http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2004/10/emw157097.htm
Stockholm, Sweden (PRWEB) October 21, 2004, -- The Banta Diet plan,
tried by over 1500 participants since 2002, yielded satisfactory and
lasting weight loss.
Participants, 80% of whom were USA online users, reported a decrease
in hunger and craving as well as an increase in perceived energy.
"I am so thrilled! I can't believe this is happening! I realize now
that I have never had this kind of success on another diet and I am
very motivated to continue" said Dawn, who lost 11 pounds in 1 week.
The program is based on the scientific fact that different
combinations of macro-nutrients -- carbohydrates, fats, and proteins
-- tend to trigger one of two different metabolic pathways. These
pathways use either carbohydrates or lipids (fats) for fuel and it is
possible to calculate, with mathematical precision, which pathway will
prevail.
This approach has been in clinical use since 1920s for treatment of
intractable childhood epilepsy. As such, there is a vast body of
evidence collected on its safety. Although the Ketogenic diet could
not make its way to general public as a weight loss program because it
was very hard to comply with, the highly motivated hard-core
bodybuilders used many of the diet's advantages. For decades, the
bodybuilders demonstrated highly reproducible fat loss results, while
sparing and increasing the muscle mass.
The remarkable story of Dr. Atkins diet's transition from heresy into
the mainstream weight loss program has interrupted the search for a
better yet diet plan -- for a while, anyway. What is happening now is
the evident decline of low carb dieting idea at large. The official
South Beach Diet website has recently reminded that it's no low carb
diet. Statistical data revealed that 50% of low carb dieters are
giving up and currently only 9% of the US dieters follow the low carb
way.
"We analyzed hundreds of cases of Atkins diet failures, and came to
the conclusion that there were mostly two reasons for them" said Dr.
Tanya Zilberter, the Banta founder. "One reason was the illusion
(usual for dieters) of complying with diet rules while in fact
cheating them. Another one was more serious and diet-specific. It's
the fact that Dr. Atkins left the true amount of carbohydrates (the
one going
into the blood) uncertain.
The fact is, counting only carb grams in foods isn't enough. Almost
50% of food protein will be converted into blood glucose. Without
taking this amount into account, one can't tell which biochemical
pathway will take over -- fat burning or fat storing one. You should
also count protein and fat grams -- but their ratios, as well."
The task seemed to be unrealistic for a lay person trying to lose
weight without professional supervision. So Dr. Zilberter developed a
plan allowing the user to ignore any kind of counting at all.
The Banta Diet consists of pre-calculated "all-you-can-eat" food
lists, meal plans, and recipes that insure the proper ratios of
carbohydrates plus protein to fat amounts. Compared with the clinical
ketogenic diet or that in use by bodybuilders, Banta is much more
liberal and easy to comply with. The dieters contacted by Banta team,
one year after they lost all unwanted body weight, reported that they
kept the lost weight off by simply returning to the stricter phases
whenever necessary.
"I feel I was successful with your diet. I lost 30 lbs and 2-3 inches
around the waist. I achieved this in about three months and was able
to maintain this weight most of the year until the holidays when I
gained back about 8 lbs. I am back on it now and back to 195," said
Lloyd who was at 225 when he started the diet in November 2002.
The advanced phases of Banta combine the advantages of many successful
dieting approaches -- such as rotation with low-fat plans, vegetarian
days, and fruit fasts. Which one a dieter chooses and when depends on
his or her ongoing results. At affordable prices, Banta provides
online planning tools, CD software, individual support, and printed or
downloadable eBook.
For information: http://bantadiet.com
Feedback: http://dietandbody.com/mfeedback.html
*****
TC
Dunne E. Dawe - 26 Oct 2004 05:42 GMT
>http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2004/10/emw157097.htm
>
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
>
>TC
Still looking for a magic bullet?
tcomeau - 26 Oct 2004 14:49 GMT
> >http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2004/10/emw157097.htm
> >
[quoted text clipped - 83 lines]
>
> Still looking for a magic bullet?
Nope. Found it about 4 years ago.
TC
Dunne E. Dawe - 26 Oct 2004 16:43 GMT
>> Still looking for a magic bullet?
>
>Nope. Found it about 4 years ago.
