from a doctor who will charge abt
$300.00 a visit minimum just to write a prescription so you are able to
take a multivitamin tablet or extra vitamin C to prevent sniffles during
the winter months or the amount of Vitamin E needed to stay healthy as can
be accessed in evidence based websites such as pubmed.?  

Sounds like you work for Codex

Ruby
======================
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"All people have a self-obligation to understand that while institutions
grow from common interests and needs of many people, control of
institutions inevitably falls into the hands of people motivated by self-
interest, and that therefore almost all which proceeds from institutions
serves only the institution."
--------------------Bill Drake.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Winfried Buechsenschuetz - 14 Feb 2005 13:29 GMT
> whats good about needing a prescription from a doctor who will charge abt
> $300.00 a visit minimum just to write a prescription so you are able to
> take a multivitamin tablet or extra vitamin C to prevent sniffles during
> the winter months or the amount of Vitamin E needed to stay healthy as can
> be accessed in evidence based websites such as pubmed.?  

Well, I would like to know where this happens. As stated by many
others, Germany already IS a Codex country, and NOTHING has changed
concerning the availability of vitamin tablets and their prices in the
last few years. You can buy tablets with 1000mg vit C without any
prescription or doctor's visit for reasonable prices, and any
drugstore has a shelf with the complete alphabet of vitamines.

Seems as if some people are very eager to create new urban legends.
Did you notice that many posts stating these lies about Codex
countries end with asking for donations to an obscure organization.
Honi soit qui mal y pense. Probably I have the wrong job, I'd better
post nightmares on the usenet and ask for donations to prohibit them.

Winfried from Germany
John Que - 14 Feb 2005 18:32 GMT
> > whats good about needing a prescription from a doctor who will charge abt
> > $300.00 a visit minimum just to write a prescription so you are able to
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Winfried from Germany

The supplement directive is yet to be implemented.
It is too be implemented mid summer of this year.
There maybe some urban legend postings on the topic
but the reality of the EU supplement directive is coming.
I not going to fly to Germany to check out
vitamins availability. Keep us posted in
the future.
Winfried Buechsenschuetz - 15 Feb 2005 07:27 GMT
> The supplement directive is yet to be implemented.
> It is too be implemented mid summer of this year.

Strange enough that this article which is currently spread all over
the newsgroups claims that it describes a visit to a german pharmacy
and has the title 'Life under Codex'.

Winfried
Alf Christophersen - 14 Feb 2005 18:48 GMT
>whats good about needing a prescription from a doctor who will charge abt
>$300.00 a visit minimum just to write a prescription so you are able to
>take a multivitamin tablet or extra vitamin C to prevent sniffles during
>the winter months or the amount of Vitamin E needed to stay healthy as can
>be accessed in evidence based websites such as pubmed.?  

Hm. Maybe move to a socialistic country.

Here you pay NOK 120 for a doctors visit. And if it is to repeat a
prescription, it is around NOK 30. The other taxpayers pay the rest of
the bill (and partly oil production)

When I had surgery for glaucoma two and a half year ago I payed NOK
400 (about 7 NOK pr $, so divide with 7 to give your price). The
second was free because I had passed the upper limit of NOK 1500 for
doctors visit, transport and medicine. This year the limit has
increased to NOK 2500.
And then all "blue prescription" pills are free. Blue prescription is
a special prescription, written on blue paper which is given on
medicine for chronically ill people, at least having a disease
continuing for more than 3 month. I have insulin and Nexium on blue
prescription for my part :-)
Alf Christophersen - 14 Feb 2005 18:59 GMT
>whats good about needing a prescription from a doctor who will charge abt
>$300.00 a visit minimum just to write a prescription so you are able to
>take a multivitamin tablet or extra vitamin C to prevent sniffles during
>the winter months or the amount of Vitamin E needed to stay healthy as can
>be accessed in evidence based websites such as pubmed.?  

If I had been a doctor and a patient had come asking for a
prescription for vit C or E, I probably would have taken $3000 for
that visit, minimum.

And by the way, how strong are your selenium tablets? 1 g?

Our are 100 ug. I think that is quite good dose. Taking 2-4 daily
gives a good optimum here.

In some parts of US, giving 1 ug may be chronic poisonous (like
feeding fluoride in areas where natural background is very high).

Are the worst areas in seleniferous areas of South Dakota at all
populated?
Juhana Harju - 14 Feb 2005 19:11 GMT
::: whats good about needing a prescription from a doctor who will
::: charge abt $300.00 a visit minimum just to write a prescription so
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
:: prescription for vit C or E, I probably would have taken $3000 for
:: that visit, minimum.

