Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

HEALTH THREAT!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
drlaibow - 31 Jan 2005 08:01 GMT
I am an MD who uses natural treatments (Nutritional Medicine, herbs,
etc.) with my patients.  But unless we, the health-oriented public,
take action now, in a very short time we will no longer have the legal
right to make these choices.  CODEX ALIMENTARIUS (CA) is already law in
Australia, Canada and the European Union.  CA makes it a crime to use,
buy, sell, reccomend or manufacture any natural substance at any but
ultra low doses (and only 18supplements TOTAL will be allowed even at
those sub-therapeutic doses).  This is not an urban legend: this is
reality.  It has already happened in virtual silence in the countries I
mentioned above: we are next.
But you can avert this health disaster now.  Please visit my blog at
http://naturalsolution.blogspot.com/ with information on how to find
out more and what actions you can take NOW.  Later will be just too
late.
Yours,
Rima E. Laibow, MD
PS: Please feel free to contact me directly for more information on
this serious threat to your health and mine.  REL
MMu - 31 Jan 2005 12:03 GMT
> right to make these choices.  CODEX ALIMENTARIUS (CA) is already law in
> Australia, Canada and the European Union.  CA makes it a crime to use,
> buy, sell, reccomend or manufacture any natural substance at any but
> ultra low doses (and only 18supplements TOTAL will be allowed even at
> those sub-therapeutic doses).

This is only partly true. Codex Alimentarius IS law in europe, but it does
not make buying vitamins illegal - you can for instance still buy a 100grams
package of Vitamin C without prescription or any other problems at the
pharmacist.
Cubit - 31 Jan 2005 14:49 GMT
One of these posts said something about vitamin C tablet sizes being
restricted to 400mg or less.  Can you still buy 1 gram tablets of vitamin C
in Europe?

> > right to make these choices.  CODEX ALIMENTARIUS (CA) is already law in
> > Australia, Canada and the European Union.  CA makes it a crime to use,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> package of Vitamin C without prescription or any other problems at the
> pharmacist.
MMu - 31 Jan 2005 16:20 GMT
> One of these posts said something about vitamin C tablet sizes being
> restricted to 400mg or less.  Can you still buy 1 gram tablets of vitamin
> C
> in Europe?

I don't know if they have a package where one tablet is exactly one gram.
..but what difference does it make when you take one tablet with one gram or
two tablets with 500 (or 400) mg?
[I think the post said 100mg or less though, which would be in the area of
the daily recommendations]

If you need to megadose you can buy Ascorbate in Powder form and take that.

Its not illegal in the EU (like the article said), thats the thing I
criticized.
drlaibow - 01 Feb 2005 19:27 GMT
First, the facts.  1. Yes, it is illegal in the EU, Canada and
Australia to purchase any but the 18 nutrients at ultra-low doses that
I mentioned.  The law has been passed.  The law, called CODEX
ALIMENTARIUS, will be phased in in stages starting this summer so that
each of its provisions will take effect according to that time-table.
Thus, it is still possible to get supplments (and they are generally
pretty low dose already in Europe over the countrer) BUT as the CA
regulations are phased in they will become more and more restricted
until, within 2-3 years they will be completely unavailable.
2. If you have to purchase low dose nutrients and take lots of them to
get a higher dose effect you will be paying a LOT more money for the
same amount of active ingredient, taking lots more fillers, binders and
non-beneficial materials and swallowing more than most people's
stomach's want to hold.  So if you want to take a gram of Vitamin C,
for example, you would need to take 5 tabs  of 200 mg (the max
allowable dose) each time you want that gram.
3. If you are taking Vitamin C at the reccomended dose, for example, to
deal with swelling, pain or the approach of an infection, you might
need not 1 gram but 10.  So you would need 50, not 5, tabs of ultra-low
dose vitamin C.
4.  And we are not talking about Vitamin C here: we are talking about
ALL nutrients.  Only 18 will be allowed.  The rest will be forbidden,
just as heroine is forbidden.  
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Roger Rabbit - 02 Feb 2005 23:22 GMT
> So if you want to take a gram of Vitamin C,
>for example, you would need to take 5 tabs  of 200 mg (the max
>allowable dose) each time you want that gram.

