> > Don't like that source John?
>
> You think the medical mafia don't have a cover story for laetrile? You may
> be asleep but some of us woke up years ago
You woke up in La-La Land.
> Contreras has been using it for 30 years
> http://www.whale.to/a/laetrile_p.html so I guess the Mexican government are
> in on the fraud too
"john" <nospamoridiots@vaccine.com> wrote...
> Contreras has been using it for 30 years
> http://www.whale.to/a/laetrile_p.html so I guess the Mexican government are
> in on the fraud too
OMG, you absolutely DESTROYED your argument when you brought in the Mexican
government. I've lived on the Mexican border much of my life (still do)
and while I doubt you've read anything I've posted to the Mexico-related
newsgroups, the recurring theme is that the Mexican government is corrupt
to the core, not even a real "government" at all but a criminal mafia-like
syndicate that has robbed the country blind. I've paid visits to Mexican
"doctors," and like their government (who granted them their UNAM public
university degrees and licenses them), they are also corrupt to the core
and many extremely incompetent (I go to them because they write
prescreeptions for controlled substances like candy, surely evidence of
standards of Mexican medical ethics).
Mexican government in on the fraud? Naturally. Please keep in mind that
this is a country whose entire police forces, military as well as high
ranking generals, and even the president of Mexico himself have been
discovered to be on the payroll of drug cartels. This is a country where
government officials have stolen literally billions of dollars in public
resources, funnelling some into personal secret Swiss bank accounts and
using some to illegally fund the ruling party's political machine to
rig elections in their favor. The moment you brought Mexico into it, you
doomed your argument in favor of Laetrile.
john - 18 Dec 2004 13:26 GMT
"Michael Myers" <mmyers@halloween.net> wrote in message news:LTRwd.2965
> Mexican government in on the fraud? Naturally. Please keep in mind that
> this is a country whose entire police forces, military as well as high
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> rig elections in their favor. The moment you brought Mexico into it, you
> doomed your argument in favor of Laetrile.
Just like our own except ours just funnells it into Corporations
http://www.whale.to/a/cartels_h.html
and the biggest drug dealer on the planet is Kissinger as Dope Inc proved,
as if we all didn't know anyway http://www.whale.to/b/drug_war.html
so I don't think your argument holds much water, as there isn't any
difference in the governments, ours just rob us more covertly, bandits in
white collars I call them
and the biggest robber is the pharma industry
http://www.whale.to/a/hoaxmed.html
Mark Probert - 18 Dec 2004 15:33 GMT
> "john" <nospamoridiots@vaccine.com> wrote...
> > Contreras has been using it for 30 years
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> OMG, you absolutely DESTROYED your argument when you brought in the Mexican
> government.
John the owner of the whale.to website never has an argument worth
destroying because they are not worth believing in the first place. The
whale.to website has been criticized as the entire internets leading
suppository of mis- and false information.
I've lived on the Mexican border much of my life (still do)
> and while I doubt you've read anything I've posted to the Mexico-related
> newsgroups, the recurring theme is that the Mexican government is corrupt
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> rig elections in their favor. The moment you brought Mexico into it, you
> doomed your argument in favor of Laetrile.
Interesting, one of the most infamous health care frauds, Hulda Clark, has a
clinic in Tiajuana. Recently, like earlier this month, Hulda's Henchmen
stipulated that they can no longer sell her gadgets, gizmos and goos in the
US with any form of health care intent. Interestingly, there is a picture
someone took of her "clinic" which shows a car from a local mortuary. Do you
know if morticians split fees with large referrers in Mexico?