Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / September 2004
My Current Diet
|
|
Thread rating:  |
John Ingram - 24 Sep 2004 16:39 GMT Yes, I should probably consult with a doctor, but I just wanted to run it by here and see what comments you might have.
Today is Day 8 of my New Life -- I hesitate to call it a diet, because most people think of a diet as something temporary. I call this a New Life. I quit smoking (I'm on the three-step patch), I started excercising, and I started watching what I'm eating. I'm not doing Atkins or any other "fad" diet (yes, I still consider Atkins a fad, just a long one -- not looking for any holy wars, though). I'm using the pure science of caloric intake and excercise to burn fat relatively slowly, recognizing as absolute fact that a net deficit of 3500 calories results in a pound of weight loss, balanced with the fact that you have to have enough calories to sustain your body at your current weight, or your body goes into survival mode, storing fat.
So, having said all that, a little about me. I'm somewhere between 245 and 250 pounds (I started at just about 250 pounds a week ago) with 30% body fat (I have a body fat scale). I'm 6'3". My "Air Force weight" was 207, so I consider that a reasonable goal, unless I'm doing some working out specifically to put on muscle, in which case I probably won't get down to 207.
My excercise is walking about a mile and a half a day through my neighborhood, which is just hilly enough and just flat enough to be a decent workout. It's a brisk, deliberate walk, but not speed walking. I do that first thing in the morning, about 5 minutes after I roll out of bed, starting with a glass of water and a vitamin C chewable.
Caloric intake: I used all the calculators I could find online for BMR maintenance calories. I was getting somewhere around 3000 for all of them.
My daily target intake is 2000 calories with 70 grams of protein and that's ALL that I'm looking at. I pay no attention to carbs, fat, sodium, vitamins, etc... I eat whatever I want, prefering foods that have at least a 30-to-1 calorie-to-protein ratio, since that will give me 2000 and 70 at the end of the day.
So far I feel great. As I said, I'm on Day 8. I drink water all day long and urinate clear all day long. If there's too much color in my urine, I know I'm not drinking enough water.
Weight loss has been obvious, on the scale anyway. There's a lot of flucuation, though, because I don't have a consistent time to weigh every day. The scale instructions say to weigh in the early evening, which hasn't been very convenient so far. But I'm pretty confident that I've lost about 3-4 pounds in the first week. I have read here and there that weight loss can be quicker during the first week, until the body's metabolism catches up with the change. That's consistent with what I've seen.
So... comments? Am I neglecting anything serious in my diet? Is the caloric intake too low? I had first decided to reduce my net calories by only 500 per day (1 pound of loss per week), but I found that the 2000 calorie diet gives me everything I need, as long as I get enough protein. So I accidentally ended up on the 2-pound-loss-per-week system (lucky me if it holds up). What kind of adjustments, if any, should I make now that I'm starting the second week.
Just looking for people with more experience in this to guide me in the right direction. I'm feeling great, morale is high, and I'm excited abou the New Life to come.
Thanks, John
cde - 24 Sep 2004 17:46 GMT > So... comments? Am I neglecting anything serious in my diet? Try to include
-2-10 cups dark green or red lettuces, dandelion greens -1-2 cups crucifers (broccoli, bok choi, turnip greeens, mustard greens, cauliflower, arugula, brussels sprouts, etc.) -1-2 cups goosefoots (spinach, chard, beet greens) -carrots or sweet potatoes -red bell pepper, tomato, watermelon -dark blue/purple berries, eggplant -red berries -citrus -apricots, canteloupe -onion, scallion, garlic
Try to eat most of your veggies and all of your fruits raw, cooking tends to destroy a good fraction of the protective phytochemicals and in most studies, raw vegetables are more protective than raw fruits, cooked vegetables, or whole grains.