Why? Vitamin C reduces blood pressure, cardiovascular disease mortality
and all-cause mortality.

Signature

Juhana

Juhana Harju - 14 Feb 2005 19:19 GMT
:: Alf Christophersen wrote:
::::
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
:: Why? Vitamin C reduces blood pressure, cardiovascular disease
:: mortality and all-cause mortality.

Duffy SJ, Gokce N, Holbrook M, et al. Treatment of hypertension with
ascorbic acid. Lancet. 1999; 354:2048-2049.

Knekt P et al., Antioxidant vitamins and coronary heart disease risk: a
pooled analysis of 9 cohorts. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,
Vol. 80, No. 6, 1508-1520, December 2004.

Fletcher AE, Breeze E, Shetty PS. Antioxidant vitamins and mortality in
older persons: findings from the nutrition add-on study to the Medical
Research Council Trial of Assessment and Management of Older People in
the Community. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Nov;78(5):999-1010.

Salonen RM et al, Six-year effect of combined vitamin C and E
supplementation on atherosclerotic progression: the Antioxidant
Supplementation in Atherosclerosis Prevention (ASAP) Study.Circulation
2003,Feb 25;107(7):947-53.)

Signature

Juhana

Alf Christophersen - 20 Feb 2005 20:21 GMT
>Why? Vitamin C reduces blood pressure, cardiovascular disease mortality
>and all-cause mortality.

for misuse of a doctor. Just go to your nearest shop and buy the pills
yourself. If doses in each pill is too low, well, eat the amount of
pills needed. Noone is checking if you buy a box of vit. C daily, or
go to the pharmacist and buy 500 g of free ascorbate.
But don't use the doctor to try to get a prescriptions he cannot write
anyway because vit C is not regarded as medicine.
Winfried Buechsenschuetz - 15 Feb 2005 07:29 GMT
> And by the way, how strong are your selenium tablets? 1 g?
>
> Our are 100 ug. I think that is quite good dose. Taking 2-4 daily
> gives a good optimum here.

The selenium level in Germany is a bit under average but there has
never been a reported case of any disease that might have been caused
by lack of selenium. Many people say that at least in Germany a
selenium supplement is not necessary.

Winfried
Alf Christophersen - 20 Feb 2005 20:24 GMT
>The selenium level in Germany is a bit under average but there has
>never been a reported case of any disease that might have been caused
>by lack of selenium. Many people say that at least in Germany a
>selenium supplement is not necessary.

As I reminds the soil in Germany most places are rather
neutral/alkaline and relatively high in Se. In Scandinavia and England
mean intake is now less than 50 ug daily except amongst people eating
lot of fish. Earlier in Norway we used lot of US or Canadian wheat
quite high in Se, now we use Se-free wheat (giving less than 1 ug pr
kg) which give animals lots of problems so veterinarians has to give
sheep and pigs a big dose of Se and vit E monthly.
Phil Scott - 16 Feb 2005 06:58 GMT
> >> next however via CODEX (a UN initiative) vitamins in any
> > worthwhile dose are being outlawed... in germany for instance
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Jeff

Jeff...you are believing the propaganda... CODEX is the
nastiest possible thing for consumers under cover of
protecting them from a few unscrupulous vendors.... the down
side is limiting vitamin E sales for one example to a few
milligrams and making any meaningful therapeutic dose go
through a physician at the cost of 200 dollars for capsusles
we are paying 20 dollars for now.

To push their cause in this case recently bogus information
was released that has been uttterly unsuported that doses of
vivtamin E over 400 mg a day is damaging... utter bullshit...
doses of 3000 units of E a day has saved many lives, mine
included when the doctors had had said there was nothing else
they could do.

it is NOT the job of government, of all the bogus
institutions imaginable, to protect the people from
errror...it is the peoples right to keep government from error
and abuse.

But I understand, your brainwashing to the contrary has you
believing in government....

In that case there is not much I can say to you except, hang
in there son, as you age you see what a bogus bunch of slime
bags comprise goverment and will morn the day that you ever
supported anything like CODEX.

CODEX is a drug company scam to capture the vitamin and
suppliments market, then 10x the prices...its a simple as
that... and the drug companies are spending billions brain
washing the public that  its to protect them.

not much I can do if you are clueless enough to only read and
reference thier propaganda.

