 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / General / March 2007Re: Jihad needs scientists
Big Bertha Thing positron Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/positron.html Access page JPG 56K Image Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including talk.politics.guns Round photographic plates. Caption;- Another pair of tracks, arising simultaneously, from a common point. The two particles responsible, for these tracks, produce equal specific ionizations. The one leaving the track of greater curvature is an electron of 27 MeV energy. The one leaving the track of smaller curvature was apparently left, by a particle not then known to exist, a particle identical with the electron, except that it carries a positive charge. It is a 450 MeV positron. From a book by J.D.Stranathan Ph.D., Professor of Physics and Chairman of Department, University of Kansas. The "Particles" of Modern Physics. (C) Copyright The Blakston Co. 1942 Big Bertha Thing forward Friends and family postings are included in the category, forwarded by you from the internet, to the internet, First Class users or conferences. The same terms and conditions apply. There is no student or accademic only exclusion clause, written or implied in them. You are personaly responsible for them. On the question of from address, a new mail item, in reply with quote format, either from you or the conference moderator will do. For the subject line use Fwd: prefix. Occams' Razor says the simplest explanation is usually right. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997. To comply with my copyright, please distribute complete copies, free of charge. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing particle Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/structur.html 7K Web Page Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including sci.med.nutrition Outlandish Particle Periodic Table in Structure Order. From Pastures Software Package Documentation. (Particle Structure Results Program, in Fortran 77.) Sub-atomic Mesons, Baryons and Leptons Classification System. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing repairs If it is not broken, do not fix it. Some parts of the project may need repairing. If you cannot fix it, with a good suggestion, then do not take it apart, in the first place, with a bad one. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing gamma Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/gamma.html Access page JPG 81K Image Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews inluding alt.sci.planetary Round photographic plates. Caption;- A photograph of the tracks of electrons, ejected by the gamma rays from radium, after these had been filtered, through 2.5 cm. of steel. Some of the electrons have energies of 1 MeV. The photograph was taken, with a magnetic field of 12,000 oersteds. From a book by J.D.Stranathan Ph.D., Professor of Physics and Chairman of Department, University of Kansas. The "Particles" of Modern Physics. (C) Copyright The Blakston Co. 1942 Big Bertha Thing effort If you see someone slogging away, but doing it all wrong. Please remember, a great effort, with no results, is worth more than a great result with no effort. The first is purchased at great cost and the latter, in terms of cost, is worthless. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997. To comply with my copyright, please distribute complete and free of charge. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing proton Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/proton.html Access page JPG 55K Image Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including soc.history.medieval Round photographic plates. Caption;- A pair of tracks, apparently arising simultaneously, from a common point, outside the field of view. The particles responsible for these tracks, have been ejected, when a cosmic ray was absorbed. The thinner track is that of a 120 MeV electron. The more dense track is that of a 130 MeV proton. This photograph was taken with a field of 17,000 oersteds. From a book by J.D.Stranathan Ph.D., Professor of Physics and Chairman of Department, University of Kansas. The "Particles" of Modern Physics. (C) Copyright The Blakston Co. 1942 Big Bertha Thing laundry My beautiful laundrette only had two machines, so I asked my customers, if they would bring there own in. Now we have seven machines and it is very nice. Once we get the water pipes and electricity laid, it will be magnificent. For water read data and electricity read documentation. Pastures was released on OUSA Classical Particle conf., on 5th November 1997(Bonfire Night UK) (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997. To comply with my copyright, please distribute complete copies, free of charge. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing coil Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/coil.html Access page JPG 9K Image Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including alt.politics Two drawings of a Gyroscopic Top complete with coil. Extract from Introductory Chapter;- The fact is that the toe is magnetic, and this being the case it is easy to see that the rolling of the toe on the side of the metal produces the motion. But Figs. XV. (a) and (b) illustrate a top, whose spindle behaves in exactly the same manner as the toe of the spider top, and yet is in no way magnetic. The action is purely mechanical, as we shall explain in later pages. It is an attractive top to watch, especially as it rushes round the corner when it comes to the end of the coil. From the book An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion. By Harold Crabtree M.A. Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge Assistant Master at Charterhouse Longmans, Green and Co. 1923 First Edition 1909 Second Edition 1914 New Impression 1923 (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing fiction Anything but a fact, changes the face of twentieth century science. 9. Gyroscopic Top motion along coil masks a weaker field effect. The Japanese antigravity experiment only worked one way. With the object spinning one way OK, but the other way failed. Anything but a fact... 10. One way gravity reduced and other way gravity increased, so is bi-polar field efftect. 11. No antigravity, which is not bi-polar, so contradicts bi-polar field effect. Wave Particle Duality Paradox two slit interference patterns can be disrupted by;- 1. Passive sensor near 2nd slit. 2. Turning room light on. Anything but a fact... 12. LCD digital watch, without backlight, near 2nd slit. 13. Thicker wall between slits. Redshift is both speedometer and tape measure. According to redshift speedo, the universe has a go faster stripe painted on the outside. Anything but a fact... 14. No Big Bang, which needs go faster stripe on the inside or antigravity. 15. No redshift speedo due to Steady State, which needs neither to have go faster stripe. Wave Particle Duality needs 1 slit and 2 slit experiments to give different results from same effect. Make the walls inside and outside the slits the same size and centre of gravity. Anything but a fact... 16. Centre of gravity is at slit in one, but not the other. 17. Equal forces act on the slit in one, but not the other. 18. Wave Particle Duality as a field effect gives different results from same effect. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing gyro Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/gyro.html Access page JPG 12K Image Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including alt.war.nuclear Drawing of an ordinary gyroscope. Caption:- Fig. XVI Extract from the Introductory Chapter:- But the most interesting top of all is undoubtedly the ordinary gyroscope. That depicted in Fig. XVI........ although merely sold as a toy, is nevertheless capable of illustrating the gyroscopic phenomena which have been so much made use of in modern mechanical invention. From the book An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion. By Harold Crabtree M.A. Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge Assistant Master at Charterhouse Longmans, Green and Co. 1923 First Edition 1909 Second Edition 1914 New Impression 1923 (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing rita Educating Rita This film portrays a dominant spouse and a long-suffering student, to the extent upto and including divorce, book-burning and forced pregnancy. There was zero privacy. Any attempt to re-register or change the password would not work, because the secret could not be kept. Every posting by the spouse is a violation of OU rules and the students education, causing real pain. Vetting by one moderator or by several using a non-public Rita conf. would not work, because the spouse would use the students name, with all the further alienation that would cause. A new policy needs to be adopted. The last resort punishment measure, needs to be the first resort measure on compassionate grounds; that of making the student read-only on FC. The student would thank you for it, but not publically. It would need to be agreed between ACS and OUSA, which is what they are there for. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing PI Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/calpi.html Access page to 46K ZIP file Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including alt.politics.bush Calculate PI upto 3000 decimal places. Ready to run Fortran 77 program complete with original source code and ported source code in listing format. Adds extended precision routines to Fortran 77. Written by Mark P. Esplin Ported to Fortran 77 By Tony Lance Big Bertha Thing general A general told his troops, before the big battle, "Right lads, we are outnumbered 4 to 1, but we are much better than them, so we should win through in the end!" Half-way through the battle he sees one of his men leaning against a tree smoking. He rushes up to him, calls him all the names under the sun and asks him what he thinks he is doing? He replied "I have already killed my four." Try not to turn the minimum requirements, into the maximum of your endeavour. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1999. To comply with my copyright, please distribute complete and free of charge. