Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / September 2004
Low carb fad losing gas
|
|
Thread rating:  |
markd@toad-net.com - 31 Aug 2004 14:39 GMT Lean times for low-carb sellers
By KAREN ROBINSON-JACOBS THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS DALLAS - After taking the nation's waistlines by storm, the low-carb juggernaut appears to be loosening its beefy grip.
Product sales, mainly at smaller specialty retailers, have slumped. Many low-carb dabblers have defected. And in a bit of dietary Darwinism, some makers and retailers of products aimed at what seemed like an endless sea of low-carbers now find themselves in lean times.
"Sales have waned," said Lora Ruffner, who co-owns Low Carb Luxury, a Web site and magazine. "We've begun to see the small merchants struggle. There is a shake out going on."
Theories abound on why the air leaked from the low-carb balloon.
Some say an influx of products from major manufacturers flooded what had been a niche market. American consumers can be notoriously fickle. Many low-carb products simply don't taste good.
Even long-time carbers find it hard to argue with the recent barrage of downward barometers. The number of U.S. adults on a low-carb diet fell to 10 percent in the three months ended June 30, off from a peak of 12 percent in the first quarter of the year, according to Morgan Stanley's equity research group.
Another study from market researcher NPD Group Inc. shows the percentage of adults on a low-carb diet dropping from a peak of 9.1 percent in January and February to 6.2 percent by April. By early July, the firm said, the percentage rose slightly to 7.3 percent.
Among the erstwhile adherents is Ronnie Ramirez, a North Dallas resident who found the diet too inconvenient when he needed to grab something from a fast-food drive-through lane.
"Most of them don't offer low-carb products," said Ramirez, 39, who lost nearly 30 pounds while on a low-carb diet from January through May.
Also, he said, feelings of deprivation started setting in.
"I wanted pasta," he said. "I wanted chicken fried steak now and again - with gravy."
To be sure, millions of Americans remain enthralled with the results of diets such as Atkins and South Beach. The Natural Marketing Institute said in July that based on its research, "the low carb movement is here to stay."
By one estimate, there are still at least 15 million "hard core" low carbers. Millions more are trying to limit their carbohydrate intake, but aren't fully committed to a special diet. Others are switching to low-carb products to combat diabetes and other illnesses.
About $1.3 billion in low-carb branded products were sold in U.S. supermarkets and mass merchandisers in the 52 weeks ended July 10, research firm ACNielsen says. (The data doesn't include sales at Wal-Mart.)
But even though that sales figure represents a dramatic 283 percent increase over the prior year, the ACNielsen data also shows the growth rate for "carb conscious" foods isn't climbing as quickly.
"It's passed peaked," said Dean Rotbart, executive editor of LowCarBiz.com, a Web site that follows the industry. He started noticing a fall-off in March.
"Much of the industry is already in the valley. Many, many of the manufacturers I'm talking to are telling me that sales are less than 50 percent of what they were in January and February," he said.
"I have one manufacturer in just one line of packaged baking mixes, and he has more than $1 million in unsold inventory," Rotbart said.
The big change, many smaller retailers and manufacturers said, is the arrival into the marketplace of "the big boys."
An estimated 1,863 low-carb products have been introduced so far this year, said Tom Vierhile, executive director of Marketing Intelligence Service Ltd.'s Productscan Online.
Smaller firms make most of those products. But a rapidly increasing portion of the portfolio comes from the likes of Dean Foods Co., PepsiCo's Frito-Lay unit and Unilever NV, which introduced products such as low-carb ice cream and tortilla chips in the spring and early summer.
Most of their goods went straight to the shelves of mainstream grocery stores and mass merchandisers, bypassing specialty outlets that popped up to support the low-carb movement.
"The time has come to close the doors in the face of the Wal-Marts, Walgreens, local grocery stores and other large retail outlets that have started carrying Low Carb Foods!" said a note to consumers at lowcarbnexus.com, one of the first and largest online low-carb retailers, which recently announced it was going out of business.
