I just got my bio-chemical tests report.

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

neo - 15 Feb 2007 16:05 GMT

High density lipid - 43.
Low density lipid - 134.

I am going to show it to my doctor tommorrow. But can anyone explain
what does it mean?

There are lot of other figures I don't understand.

Blood sugar: fasting - 85, post lunch - 129.

S. Triglycerides - 105.
S. Creatinine - 0.9.
Uric acid - 4.4.
S. Proteins - 7.6 (albumin - 4.3, globulin - 3.3, AG ratio - 1.3).
S. Bilirubin: direct - 0.2, indirect - 0.3, total - 0.5.
SGOT (AST) - 28.
SGPT (ALT) - 24.
S. Alkaline phosphatase - 108.
S. Electrolytes: sodium - 143, potassium - 4.4, chloride - 99.
Elisa for HIV: HIV1 + 2 - negative.

Reply to this Message

Geoff - 15 Feb 2007 18:31 GMT

Your doctor can explain it.

Jeff

> High density lipid - 43.
> Low density lipid - 134.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> S. Electrolytes: sodium - 143, potassium - 4.4, chloride - 99.
> Elisa for HIV: HIV1 + 2 - negative.

Reply to this Message

neo - 15 Feb 2007 19:01 GMT

> Your doctor can explain it.

.
Hmmm... Cyber doctor told me something.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_density_lipoprotein

.
My high density lipid - 43. I am on borderline. If it drops below 40,
I am dead.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_density_lipoprotein
.
My low density lipid - 134. Here also I am on borderline. It should be
below 100.

I knew, ECG is just farce. It does not reveal real situation. My third
ECG in last 18 months was declared 'normal' by doctors.

Now doctors say chest x-ray is not necessary even though I am smoking
for 18 years because I am just(!) 36. But I am going to force them to
do it.

Reply to this Message

GMCarter - 16 Feb 2007 12:05 GMT

>> Your doctor can explain it.
>.
>Hmmm... Cyber doctor told me something.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_density_lipoprotein

Your interpretations are exaggerrated. Speak with your physician and
also a nutritionist. Exercise and good diet are probably VERY adequate
to help improve the numbers. Are those possible for you to address?

George M. Carter

Reply to this Message