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing burster Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/gammaray.html 16K Web Page Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including sci.astro.seti Gamma Ray Bursters v1.0 01 feb 2000 Greg Goebel public domain Contents List:- 1.THE DISCOVERY OF GRBS 2.PINPOINTING A GRB 3.CAUGHT IN THE ACT 4.COMMENTS, SOURCES, & REVISION HISTORY Big Bertha Thing publication The statistics for Big Bertha Thing postings published on sci.astro are as follows:- 20 No. 50K primary postings (out of 26) 2 No. 600K ditto (out of 4) 12 No. off-topic postings (out of 200) 4 No. 50K secondary postings (out of 26) 20 No. 4K ditto (out of 26) 20 No. 2K ditto (out of 26) 24 No. astronomical postings (out of 2000) There was almost zero response to the above, which were spread over 28 days, at the rate of two days per week. Book-burners deleted the archive of Net Access Policy postings prior to 2nd November 1998. Bertha saved those, with the exception of replies and published 12. The above were also posted to the Onenet conference Astronomy & Space. Here days 18, 19, 20, were minimal keep-off-the-grass days and on days 27 and 28 they broke ranks. The on-topic filibuster of sound-bite journalism ended, at 42 days old. (The beginning of the end of spam.) Thank you, Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing uniform Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs. http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/uniform.html Access page to 714K ZIP file Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including alt.support.attn-deficit Animated wire-frame Polyhedron display, complete with duals and double precision angles to the polygons. Also technical program description and 75 pictures. Just one thing, thats still outstanding. This is a collection of PostScript files from the Computing Science Technical Report series of organization 1127 of AT&T Bell Laboratories report Comp. Sci. Tech. Rep. No. 130 author Andrew Hume title Exact Descriptions of Regular and Semi-Regular Polyhedra and Their Duals date November 1986 tm TM 11276-861022-09 type techreport Just two programs ready to run. 1. kaleido.exe (MSDOS) 86KB (see Zip) 2. schwarz.exe (MSDOS) 27KB (see Zip) Just one description of two programs, that do just one thing, better than the next best thing. uniform.pdf (Adobe) 676KB (see Zip) Big Bertha Thing windows On the Windows of King's College Remaining Boarded. Loquitur Discipulus Esuriens. Professors, in your plan there seems A something not quite right, 'Tis queer to cherish learning's beams, By shutting out the light. While thus we see your windows block'd, If nobody complains; Yet everybody must be shock'd, To see you don't take pains. And tell me why should bodily Succumb to mental meat? Or why should eta, beta, pi, Be all the pie we eat? No helluo liborum I, No literary glutton, Would veal with Virgil like to try, With metaphysics, mutton. Leave us no longer in the lurch, With Romans, Greeks, and Hindoos; But give us beef as well as birch, And board us - not your windows. From the book The Ingoldsby Legends by the Rev. Richard H. Barham Published by Richard Edward King, 88 Curtain Road, London E.C. Inscribed;- Barbara Death From Aunt Emma March 6th 1921 Thank you, Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing positron Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/positron.html Access page JPG 56K Image Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including talk.politics.guns Round photographic plates. Caption;- Another pair of tracks, arising simultaneously, from a common point. The two particles responsible, for these tracks, produce equal specific ionizations. The one leaving the track of greater curvature is an electron of 27 MeV energy. The one leaving the track of smaller curvature was apparently left, by a particle not then known to exist, a particle identical with the electron, except that it carries a positive charge. It is a 450 MeV positron. From a book by J.D.Stranathan Ph.D., Professor of Physics and Chairman of Department, University of Kansas. The "Particles" of Modern Physics. (C) Copyright The Blakston Co. 1942 Big Bertha Thing forward Friends and family postings are included in the category, forwarded by you from the internet, to the internet, First Class users or conferences. The same terms and conditions apply. There is no student or accademic only exclusion clause, written or implied in them. You are personaly responsible for them. On the question of from address, a new mail item, in reply with quote format, either from you or the conference moderator will do. For the subject line use Fwd: prefix. Occams' Razor says the simplest explanation is usually right. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997. To comply with my copyright, please distribute complete copies, free of charge. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing Halfrail Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/halfrail.html Access page JPG 22K Image Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including uk.rec.gardening Detail in photgraph of a model of Track on the Bottom Monorail Half. Caption;- Schilowsky's Monorail Car. Extract from Chapter V;- 73. Another ingenious application of the gyroscope to a monorail car has lately (Feb., 1914) been made by Monsieur Schilowsky, a Russian inventor..... So far as experiments have gone at present the weight of the gyroscope is designed to be something between 1/10th and 1/25th of the whole weight of the car, while the two pendulums together are about 1/3rd of the weight of the gyroscope. The author is indebted to M. Schilosky both for the diagrams and the photograph from which plate IV has been made. A model of the car has been presented by the inventor to the Science Museum at South Kensington and can be viewed by the public at anytime. An article on this monorail is to be found in the issue of The Engineer for January 23, 1914. From the book An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion. By Harold Crabtree M.A. Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge Assistant Master at Charterhouse Longmans, Green and Co. 1923 First Edition 1909 Second Edition 1914 New Impression 1923 (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing handbook 1. Handbook thread one posting long. 2. Correctly attributed. 3. Professional. 4. Steet savvy. 5. Well read. 6. Appropriate. 7. Source softly spoken. 8. Solitary. 9. More Sesame Street than Darth Vader. 10. Optional, optimal and optical. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing dwarf Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/dwarf.html 42K Web Page Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including alt.astronomy White Dwarfs, Neutron Stars, And Black Holes v1.0 01 sep 99 greg goebel public domain Contents List:- 1.THE DISCOVERY OF WHITE DWARFS 2.WHITE DWARFS AND ELECTRON DEGENERACY 3.THE STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF WHITE DWARFS 4.WHITE DWARFS AND THE AGE OF THE GALAXY 5.BEYOND WHITE DWARFS? 6.NEUTRON STARS DISCOVERED 7.CHARACTERISTICS OF NEUTRON STARS 8.MILLISECOND PULSARS AND OTHER UNUSUAL NEUTRON STARS 9.BLACK HOLES DISCOVERED? 10.MINIHOLES 11.COMMENTS, SOURCES, AND REVISION HISTORY Big Bertha Thing checklist Neighbour checklist 1.Your child beaten up? 2.Rat-proof dustbins? 3.Broken windows? 4.You have apologised? 5.Police called out? 6.Security lighting? 7.New fences? 8.No Leylandii? 9.No Russian Vine? 10.No Solicitors letters sent? Our score is 10, one neighbour scores 1, another scores 5. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing hacked Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/hacked.html Access page to 15K ZIP file Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including alt.politics 301 files from the third battle of cyberspace. Big Bertha Thing hacked I can perhaps make a unique claim. My Fortunecity web site has been closed, opened, hacked and disabled by Fortunecity. 1. 30th October 2000 Closed 2. 30th December 2000 Opened 3. 31st December 2000 Hacked 4. 1st January 2001 Net ring code deleted My Astrophysics web ring picture was replaced by a Fortunecity logo. All I did was fight the third battle of cyberspace, using my FC mailbox, amongst others and a mail to newsgroups gateway. It was a text only battle, no hacking or even anonymous mail was used. Site references were used instead of attachments. Thank you, Tony Lance Big Bertha Thing reason 1. Third Battle of Cyberspace. 2. Death Threats.(3) 3. Newsgroup Review. 4. Odd newsgroup users with 1000 postings. 5. Berserker attacks on legitimate postings to sci.astro et al. 6. Political and totally innexplicable. 7. Net Newbie basket cases. 8. Violent spam busters. 9. Abuse complaints procedure. 10. Web site closure. Take your pick, the opposition will not give you the choice. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing letter Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/letter.html 4K Web Page Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including sci.physics.particle Letter to a friend explaining Pastures and quest. From Pastures Software Package Documentation. (Particle Structure Results Program in Fortran 77.) Sub-atomic Mesons, Baryons and Leptons Classification System. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing folder Keep busy in your mailbox and put all postings in a PIP Research folder for safe-keeping in perpetuity, every night. Part of your chores would be to read each missive, subject by subject. Answer it, in a weekly PIP Research Newsletter or not, as the case may be, which would again, go rapidly from the mailbox to the folder. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997. To comply with my copyright, please distribute complete and free of charge. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing pathos Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/pathos.html Access page JPG 12K Image Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including uk.rec.cycling Detail from painting of captive musketeers. Caption:- Porthos took hold of a bar (foot rail) with both hands From the book Twenty Years After by Alexandre Dumas Published by George G.Harrup & Co.Ltd., 1923 Reprinted 1929 (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing poem Some Days, Then Some by Tony Lance I've had better days, he thought and said. When I could get my sorry butt out of bed. When I wasn't mistook for as good as dead. When they didn't fill my boots with all that lead. There are days sometimes, of sunshine on my head. Windswept shores viewed from along a beachy-head. Carefree larks, in a clearly blue sky, over-head. Then of course, I became a headmaster, the old man said. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing lightcraft Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/liteship.html 14K Web page Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including uk.rec.gardening Lightcraft powered by lasers and microwaves v1.1 15 sep 99 greg goebel public domain Contents List:- 1.LASER LIGHTCRAFT 2.MICROWAVE LIGHTCRAFT 3.LASER LIGHTCRAFT IN TEST 4.COMMENTS, SOURCES, & REVISION HISTORY Big Bertha Thing property All pages are handcoded in HTML level 2. No pages are proprietary copyrighted HTML code copies. Such copies would be illegal. Such are in restraint of trade. Such are theft of intellectual property. Such close down the open web. All refugees from such are welcome. Such delete downloaded pages. Such download twice regardless. Such switch off the text only option. Such demand to be the default browser. Such yield control not even to power down. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing mathematics Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/maths.html Access page to 600K ZIP file Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including sci.physics.particle Postings potentially suitable for fowarding to;- 1.SRF Classical Mathematics 2.SRF Classical Astronomy 13th March 2003 sci.math and sci.astro newsfeeds dropped by university. Onenet UK Astronomy & Space conference feed dropped by university. OUSA Research conference still up, by invitation only. (empty) UK politics internal conference setup next to Net Access Policy (empty bar 3), which was last target of the book-burners. Politics makes poor science. Big Bertha Thing ISP 23rd June 2000 Finance Director, Ision Internet Plc., UK Dear Sir, Further to your letter of the 21st June 2000, regarding payment of 56.36 pounds sterling, for 77 days ISP charges. My last payment of 14.09, as detailed in your letter, covered the three dates as follows;- 1st March 2000 2nd March 2000 13th March 2000 These were the only days of the previous 107 days, when my site was not disabled, in more ways than one and my mailbox locked up from me. Apparently the only person, who can enable site access and password reset, is your accounts manager. He can only be contacted via national telephone lines, complete with revolving door and canned musak. You want a further payment of 56.36, to bring the charges up to 23.48 per day. (At a rate of 8570.20 pounds sterling per annum.) Please find enclosed herewith my cheque for 56.36 and a copy of my previous letter to you, dated 12th June 2000. (recorded delivery) In view of the extraordinary nature of these charges, I would ask you to confirm just three things;- 1.That you have received payment by issueing a reciept. (Received) 2.That you will close my account as from todays date. (Closed 3rd July) 3.That there will be no further charges made against this account. In mitigation of the conduct of your staff, it would appear that they had some difficulty with my Usenet newsgroup postings, as detailed on my new site. http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/news.html I trust that this will be in order and will be looking forward to the favour of your reply. Thank you, Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing spider Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/spider.html Access page JPG 11K Image Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including uk.rec.cycling Drawing of a clockwork spider wheel and hairpin. Extract from Introductory Chapter;- The "Spider tops," which are frequently sold in the streets of London, consist of a heavy little disc mounted on a spindle (Fig. XIV.). When the disc has been set spinning a small curved piece of metal is placed to touch the toe, and at once begins to slide round it, first the side (a) in the figure, and then the side (b), the motion continuing backwards and forwards till the top comes to rest. The fact is that the toe is magnetic, and this being the case it is easy to see that the rolling of the toe on the side of the metal produces the motion. From the book An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion. By Harold Crabtree M.A. Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge Assistant Master at Charterhouse Longmans, Green and Co. 1923 First Edition 1909 Second Edition 1914 New Impression 1923 (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing fact Anything but a fact, changes the face of twentieth century science. 1. No iron moons and planetary cores. 2. No red shift measure of speed. 3. No Patrick Moore star at 95% the speed of light. 4. Muons arrive on earth. 5. Relativity is like an imaginary number; useful but not real. 6. Einstein-Haas gives a field strength 1/10000th the electric field. 7. Wave particle duality is a field effect. 8. Schroedinger is an approximation. Who has the wit to check the fact? Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Could you please terminate this thread. It's off topic and crossposted to sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.electronics.design, sci.med The discussion below is only about electronics design. Please start a new thread in your own news group and give it a Subject heading appropriate to the topic under discussion. Please no more 'Jihad needs scientists'. It's offensive. "MassiveProng" <MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:n0het2dj2astubvhnki3hgsd6gcolqcjlr@4ax.com... > On Sat, 17 Feb 07 14:12:38 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com Gave us: > [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > So either learn about or shut the f.ck up. Quit dissin' something > you know nothing about. Big Bertha Thing balloon Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/balloon.html 7K Web Page Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including sci.optics The "Monstre" Balloon From the book The Ingoldsby Legends by the Rev. Richard H. Barham Published by Richard Edward King, 88 Curtain Road, London E.C. Inscribed;- Barbara Death From Aunt Emma March 6th 1921 (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1999 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing welfare 29th April 1999 Operations Manager, The Benefits Agency, Dear Sirs, Further to your letter of 28th April 1999, regarding a list of questions, on the possibility of my working at all. I will attempt to answer your questions, in order as listed in your letter. 1.I am not working, I am just pottering arround on the internet. I last registered for course work with the Open University in 1997. This would have involved 6 hours work per week. I could only manage half-an-hour per day, so totally failed to do the work or complete the course. Not even one homework assignment was completed. In August 1997, I bought a second hand computer for 150 pounds sterling, and was given free access to the Open University computer along local telephone lines at a call charge of 1p per minute. Since that time, I managed to build up a body of correspondence, within the limits of half-an-hour per day mental or physical work. In January 1999, this correspondence was transfered by me to my web site; www.bertha.ndirect.co.uk(since disabled.) I have to pay 14 pounds and 9p per month for this site. 2.Nobody suggested it, it just happened. 3.My doctor does not know that I have a web site. 4.See answer 1 for description of my activities. No job is being done, so no job description exists. 5.No employer exists or payments have been recieved. 6.I can think straight for half-an-hour per day. The rest of the time is spent pottering arround. I can do one side of A4 paper of mathematics or computer work per day. 7.On any day free of a major shopping expedition, I can do half-an-hour of original work and about an hour of copy typing at non-typist speeds. 8.My principle interest is a 50 year scientific project, which was started 30 years ago. If I could spend 48 hours per week doing it I would. However half-an-hour work and an hour pottering, seems to be all I can manage and at that not every day of the week. Due to my condition, I asked Mrs. Pam S...., a fellow Open University student to be the project archivist for my work on the Open University computer. She agreed and kept the archive of the correspondence which is now on my web site. This is both an unusual request and an unusually generous service to a fellow student on incapacity benefit. 9.Zero income for as far as the eye can see. 10.Not applicable, zero wages or income. 11.August 1997 and is ongoing. I trust that the above will put the internet feeding frenzy of the newspaper hype into some perspective. Thank you, Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing moisture Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/moisture.html Access page to 73K ZIP file Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including misc.health.aids Working Prototype of second phase Pastures software, with 20 polyhedrons model and 200 buckminster fullerine molecules model, complete with programs, source code in listing format and using Pastures documentation. Moisture Software Package. (Based on Particle Structure Results Program, in Fortran 77.) Sub-atomic Mesons, Baryons and Leptons Classification System. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing virus 18th October 1999 Hi Chris, Thanks for the Keyboard.drv, but Windows is still down. The new messages are; 1. Clock General Protection Fault in gdi.exe (system) 2. Progman Ditto krnl386.exe (system) Clock.exe see windows. Progman.exe see windows. The two options seem to be, to try another four files for windows 3.11 or save up and update PC. (130 pounds) They have a nice 486DX66 16MB 270MB hard-drive 14" SVGA and win 95, at the same place I bought the 386PC. It is four times faster too. My biggest program takes 7 hours on standard IBM PC, 90 minutes on 386 and 20 minutes on 486DX, which has a built in maths co-processor. My DOS browser can read newsgroups, send/receive e-mail, browse web, but not receive attachments, look up my own site or update it. Keyboard.drv worked, but closed down every app in windows, so there was no way out. Clever that. The scrub round was in the book, for bypassing emm386. Wait till boot up gets to MSDOS loading and press F8. Step through Config.sys line-by-line with y answer. It then goes through autoexec.bat to last line of win. N answer drops you out to DOS prompt. Strange to say I can still work on my science maths project using Fortran 77 in DOS. Apps down with windows are Free Agent, WS-ftple, Winzip, F-Prot, Anyware Virus, Chekmate Virus, FirstClass client. It looks like I picked up a macro virus off a wordperfect attachment from e-mail of a guy in newsgroup. Three virus apps missed it. It is visible in notepad view of file after saving with write.exe. Isolate 386 and do not update site. You might check that my site is still up, by the back door and let me know the count. <www.bertha.ndirect.co.uk/series.htm> It could not have happened to a nicer chap. Thank you, Tony Lance Big Bertha Thing designer Once there was Big Blue, Baby Bell and Pax IBM. Now ther is Big Bertha, Baby Bill and Pax Microsoft. 1980 The Greater London Council, Central Computer Service installation standards for IBM mainframe had standard date subroutines as mandatory. 1980 No standards for Prime minicomputer, so date subroutine for program was written to be 2075 OK, by me. All IBM customers and suppliers applied IBM standards. Enforcement of these standards means that the following instances can only be designer software obsolescence.(Smoking Gun features.) 1. First PC operating system DOS was written 1980 (IBM/Microsoft) No 2000 2. Next PC operating system MS-DOS (Microsoft) No 2000 3. Windows 95 enabled macro virus (Microsoft) admitted 4. Windows 95 macro virus written by Microsoft.(admitted) 5. Windows 95 macro virus released by Microsoft.(admitted) 6. Windows 98 enabled text virus (Microsoft) admitted 7. Windows 98 no product recall, fix is on Microsoft website only. 8. Windows 98 to release virus just say it exists and fix is on website. 9. 1997 MS-DOS 6.20 licensed copy sold for Microsoft with no 2000. 10. 1999 Windows 3.11 virus closes all applications leaving no exit. Big Bertha Thing history 1st virus was boot sector virus, which was first sector of floppy disc or start here sector. 2nd virus was program virus, which is enabled with on/off switch, by operating system as primary function thereoff.(exe, sys, com) 3rd virus was macro virus, which is enabled with on/off switch, by wordprocessor or other application software.(doc) 4th virus was zip virus, which is enabled with on/off switch, by zip application software.(zip) 5th virus was text virus, which is enabled with on/off switch, by operating system as a purely viral function, otherwise uneccessary.(txt) Since 1980 the text virus has been impossible. 18 years to crack it, with Windows 98 by Microsoft. 42 million Windows 3.xx users. 12 million e-mail only users. Windows 95 not known. Windows 98 not known. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing Positive Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/positive.html Access page JPG 53K Image Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including se.vetenskap.astronomi Round photographic plates. Caption;- A photograph of great historical interest. The track is one left by a positron. This positron possessed, an energy of 63 MeV, before entering the lead plate from below; after penetrating the 6 mm. lead plate, it proceeded with an energy of 23 MeV. This change of energy, shows definitely, the direction of motion of the particle and, therefore, allows one to conclude, that it is positively charged. From a book by J.D.Stranathan Ph.D., Professor of Physics and Chairman of Department, University of Kansas. The "Particles" of Modern Physics. (C) Copyright The Blakston Co. 1942 Big Bertha Thing jeremiah A film Jeremiah Johnson, not necessarily true. A mountain man asked him, whether he was any good at skinning bears. He said that he could skin them, faster than the mountain man could catch them. So running down the mountain, with a bear in hot pursuit. His friend runs in the front door of the cabin and jumps out the back window. Quote "You skin that one ... and I'll go catch me another one!" Unquote. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997. To comply with my copyright, please distribute complete copies, free of charge. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing retrenchment Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/retrench.html Access page to 600K Zip File Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including sci.med.nutrition 301 files concluding the two battles of cyberspace. (Third in Battle, Faculty trilogy) Students Research Faculty (SRF conference prefix) First Aid Tent (FAT project prefix on SRF conference) 1. Existence 2. Zero interference 3. Foundation (Students, tutors or funding) 4. Articles (See Armistice terms) 5. Publications (See overview) 6. Projects (Pastures, Moisture, Big Bertha, Strategic Studies) 7. Staff (First Aid Tent, volunteers, moderators) 8. Access None. 9. SRF Classical Astronomy (empty) deleted 10. SRF Net Access Policy (empty) deleted 11. SRF Los Alamos (restricted access.) deleted 12. SRF Big Bertha (Staff entrance) deleted 13. SRF Strategic Studies (FAT Net Access Policy) deleted 14. SRF Specification (FAT Classical Astronomy) deleted 15. SRF Mathematics (FAT CAT) deleted 16. SRF Prototype (FAT Yesterslaggings) deleted 17. SRF Yesterslaggings (Deleted) 18. OUSA Classical Particle (FAT First Aid Tent) deleted 19. OUSA Research (battle, faculty, retrenchment & 20 family jewels) I 45 day expiry mailboxes. (See SRF Yesterslaggings, FAT CAT, FAT Yesterslaggings) II SRF Los Alamos (See retrenchment) III OUSA Classical Particle (See faculty) IV Rest of SRF deleted conferences. (See faculty, retrenchment) V 20 family jewels, poem, battle, faculty, retrenchment. (See OUSA Research 14th Nov.97 to 1st Nov.98) VI 20 family jewels. (See battle, faculty, retrenchment) VII To the victor the spoils of the 1st and 2nd battles of cyberspace; the 20 family jewels and the potential CD Rom triology battle, faculty and retrenchment. VIII OUSA Research now empty. (See http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/series.html) Big Bertha Thing deleted Now are all men deleted equal, from the high to the low. There is no distinction between newbies, spammers, spam busters, victims and tenure. There is no wrath in the deletion of the dullard, the sound bite or the sounding cymbal. Magna Carta is writ large on a world stage. This truly is the beginning of the end of spam. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing letter Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/letter.html 4K Web Page Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including sci.physics.particle Letter to a friend explaining Pastures and quest. From Pastures Software Package Documentation. (Particle Structure Results Program in Fortran 77.) Sub-atomic Mesons, Baryons and Leptons Classification System. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing folder Keep busy in your mailbox and put all postings in a PIP Research folder for safe-keeping in perpetuity, every night. Part of your chores would be to read each missive, subject by subject. Answer it, in a weekly PIP Research Newsletter or not, as the case may be, which would again, go rapidly from the mailbox to the folder. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997. To comply with my copyright, please distribute complete and free of charge. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Big Bertha Thing monorail Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/monorail.html Access page JPG 8K Image Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including rec.aviation.student Drawing of model of track on the bottom monorail. Caption;- Model exhibited before the Royal Society, May 8, 1907. Extract from Chapter V;- 72. The gyroscope has been employed by Mr. Louis Brennan with striking ingenuity and success, to ensure the stability of a heavy car travelling on a single line of rail, with its centre of gravity above the level of the rail, as is seen in the accompanying illustrations.... A full description of the mechanism, with a mathematical discussion on the subject, is given by Mr. H. Cousins in the issue of Engineering for Nov. 21st, 1913, and following numbers. From the book An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion. By Harold Crabtree M.A. Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge Assistant Master at Charterhouse Longmans, Green and Co. 1923 First Edition 1909 Second Edition 1914 New Impression 1923 (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing francis To my brother-in-law Francis (RIP), who I once called "as daft as a brush." To his everlasting credit, he replied "I know." The greatest compliment, my wife ever paid me, was to say, that I did not hold a grudge. Net surfers do not hold grudges, but they are a bit short on victim support, whichever side the victim comes from. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro, sci.chem From: Tony Lance <judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:52:45 +0000 Local: Fri, Feb 16 2007 4:52 pm Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing unified Friday, November 14, 1997 01:43:02 PM Message From: Tony Lance Subject: Big Bertha Thing 5 To: FC Mods Discussion Big Bertha Thing 5 Some people think that Big Bertha is less suitable for the Mods Conf., than for Classical Particle Conf. Have they heard the long name for CP Conf? High Energy Particle Physics Rock Hard Science With a Fringe Perspective. They think that is a better place to put Big Bertha. They must be besides themselves, which proves the thing. Big Bertha Thing Faculty (Sequel to battle) Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/faculty.html Access page 600K ZIP file Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including sci.med 301 files from the second battle of cyberspace. Students Research Faculty 1. Existence 2. Zero interference 3. Foundation (Students, tutors or funding) 4. Articles (See Armistice terms) 5. Publications (See overview) 6. Projects (Pastures, Moisture, Big Bertha, Strategic Studies) 7. Staff (First Aid Tent, volunteers, moderators) 8. Access (All user or staff only.) 9. SRF Classical Astronomy (see OUSA Research, All user) 10. SRF Net Access Policy (See OUSA Research, All user) 11. SRF Los Alamos (see Armistice terms, OUSA Research, restricted access.) 12. SRF Big Bertha (See SRF Los Alamos, staff only.) 13. SRF Strategic Studies (See SRF Big Bertha, staff only.) 14. SRF Specification (See SRF Big Bertha, staff only.) 15. SRF Mathematics (See SRF Big Bertha, staff only.) 16. SRF Prototype (See SRF Big Bertha, staff only.) 17. SRF Yesterslaggings (SRF Net Access Policy, all user) 18. OUSA Classical Particle (OUSA Research, All user) Big Bertha Thing galios Nobody understood a thing he said, when he was alive. After he was dead, they decided that he had done a good job. The Galios Theory branch of mathematics bears his name. Now they are trying to teach me, what he did in the first place. Do you think that the penny will drop, before it becomes posthumous? Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro, sci.chem From: Tony Lance <judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 17:08:08 +0000 Local: Sat, Feb 17 2007 5:08 pm Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing unified Friday, November 14, 1997 01:46:13 PM Message From: Tony Lance Subject: Big Bertha Thing 6 To: OUSA Classical Particle Big Bertha Thing 6 6. My beautiful laundrette only had two machines, so I asked my customers, if they would bring there own in. Now we have seven machines and it is very nice. Once we get the water pipes and electricity laid, it will be magnificent. For water read data and electricity read documentation. Big Bertha Thing features Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/features.html 6K Web Page Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including sci.space.policy Features, hyperbole and blurb, on the Pastures package and the quest. From Pastures Software Package Documentation. (Particle Structure Results Program in Fortran 77.) Sub-atomic Mesons, Baryons and Leptons Classification System. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing language The purest form of the english language is contained in the dead sea scrolls. There is not a lot of it, even there. Pure english language is a bit like house dust, all dead skin. The living bits of the english language are anything but pure, borrowing from a dozen drunken, pilaging, barbarian invaders, with not one good intention between them. (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997. To comply with my copyright, please distribute complete and free of charge. Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk Saturday, November 15, 1997 04:46:08 PM Message From: Pam Scruton Subject: Re(3): Big Bertha Thing 6 To: Tony Lance Anything else is riches. Runs under DOS, not windows crash crash, Ah well, we might be able to add substantially to your volunteer force (but not guaranteed until we see what is involved) we can offer Pentium 166 W95 laptop (Husband) 486DX-66 W95 (Me) 386 Dos 6/Win 3.11 (Son) 386 Dos 5/Win 3.11 laptop (Me) 8086 Dos 3/Win 2.1 (Daughter) 8086 Dos 3 up in the loft - but could be set up again if needed. And my favourite BBC Master 512 (Z80 co-processor) running Digital Research Dos 2.1 - not sure who has got that one at the moment - maybe that's what the dog is using now. Big Bertha Thing tidings Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/tidings.html Access page for 4K Web Page Astrophysics net ring Access site Newsgroup Reviews including de.sci.physik Tidings of the battle of Lens From the book Twenty Years After by Alexandre Dumas Published by George G.Harrup & Co.Ltd., 1923 Reprinted 1929 (C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998 Distribute complete and free of charge to comply. Big Bertha Thing nation In "A Town Like Alice" by Nevil Shute the heroine has to ride forty miles through the "wet", at her first time on a horse, to save someones life. She does it and ends up in hospital, OK but unable to sit down for a week. Her fiancee gets told "Thats some Sheila that you have got there mate." Tony Lance judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk From: Tony Lance <judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk> Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro,sci.chem Subject: Big Bertha Thing unified Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:00:24 +0000 INTRODUCTORY LETTER One of the first things I did was invent a new kind of clock, a so called perfect clock. One whose period does not vary with motion. Actually I did not invent it. Its construction has been known for years but I am the first one to actually use it as a clock, to obtain scientific results using such a clock. As you know many advancements in science have accompanied advancements in time keeping. Using such a clock it is possible to obtain varying velocities for the speed of light. Therefore using such a clock it is possible to invalidate Einsteins 2nd postulate, that the speed of light is constant. By doing this it is possible to develop a alternative physics. Unfortunately this physics is almost identical to Newtonian physics so there are no new developments from this analysis. But it is a valid Physics not just a approximation. There are two valid physics now Newtonian and Einsteinian. The weakest part of my theory is the first theorem. That time equals motion. This is because it is a assumed premise. I tried to give it as much justification for it as I could but I could not prove it. All great theories have to start with a assumed premise. As far as I know there is no proof for such theorems as "A body in motion remains in motion..." or for the notion that all motion is relative. You just have to start off with a assumed premise, that's just the way it is. I feel mine is not too egregious. Therefore stay with me though this weak part of my work, please do not dismiss it to quickly or out of hand. It is the results of this premise that give credence to it. By beginning with this premise I was able to determine what time is, what motion is, what space is, how gravity works including how all the forces work, that space and time are both forms of energy and subject to the laws of particle physics , determine the arrow of time, determine why the speed of light always appears to us to be constant, unify not only Newtonian and Einsteinian physics but also relativity and quantum physics and stumble apon a new law for physics. yours truly Sidereus Nuncius RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM PHYSICS The unification of Quantum and relativity theory by Sidereus Nuncius From: nhol310053@aol.com (NHol310053) Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics Subject: What Time Is (I