Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / November 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Stevia, why isn't it popular?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Stiki - 26 Oct 2004 14:29 GMT
It tastes better then sugar, everything I've read shows that there are
no side effects, so why isn't it in use?

http://www.torontotalent.com/articleDisplay.asp?id=131
steve@easynn.com - 26 Oct 2004 15:38 GMT
>It tastes better then sugar, everything I've read shows that there are
>no side effects, so why isn't it in use?

It doesn't taste better than sugar, it tastes different to sugar. It
tastes a bit sickly to me. There is no point in using it as a sugar
substitute because it tastes different. It's OK for sweetening a
little when the sickly taste doesn't break through.
magnulus - 26 Oct 2004 19:46 GMT
 The stevia extract I have tried had a bitter aftertaste- much worse than
saccharin or aspartame.

 I think licorice powder is a much better sweetener, although it definitely
has a taste all of its own.
Skinny - 28 Oct 2004 05:24 GMT
>   The stevia extract I have tried had a bitter aftertaste- much worse than
> saccharin or aspartame.
>
>   I think licorice powder is a much better sweetener, although it definitely
> has a taste all of its own.

I use the stevia leaf a lot. It tastes much nicer than the powder/extract.

As to the OP question, stevia is a plant, and the leaf is good as a
sweetener with no processing (except drying, like any herb). The
extract/powder isn't hard to make, and I don't think it's patentable.

So there's no way to make much money selling stevia products. It's kind of a
spoiler for Splenda, Nutra-Sweet, etc. It could cut their market, but no one
company could make much money from it, because anyone could grow and sell
it.

So there's no reason for any big company to spend a lot of money getting it
approved by the FDA, but much reason for the manufacturers of Splenda etc to
spend money to keep it from being approved. (I don't mean by bribing the
FDA, but by funding studies to look for dangers and to test for safety. In
order to be approved, a product has to run a lot of expensive tests to prove
it is safe.)

Skinny
RH - 28 Oct 2004 07:25 GMT
>It tastes better then sugar, everything I've read shows that there are
>no side effects, so why isn't it in use?
>
>http://www.torontotalent.com/articleDisplay.asp?id=131

Stevia is not allowed on the EU market, due to side effects, such as
teratogenicity (toxic to the unborn child) and some other.

Ralf
Peter Fackelmann - 28 Oct 2004 16:06 GMT
Stevia No Longer Banned in Europe
Aspartame:  Rats Jump NutraShip
Date: Saturday, October 16, 2004 7:56 PM

A meeting  in Geneva June 8 - 17, of the Joint FAQ/WHO Expert Committee on
Food Additives was held  to evaluate certain food additives, ingredients,
and flavouring agents.

It was decided that Steviol glycosides be approved.  and orders to England
are no longer being confiscated.
A study is pending to make sure it doesn't lower blood sugar in
non-diabetics.
Stevia has always been known  to help in the metabolism of sugar, thus
being
beneficial to diabetics.

Regards

Peter

>Stevia is not allowed on the EU market, due to side effects, such as
>teratogenicity (toxic to the unborn child) and some other.
>
>Ralf
MilkyWhy - 28 Oct 2004 09:47 GMT
>It tastes better then sugar, everything I've read shows that there are
>no side effects, so why isn't Stevia used?

Because Stevia (alone as sweetener) has a bitter aftertaste. Here is what I do:
I sweeten my drinks to "near sweetness" with Stevia and then I "top it off"
with a half teaspoon or so of honey or Maple Syrup. Mmmmm. Now, that tastes
GOOD, and almost no sugar used. It takes that horrid Stevia-bitter-aftertaste
away.
magnulus - 28 Oct 2004 18:02 GMT
> Because Stevia (alone as sweetener) has a bitter aftertaste. Here is what I do:
> I sweeten my drinks to "near sweetness" with Stevia and then I "top it off"
> with a half teaspoon or so of honey or Maple Syrup. Mmmmm. Now, that tastes
> GOOD, and almost no sugar used. It takes that horrid Stevia-bitter-aftertaste
> away.

  I have found using a half packet of refined stevia sweetener actually
tastes better than using a whole packet- it avoids the bitter aftertaste.

 Still, I think the combo of Splenda + Eridex tastes the best, at least in
the coffee syrup I have tried.  I would like to find a "table sugar" type
Splenda-Eridex combo.  Or even Eridex on it's own.

 One problem with many artificial or substitute sweeteners is the lack of
bulk- they are just too sweet per gram, and they don't contribute to the
syrupy texture that real sugar has.

 I don't really like aspartame now days, it tastes fake and there are
better sweeteners.  But products are still using it.  Saccharin tasted
better, but the healthscare about it drove people to the, IMO, inferior
aspartame.
Skinny - 29 Oct 2004 05:32 GMT
> >It tastes better then sugar, everything I've read shows that there are
> >no side effects, so why isn't Stevia used?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> GOOD, and almost no sugar used. It takes that horrid Stevia-bitter-aftertaste
> away.

Have you tried the stevia leaf, or just the powder? I don't notice any
bitter taste at all from the leaf.

Skinny
Dunne E. Dawe - 29 Oct 2004 07:10 GMT
>>It tastes better then sugar, everything I've read shows that there are
>>no side effects, so why isn't Stevia used?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>GOOD, and almost no sugar used. It takes that horrid Stevia-bitter-aftertaste
>away.

Hooley Dooley, how sweet do you like it? The half teaspoon of sugar
would be too sweet for me. I personally am used to saccharine (one
drop of the solution, or half of a tablet). That has a bitter
aftertaste to many, I believe, but I've grown to like it. For cereals,
I find that a few drops of saccharine and a sprinkle of one of the
powders seems to give more sweetness than even more of just the one
sweetener. If I'm physically whacked, I will use some saccharine and
sucrose. That makes it very sweet and very restorative for me.
Stiki - 13 Nov 2004 05:12 GMT
are there any negative effects to using the processed stevia. The
bleached white poweder, because that it the one I use.. I use very
small amounts of it in my tea?

Are there benefits to using the non bleached product instead?
MilkyWhy - 14 Nov 2004 08:04 GMT
I sweeten my tea with Stevia...to just near sweetness, then add just a bit of
Maple Syrup to finish sweetening it, remove that bitter stevia edge and give it
that wonderful maple syrup taste.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.