 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / October 2004The World's Healthiest Foods List
This list is based on certain criteria discussed in the article, nutrition density being one of the most important: http://www.whfoods.com/foodstoc.php > This list is based on certain criteria discussed in the article, nutrition > density being one of the most important: > > http://www.whfoods.com/foodstoc.php Sounds like they are on the low-fat bandwagon. That's one red flag. At least they seem to understand that refined crap is just that, crap. TC >>This list is based on certain criteria discussed in the article, nutrition >>density being one of the most important: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > TC It doesn't seem to me that they're on the low fat wagon Salmon, Cod, Tuna, Olives, Avocado, Almonds, Walnuts, Sunflower Seeds and so on don't seem exatly low-fat to me Actually, they the higher fat foods, more than meats and dairy They are on low-fat cheese wagon and this is a good thing since fats from cheese are the worst fats possible and cheese compared to eggs, fish, veggies, nuts, legums and fruits has such a low nutritional value that every calories of cheese is a spoiled calories that could have been used to secure more vitamins, minerals, antioxidants and phytochemicals > > This list is based on certain criteria discussed in the article, nutrition > > density being one of the most important: > > > > http://www.whfoods.com/foodstoc.php > > Sounds like they are on the low-fat bandwagon. Beef, lean, organic, Calf's liver, Chicken, Lamb, loin, Turkey, roast, Venison Low fat compared to lard and huge slabs of pork I suppose... > > This list is based on certain criteria discussed in the article, nutrition > > density being one of the most important: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > TC There are no oils on the list. Are we suppose to avoid oils? Silly list. "There are no oils on the list. Are we suppose to avoid oils?" Oils/fats are well reppresented in the many foods containing them,ex. nuts/animal products. Oil or fat as a single item is not because by definition it is excluded for lacking enough nutrients per measure of calorie which marks listing foods there,ie. more nutritional bang for the buck. > This list is based on certain criteria discussed in the article, nutrition > density being one of the most important: > > http://www.whfoods.com/foodstoc.php I have my own published list, since 02/05/02,at: http://food.naturalhealthperspective.com/fdscore.html I will compare the two lists. My objective was to promote eating a plant based diet. There is no need to stress meat and oils as most are already over consuming these items. Of course, both lists are mostly about whole foods. -- John Gohde > > This list is based on certain criteria discussed in the article, nutrition > > density being one of the most important: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Of course, both lists are mostly about whole foods. The above web site is billed as: The World's Healthiest Foods List, A-Z. Of course, this is obviously not true at all. What it actually is, is a very complete list of all the whole foods which are commonly available to the consumer in the United States. It is a "complete" list rather than a very selective list of the so-called best whole foods. What I found interesting about this web site was that it had 68 Google backward links to its home page. 65 of these links came from within the same web site, with only 3 from other web sites. This was precisely the same condition my web site was in at the end of last year. All of my internal links to my home page have since disappeared. Now all 60 of my backward links are coming from other web sites. Hence, Google is apparently using some kind of life cycle in order to compute its backward links. This web site is, thus, younger than my site. Ergo, Google's computation of backward links is anything but honest, straight forward or correct. They are never remotely correct in most cases. If all my internal web pages were to be added to my list, I would easily have over 150 backward links. :( -- John Gohde |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.