to IV) Date: 18 Sep 1999 Contents List:- 1.Devotion 2.Dedication 3.Abstract 4.Introduction 5.Theory of Time 6.Theory of Space 7.Theory of Motion 8.Relativistic Quantum Physics 1. DEVOTION In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The Earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. Then God said "Let there be light." And there was light. And God saw the light that it was good. And God divided the light from the darkness. God called the light day, and the darkness he called night. So the evening and the morning were the first day. -Holy Christian Bible Lion of Judah, God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Brilliant Morning Star, Lamb of God, King of Kings, Lord of Lords, Word of God, the All Sovereign, God Almighty, the Great I AM! The God of Heaven and Earth. Blessed be the name of the Lord who was, who is, and who is to come. Worthy are You O' Lord to receive honor, glory and blessing because You and You alone have created all things. By Your will they were created, and have been created and without You nothing that was created would exist. Before time You laid the foundations of the Earth. The heavens declare the glory of God; And the firmament shows His Handiwork. The Earth is the Lord's ,and all its fullness. Day until day utters speech and night until night reveals knowledge. The word of the Lord is right, and all His work is done in truth. By the word of the Lord the heavens were made and all the host of them by the breath of His mouth. The voice of the Lord is powerful, the voice of the Lord is full of wisdom, Teach me Your ways O'Lord, do not be silent to me, to the end that my glory may sing praise to you. 2. DEDICATION This book must be dedicated to the two blessed patron saints of science Whose generosity has enabled this endeavor: To my mother and maternal grandmother. Science owes them a great debt. And so do I. 3. ABSTRACT THE RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM HYPOTHESES: That A L L the phenomena of nature as we know it, i.e., mass, energy, space, time, motion, etc... are the effects of subatomic particle exchanges. That for each and every physical manifestation there is a associated particle and for every particle there is a physical manifestation. All causes are particle causes and without a particle there is neither cause nor sensation. We only experience what we come directly in contact with. (Action by contact) Reality, the physical universe, is the sum total of our experience of the particles we receive. No particle - no experience. We experience particles and that is all. Subatomic particles are the cause of all are physical experiences and without them we have no physical experiences. That all experience of phenomenon is quantified the experience is discrete because the cause is discrete. No particle no experience no experience no particle. The universe stimulates our senses one particle at a time. 4. INTRODUCTION To be able to advance the relativistic quantum hypophysis one thing must be done - associate with every phenomenon a particle or series of particles. There are several immediate difficulties here. One, there are as many phenomenons are there are experiences, millions of them. Which experiences go with which particles or series of particles? Also all particles are probably not known so any analysis will be incomplete at this time. The most logical course of action is to create a category of fundamental phenomenon, associate particles to these and then derive complex phenomenon from a fundamental analysis. The most basic fundamental units of physics seem to me to be: (I) mass (II) energy (III) space (IV) time At any rate if the relativistic quantum hypophysis can be demonstrate for these it is a sufficient start. Quantification type theories already exist for matter and energy are well established and accepted by all. For matter the theory is called Atomic theory or Atomism and was discovered by Leucippus and Democritus. The theory basically attests to the fact that matter is little particles. For energy the theory is called Quantification Theory and was discovered by Max Planks. Energy has the same characteristic as mass of being quantized or existing as separate particles. Therefore we can pass over both mass and energy in considering the relativistic quantum hypophysis by granting that the hypophysis has already been demonstrate for these two quantities. Further I feel it is only required that equivalence to either mass or energy be demonstrate to assume a quantity must exist quantified. By equivalence I mean transformation either in theory or in practice. By the first law of thermodynamics there can be no fractions left over for this would mean loss. This only leaves space and time to be demonstrated. Not only is there no quantum theory of space and time there is no theory whatsoever as to the cause of their generation. From whence comes space? From whence comes time? There has never been a adequate theory as to the nature of space and time. As to the properties of space and time some were discovered and only recently by Einstein. But wherever a property arises we know some relation, some connection, must exist, IE, physical connection, so that one quantity, like time, can be depended on another quantity, in this case motion. Otherwise how is it dependent? Every property must have a cause. (Principle of Cause and Effect) It should be obvious that these connections require some particle, (action by contact) or some force (action at a distance) to operate. We presently have no other option unless it waits to be discovered. From such considerations it is possible to develop both a theory of time and a theory of space. Theories that are homogeneous to quantum physics and a quantum universe. A space and time that are materials, physical quantities, quantum, quantified, just like mass and energy. With materialization of space and time it is easy to demonstrate quantum properties for these materials exactly has been done for the other constituents of the universe. Time and space become material and quantified. Space particles, time particles! Then time and space can come under the province of quantum mechanics and elementary particle physics and obey quantum mechanical laws and the laws of elementary physics like any other particles. Space or its particles becomes a subject of elementary particle physics! Time becomes a subject of elementary particle physics! This is a extraordinary implication in physical science. Once these facts are uncovered a new science unfolds, almost trivially. The science that I call Relativistic Quantum Physics. 5. THEORY OF TIME "Because mathematicians frequently make use of time they ought to have a distinct idea of what time is, otherwise they are quacks..." Issac Barrow PREFACE What is time? What physical influence generates the phenomena of time? Where does time come from and where is time going? Is it everywhere? Or only in spots? Is it a physical quantity or merely a psychological manifestation? If it is physical can it be defined? Or is it too fundamental a notion? At first impression time appears to be a simple, reasonable, self explanatory, uncomplicated and unbelieving notion. But try to analyze time, define it, explain it, and the simple, reasonable, self explanatory, uncomplicated and unbelieving notion of time vanishes. To quote St. Augustine (354 AD-430 AD) , "What is time? If someone asks me, I know; But ask me to explain, I know not." Time is such a hard concept to appreciate because time is a completely abstract quantity, it does not have weight, it can not be felt, it has no heft, you cannot hold it in your hand, you cannot examine it, there is nothing to experiment on, nothing to analyze. In short time has no corporal body, it is a wholly intangible, impalpable medium. Neither does it have a place of existence, it is not up, it is not down, it is not over, it is not under, it is not here, it is not there, time does not seem to be anywhere. Time is not in a place, we seem to be in time. Time envelopes us. Time just seems to be. Mass and distance are much more concrete subjects. Mass has weight, it can be felt, it has heft, you can hold it in your hand, you can examine it, there is something to experiment on, something to analyze. It has a corporal body, it is a wholly tangible, palpable medium. It does have a place of existence, it is either here or it is there. Mass can be directly appreciated. While space cannot be directly experienced as mass can distance can be seen, we see space, it is all around us, we see the distances between things, every distance has a place, distances can be marked off, they can be walked; if necessary space itself can be enclosed in a box and taken from place to place as it were. Yet it is neither space nor mass that stimulates our imaginations the most as does time. Time is the great healer, time marches on, time and tide wait for no man, time is money, you cannot beat time, time is fleeting, time slips away, time is catching up with you...For such a ubiquitous concept you would think it would be well defined and the underlying physical stimulus well comprehended. Time is and always has been a critical concept in every branch of learning and in all human affairs. Time crops up in ventrally every aspect of human thought. There have been two great schools of thought who have debated the genesis of time, philosophy and science. Because of the ethereal nature of time time has for along time been the province of philosophy more than science. Time is incorporeal, immaterial and intangible. Time is a quite abstract concept. And abstract concepts lend themselves to philosophical debate. Philosophy has speculated about time from everything that it does not exist, (ignore the problem and it will go away) to it being a disturbance of the middle ear! Science has done no better. Indeed time was supposed to be only a abstract concept, but the chief reason is that science has long been almost completely ignorant of time and its genesis Scientist are split as to what time really is, some of the better speculations being: Time is a primitive undefined notion and as such can never be defined. Anymore than mass or space can be defined, it simply is. Time is the result of the peculiar initial conditions from which the universe started. It started with high entropy and is transforming to a condition of low entropy. Time becomes the subjective experience of this shift from order to randomness. Time (its sensation) is not actually a physical quantity but a psychological aberration brought on by macroscopic properties of matter. Science has decided that although not understanding how time operated that it is a dimension and that it is interlaced with the spacial dimensions. This combination is called space-time. But space-time is not so much a theory of time as it is a theory of gravitation. Gravity effects (warps or bends) space and time in equal proportions. It is simpler to handle these calculations together as one quantity, the space-time manifold. There is no adequate theory of time in science. This is the great enigma of time. Everyone is aware of it, everyone has a deep personal experience of it, yet no one can define it! What would appear to be essential to physics would seem to be a theory of time, a explanation of what time is. It is mandatory that science be able to specify what entities the universe does contain and what it does not. What the universe is composed of or what it is not composed of. From ancient times time and space to have existed in a kind of knowledgeable limbo, neither existing or not existing, intermediate between real and imaginary. TIME MECHANICS THE DYNAMICS OF TIME A MOTION THEORY OF TIME To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven. Ecc. 3.1 OUTLINE Thesis: Time is equivalent to motion, motion is a form of energy therefore time is a form of energy. It directly follows from relativity that of some of the fundamental units that describe the universe, three are all