With the industry giants now in the game, some smaller players are getting out - or trying to. One California-based low-carb merchant tried to sell his store on E-Bay and got no takers, even after lowering the price.
The Low Carb Store in Flower Mound, Texas, closed in June. One low-carb manufacturer said at least two retailers that carry her products plan to close soon.
"I don't want to be in every grocery store in the country if it's going to mean that the little Ma and Pa stores that supported us in the beginning aren't going to have any customers," said Julee Dennis, who heads Gram's Gourmet in Pflugerville, Texas, and has seen sales of her low-carb snacks fall from $180,000 in January to about $60,000 today.
Loyalty notwithstanding, she's trying to get her products into Walgreens.
Dennis and others feel that some of the products being aimed at low-carbers have carb-conscious names and marketing approaches, but still have more carbohydrates than allowed in most strict low-carb diets.
Other products tout having fewer net carbs - the total number of carbohydrate grams in a product, minus the carb grams that cause little or no increase in your blood-sugar level.
But the net carb figure is usually an estimate, rather than a figure determined from scientific testing, said Jon Anfinsen, a principal of DNA Dreamfields Co., which developed a low-carb pasta.
Actual net carb count can actually be six times higher than the level stated on the packaging, based on tests his firm ran.
Consumers try some of the products under the mistaken impression they have fewer carbs, several industry experts said. When those consumers don't shed the pounds, they drop the diet.
Unlike claims about "low-fat," the U.S. Food and Drug Administration doesn't regulate what's classifies as low-carb and doesn't require testing for net carbs.
"This industry needs regulating badly," said Dennis, adding that if it guidelines are eventually established, "a whole lot of companies are going to have to reformulate, or re-label.
Some in the industry speculate that many of the major manufacturers, especially those with carb-laden marquee products, would be just as happy to see the low-carb movement die.
"They put the money into low-carb not to be market leaders, but to defend their sugar-based carb franchise," Rotbart said.
(Published: August 29, 2004)
chas.@home. - 31 Aug 2004 19:24 GMT >Lean times for low-carb sellers > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >Darwinism, some makers and retailers of products aimed at what seemed >like an endless sea of low-carbers now find themselves in lean times. <snip>
Maybe so, but I sure hope some of the products, like Heinz reduced-sugar ketchup and Smuckers sugar-free jams, stay around.
tcomeau - 31 Aug 2004 20:41 GMT It was only a matter of time before it became clear that people will balk at paying a premium for inferior tasting manufactured crap even if the label says low-carb. The manufacturers over estimated the need for these kinds of products and the level of gullibility of the low-carb market.
Why eat tasteless manufactured crap when you can eat filet mignon? Literally.
TC
> Lean times for low-carb sellers > [quoted text clipped - 150 lines] > > (Published: August 29, 2004) MikeV - 01 Sep 2004 02:53 GMT > It was only a matter of time before it became clear that people > will It is also interesting that manufacturers of such delicacies as "WonderBread", "Twinkies", and "KrispyKreme Donuts" are suffering severely in the market place. All because of those flagging Controlled Carb dieters I guess. MarkDToad by his selective reporting, is as deluded as his nemesis Doe.
MikeV
MikeL - 01 Sep 2004 04:38 GMT >> It was only a matter of time before it became clear that people >> will [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >MikeV In healthy diet would exclude that crap.
taurusrc@pacbell.net - 01 Sep 2004 04:49 GMT Where did you learn that those guys are suffering in the market place? That is very good news. I hate to buy stale bread and twinkies and krispy cremes have entirely too much sugar in them. If I want candy I will buy candy.
Ora
>>> It was only a matter of time before it became clear that people >>> will [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> >In healthy diet would exclude that crap. MikeV - 02 Sep 2004 03:06 GMT Low carb. diets impact Interstate Bakeries' Q3 results US bakery group Interstate Bakeries (NYSE: IBC - news) has recorded a 2.5% sales decline in the third quarter. The company blamed the decline on the popularity of low carbohydrate diets which contributed to a decline in its white bread sales.
