Yes, if looking at sales. Atkins spent 15 million on a marketing pitch to
sell a low carb line of pasta, its sitting in warehouses collecting dust.
Like all such fads, the peak is past, the bloom is off the rose. For
those with metabolic disorders, being carb moderate and making choices for
whole carb sources will remain, but this fad for the general public is
another cycle in the boom and bust diet industry. It will be intresting
to see what the next fad is, whatever it is it too will allow weight loss
by matching energy intake with energy needs period. Read an analysis:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/05/business/yourmoney/05atki.html
Kevin Hill - 05 Dec 2004 21:00 GMT
It could be that it was neither low carb or pasta.
> Yes, if looking at sales. Atkins spent 15 million on a marketing pitch to
> sell a low carb line of pasta, its sitting in warehouses collecting dust.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/05/business/yourmoney/05atki.html
Susan - 06 Dec 2004 00:40 GMT
>It could be that it was neither low carb or pasta.
It tasted like sh.t.
It's not low carb that's waning, it's the sales of lousy ersatz foods.
Susan
jt - 06 Dec 2004 01:05 GMT
>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>It's not low carb that's waning
Its over Johnny
Hagrinas Mivali - 08 Dec 2004 06:25 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
>> It could be that it was neither low carb or pasta.
>
> It tasted like sh.t.
I could not help but wonder how you would know that.
markd@toad-net.com - 06 Dec 2004 00:12 GMT
"According to the NPD Group, a research firm, the percentage of
Americans who followed low-carb diets like Atkins, South Beach
or the Zone fell to 4.6 percent in September from 9 percent in
January."
It's not sales, it's people getting tired/moving on in their diet
choices; they tried it they voted with their feet and the vote continues.
>It's not low carb that's waning, it's the sales of lousy ersatz foods.
>
>Susan
Gregory Toomey - 06 Dec 2004 00:48 GMT
> Yes, if looking at sales. Atkins spent 15 million on a marketing pitch to
> sell a low carb line of pasta, its sitting in warehouses collecting dust.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/05/business/yourmoney/05atki.html
I eat low carb all the time and use very few processed products.
Low fat was a fad & low carb keeps growing in popularity for good reasons,
mainly its success stories.
gtoomey
tcomeau - 06 Dec 2004 04:12 GMT
> Yes, if looking at sales. Atkins spent 15 million on a marketing pitch to
> sell a low carb line of pasta, its sitting in warehouses collecting dust.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/05/business/yourmoney/05atki.html
You are a grade A idiot.
Just because no-one is being sucked into buying all the manufactured
crap with a low carb label on it, it does not reflect in any way on
the popularity, the efficacy or the numbers of people on a low carb
diet. It is an apples and oranges kind of thing.
TC
markd@toad-net.com - 06 Dec 2004 16:59 GMT
"You are a grade A idiot.
Just because no-one is being sucked into buying all the manufactured crap
with a low carb label on it, it does not reflect in any way on the
popularity, the efficacy or the numbers of people on a low carb diet. It
is an apples and oranges kind of thing."
Consider:
"According to the NPD Group, a research firm, the percentage of
Americans who followed low-carb diets like Atkins, South Beach
or the Zone fell to 4.6 percent in September from 9 percent in
January."
Apples and oranges, sure, and whole sources of grains and tubers and beans
and nuts and fruits and veggies galore also.
Hagrinas Mivali - 08 Dec 2004 06:37 GMT
> "You are a grade A idiot.
> Just because no-one is being sucked into buying all the manufactured
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Apples and oranges, sure, and whole sources of grains and tubers and
> beans and nuts and fruits and veggies galore also.
All of which are allowed on South Beach, but must be limited more on the
others.