alternate equivalent manifestations. According to empiricism all true knowledge stems from sense perception. Since we have knowledge of time we must have some real sense perception of time, according to the rationalist. Every natural effect has a natural cause. If the experience of time is a natural effect then it should have a natural cause. Thus time should have a natural cause. MOTION THEORY OF TIME What is time? That we have not known. Einstein came closest when he said, "Time is what clocks measure." Unfortunately the notion of clocks incorporate the fundamental notion of time so that time really wasnt defined. Such a definition does not state what components of a clock define time or inform us as to any properties of time. It is too vague. I agree with Einstein, time is what clocks measure. So what do clocks measure? Mechanical time, physical time or clocktime is the time measured by mechanical instruments. All measuring of time requires comparison to regular occurring phenomena. Time requires some change to be perceived. Change is motion, therefore time requires some motion to be perceived. There is no independent time. It is all dependent and all comparison. This makes time a relation. What's the relation then? What is it relative to and what's the connection? Time is a phenomena, it has corporal extension, in the things to which it relates or within things themselves. One the other or both. Physical relations are necessarily between things. State the thing and the rule that governs them and you state the relation. Therefore we know that time is some thing and some process between those things. If time is a thing or a relation between things we should be able to catagorize exactly what that thing or relation of things is. We should be able to point to it, we should be able to say, "That is time!" Therefore a theory of time is possible! If a phenomena requires a concomitant process always to be perceived and no other associated process it is only reasonable to assume that the concomitant process is the primary process and not just a associated process. If time requires motion then motion defines time and motion is time. If time is relative to motion then it must be connected to motion in some way. A time that is relative to motion is inseparable from motion. Clocks are motion machines. They move. There entire operation consists of there movement. We translate this movement into a concept of time. A clock is mass in motion. If time is what clocks measure and clocks are devices that measure motion then time is motion. Since we measure time by motion a quantity of time becomes a quantity of motion. Clocks are not measuring some external dimension they simply move. If we accept that time is relative to motion then we are obliged to accept that the concept of time is inseparable from motion. Then time is not a independent dimension that exists somehow apart from everything. Time is motion because it is observed to be such. A quantity can be conceived only from some relation it bears to sensible objects. Things don't exist in time, time exists in the motion of things. Since at least the time of Newton time has been considered some ethereal unworldly, immaterial quantity that can be neither isolated nor contained. Since time can be neither isolated, contained or obtained in practice time has only been a relation to time keeping devices. The entire modern concept of time is based on the measurement of time. Generally in measurements a quantity to be measured is the measure of the same. A quantity of mass is the measure of the same, a quantity of length is the measure of the same, a quantity of energy is the measure of the same...All clocks keep time by measuring some motion. If motion is the measure of time then perhaps a quantity of motion (time) is a measure of the same (time). This implies that time is motion. The analysis can also be reached by this reasoning, there is a inexplicable connection between change and time. Without change it is impossible to apprehend time. It is even conceivable that without change time does not exist. So time=change. All change can be reduced to some kind of motion. Therefore time as change is also reduced to time as motion. In mechanics one concludes that all the processes of nature can be reduced to motions. Why not time? The time taken for any motion is the period of that motion. Because clocks are moving devises clocktime is just the comparison of one movement to another. Because of the motion theory of time time really does not exist. It is just our relation of one motion to another. We apprehend time only when we have marked motion. But not only do we measure time by motion but we measure motion by time, they define each other. This seems to imply a equivalence. A clock measures time and it is assumed that time exists without clocks. Everything that experiences time is a kind of clock and nothing that is not a clock does not experience time. So every thing is a clock. When we say we measure motion by time what we really mean is that we are comparing one motion to another. So we do not measure motion by time but motion by motion. A quantity of motion is the measure of the same. There is no way to measure motion except by motion. This is actually true for all quantities. A quantity of matter is the measure of the same. A quantity of energy is the measure of the same. A quantity of space is the measure of the same. When something stimulates a balance we call it mass, when we can extend a ruler thru a space we call it distance, when something heats a thermometer we call it energy...That is we usually measure a thing by a quantity of the same. We measure mass by mass, we measure distance by distance, we measure heat by heat... Now the subject of time measurement is motion. If we measure time by motion it must be motion. If the quantities we measure with our instruments is to be the subject of our measurements. Until we can find some other quantity to measure we will have to take time as motion, defacto. If as Einstein said "Time is what clocks measure." What do clocks measure? A clock is a machine, a device, a instrument, a construction of parts to a certain end. Is time inherent somehow in the construction? Configuration? That I do not believe because there's so many variations on clock design. There is nothing within a clock that generates time and this is consistent with are experience of time as a external quantity. A clock however as it is configured is nothing, does nothing, measures nothing until it is set in motion, until a external force is added that sets it into operation. So what clocks measure is not time but forces and if time is what clocks measure then time is a force or forces! Time is a force! The Time-Motion Equivalence Principle: TIME = MOTION. Motion theory of time hypophysis; Time is motion. FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS What is important from this analysis or any analysis of the operation of any clock is that time (the measurement) depends on motion. Matter in motion determines both space and time! Or at least the geometry of space and the chronomitry of time. Motion is the link that connects space and time. Motion requires both space and time. Unless we could find some way to define physical space and/or physical time without recourse to motion the two will be inexplicably connected. This also indicates that motion is not really a derived term since it is used to set the parameters of fundamental notions. When you start defining time by motion you make time motion or a kind of motion weather it is truly a motion or not. But it is no coincidence that time is motion. Motion is the concept that connects space and time. It is impossible to conceive of motion without both space and time. Is space-time a motion? They cannot be separated when considering motion. If they cannot be separated they must be interrelated. If they are interconnected there must be a physical interconnection. Since Einstein it has been known that space and time very with motion. Space and time therefore cannot be independent of matter in motion. Motion as a physical process must somehow be in physical contact with space and time. Physical things only make contact with physical things. Therefore space and time must be physical entities. If a physical connection exists one must wonder what is the nature of this physical connection? The only (known) common connection between motion, space and time is gravitation. Gravitation is a field in space, it drives the motion of bodies and it has been shown to effect time dilation. Gravitation is the common connection. If we measure time by motion by the use of clocks how do we measure motion because we certainly aren't using time. This means that what we are really doing is making comparisons of one motion to another. And the concept of time really becomes unnecessary. In effect we are only comparing one motion to another where the concept of time acts as a intermediary, essentially a mathematical concept. Time cannot at the same time be measured by motion and the measure of motion. We cannot take time as a fundamental notion even if we wanted to because it is impossible to measure time without motion. Motion is the fundamental notion. Under the motion theory of time motion must be taken as a primitive undefined term replacing time. The expression v=d/t must be taken as a expression of two motions one compared to the other. Where the motion in the t variable is a standard unit of motion/time. What you actually have is motion defining itself by the use of clock motion which is the standard. Therefore it must be admitted that motion is a fundamental quantity. Really what we call time is really motions and comparisons of motions. When I see the expression T=D/V I see time being expressed as a mass moving with a velocity thru a distance. And that is a motion. Given a motion such as a vibration in a string, the string will be marked in segments, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...so that when the vibration reaches a particular segment, segment 1 equals time one, segment 2 equals time two etc. We see that motions can serve as there own chronometers. This is our clock. The shape of the string can be described by some equation say y=f(x) at t=ta. But the reverse is also true that motions define time. Really only the motion exists. We see that the time variable can be omitted. It is not required. This is strong evidence that time = motion. Time is the number of motion. Time has a number because velocity is a quantity and quantities have numbers. Every motions numbers can be compared, this is time a comparison of motions. Time is a motion but it is a rate of motion. Time is a rate. It becomes a rate when one is compared to another. TIME IS A FORM OF ENERGY. Because time is motion and motion is a form of energy time is a form of energy. T = E So we no longer just have E=MC2, not just one relation of one fundamental parameter to another but we have added another. Now we also know that time is energy. Perhaps this energy can be harnessed. MOTION PROPERTIES OF TIME A mechanistic explanation of the properties of time. Many of the properties of time can be explained in terms of motion. Time becomes a physics of motion which is well understood. It can be explained wholly in terms of motion, there is no need to recourse to a hypothetical dimension of time, or the transformation of such a dimension to effect local time. We do not need any meaning for time apart from motion. If time is motion then all the properties of motion are properties of time and vis versa. If motion could be stopped then time could be stopped. And I do not mean relative motion. With the proper technology objects can be frozen in time. Of course such objects disappear from or plane of view I believe. Time is relative because motions are relative. The relativity of time is just the relativity of motion. PHILOSOPHY AND TIME Many notions of physics are not physics. Many of our most basic and core