US bakery group Interstate Bakeries has recorded a 2.5% sales decline in the third quarter. The company blamed the decline on the popularity of low carbohydrate diets which contributed to a decline in its white bread sales.
The company said a reduction in unit volume, along with its continuing challenge to deal with overcapacity and a high fixed cost infrastructure, was the primary driver in the quarter's loss. The unit decline was partially attributable to an industry-wide trend of declining white bread sales.
In an effort to address the popularity of low carbohydrate diets,, the company introduced a line of low-carb breads, under the "Home Pride Carb Action" trade name, during the third quarter. Additionally, the company is finalizing plans for a nationwide rollout on April 19, 2004 of its new "Baker's Inn" products, a line of super premium breads.
Looking forward, James R. Elsessers, the company's chairman of the board and chief executive officer, stated, "We will continue to intensify our efforts to re-engineer our business for the future success of the company. We are pursuing both short-term tactics and longer-term strategies that will help move IBC to the next level."
Google "Interstate Bakeries"; and/or "Interstate Brands"
*****************************************************
What's Eating Krispy Kreme? By Tim Beyers
It's official: The sugar high is over.
This morning, Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick Krispy Kreme Doughnuts (NYSE: KKD) announced that second-quarter 2005 net income dropped by 56% from last year despite higher sales. Investors fled the stock upon hearing the news, sending the shares lower by more than 11% as of this writing.
CEO Scott Livengood summed up the stickiness of the situation by admitting Krispy Kreme wasn't getting the job done on the fundamentals. I appreciate the hit-me-between-the-eyes honesty, but this may be the understatement of the year. Sales rose 11% from last year's second quarter, but operating costs rose 21% over the same period. Comparable store sales were up less than 1%. So what accounted for the revenue growth? Capital spending to open new stores. No wonder net income suffered.
Unfortunately, this isn't even the worst of the news. Krispy Kreme said it wouldn't provide earnings guidance for the third quarter and that it can no longer provide an accurate prediction for the full fiscal year. In other words: Remember when we said we'd earn between $1.04 and $1.06 per stub in May? Sorry, we were wrong. We can't tell you how long it will take to right the ship. And this after the Securities and Exchange Commission has decided to go out for a box of classic glazed.
Part of the problem, according to management, is the low-carb phenomenon. The company says its research shows that more than 1,000 low-carb products have been introduced during 2004, and -- get this -- media coverage of carb-conscious diets is apparently up more than 200% over last year. The alternatives, and the media blitz, may be forcing some of Krispy Kreme's normal constituency into the gym.
But is the ever-expanding appetite for all things low-carb really what's killing Krispy Kreme's business? Uh, no. The company continued to spend like a hyperactive teenager on a $10,000 shopping spree at Nordstrom (NYSE: JWN) even as it saw minimal new demand for its gooey products in existing stores. CEO Livengood says that's about to change and suggested this morning several ways in which the firm can improve, including being more efficient with deliveries, introducing a reloadable cash card apparently modeled after Starbucks' (Nasdaq: SBUX) version, and opening new, smaller-format stores that are less costly to operate.
You can call it irony, or maybe just desserts, but it turns out that Krispy Kreme is headed for a diet of its own. And that's probably a good thing. Investors are much more likely to appreciate a slimmer, sexier doughnut king.
For more jelly-filled Fool coverage:
a.. Chief Operating Officer John Tate traded in sweet treats for stained tables at Restoration Hardware (Nasdaq: RSTO). b.. Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner provides some perspective on Krispy Kreme's business. c.. The SEC has decided to go out for a box of doughnuts. d.. Fool Bill Mann says it's folly to blame low-carb diets for Krispy Kreme's problems. Fool contributor Tim Beyers loves a good jelly doughnut as much as the next guy, but he doesn't frequent Krispy Kreme. He doesn't own any of its stock either, nor any of the other companies mentioned. You can view Tim's Fool profile here.
http://www.fool.com/Server/FoolPrint.asp?File=/news/take/2004/take040826.htm
> Where did you learn that those guys are suffering in the market > place? That is [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] >>> >>In healthy diet would exclude that crap.
|
|
|