I live in Canada and I buy Vitamin C in 500 mg tablets. I used to buy
1000 mg tabs. I'll check to see if those are still available.

rr
drlaibow - 04 Feb 2005 07:32 GMT
You wrote "I live in Canada and I buy Vitamin C in 500 mg tablets. I
used to buy
1000 mg tabs. I'll check to see if those are still available. "
The point is not whether they are available now.  The point is that
they will not be available once CODEX begins to be phased in.  Check
with your local MP to find out when  he/or she has slated you for this
loss of health freedom.  Let us know what the answer is.
It will be instructive for those of us to the South here in the US.
Dr. Laibow
MMu - 07 Feb 2005 09:57 GMT
> First, the facts.  1. Yes, it is illegal in the EU, Canada and
> Australia to purchase any but the 18 nutrients at ultra-low doses that
> I mentioned.  The law has been passed.

This is not true. Sorry.
I DO LIVE in europe and I DO buy 100gram Vitamin C in the pharmacy (in ANY
pharmacy) without any problems whatsoever. Price is nothing spectacular
either.
MMu - 07 Feb 2005 10:00 GMT
replace my "europe" with "the EU" to be more precise
Alf Christophersen - 10 Feb 2005 00:22 GMT
>replace my "europe" with "the EU" to be more precise

No need. The same here in Norway. Somebody is lying about us, in order
to spread false rumours to scare US people.
(Could it be Al Quaida??Or nazi groups that control the Al Quaida (in
august 2001 newspapers here mentioned that Nazi groups and right wing
extreme christian groups was observed training Al Quaida)
drlaibow - 10 Feb 2005 04:48 GMT
Alf,
No one is trying to lie.  CODEX passed in the EU Parliament in
November.  Veteranary restrictions are already taking place.  Human
dietary restrictions will start to make natural vitamins, minerals and
herbs illegal later this year, around June.  The restrictions will be
phased in over the next 2-3 years.
I have no interest in lying about your situation.  This is not an urban
legend, my friend.  This is a real health peril given that we live in a
toxic world and nutrients are our only defense against the effects of
that toxicity.
Dr. Laibow
Alf Christophersen - 10 Feb 2005 16:31 GMT
>Alf,
>No one is trying to lie.  CODEX passed in the EU Parliament in
>November.  Veteranary restrictions are already taking place.  Human

Codex alimentarius has been around for many years. It is nothing new.

The only new thing is that also vitamin pills are now included in
order to make it sure for the buyer that the pills you buy has some
documented effects. Too many pilltraders has been around selling
expensive hearsay products that do just one thing,saying plonk in the
toilet when the intact pill comes out again.

You could equally sell concrete pills and claim they cure whatever
disease you want.

Latest phone seller was about 10 minutes ago trying to sell me
nonfunctional rose root pills. And Codex has been here for long time
(as you or some other stated, Norwegian rules has been accepted by EU
so beware)
No, it isn't that bad as you say. But in countries where it has been
totally free to sell anything, either nonfunctional as rose root,or
deadly poisons like CN- under cover as laetrile, the buyer will get
some prevention against the worst speculants and snake oil resellers.

As I understand it, you are fighting for the snake oil resellers
rights to  poison people under cover natural health remedies. (I'm
glad you are not allowed to sell functioning natural health preparates
like digitalis preparats, atropine etc.)
Cubit - 11 Mar 2005 22:48 GMT
My concern would be to ensure that the snake oil really comes from snakes,
and let people have an informed opportunity to choose.

> >Alf,
> >No one is trying to lie.  CODEX passed in the EU Parliament in
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> glad you are not allowed to sell functioning natural health preparates
> like digitalis preparats, atropine etc.)
Alf Christophersen - 13 Mar 2005 15:20 GMT
>My concern would be to ensure that the snake oil really comes from snakes,
>and let people have an informed opportunity to choose.

The problem is that people need medical knowledge to make an informed
opportunity to choice.

They don't have unless they are doctors or nurses.

Information about medicine etc. was until quite recentlly restricted
information. The big blue book about medicines was only allowed
doctors to read. I remember I had studied biochemistry for a long
period before I was allowed to loan a copy (because I needed some
information about MAO-inhibitors and alike)

Medical eduction has never been a topic in school, so when people
suddenly get lots of newspapers about health and nutrition, printed by
the sellers of health preparates, most people do believe everything
printed there, while people trained in medicine are almost crying
about all the misunderstandings and misinterpretations of medical
research that is printed there in order to make snake oil sell.

