Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Isoflavones

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Leo - 19 Dec 2004 19:38 GMT
?In males, levels of 17B-estradiol and testosterone were not
    affected, but levels of 3a, 17B- androstanediol glucuronide (a
    metabolite of dihydrotestosterone) and dehydroepiandrosterone
    sulfate were decreased by 13% and 14%, respectively, after 2-4
    weeks of daily soya ingestion.?

Sounds bad! But did you read the conclusion of the study: "We conclude
that soya consumption can affect hormones that regulate growth of
neoplastic cells, and that this may account at least in part for
decreased cancer risk in populations with high legume consumption."

So let us eat more soy!

http://www.isoflavones.info
usual suspect - 19 Dec 2004 20:03 GMT
> ?In males, levels of 17B-estradiol and testosterone were not
>      affected, but levels of 3a, 17B- androstanediol glucuronide (a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> neoplastic cells, and that this may account at least in part for
> decreased cancer risk in populations with high legume consumption."

Other studies have shown possible associative risks between soy
consumption and other forms of cancer. Indeed, some of the links I
offered note the higher incidence of esophegal and other alimentary
cancers in Asia -- thought to possibly be from a higher intake of soy.

> So let us eat more soy!

No, let's do more research before we take ONE study and make unfounded
generalizations from it.
Chuck - 19 Dec 2004 22:00 GMT
Everyone appears to be fearful of something happening to them but we are
getting fatter and living longer than ever before,  Why?  Are all these
"chemicals" really good for us and actually making us live longer.  Before
the turn of the century (1900) average life expectancy was less than 45,
What is it today and why?

Chuck

>> ?In males, levels of 17B-estradiol and testosterone were not
>>      affected, but levels of 3a, 17B- androstanediol glucuronide (a
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> No, let's do more research before we take ONE study and make unfounded
> generalizations from it.
Bruce Sinclair - 20 Dec 2004 03:14 GMT
>Everyone appears to be fearful of something happening to them but we are
>getting fatter and living longer than ever before,  Why?  Are all these
>"chemicals" really good for us and actually making us live longer.  Before
>the turn of the century (1900) average life expectancy was less than 45,
>What is it today and why?

Do you have an opinion ? ... and does it agree with the data already
gathered on this subject ? :)

Bruce

------------------------------
Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals
dying of nothing.

-Redd Foxx

Caution ===== followups may have been changed to relevant groups
(if there were any)
Bruce Sinclair - 20 Dec 2004 03:14 GMT
>?In males, levels of 17B-estradiol and testosterone were not
>     affected, but levels of 3a, 17B- androstanediol glucuronide (a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>So let us eat more soy!

Maybe when it tastes good :)

Bruce

------------------------------
Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals
dying of nothing.

-Redd Foxx

Caution ===== followups may have been changed to relevant groups
(if there were any)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.