ideas are notoriously difficult to define. How do things exist? Where did they come from? How do things change? If things are constantly changing how are they the same things? The same and yet different? Are things one or are they many? What is substance? What is space? What is time? What is energy? Many a physicist will tell you that he doesn't have to understand such concepts he only has to be able to define them. Unfortunate for many physical concepts they cannot be defined exactly or even roughly. It is not good enough to say "I cant define them but I know them when I see them." Not if what you are practicing is exact science. How can you have exact science built on such weak foundations? Consider time and space, traditionally two of the most important of concepts of physics. There has been no true theory of time and/or space. No physical explanations of them. Having no explanations both have had to reside as metaphysical theories. Really as nothing more then metaphysical phantoms, primarily apprehension of the mind alone. Not truly physical and therefore incapable of physical analysis. To me it is intolerable that such important physical notions should have been disposed of. Of course the reason why time and space have remained metaphysical notions is obvious. Both have the same surreal properties. Both appear to be immaterial. They cannot be handled, weighed, felt or observed. They appear to be nothings, fictions unreal and immaterial. As nothings both are uncreatable and indestructible. Both are invisible and incorporeal. Except to reason to are hardly real, beholding them as if in a dream. One inalienable property of any thing is that it be, that it occupy space, that it be felt, be observable. But that which has no mass, no weight, no feeling, no taste, no sound, can it exist? Can it be? It is impossible to prove time is motion because it is like saying time is time. Some physical notions are so basic that they can only be accepted by there shrewdness. GRAVITATIONAL TIME DILATION THE THERMODYNAMICS OF MOTION AND TIME In this section I intend to demonstrate that what we call time is simply a manifestation of the force of gravity. That is, I will give a definition of time by what causes it and how it operates. This new explanation of time will itself suggest a alternate theory of motion. Thus this section is both a treatise on time and a alternate theoretical development of motion. TIME AND THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT NEWTONIAN TIME VS. EINSTEINIAN TIME ABSOLUTE TIME VS. RELATIVE TIME Does the notion of absolute time still exist? Is it still viable? Having completely yoked time to clocks I find somewhat of a paradox. If you define time by clocks your definition acquires all the failings of any earthly container, all the weakness of the flesh, all the foibles of mortality. The flesh is weak. To have a good definition of time you need a good clock. But what is a good clock? If you have a bad clock a bad definition will almost certainly result. The idea of good and bad clocks of course is a hold over from Newtons concept of absolute time. Where every event had a absolutely correct time. A good clock was a clock that corresponded to that time. While we have abandoned the idea of absolute time we have remained saddled with the concept of good time. Of course good-time is nonsense or at least I don't know how to define it. Good and bad time is only consistent with Newtonian physics not Einsteinian physics. It has been difficult to divorce our selves from many of these old conceptions. Because we don't even notice that they cling to us. Human beings are still plagued by the superstitions of the past how much more of antiquated concepts. There is no good time or bad time or right time or wrong time. Of course you will never know the good from the bad, what definition will you use to choose? Time becomes a contradiction when you base it on judgement. The best we can have is a agreed upon time. We set our clocks so the velocity of light is c, if we set our clocks so the velocity of light is c it is inevitable that the velocity of light will always be c. Is the velocity of light c or do we make it c by the chronomitry of our clocks? All clocks have to be set, they have to be calibrated, they have to be coordinated. What if we could create a clock that was not effected by motion. So called a perfect clock. For such a clock one must ask, what are the laws of physics then? What is the velocity of light? This kind of clock can be constructed. Its period is not relative to motion. It is simple a mathematical fiction using the Lorenz contraction . Its time will be different but in sync with a clock in a higher gravitational field. The thing is the clock in the higher gravitational field will be calibrated so that it reads c for the velocity of light. The lower clock will read a increased velocity for light. Which is right? So the velocity of light is not truly constant but variable. Physics depends upon the clock you choose. Thus Newtonian physics is correct if you use a relativistic clock and Einsteinian physics is correct if you use a Newtonian clock. It is odd that each would require the others kind of clock. They complement each other. Newtonian time is defined such that it was supposed the speed of light varied, Einsteinian time has time where the speed of light does not vary. The former problem was that Newtonians were trying to use a Newtonian clock. Good science, bad clock. Of the two kinds of clocks which is right? Which is the correct time? Both and neither of course. You might as well ask, "Which path does the electron take?" With such a clock I was able to obtain varying velocities for the speed of light. The speed of light is not constant. This discovery negated Einsteins second postulate. From the negation it is possible to construct a anti physics. A contradictory physics. Just as it was possible to develop contradictory geometies by negating the fifth postulate so too can we negate Einstiens second postulate, the constancy of velocity of light. You can either derive relative time, relative mass, relative distance from the absolute motion of light or you can derive absolute time, absolute mass, and absolute distance from the relative motion of light with neither being right or wrong so it is possible to construct various scientific paradigms with neither being right or wrong! If you find such things interesting. Given two clocks in a gravitational field at rest of identical construction if you drop one it will remain synchronized with the stationary clock for as long as it falls. That is, They will remain in phase (simultaneity-clocks are simultaneous or in phase if they appear to pulse at the same rate from boths frame of reference) and at the same frequency (time dilation). There are no relativistic transformations from the motion. This shows that time dilation is not relative to motion but too energy. The energy does not change because it is only being converted from potential to kinetic energy. The two clocks remain in sync because they remain at the same energy level. Frequency=time Dilation, wavelength=space dilation, amplitude=energy dilation. Relative transformations require absolute changes in energy. And while a clock falls from a height the energy is not changed it is only transformed form potential to kinetic energy. This shows that potential energy also causes time dilation not just kinetic energy. The overall energy does not change. This is why clocks vary in a gravitational field. Time like motion is a vector quantity it not only depends on the quantity but also the direction. All that matters is absolute changes in energy and the direction they move. Falling clocks, measuring rods, weights, remain Galilean reference bodies because for them no gravitational field exists, they are not effected by gravitational time dilation under the same conditions. This also shows that it is not motion that is the dominant source of time dilation but gravitation. VELOCITY OF LIGHT You may wonder does the velocity of light equal c for the falling clock as it does for the stationary clock since they run at the same time but are in different motions? Because they keep the same time but one is moving and the other is not they cannot possible record the same velocity from a source of light. This means that the velocity of light is not constant!! Let us analyze what is happening. We know while the two clocks are in sync they are not truly in sync because one is experiencing greater gravitational force since it has fallen to a lower gravitational position. The lower the position the greater the gravitational force and the greater the gravitational effects. The stationary clock records the velocity of light as C with a frequency n because let us say we have calibrated that clock to be set at a rate just so that result is experienced. Say we have another clock right next to it set in the exact precise way. The clocks are in sync. They are also at a high altitude so that one clock can be released and various experiments can be preformed. Now the one clock falls the other remains stationary. By sending pulses of light between the two we determine that they appear to remain in sync relative to each others frame of reference. Now we take a beam of light and point it downward so that it passes both the falling clock and the stationary clock. Both measure its velocity. Both come up with identical readings. How can this be. We know they are not truly running at the same rate because of varying gravitational forces. The only explanation is that the velocity of light increases as it falls. The falling clock rate also increases as it falls. The greater the gravitational force the faster a clock runs, its periods are shorter. So the result is that in direct proportion light and clocks fall at the same rate equalizing each other so that the velocity of light appears to be constant. This could not happen if the velocity of light did not actually vary! Light falls at the same rate as everything else in a gravitational field! Only the frequency will be changed. So light is accelerated and decelerated and such as that. Light is accelerated thru a gravitational field just like any other particle! The velocity of light is not constant! If energy is equivalent to mass then it must be subject to gravitation just like mass. Light must not only bend in a gravitational field it must fall in a gravitational field like every thing else. There cannot be two kinds of motion one for energy and one for mass, one relative and one absolute? This brings to completion Galileo's thesis of the uniformity of falling bodies. All bodies fall at the same rate including light. Of course the velocity of light can only be expressed in reference to time and clocks and using a Einsteinian clock (relative one) the velocity of light will always appear constant. But we do not always have to use a Einsteinian clock. We could use a Newtonian (absolute clock) and then will wind up with many varying velocities for light. The velocity of light is purely arbitrary. It depends purely on the clock chosen to measure its velocity. EINSTEIN AXIOMS ARE A DEFACTO DEFINITION OF TIME Einstein two postulates, the principle of relativity and the constancy of the velocity of light, actually serve as a definition of time, that is as a calibration for setting clocks. Making the velocity of light constant is the same as saying the only clocks that record the velocity of light as c are correct. This serves as a calibration of clocks. Only such clocks will be accepted as correct. It becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. Only clocks that record a velocity for light of c are correct therefore only the velocity c for light can ever be recorded. DOPPLER EFFECT Light is a clock. In fact every particle is a clock. Actually every particle in motion is a clock and since every particle is in motion every particle is a clock. All particles are clocks! That is if time is motion. To the