Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Nutrition / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How many calories for a growing boy ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Daniel - 23 Aug 2004 21:35 GMT
Hi,
How can I estimate how many calories a 14 years old growing kids who
started a proper weight training program need daily?
I’ve been a suggested a method by Lyle McDonald that says you need 14
calories per pound of bodyweight for maintenance and 16 calories per
pounds of bodyweight for muscle growth
But does he need more because of bone and body growth other than muscle
growth?
Harris-Benedict method doesn’t seem to precise
Maybe I should first calculate the basal metabolic rate and then add for
the activity and muscle growth factor?
Any idea

Thanks a lot to everyone
Daniel
Chad C. - 24 Aug 2004 12:44 GMT
14-16 sounds too low. For an adult maybe. For someone his age I would think
22-28 cal/lb would be better.

-Chad

> Hi,
> How can I estimate how many calories a 14 years old growing kids who
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Thanks a lot to everyone
> Daniel
Daniel - 25 Aug 2004 11:41 GMT
In data Tue, 24 Aug 2004 04:44:35 -0700, Chad C. <johnkeynesX@Xemail.com>
ha scritto:

> 14-16 sounds too low. For an adult maybe. For someone his age I would
> think
> 22-28 cal/lb would be better.
>
> -Chad

Thanks for your answer
I've still some doubt
I calculated his Basal Metabolic Rate at:
http://www.exrx.net/Calculators/CalRequire.html

if I set Resting Hours at 24 (resting metabolic rate) and I
change the age between 14 and 30 the difference is just 100
That means that the difference between his resting metabolic rate and
a 30 years old metabolic rate is just 100 calories
So, his exrx calculator wrong ?
If not, what the difference between 14-16 and 22-28 account for ?
Not only age, it seems age only results in a difference of 100-150
calories more or less

Thanks again
Daniel
Chad C. - 25 Aug 2004 20:41 GMT
Hi Daniel,

I'm not the best person at all to answer your question. My figure was a sum
of what I think a good basal figure might be + enough calories to support
normal physical growth of that age and allow for muscle growth & large
amounts of physical activity. That's the scope of my answer. My figures are
not BMR.

Thanks,

-Chad

> In data Tue, 24 Aug 2004 04:44:35 -0700, Chad C. <johnkeynesX@Xemail.com>
> ha scritto:
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Thanks again
> Daniel
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.