So why are you appearing confused and persistently asking what appear
to be naive, uneducated questions here? What was this stuff you posted
here now about the banta diet? To what purpose?
MikeV - 26 Oct 2004 19:15 GMT
>>> Still looking for a magic bullet?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> posted
> here now about the banta diet? To what purpose?
Is dunne e dawe an alias for john gohde, mooshe, or markdtoad, or
are you an original self satisfied 'know it all' poster in your own
right?
MikeV
Dunne E. Dawe - 27 Oct 2004 08:42 GMT
>>>> Still looking for a magic bullet?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>MikeV
Thank you. I have no idea what you are raving on about.
Have you a problem with my trying to help this tcomeau person with his
apparent confusion and errors in energy balance?
Have you tried to help tcomeau at all?
I couldn't help looking to the archives at your "claim to fame" and I
guess you must be projecting with your characterising of my postings.
I did come across a classic piece of stupidity from you when a Mr
Bohlman made a very sensible suggestion, and just look at the idiotic,
illogical response you gave:
Mr Bohlman wrote:
> You don't have to "abandon all your sweets." You just have to
> avoid pigging out on them. Bakery goods are fine as *treats*; the
> problem is treating them as *staples*. "X is bad for you; Y is good for
> you," without any quantification, is a statement of religious belief, not
> science.
You responded:
"I get the idea, I think . . .
Yes, sorta like . . .a little bit of pregnancy, or cocaine is
good for your health . . but be SURE not to go "all the way"! :-}
MikeV "
------------------------
Nuff said?
markd@toad-net.com - 26 Oct 2004 19:56 GMT
It is the primary symptom of nutritional theology, those who are
uncomfortable with science and/or really really want it not to be true
find a guru and follow the written in stone teachings thereof. There is
starting to be some real science being done, at last, on the "low carb"
question. It's weight loss features are the same at one year as other
weight loss plans. The question now is the long term concerns for it's
impact in large populations using it. One big problem is that people who
use it don't follow guidelines,ie. the two pounds of bacon for breakfast
and "veggies, what veggies" crowd. Weight is one thing, it's supposed
health "advantages" are equaled by long term large population real world
natural experiments,ie. the med. food tradition and that of e. asia, the
latter having an average of 70 percent of food as carbs. So the score
card, other plans equal weight loss, long term concerns not resolved yet,
and existing food traditions equal and exceed health goals. One place
which it has a research based application is in those who have the
metabolic syndrom, where studies show that controlled carb food plans help
insulin resistance and related features of the syndrome.
>>> Still looking for a magic bullet?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>to be naive, uneducated questions here? What was this stuff you posted
>here now about the banta diet? To what purpose?
Ben A. Green - 26 Oct 2004 22:54 GMT
I found the website TC cited and actually sprang for the $25 membership.
What I found was a web site not yet ready for prime time. The link for
"resistance training" was not found. The link for "Jumpstart Plan" pointed
to the page it lives on -- a circular reference.
The substance of the plan is that ketosis is good and to get into it
reliably one must limit not only carbs but proteins as well. In other
words, it is a high-fat diet. It probably works, but the help provided by
the web site for your $25 is hard to follow.
For example, to assess your fat percentage, men are to measure body
circumferences: waist at the narrowest, waist at the belly button, and hips.
The you look for the fat percentage calculator. The first link I tried gave
a page with a title but no content. Eventually, I found the fat calculator
and saw that one needs also the neck circumference. That measurement was on
the women's list, not the man's.
So maybe they can clean up the web site in time, but a better bet for your
$25 might be a book on the high-fat diet, if there is one.
Caveat emptor.
Ben
> http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2004/10/emw157097.htm
>
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
>
> TC
markd@toad-net.com - 26 Oct 2004 22:21 GMT
""At affordable prices, Banta provides > online planning tools, CD
software, individual support, and printed or > downloadable eBook."
Does this violate the group rule that commercial intrest, no matter the
quality of the info, makes all content false? Because "low carb" was
used, must this category be put in provisional box as a "fellow traveler"
and "guilt by association" sub rules?
tcomeau - 27 Oct 2004 14:35 GMT
My apologies to all. I should have checked this "diet" closer. It is
of no interest whatsoever.
I do not endorse this diet and I apologize for wasting your time with
this..
TC
> http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2004/10/emw157097.htm
>
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
>
> TC