physicist any stable vibration is a clock. Every quantity can be reduced to one of time. You see this in met achromatism, a change in color due to a change in temperature. Since heat is time you could make color changes a function of the time. Frequency is just variation in time dilation thus the spectrum of frequency is just a spectrum of time dilation. Frequency is just the comparison of one time dilation to another. The time dilation or frequency of a particle changes with the motion. This is the same as the Doppler shift for light color. If a frequency was so many per second this would be its rythem or time. Changes in that frequency indicate changes in both energy and the time dilation of a body. Basically all electromagnetic radiation is a kind of a clock with the frequency playing the part of the length of the period. As light falls in a gravitational field its frequency is increased, IE its clock runs faster, or as it rises its frequency is decreased. That time has direction can also be demonstrated by the Doppler effect. Pulsars are superbly accurate clocks. Being masses they can also be in motion. The timing of a pulsar can be effected by its motion. The pulse rate is increased when moving toward a observer and decreased when moving away. Thus time dilation is a extension of the Doppler effect. This is because time dilation is frequency and frequency is subject to the Doppler effect. Since the Doppler effect is dependent on direction then so too must be time dilation dependent on direction. Every particle is a wave, every wave has a frequency, every frequency is a clock. Are all particles clocks because they are waves. Or are all particles waves because they are clocks? This of course makes time a micro property of particals. It is ridicules to believe that such fundamental properties as time or space could have been associated apart from material bodies or particals. Every property is a particle property. TIME AND ENERGY There is a connection between time and energy just as there was a connection between electricity and magnetism. In 1820 Oersted discovered that when a electric current flows thru a wire a magnetic field is set up, conversely Faraday discovered that when a magnetic field is set up a electric current will be induced in a wire. Similarly when a clock is heated it appreciates time dilation and if you could induce time dilation artifacts would heat. This may be possible and a way to generate power. If a moving compass needle was sufficient to connect magnetism and electricity then a moving clock hand is sufficient to connect time and energy. Thus it is apparent that energy can be converted into time (dilation) and therefore time should be able to be converted into energy. this means, T = E This shows a undeniable connection between energy and time just as a undeniable connection was made for electricity and magnetism. It means that time is a form of energy! Time is motion, motion is energy therefore time is energy! Time dilation is therefore a relation of energy and there is a form of time dilation for every form of energy. There are not two forms of time dilation but many more. (i) Mechanical time dilation. (ii) Electrical time dilation. (iii) Thermal time dilation. (iv) Radiant time dilation. (v) Gravitational time dilation. (vi) Kinetic time dilation. (vii) Potential time dilation. (viii) Chemical time dilation. There may be more. Time dilation is caused by varying the energy levels of clocks. And there are many ways to vary the energy of clocks. For these reasons time dilation should not be analyzed according to motion but according to energy and specifically changes in energy. Actually we don't want a Lorentz type equation based on velocity we want one that is based on energy. But I don't know how to formulate it. Because the energy varies according to various frames of reference the time also varies. To obtain different frames of reference requires energy. This makes it unlike Einstein relativity where values just only seem to exist in relation. These are real values that can only be appreciated by real expenditures of energy. The difference between the Earth and the moon is not just a relative value. To get to the moon requires a hell of a lot of energy. If you want to appreciate that reference frame you will have to expand that energy. This moves physics away from the relative back to the absolute. Reference frames, they're energy, are absolute. Different reference frames require different energies. So what relativity really means was that we exist at different energy levels! That's what's relative. Frequency, wavelength, velocity, period, amplitude, all the properties of any particle are interconnected and interrelated by a common denominator - energy. All these attributes appear to be functions of the energy. These of course are all reminiscent of Planks constant, Time is the rate at which energy and matter interact. TIME IS A FORCE! The measurement of any time requires generally a acceleration, I mean something must set a body in motion. Accelerations require a force, time is a acceleration, IE motion, therefore time is a force! All time dilation therefore is not the result of motion but the result of variations in the gravitational force surrounding a object. The variations in time modulate just like variations in a force field. In fact directly proportional to the force of gravity. This suggests that time is a force like gravity. Since we have no notion of any other force like gravity except gravity we should accept that time is gravity. This is because time is gravitation. Motion dilation is a subdivision of gravitational time dilation. Motion dilation must be explained it terms of gravitational time dilation. Gravitational time dilation is the cause of motion dilation. TIME = GRAVITY If time is a force and forces are accelerations then time is a acceleration. Time = acceleration The energy of any body varies with its motion. If t=f then, time =s force. t=mxa and time =s mass times the acceleration. A change in the force changes the acceleration. An increase in the force causes a increase in the acceleration. A increase in acceleration decreases the oscillation period. Therefore an increase in the force causes time to run faster. Time also varies with the square of the distance just like gravitation does. Or something like that. Since time is a force it should be possible to express time as a force in equations. Every time a time variable (t) appears it should be able to substitute it for the force of gravity. Or analogously since time is energy it should be possible to express time as a unit of energy. We would not say 15 billion years have gone by since creation we would say 20 trillion units of this energy has been expended. We may find out the universe has 100 trillion of these units therefore it would be one fifth thru its cycle. So the universe would be one fifth old. Time only exists in proportion. GRAVITATIONAL TIME It will become obvious after I demonstrate a new theory of motion later that motion is a subdivision of the greater concept of gravitation. It is totally dependent on gravitation and specifically on gravitons. Because time is motion if motion is a property of gravitation then time becomes a property of gravitation. Time=motion, motion=gravitation, therefore time=gravitation. The cause of time is gravity, the effect of gravity is time. Just as gravity envelopes us time envelopes us. All properties of gravitation are properties of time and vis versa. What drives time is clocks, what drives clocks is motion, what drives motion is gravitation therefore what drives time is gravity. Gravitational time dilation and motion time dilation are really the same effect and are caused the same way. Both are caused by variations in the gravitational field. Motion is energy, energy is a form of mass, so motion produces mass, the greater the motion the greater the mass, the greater the mass the greater the field strength, variances in field strength are time dilation, therefore the mechanism behind motion dilation is gravitation. All kinetic time dilation is gravitational time dilation because all motion is motion thru a gravitational field and thru a range of energy levels. Special time dilation (as given in special relativity) does not exist because special motion does not exist. In special relativity the direction does not matter. In gravitational time dilation it has to be considered. Since time equals motion/gravitation all the properties of gravitation are properties of time. (I) Time varies in direct relation to the strength of gravity. The stronger the gravity the faster the time. (II) Motion is only defined in a gravitational field therefore time is only defined in a gravitational field. (III) Since motion is a vector quantity time is a vector quantity. If time =gravity then time is a sensation of gravity. This is what I mean when I say time is a gravitational effect. There are several gravitational effects. Weight is the most obvious one, inertia, and time. At first I though that weight=inertia=time but this was wrong. They are of course all connected but each is a particular sensation of a different aspect of the force of gravitation. The first difficulty is "How can so many various sensations be generated from the same stimulus?" One could ask the vary same question about electro magnetic radiation. Indeed we seem to experience a wealth of sensations from a poverty of stimulus. Since there are only four of them. For each is felt in a different way. Weight is felt at rest in a gravitational field. Inertia is felt while in motion in a gravitational field. Time is a pure experience of force alone. For example, in free fall say in orbit around the Earth we understand our weight to be zero yet we still experience time. So time cannot be weight. The same holds true for inertia. If one of these is varying then the others are also varying in exact proportion. The relationship of time to weight and force indicates that time should be able to be expressed as derived units, Because time is gravity and gravity is a force it should be able to be expressed as units of force. But I do not know what these units would be. The rate of time depends on the gravitational force which in turn depends on the mass of the related bodies. Which in turn depends on the amount of energy they posses. Rates of time are different for different masses with different energy levels. A flea does not experience time at the same rate as a elephant. If you could change the time of a mass you would change its mass. This may allow for perpetual motion. Time cannot be warped by gravity because it is gravity. In this sense gravitational time dilation does not exist. VECTOR TIME Time dilation depends completely on the energy and mass of a clock that records it. Since energy/mass varies with the position of a body in a gravitational field and the direction of motion in that field time is shown to be a vector quantity. Time is a vector quantity. Because time is motion and motion is a vector quantity time is a vector quantity. Just as a proper description of motion must include direction so too does a proper description of time require direction. THERMODYNAMIC TIME DILATION AND OTHER FORMS OF TIME DILATION We know time changes with motion But we may well ask, "How does time know how to do this?" This appears to be another sticky action at a distance. Actually it is a property of gravity and everything associated with gravity appears to be a action at a distance. If you have a action at a distance problem it would pay to start looking at gravity. A change in the mass/energy of bodies alters the surrounding gravitational field which in turn alters time. We know from the equivalence principle the motion, IE inertia is equal to gravity. This can only imply that, time = motion and motion = gravity therefore time = gravity. Time is a effect of gravitation like weight or inertia. Because time = motio |
Enable EMail Alerts
Start New Thread
Reply to this Message