Could include some legumes, cooked from dried soaked (and preferrably, sprouted)
fats: raw walnuts, pecans, almonds, hazelnuts/filberts, sunflower seeds, etc, extra virgin olive oil, olives, avocadoes, fish fat
omega6:omega3 fatty acid ratio should be 4:1 or lower.
fiber: current rec is 30 g per day, probably should be 30 g per 1000 kcal/day.
fish: should not be fried
green tea: instead of diet soft drinks
John Ingram - 24 Sep 2004 18:07 GMT > Try to include > [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > green tea: > instead of diet soft drinks Wow, that's quite a list. Thanks for your input. When I say I eat "pretty much whatever I want", that's what I mean. I don't scoff too much at the usual family cereal, Frosted Flakes... I only separated my eggs once, Rice Bowl for lunch, though yesterday I had a normal Bubba Burger... and I'll partake in whatever the family is having for dinner (lasagna, chinese, pizza, whatever).
In my research (though I'm no expert), what really matters is the calories -- which are made up of all the elements in the food (fat, protein, sugar). So if the protein content is high enough and the calories are low enough that I can "afford" them in my 2000 calorie diet, I can assume that the other calorie sources aren't going to give me much of a problem. So that bowl of Frosted Flakes isn't carefree -- it's carefully measured and logged on the spreadsheet as 160 calories and 5 grams of protein (including the 2% milk -- can't stand skim milk). It's just under my 30-to-1 protein requirement, but I make up for it with eggs or cottage cheese.
When I say it's a simple diet, I really mean it. It does take some effort to make sure everything is correctly recorded and to make sure eating is spread out throughout the day (I eat about 5 times a day, I guess). And one of the most important factors is to prove that weight loss goals are obtainable without turning into a barley-and-whey kind of guy.
I enjoy food that tastes good and I believe a 2000/70 ratio supports eating the whole spectrum of food. If I skip a piece of cheesecake, for example, I don't want it to be because I'm not allowed to have it -- but because I choose to get my calories elsewhere. On the other hand, if I really want that piece of cheesecake, I just, as they say in the government budget world, have to find a way to pay for it -- giving up calories elsewhere throughout the day.
Obviously, I'm giving an overview of my nutrition philosophy. If I'm way off base, feel free to jump in and warn me about my dangerous ways.
Thanks for the fatty acid ratio, by the way. I enjoy having good, reliable math on which to base my eating decisions. I came up with the 30/1 calorie-to-protein ratio with a pencil on the back of an envelope and it has been effective.
Thanks, John
Jan - 24 Sep 2004 19:16 GMT > > So... comments? Am I neglecting anything serious in my diet? > [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > green tea: > instead of diet soft drinks Very good list, IMO! I would only like to add that tomatoes should be cooked to ensure the best absorption of lycopene.
Jan
cde - 24 Sep 2004 22:01 GMT > Very good list, IMO! I would only like to add that tomatoes should be > cooked to ensure the best absorption of lycopene. That's what they say. But, I think it may be more complicated than that. Carotenoids are not very stable. Cooking may increase uptake of certain carotenoids while reducing bioactivity because of conversion from the trans to cis isomers. Cis isomers are less biologically active.
Refs:
Eitenmiller RR;Landen WO Jr.;. Vitamin Analysis for the Health and Food Sciences. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 1999.
Cano MP, Vegetables. Jeremiah LE;. Freezing Effects on Food Quality. New York, NY, Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1996: 247-298
Jan - 24 Sep 2004 22:19 GMT > > Very good list, IMO! I would only like to add that tomatoes should be > > cooked to ensure the best absorption of lycopene. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > reducing bioactivity because of conversion from the trans > to cis isomers. Cis isomers are less biologically active. That was interesting to learn. This is quite academic, but how about switching the red bell pepper to the orange bell pepper? Orange bell pepper is the best source of zeaxanthin and a good source of cryptoxanthin.
Jan
cde - 25 Sep 2004 02:42 GMT > This is quite academic, but how about > switching the red bell pepper to the orange bell pepper? Orange bell > pepper is the best source of zeaxanthin and a good source of > cryptoxanthin. Yes, that would be better. Do you have any data for the purple ones?
Jan - 25 Sep 2004 07:59 GMT > > This is quite academic, but how about > > switching the red bell pepper to the orange bell pepper? Orange bell [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Yes, that would be better. Do you have any data for > the purple ones? No, I couldn't find any. My guess is that it has a good deal of anthocyanins.
Jan
|
|
|