 Phil Scott
Winfried Buechsenschuetz - 16 Feb 2005 12:04 GMT
> > "Phil Scott" <philscott888@sf.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
> message
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> you
> > > need a prescription.

> > Good for consumers, though.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Jeff...you are believing the propaganda...

And what about you? Do you believe or do you have any facts? Please
tell me which dose of vit E used to cost USD 4 and now costs USD 200
plus a doctor's visit in Germany. I happen to live in Germany and did
not see any package of vit E which costs more than a few USD. It is
still available in any drugstore and many supermarkets.

BTW, consumers in Germany would be happy if they could receive a pack
of vit E on prescripition (whatever it may cost) instead of paying USD
4 for it. Due to the german health insurance system you never pay more
than a fixed amount depending on package size, NOT depending on actual
cost. Very few people in Germany pay themselves for their prescription
drugs.

Winfried
Alf Christophersen - 20 Feb 2005 20:28 GMT
>BTW, consumers in Germany would be happy if they could receive a pack
>of vit E on prescripition (whatever it may cost) instead of paying USD
>4 for it. Due to the german health insurance system you never pay more
>than a fixed amount depending on package size, NOT depending on actual
>cost. Very few people in Germany pay themselves for their prescription
>drugs.

Same here. I would really look forward to get any drugs that must be
used chronicly on a blue prescription (but I think it is not possible)

If also green prescription would be free for paying after reaching an
upper limit, I would love it. (free access to physical studios, free
vegetables and lot of other healthy stuff).
Winfried Buechsenschuetz - 14 Feb 2005 07:49 GMT
> next however via CODEX (a UN initiative) vitamins in any
> worthwhile dose are being outlawed... in germany for instance
> now 20 dollars worth of vitamin E, costs 200 dollars and you
> need a prescription.

Another victim of the anti-Codex-propaganda or rather lies. Please
show me a place in Germany (where I live) where they sell vit E pills
for USD 200 and ask for a prescription. At least in low doses vit E
pills are available in any major supermarket for a few USD (without
prescription), and you can buy as many packages as you want.

There has been no noticeable price lap for vitamine pills in Germany
in the past few years.

Winfried from Germany
N10 - 18 Feb 2005 00:40 GMT
>> next however via CODEX (a UN initiative) vitamins in any
>> worthwhile dose are being outlawed... in germany for instance
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Winfried from Germany

HI Winfried

Wake up and smell the assault on your freeedom.

http://www.hfma.co.uk/FoodSupplementsDirectiveDebate25.1.05.pdf

Best N10  pro the freedom to eat what you like
Winfried Buechsenschuetz - 18 Feb 2005 07:20 GMT
> > Another victim of the anti-Codex-propaganda or rather lies. Please
> > show me a place in Germany (where I live) where they sell vit E pills
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> http://www.hfma.co.uk/FoodSupplementsDirectiveDebate25.1.05.pdf

I am still waiting for a verification of the statements about the food
supplement situation in Germany and the 'price rises' due to the
implementation of Codex in Germany.

Maybe the EU directive is a threat but your arguments will not get
stronger if you are argueing with fiction, not facts.

Winfried
Alf Christophersen - 20 Feb 2005 20:31 GMT
>Wake up and smell the assault on your freeedom.
>
>http://www.hfma.co.uk/FoodSupplementsDirectiveDebate25.1.05.pdf

Can't you rather cite some government pages, rather than a consulting
firm who are free to tell any fairytale on the net.

UK has no White House. It must be a fake site.
N10 - 22 Feb 2005 22:04 GMT
>>Wake up and smell the assault on your freeedom.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> UK has no White House. It must be a fake site.

You either cant read, dont know what your talking about or both lol

N10
Alf Christophersen - 23 Feb 2005 18:14 GMT
>You either cant read, dont know what your talking about or both lol

UK has a Parliament, not a White House.
USA has a White House on the other side.
Don't mix that.
Ben Fullerton - 18 Feb 2005 19:46 GMT
: Is it true that salmon is white and that they add some color to it to
: make it pink ?
: And is that toxic ?

: Virg

I am coming in late on this one (and have read most of the 26 replies) ...

... but it reminds me of a story that I read thirty or more years ago,
AFAIK it was long before fish farming was carried out anywhere in Canada.

A cannery in B.C. found that the white flesh (wild, of course) salmon that
they canned were losing out to the canners of pink salmon - others of the
several salmon sub-species that were fished off the B.C. coast in those
days.

Their sales boomed when they added the following statement to their
product label:

"Guaranteed not to turn pink in the can."

Ben Fullerton
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.