And when the pills are analyzed for contents, the results are
deprimating. Some pills do not at all contain the stuff proclaimed to
be main principle (some times very fortunate, like red kidney bean
protease inhibitors slimming pills that ad that the pill will prevent
degradation of 10% of the energy intake (proteins) and let them pass
untouched through stomach (not telling the truth that the energy will
be degraded totally by bacteria and would produce lots of gas, making
you fart almost continually, or at worst, puncture the intestines and
pour out intestine content into lumen, giving you a hell of problem)
(the case with cows eating poisonous plants ooozing with the same
inhibitors, the inhibitors making people not used to eat bean soup
etc. fart as hell, (beans beans the musical fruit, the more you eat,
the more you toot)

One of the aims of Codex is to have strict rules about producing,
control of content etc.
Piezo Guru - 13 Mar 2005 19:20 GMT
This opens up a whole new field of "medical advisers"

Why has this profession not flourished to date? Unbiased, notrhing to gain
medical advise for a knowledgable person that doesn't spend all day dishing
out anti-biotics and ASA. Somebody to follow you through the operating room
(like a lawyer in court or divorce) and make sure things are done as
requested by your educated decision.

> >My concern would be to ensure that the snake oil really comes from snakes,
> >and let people have an informed opportunity to choose.
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> One of the aims of Codex is to have strict rules about producing,
> control of content etc.
John Que - 16 Mar 2005 10:44 GMT
> >My concern would be to ensure that the snake oil really comes from snakes,
> >and let people have an informed opportunity to choose.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> period before I was allowed to loan a copy (because I needed some
> information about MAO-inhibitors and alike)

It has been like that here since the 1960's here in the States.
Before that the Docs often didn't tell the patients what
they were taking. It was trust me "I am Doc God".

> Medical eduction has never been a topic in school, so when people
> suddenly get lots of newspapers about health and nutrition, printed by
> the sellers of health preparates, most people do believe everything
> printed there, while people trained in medicine are almost crying
> about all the misunderstandings and misinterpretations of medical
> research that is printed there in order to make snake oil sell.

I see misunderstanding in the medical research and the medical
journals. I often wonder if the medical experts ever had a statistics
class.

> And when the pills are analyzed for contents, the results are
> deprimating. Some pills do not at all contain the stuff proclaimed to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> One of the aims of Codex is to have strict rules about producing,
> control of content etc.

Big Daddy government that mutters under it breath that
the peasants are too simple to feed themselves.
And some are too simple. The prescription fat blockers
are also quite a mess (literally) and they were passed the US FDA
regulators. So it seems government and the Doctors and
the prescription drug companies are also too simple
to be trusted.
drlaibow - 10 Feb 2005 04:44 GMT
Yes, I am afraid that it is true.  The EU adopted the CODEX
ALIMENTARIUS regulations last November.  The European Supplements
Directive (which is even more restrictive than CODEX, by the way) has
been challenged in the European Justice system by Dr. Verkerk of the UK
(final arguments presented January 25, ruling from 13 judge banque due
in June) but the phase in of CODEX restrictions and regulations will
begin this summer in the EU.   I have just been informed that CODEX
restrictions have led to the removal of about 1500 natural products and
supplements from the shelves in Australia.  I have not had
corroboration on that so right now it is unsubstantiated.  However, it
IS what you can expect in the EU and Canada (and the US if we are
unwise enought to allow CODEX to become law here.
About Vitamin C, please remember that 100 mg is a very low dose.  If we
had not lost the ability to manufacture our own Vitamin C (as most of
the animal wolrd does), we would, under conditions of no stress,
produce about 1500 mg of Vitamin C per day.  Under condtions of stress,
be they psychological, microbial, toxic or any other sort, we need
considerably more.  So being able to purchase 1/15 of the minimal dose
we need for baseline well-being is not very comforting.
By the way, you probably mean 100 mg (1/10 gram), not 100 grams for
oral dosage.  100 grams of Vitamin C by mouth would cause severe
diarrhea.  However, IV administration of that much is quite effective
in many conditions and very well tolerated.
Also, please remember that  Vitamin C is but one of many, many vital
nutrients which will be unavailable at therapeutic doses under CODEX.
I hope that you are working vigorously for repeal of this dreadful set
of regulations where you live.  
Dr. Laibow
drlaibow - 01 Feb 2005 00:20 GMT
Vitamin C will be restricted to the sub-therapeutic dose of 200 mg, not
400.  You will need to take 5 tablets to get 1000 mg of Vitamin C.
Remember, the problem is that every nutrient will be impacted.  Vitamin
C will still be allowed at these ineffective doses.  The vast majority
of nutients will not even be legal at all, even with a physicians's
prescription.  And CA has not yet gone into effect.  The first phase is
due to take effect this summer.
Dr. Laibow
drlaibow - 01 Feb 2005 19:35 GMT
The issue is NOT just vitamin C, folks.  Vitamin C is an example.  The
issue is that only 18 nutrients will be available in ulta-low doses.
The rest will be unavailable/illegal (like cocaine is
unavailable/illegal).  That is what CODEX is bringing us.
Vitamin C may still be available in 1 gram tabs in Europe but CODEX
ALIMENTARIUS has not phased in yet.  When it has, Vitamin C and all
other (permitted) nutritionals will be available only at ultra low
doses and all others will be illegal.
I know it is a hard concept to wrap your mind around but that is the
law and, unless we make sure it does not happen, it will be here
shortly.
Yours in health and freedom,
Rima E. Laibow, MD
barbara - 04 Feb 2005 23:55 GMT
Even if we could manage to take our preferred dosages, I am concerned
with the idea that only 18 nutrients would be available.   Now of
course, I have no idea of the proper number of supplements that are
useful or might be determined to be useful in the future.  I do however
think that even now my multivitamin approaches 18 different nutrients.
I know that my body needs more than a multivitamin a day.
MMu - 08 Feb 2005 13:07 GMT
> I know that my body needs more than a multivitamin a day.

I don't know if you have any special conditions that cause an increased need
for vitamins, but with a healthy balanced diet you don't _need_ even one
multivitamin tablet a day..
Piezo Guru - 09 Feb 2005 04:23 GMT
Bullshit. Shove that balanced, healthy eating crap in your ear. It doesn't
work or most of us would live to be 200 years old.

> > I know that my body needs more than a multivitamin a day.
>
> I don't know if you have any special conditions that cause an increased need
> for vitamins, but with a healthy balanced diet you don't _need_ even one
> multivitamin tablet a day..
drlaibow - 01 Feb 2005 00:17 GMT
What I wrote was that only ultra low doses of these 18 vitamins are
available.  100 mg of Vitamin C IS an ultra low dose.  The unstressed,
non-toxic human being would, if it had not lost the ability to
manufacture Vitamin C somewhere in its evolutionary history, it is
estimated by Biochemists, make approximately 1500 mg (15 times the 100
mg dose currently available in the EU)on a daily basis.  However, under
physical, emotional or toxicological stress, that need goes up,
sometimes 10 to 20 fold or more.
However, the most significant problem with the information you shared
is that CODEX is the law in Europe but its regulations are due to phase
in this summer.  That sub-therapeutic dose is available now BEFORE CA
takes effect!  bE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID.
Dr. Laibow
> > right to make these choices.  CODEX ALIMENTARIUS (CA) is already law in
> > Australia, Canada and the European Union.  CA makes it a crime to use,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> package of Vitamin C without prescription or any other problems at the
> pharmacist.
drlaibow - 01 Feb 2005 19:32 GMT
100 grams of Vitamin C is a sub-therapeutic dose.  Only 18 nutrients
will be permitted.  ALL others will be illegal.  If I, as a physician,
tell you, as my patient, that you need 12 grams of Vitamin C, 25 mg of
zinc, 2000 mg of L-Carnitine, 800 IU of Vitamin E, 1300 mg of Evening
Primrose Oil and 500 mg of Vitamin B6 and half of those are
unavailable/illegal and the other half require you to take a total of
75 pills a day (at a horribly inflated cost) is your health freedom in
tact?
Let's try this again: CODEX ALIMENTARIUS makes natural health choices
unavailable.  We must not let it pass here in the US.
Piezo Guru - 02 Feb 2005 04:22 GMT
When does this become effective in Canada? The health professionals have
never noticed.

> 100 grams of Vitamin C is a sub-therapeutic dose.  Only 18 nutrients
> will be permitted.  ALL others will be illegal.  If I, as a physician,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Let's try this again: CODEX ALIMENTARIUS makes natural health choices
> unavailable.  We must not let it pass here in the US.
Roger Rabbit - 02 Feb 2005 23:38 GMT
>When does this become effective in Canada? The health professionals have
>never noticed.

Well, I live in Ontario and I have a bottle of 500 mg/tablet Vitamin
C in my cupboard right now. My wife, who does the shopping, says she
still sees the 1000 mg/tablet bottles on the shelves of the
Pharmacies.

rr
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.